Google's calculator function fails when handling large numbers. News.com's Stephen Shankland opinionates: "Any company that named itself after a big number must be held to a higher standard." Cut the Googlers some slack, Stephen: How are they supposed to maintain optimal blood-sugar levels for accurate coding when Larry and Sergey are taking away their snacks? (Screenshot via Blogoscoped)
Submitted discussions can be approved by the author or users followed by this blog.