No doubt this post will catch grief because it breaks an unspoken rule: speak no ill of a former Gawker writer. But it's a good yarn, of the romantic and professional entanglement of New York's literary and media networks, so fuck it. Enfant terrible of the city's literary set, Keith Gessen of n+1 magazine, has lost one of his acolytes. The desperately highbrow writer's former intern, Leon Neyfakh of the New York Observer, was commissioned to write a piece about his mentor's new work, All the Sad Young Literary Men. Neyfakh's thesis, that galleys of Gessen's first novel have been snapped up by other young writers searching for themselves in the characters, may yet make it into print. But the Observer reporter is unlikely to remain so devoted a promoter. Gessen's novel, which is published in April, is a black comedy centering around the romantic and literary ambitions of three young writers. Fact mirrors fiction: in an improbable twist that could have jumped out of the pages of his novel, the n+1 editor has stolen his devoted follower's girlfriend. And she's a familiar figure.
One of Gessen's protagonists in All the Sad Young Literary Men, studying for a doctorate in Russian history, discovers that erudition counts for little in his erotic life. But the author himself, with the soulful looks of a Greenwich Village bohemian and the oh-so-erotic arrogance of a Russian-Jewish intellectual, has had greater romantic success. Says one peripheral observer: "I don't really get it, honestly, the Gessen mystique; why these n+1 groupie girls love him so much." Nevertheless, they do; currently, one in particular, a former blogger with this site. Emily Gould, who used to date Neyfakh until a few weeks ago, has transferred her affection to Gessen.
It's been a long seduction. Emily wrote many of the items on n+1 in Gawker, last year, and even quit her blogging gig in a post about the literary magazine. After a party for the Winter 2008 issue, at which contributors and other guests were expected to offload copies from the back of a truck, Emily read Carla Blumenkranz's anemic review, 'In Search of Gawker'. "The status of Gawker rose as the overall status of its subjects declined, and it was this that made Gawker appear at times a reprehensible bully," wrote Blumenkranz—and Emily agreed. The post (A long dark early evening of the soul with Keith Gessen) began as a report on the n+1 party; it ended as a public resignation.
After quitting Gawker, and breaking up with Josh Stein, one of the site's crowd-pleasing bloggers, Emily Gould sought increasingly refined company. Leon Neyfakh's Observer may have a circulation of just 50,000, but it retains some of the patina from when it was a must-read weekly for Manhattan's business and cultural elites. In Gessen, she has found a boyfriend so high-minded that his publication has no measured readership whatsoever. "We think of ourselves as a research institute that has taken on the form of a literary magazine," Gessen once told an interviewer.
To be sure, Gessen's magazine adheres to the model of the Russian intelligentsia: women, as a friend of Choire Sicha's once said, are "mere accessories" in the world of n+1. But even the most feminist of writers can be drawn to the myth of the literary salon, however faded, in which the muse calls forth the genius in her lover, and shines in his reflected brilliance. Says a former friend: "Emily wants everyone—or at least a small sliver of New York's male media world—to think she's smart. And they want to fuck her. Both sides, thus far and pretty much, have gotten what they want." And Gessen, who now has a book to sell, will get so much more than merely private adoration.
The n+1 editor used to disdain the marketing machinery of the literary world. In his novel, the self-identifying immigrant rails against the nepotistic New York establishment in which, if a surname sounds familiar, that's because the person is a relation. And he used to have nothing but contempt for bloggers. "Wait 'til Gawker gets its filthy mitts on you," he said in a round table for the Harvard Crimson. "It's just strange, you know we live in a time when people can say whatever they want about you on the Internet and take no responsibility for it."
Of course, he didn't complain when n+1 began to receive blog attention, last year. I count 25 mentions on Gawker alone, last year, most of them gently mocking, but each reinforcing the semi-ironic message: "n+1 is the most important literary magazine of our time." One of the first reviews of his book is on one of Emily Gould's blogs. And now he's abandoned all pretense of detachment from irresponsible blogdom. Gawker has indeed gotten its filthy mitts on Gessen: he's dating one of the most untrammeled writers the site has ever had.
Emily rather famously rubbished her former boyfriend, Josh Stein, as "emotionally manipulative" though the assumption that she also dismissed him as a premature ejaculator is apparently a misunderstanding. The slanging match continues, months later. After a warning by her ex in the New York Post's Page Six Magazine against dating a blogger, she responded: "Josh is busy altering his odd sweaters with the $2K he got for his article and probably doesn’t give a shit about anything but that money, and the fact that the whole little scandal gave Gawker commenters another opportunity to marvel at the musculature of his torso."
For the moment, Emily is still revealing only with a six-month lag: she has been commissioned to write her own personal account of her experience as a blogger for the New York Times Magazine—where Gessen, despite his image as an outsider, has several connections. (I assume it will focus on manipulative capitalists rather than manipulative boyfriends.) But eventually she'll move on to the literary milieu. I can't wait for the too-much-information blog posts. Word is she's already honing a pitch for New York Magazine on her new area of expertise, the most important writer of his generation, Keith Gessen. That's synergy!
There's nothing that scandalous about any of this. Bed-hopping is an honored literary tradition. The only victims in this story are the more naive among the dreamy writer's groupies, who may have believed that he was a pure soul, or at least a potential soulmate. Oh, and the Observer's poor Leon Neyfakh—though he had plenty of evidence that Emily Gould's a heartbreaker. Both Gessen and Gould are, despite their self-involvement, talented writers: maybe the self-involvement is an integral part of the talent. Hypocrisy? Well, duh! Radical writers have always tilted against the publishing establishment—until the moment the doors open a little. Today's penniless bomb-throwers are tomorrow's self-satisfied rulers: that holds as much for New York's literary scene as for the Russian revolution with which one of Gessen's characters is so obsessed.
