In a column for Slate that feels just as tossed off as this very post is sure to be, media critic Jack Shafer offers a list of suggestions for the soon-to-be-vacated position of New York Times Public Editor. Shafer wants to see "somebody who is under 40, whose worldview hasn't been Lasiked blind by decades inside a newspaper newsroom, and who writes the way fire ants bite." His nominees include blog empress Elizabeth Spiers (who apparently has gas), some lady from the New Yorker, and the dude from Talking Points Memo, who is a Princeton alum. In that spirit we've come up with our own slate of candidates.
In no particular order:
Sewell Chan: Sure, he already works for the paper, but he could do this job in his sleep, which we imagine occurs between the minutes of 5:43 and 5:44 A.M. Honestly he'd probably nail CEO Janet Robinson's scalp to a wall while just wandering around asking questions.
Brian Montopoli: Nonstopoli, the boy wonder of CBS Public Eye and also of the neighborhood of Cobble Hill, is a stellar choice. His context-free ploddings are the perfect solution for editors worried about invasive public editors who ask questions. Plus, he'll never let the web journal go un-updated—even when he has nothing to say he makes sure to tell you. A fine choice for those who are worried about a public editor with too little self-esteem.
Rachel Sklar: This perky Canadian calls them like she sees them. Tough but fair, Sklar made her bones in the trenches of Mediabistro, then took The Huffington Post by storm, birthing Eat the Press, a website that combines the humorless media scolding of Columbia Journalism Review with incessant show tune references. This is the ombudsman—nay, ombudsperson—who will always see the other side of any argument.
Ira Stoll: Well, he invented Times-blogging, to be sure. Also, will make sure he catches all those pesky moments when the Times refers to Palestinians as human beings.
Rachel Marsden: Once this Fox babe starts following something, she doesn't quit!
Jesse Oxfeld: We placed the former Gawker editor on this list because it must be killing him to see Spiers' name put forth for the gig. Also, pretty much every Times article makes us say "Oy!" and it would be great to see that sentiment acknowledged in the paper itself. Is always willing to go boldly to press with his original thesis untarnished by any sort of later-forthcoming information.
Maer Roshan: The serial Radar reviver has worked at every magazine that matters in this town. He knows where the bodies are buried. Even better, he has plenty of experience with projects that last for a year or less. The only downside with this choice is the whole "under 40" thing.
Byron "Dan" Worthington III: We know for a fact that the Gawker ombudsman would love to leave Gawker as soon as humanly possible. He promises he will go easy on Times reporters in every case brought before him. You know, just like Calame. Drop him a line, Keller, he wants out.
******
Your nominations? Send them to slate.pressbox@gmail.com, because we really don't give a shit.
The Next Times Public Editor [Slate]












Comments
Fuck it. I nominate me.
I nominate Momo.
@momo: Momo, no need. We'll do it for you. I swear I did not know you were doing that. How sycophantic I must look now. Fuck it.
I suggest KarenUhOh. Please.
I second KarenUhOh.
You guys trying to get rid of me?
What the fuck's a 'public editor'?
Wonkette Emeritata Ana Marie Cox. The New York Times needs a Public Editor who likes to bang panda bears.
@KarenUhOh:
I think Bill Keller would be fine with you serving as public editor (that title does have to be changed) and a Gawker commenter.
Public? oh.
I read 'Pubic Editor'.
and Jackie, you can't be sycophantic to someone that can grant no favors ... unless it was party favors, and then maybe we can go dutch.
Batman.
@Lee: I second that nomination. If there's anything the NY Times needs, it's more assfucking.
@KarenUhOh: You guys trying to get rid of me?
Oh, hell to the no.
I think we're trying to get you to write a 2000 word comment in the Times.
Balk's constant cries for help also makes Baby Jesus cry.
@The Infopornographer: which is why it should be momo.
I think Gawker fav Bill Jensen from Village Voice Media would be a bang-up public editor and triple the use of profanity in the paper.
I vote for the Unethicist
ellagood@: Maybe co-editors? That way we get boy/boy AND girl/boy assfucking. Everybody wins!
@Koala325:
Le Monde calls the position "Le médiateur du 'New York Times.'&thinsp"
"Médiateur" can mean mediator, referee, or arbiter. But maybe the NYT should stay away from the "A-word" for a while.
I disagree with J. Shafer; young reporters can be very effective not because they're "ignorant," but because young people tend to see the world in black-and-white terms. Which may not actually be the best quality in an ombudsperson. They do, however, have fewer enemies and less baggage.
KarenUhOh was at the top of my list, too. Turning to back to reality, although she's way over 40, I'd like to see someone like Katha Pollitt.
Is the Underminer too busy? Too important? Reluctant to take a pay cut?
@Seeräuber Jenny: Jenny, thou cuttest moi. I don't act a day over 14.
'Under 40,' eh? How about IQ? Waistline? Outstanding warrants?
@KarenUhOh:
And of course, and yes, I understand that I am responding as intended, Jack Shafer would be interesting, too, although I assume he's somewhere north of 40. Why?
1) He'd probably be good at it;
2) It would be fun to read JS's successor's constant stream of criticism about his stewardship.
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?