Feb 19, 2008 05:32 PM
10,328
Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:30 AM
Wed Feb 10
56 posts in the last 24 hours
As we pointed out yesterday, Lindsay Lohan's nude body [pic via New York] is only interesting insofar as it generates lofty intellectual analysis. What underlying effect might the photo shoot have on Lindsay, her career, and American culture as a whole? Radar rounded up reaction to these questions from several esteemed media observers (including Ronn Torossian), but we decided to turn to the world's foremost experts in these matters: the Gawker commenters. After the jump, five incisive observations from two commenters that summarize—in verse, no less!— this sordid moment in our history.
BY MISTERHIPPITY AT 02/18/08 06:00 PMLilo's freckles bespeckle her hiney
And likely as well her vaginey.
Her breasts are audacious,
Because, though capacious,
The nipples by contrast are tiny!
BY TEDSEZ AT 02/18/08 06:41 PM@MisterHippity:
There was a young lady named Lindsay
Whose photos were naked and skinsy
Though she looked very fine
In the boobs and behind
Her expression was vapid and ginsy.
BY TEDSEZ AT 02/18/08 08:06 PMThe sad truth about our lovely Lindz:
Her career may be gone with the winds.
But she'll see better days —
She's a hit with the gays,
With a camp value high as Paul Lynde's.
BY MISTERHIPPITY AT 02/18/08 09:32 PMOn LiLo's nude-pic escapade
Let me share an assessment I made:
The freckles on her tits
Outnumber the twits
Who saw the last movie she made
BY MISTERHIPPITY AT 02/18/08 10:47 PMLilo's nudity here, to be fair,
Is just part of her drug-rehab care.
First her coke pants she doffed.
Next the coke blouse came off.
Last, she took off her coke underwear!
Send an email to Hamilton Nolan, the author of this post, at Hamilton@gawker.com.
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
Start a new discussion