And that brings us to the closing anecdote, which is slightly unfair, because the author may have simply been looking after his father's dog. In Emily's account of the arrival of n+1's winter issue, Gessen in the style of a literary revolutionary drove the delivery truck himself from the Ingram warehouse in Pennsylvania. Now he leaves such menial work to the foot soldiers. n+1's great leader spent last weekend in Cape Cod, with his new muse, leaving one of his unfortunate underlings to make the following plea, complete with compromisingly bloglike links at the end, to their groupies.
Dear Stalwarts,
I received an urgent text message tonight from Delmore Gessen ordering me to organize a crack posse to converge at 11 am upon 195 Chrystie St. (Manhattan) to move the offices of n+1 magazine back to their rightful native home in DUMBO.
This effort commences from 11am-1pm, Saturday.
People, if you are reading this email (pimped out from the scratcher list), YOU ARE THE FORCE.
There is no other way but to show up.
Now to make this mass email more palatable, I throw in some video links to commemorate the death of the eminent reactionary Bill Buckley:
FULL BUCKLEY V. CHOMSKY:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1214894113898255184
BUCKLEY TO VIDAL: "NOW LISTEN YOU QUEER":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYymnxoQnf8
BLOATED BUCKLEY SWAN SONG ON CHARLIE ROSE:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2955116813086874076











Comments
Too insidery.
Also: lame.
and the scorpion floats down with the turtle.
What is this, fucking high school? Jesus.
Oh, like NOBODY saw this one coming! Weren't some commenters starting a betting pool a while back regarding the likelihood that Emily Gould was boning Keith Gessen, or soon would be boning Keith Gessen, a while back. Could her adoration for him been more transparent?
When is she going to move on to Eggers? Y'all KNOW that's where this will end up.
Cliff's Notes, please.
I'm mystified at the length of this piece and how convoluted it is considering I've never heard about these people.
I was the best of posts, it was the lengthiest of posts.
I feel sort of gross. And also dumber.
Call me when the whole story is condensed into a limerick by Julia Allison.
You're all going to hell!
Bad title for his book. The Fitzgerald reference is hamfisted (if that's what it was). How's about: The Rasputin of Greenwich Village?
@TheHonJudgeSmails: Also hard to parse.
The funniest part of this post is the continued usage of the term "New York literary scene". There is no such thing, outside of the minds of the two-dozen or so people who are directly implicated in this post.
Agreed and AGREED! She is a tool and a douchebag but mostly a star fucker. How happy was I when Denton came back and cleaned this shit up? Very. Ok groupie lovers, commence your bashing of me, someone who is outside of this whole thing but misses the Gawker of Spiers, Sascha and the brilliant Jessica C and Jessie O.
tldr.
@Chief Wahoo:
''THE ideal Gawker item,'' Nick Denton, the owner of Gawker Media, wrote in an instant message last month to a prospective hire, ''is something triggered by a quote at a party, or an incident, or a story somewhere else and serves to expose hypocrisy, or turn conventional wisdom on its head.
"And it's 100 words long. 200 max. Any good idea can be expressed at that length.''
@Conbon: As hard to parse as it is to care about.
Too many words.
I'm so glad that I don't live in New York anymore.
@transomist: Gould Loves Stein. Gould Loves Neyfakh. Gould Loves Gessen. Gessen Loves Gould. Gould Loves Times. Times Loves Gessen. Times Love Gould.
Did she steal something on her way out?
Because, this is a lot of words to use just to call someone a starfucker.
@TheHonJudgeSmails: Let's talk about something else. Who's excited for College Road Trip this weekend?
Joan Didion, what's the best way to respond to Baroque banality?
[www.nybooks.com]
@Conbon: Breckin Meyer?
this is low and so unnecessary, even for gawker
i likey the paris review. i liked n+1 but that gawker piece was ridiculous and that long novella they ran was just sort of a typical novella, nothing special or really fresh about it. like, if they weren't based in new york and didn't run the occasional comments about blogs, nobody would give a shit about them.
Who poked who in the what, now?
Is Emily Gould into girls? She sure is a hornet's nest of crazy, thus I'd imagine she's a pretty good romp.
So, I think this story concludes with me being married to Josh after Emily stole my Fabrege egg, right?
i can hardly wait for details of the blakeley-balk-krucoff affair to emerge!
@TheHonJudgeSmails: That is funny and depressing.
@Conbon: That's so Raven.
I find myself occasionally yearning for slightly longer blog posts on Gawker. This seems a little incoherent, though. Is this symptomatic of a decline in my attention span?
@the cajun boy: ah, I imagine a sea of pasty white cellulite...
@Conbon: @TheHonJudgeSmails: LEARN TO PARSE
gould was nothing more than a self-involved whiner the entire time she was at gawker and her exit could be summed up with the saying "get off the cross jesus, we need the wood." her and her whole gawker-graduating class could be the poster children for taking themselves way too seriously.
good lord. it's called editing. try it some time.
@dustindeed: Don't talk about Choire like that. Ever.
@BrianVan: well, with blakeley involved, you just know there'll be a video, so we'll all get to have our eyes poisoned by it.
TEAM BALK!
@the cajun boy: ha! and noooo...please let me have Balk to fantasize over.
@dustindeed: Really? I thought we all enjoyed a good many of her posts. Josh's, too.
@karion: Well, of course there's that . . .
smaller word count.
larger photo of neyfakh.
@baby flipper: This was like the PhD exam of parsing. Is Emily dating a character from a novel?
Needs more backstory.
If that were a Blakeley versus Chomsky video, I'd be interested in this.