• more about

    #corrections

    Successful Baldwin Brother in Weezy Cake-Buy Deny

    New York Times to Washington Post's Executive Editor: Liar, Liar, Liar.

    CNN Apologizes to Rush Limbaugh

    read more: #alessandrastanley, #corrections, #newyorktimes, #oprah, #tv

    The Alessandra Stanley Watch: Live from Chicago Edition

    20051115oprah.jpgThe rakishly obsessive Reference Tone somehow found time in the wee hours of this morning to fact-check today's Stanley effort — and, naturally, finds a fuck up:

    From Alessandra Stanley's story on Oprah Winfrey's 20th anniversary on the air:

    "Ms. Winfrey was born into poverty in Mississippi and refers to herself as a 'former colored girl.' Like another prominent African-American, Condoleezza Rice, Ms. Winfrey owes her distinctive first name to a spelling error: she was supposed to be named Orpah, after a figure in the Book of Ruth, but someone transposed the letters at the registry."

    From a 1989 Washington Post profile of Rice, containing the earliest Nexis-able reference to the derivation of her name: "Her name was derived from the musical notation con dolcezza — sweetly."

    A 1999 National Review profile of Rice makes the point more directly: "Her mother, a pianist, was thinking of the musical direction con dolcezza, or 'with sweetness'; for her only child, she composed a variation on it."

    This Times of London profile from last year says Rice's mother "crafted the name Condoleezza from the Italian musical notation 'con dolcezza' (with sweetness)."

    "Derived," "composed," "crafted": I suppose it's entirely possible that Rice's mother—a pianist—attempted to name her daughter Condolcezza, but made (or allowed a bureaucrat to make) a spelling error that rendered the attempt a failure, resulting in the bastardized Condoleezza. But for some reason, I think I'll take the above accounts, as well as the dozens of others in Nexis that suggest the transformation from con dolcezza to Condoleezza was purposeful (it is a slightly more natural sounding name), over Stanley's.

    So would we. But, at the same time, we wonder if Ref is perhaps being a touch unfair. After all, if a reporter can't even check the Times's own archives, why would you possibly expect her to look at other papers'?

    Tomorrow's Corrections Today [Reference Tone]
    Oh, Oprah, 20 Years of Talk, Causes and Self-Improvement [NYT]


    Contact information for this author is not available.