Be forwarned, youngsters: the magazine industry has no room for you any more. Also, it can't find you! You're all out there working on the blogs and not learning how to do real journalism. Which makes you suck! "These people don't leave their fucking laptops," says elderly writer Gay Talese. "It used to be, you would go outside." My, how things change for the Gay. The Observer's attempt to capture the magazine freelancing zeitgeist in article form is written by former Gawker blogger Doree Shafrir, a fact which does not seem to register with the irony-proof older generation quoted therein. So the aspirational young magazine crowd either succeeds quickly or withers away into bitterness at the closed doors of the industry, while old veterans of top-tier magazines grow increasingly out of touch and bemoan every little change since their golden days. Isn't this how things have always been?
Mr. Taro Greenfeld continued: "As much as I can't stand these parochial notions of journalism school, there is something to be said for, like, reporting. There's something to be said for hanging around with people. ... Editors who are around my age say, 'We're just not finding those up-and-coming 20-something writers.' Those people used to be like a bedrock of magazines! ... Why aren't we better at producing young writers?"
That, of course, from an over-40 editor. The fact is that journalism is not rocket science, no matter what J-school brochures tell you. Most talented young writers, even if they have made their names as bloggers, can easily and quickly make the transition into magazines. Yes, the industry is changing—more slowly than newspapers, but faster than book publishing. Still, a solid gig at a prestigious magazine is the best job that anyone can possibly have in journalism. Yes, the starting pay for entry level positions sucks; Yes, it's a sickeningly connection-driven business that rewards rich kids who can afford to work for low pay. Those are institutional problems.
And yes, freelancing full time is a difficult hustle. But don't cry for those who actually have established freelance connections. The $2/ word rate that Shafrir cites sympathetically as the low end of the major magazine scale can, of course, fall much, much lower once you get out side of well known consumer titles, as most freelancers are forced to do. I started writing for 10 cents per word for an alt-weekly. Once you've reached the $2 a word mark, satisfaction is in order.
The real interesting time will come when magazines aren't like this. When employment is a meritocracy; when online and print writing are seamlessly integrated and equally respected; when young writers aren't arrogant and impatient, and old editors aren't out of touch. But magazine themselves aren't in real danger, as long as we need to read something while we poop.










Comments
Thief!
Awesome build in the last paragraph, Hamilton.
@TheHonJudgeSmails: Someone also stole whatever makes your link work, I think.
@CodePink: Does this work [gawker.com] ?
The only thing I ever needed to read while I poop is the farmers almanac and musky hunter magazine.
The first time I made 2 dollars a word, I felt like a fucking grifter.
@collegecallgirl: I would be given to use a lot of prepositions.
@TheHonJudgeSmails: Yes. HAH. I remember that comment. Still funny!
Amen, Mr. Nolan. You ought to forward this to that Nick Denton fellow, whose response to the same story I am still trying to parse, with little success.
$2 per word? I am working in the wrong town.
Good article by Doree, but what's with all the anonymous sources? She isn't exactly legitimizing herself as a blogger-turned-reporter with all the unnamed references to young editors.
So, really, what's the difference between Denton and any other writers around here? Or any of the writers and the commenters? The lines are now irreversibly blurred. We all get the same newspapers and think the same things while reading them. It's just that some of us are making money off of Battlestar Galactica while doing it. While others make less money, and some of us make no money.
Me, I'd rather make money.
@TheHonJudgeSmails: I just tack them on to the ends of all my sentences.
It's Groundhog Day
@CodePink: I am the first person, ever, to have this thought.
@demetria23: It's simple. People are pussies. Getting anyone to talk about 1. work and security or 2. cash dollars is insanely difficult.
@Choire: Choire! How have you been? Also, I have little to no money, work my ass off and I'm still working on securing a certain degree of comfort for my future retirement.
Love that last paragraph...I'm entranced by your utopian visions.
And I'd definitely read a whole magazine about that utopia while I poop.
The reason they can't find these "20-something up and comers" is the magazine industry, specifically any book resembling one of Conde Nast's luxury clusterfucks, hires their entry level personal according to who their daddy and mommy are, net worth, and where they choose to "summer."
And then all of the veteran editors sit around and wonder why all of their Ralph Lauren advertisement-esque staffers are very "aspirational looking" but troublesomely dumb as rocks.
I do hope that one day there will be a full-hearted rising of the plebes to overthrow the magazine industry. I mean, seriously, are we supposed to sympathize with, say, New York Magazine's endless indentifying/butt-fucking of the zeitgeist. Do trees really need to be killed so as to tell readers that latest spot in NYC for people to build condos on top of the dead bodies of the displaced working class.
Does anybody have a Che Guvera T-shirt I can borrow? I'm feeling rebelish this morning!
@Choire: And it's weird that they won't say certain things in print but will blog very personal things under their real names or paper-thin pseudonyms.
@TallulahSkankhead: yes, doree is solid, but the blind quotes were ridiculous. why? these were observations, generalities, very weird. probably the most banal blind quotes I've read in a long time. were these doree's friends and ex-colleagues and so she didn't want to look a little, um, lazy?
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?