Last night, some awesomely catty bitches gave birth to Social Rank, a power ranking system for New York's "social elite." Finally, some organized, arbitrary judging that we can get behind. Plus, we're thrilled someone's taken the time to organize all the pretty rich girls for us, seeing as we can hardly tell one Hearst from another. But, thanks to whoever's behind this endeavor, we now know that Lydia Hearst is 1.2 points superior to her sister Amanda, as decided by a committee consisting of "three designers, four editors, two dames and one gentleman of the social scene, one gossip columnist and one party photographer" (which, in all likelihood, translates to "three Spence girls and a hanger-on from Dalton"). Whatever the list's true origins, we're praying it results in some hardcore hair-pulling.
For your quick reference, the Rank deems Tinsley Mortimer, Lauren Davis, and Margarita Missoni as the top 3 for the next two weeks, until the index is recalculated. And once the "committee" realizes Margarita is not a New York Blonde, you can expect some seismic shifts in the lineup.
!["...This is a real paradox for me: My entire life I've been told I wasn't pretty enough. My entire life I was told by people that I was ugly, that I was too tall, that I was flat-chested, that I was this, that I was that. When I was a stripper I was never quite pretty enough. I was never one of the beautiful girls. I was never one of the top earners. Suddenly I achieve something in my life that is purely intellectual and purely creative, and I'm being told that it's because I'm pretty. To me that is the weirdest, most ironic thing ever. Like all of a sudden I'm attractive when it suits people's purposes. But in the past when I needed to be attractive I was ugly. So let's pick. Which is it?" — Juno screenwriter Diablo Cody [Minneapolis City Pages]](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--ONS8aczB--/c_fill,fl_progressive,g_center,h_180,q_80,w_320/18s10utp0femfjpg.jpg)
