If you're of the opinion that wealthy people are innately fascinating because of their wealth, Nick Paumgarten's 13-page New Yorker profile of Daily News proprietor and real estate magnate Mort Zuckerman is a helpful corrective. That thing is a Lunesta in tiny type. We're not even inclined to blame Paumgarten on this one: Zuckerman may be the most boring billionaire in the world, which is particularly surprising considering he's essentially self-made, and his Canadian Jew background alone should at least provide some spark of interest. But guess what? He's full of himself, he brags about his influence in the political sphere, he talks a lot, he used to bang Gloria Steinem, and, uh, that's it. It's telling that Zuckerman only seems interesting in the pages of the New York Post, which has a vested interest in making its rival look bad. In fact, the only amusing anecdote to come out of the story sounds like something you'd read in the Post.
A good Mort story, of the kind not told, or even remembered by Mort himself, has [former U.S. News & World Report editor Roger] Rosenblatt and Zuckerman on their way to Washington on Zuckerman's private jet, to announce Rosenblatt's resignation to the staff of U.S. News. The plane hits turbulence, and Rosenblatt and Zuckerman go flying out of their seats. Zuckerman turns to Rosenblatt and says, 'Did you see what just happened to me?'And that's it. We can understand why Ken Auletta passed on this assignment.
The Tycoon [NYer, not online and thank God for that]








Comments
I find myself aroused by the cover of that magazine.
@KarenUhOh: Was the littlest UhOh conceived after an especially endearing holiday Coca-Cola ad?
Karen and Lol need to take your act on the road, the only question is, which one of you two are going to play the straight man?
@adropp: Starting to look like it's me, in't it?
If you're of the opinion that wealthy people are innately fascinating because of their wealth...
Read: "If you're a contributor to Gawker.com..."
Another self-fulfilling post from Balk as we see not one word about Zuckerman, just some lazy give and take between two commenters who are infinitely more interesting than Zuck is, incomes notwithstanding.
I will take the blame for hijacking the thread. Balk seems to be saying the piece was not worth his time, or ours, which I'd gauge as fair media comment.
In the meantime, I will attempt to locate a picture of Mr. Zuckerman in order to pleasure myself.
@KarenUhOh: Doubt you will have much luck in that regard.
We know what we thought of the New Yorker's profile of media/real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman's this past July mdash; we still can't believe they let Nick Paumgarten get away with this bit: "...his eyes, glinting things." Yes yes, Nick Paumgarten, you're very poetic.
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?