History is repeating itself. During the last internet bubble, Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation used its Page Six brand to launch a new entertainment website, Pagesix.com. The property has had an even shorter life this cycle: Pagesix.com, which was largely independent of the newspaper's Page Six print column, is being shuttered immediately; it had been live only since December. The URL already redirects to the New York Post's main website, and the site's staff have had their access to email cut off. Managing Editor, David Boyle, told the site's Los Angeles staff. "Given the difficulty in the economy, it was not the right time for this launch," said Jennifer Jehn, one of the site's managers. A total of 18 editorial and support staffers will be let go and three reassigned within the New York Post.
So, are readers finally tiring of the torrent of shallow news about no-name celebrities, as Salon believes? The reasons for the abrupt decision are more prosaic, and depressing. Pagesix.com experienced its first day with more than 1m pageviews, last week, when the site published a gallery of photographs of Eliot Spitzer's hooker, Ashley Alexandra Dupré. But it was not making sufficiently rapid inroads into a market dominated by Time Warner's TMZ, and gossip blogs such as Perez Hilton. But the decision to shutter the spinoff gossip site likely owes even more to the Australian media mogul's pessimism about the US economy, and advertising spending.

Murdoch, disclosing a slowdown in ad revenue at his Fox television stations and newspapers, has predicted a "temporary downturn for a year or so." Other media companies, such as the New York Times, are also suffering from the advertising downturn, and have cut costs by making piecemeal layoffs.
The News Corporation boss, who has funded a decade of losses at his tabloid, the New York Post, is typically a patient investor. But he can also be decisive. He will be wary of overstretching the company, particularly after stretching to acquire the Wall Street Journal. During the last big advertising downturn, Murdoch nearly lost control of his company.
Anyway, before competitors gloat at News Corporation's reverse, they should remember this: if advertising spending has indeed turned down, the downturn will not spare web sites. The web's boosters hope that newly cost-conscious marketers will simply redirect their budgets from print and television to the web; that was the hope during the last recession, and it was wishful thinking, then and now. Murdoch will be embarrassed for a day; other media groups will be subsidizing loss-making websites for months before they come to the same conclusion.








Comments
Did Gawker Media go off-line this afternoon in protest solidarity?
Salon has an interesting article regarding the end of celebrity gossip.
[www.salon.com]
I wonder how many News Corp internet companies have folded.
Nick, why didn't you mention what happened to the servers? I smell Scientology!
BTW . "Given the difficulty in the economy, it was not the right time for this launch," is such bullshit.
The site sucked and it was annoying how you couldn't dodge it when you wanted to go to newspaper's page six.
Clever gossip will survive. The usual drum-beating stupidity may not. Adieu to it.
That is fucking amazing!
How much money could they have really been losing? Methinks this story may need more fleshing out.
Some WSJ blowback?
How the fuck could he NOT get page views just by leveraging myspace?
Something smells funny here, and it's not just Rupert's skidmarked underwear --this time.
@Cheap Shot: Actually, that's how Denton deals with declining ad revenue - he turns off Con-Ed services for one hour in the middle of the afternoon to save money once a week.
//not true
///Hungary
Actually online ad revenue estimates for the coming year are projected to be well up, though were slightly downgraded from early projections. P6.com died because 1 suits think they can have profit in 3 months, 2 because the site linked to no one ever and 3 because it was run by psychotic vindictive trolls.
I think it would be so cute if Websites had shutters.
@Choire: Your points 2. and 3. may well be valid. But I wouldn't set much store by forecasts of online ad revenues. The analysts were over-optimistic last time. And I don't think it's fair to blame the News Corporation suits. Murdoch and his aides have been extraordinarily patient in backing satellite TV, Fox, etc. If you're going to slam panicky suits, best look at other media companies more subject to the whims of Wall Street.
Speaking of which, Gawker has been running so many "Gawker Artist" spreads lately in place of ads. I hope I don't get executed for this comment; just observing.
@Choire, @Nick Denton: Oh, please, take it to Mediabistro, why don't you?
Denton, Van and Choire commenting on the same post?
It's the all male version of The Power of Three.
The Salon article was self-indulgent and a page and a half too long. The time I spent dozing off between paragraphs could've been spent on an actual nap.
@Choire: @Nick Denton: daddies, don't fight!
I have a new theory about this:
They shuttered the site because it was actually cutting into newspaper sales. Face facts, Page 6 is the only thing that keeps The NY Post from hemorrhaging even more red ink than it currently does.
Just spit-balling here.
Well I picked a hell of a time to have a patchy internet connection.
All I can do is quote the brilliant, well-versed Nelson: "HA HA!"
@Nick Denton: But what kind of crazy person would pull the plug on a web venture after THREE MONTHS? (I remember the traffic under Spiers!) Killing Page Six Dot Com so soon, as miserable and pitiful as it was, is the sign of... something.
A change in business strategy, perhaps, actually.
Anyway: Apparently Newser.com is still online! Now that's gumption.
@McCheeburger:
Good point. I used to cough up the quarter for the NYP 5 years ago before I became an Internet junkie. P6 was my main motivation. Now I refuse free copies.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?