<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Ok!]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/ok!</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Ok!]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Which Tabloids Lie the Most?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Which Tabloids Lie the Most?" href="http://gawker.com/exclusive/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">exclusive</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Which Tabloids Lie the Most?" href="http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Which Tabloids Lie the Most?" alt="Click here to read Which Tabloids Lie the Most?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_e4570ee41210c1167fc0020a89a5a434.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In the constantly-contradicting world of tabloid journalism, is anyone reliable? We analyzed 20 months of reported break-ups, marriages, and pregnancies to tabulate our first-ever Tabloid Reality Index, batting averages for America's five major celebrity glossies and the rumors they monger.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most" title="Click here to read more about Which Tabloids Lie the Most?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5638480]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charticle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[In Touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Life & Style]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[OK Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[showcase]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloid reality index]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:04:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5638480&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?" href="http://gawker.com/run-for-cover/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">runforcover</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?" href="http://gawker.com/5432262/does-tiger-woods-not-sell-magazines-covers-because-hes-black" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?" alt="Click here to read Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/12/500x_starleadimage121609.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				That's the conclusion that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #robshuter" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #robshuter" href="http://gawker.com/tag/robshuter/">Rob Shuter</a> comes to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-shuter/tiger-dumped-because-hes_b_396059.html">in the Huffington Post</a> when he says that the tabloid covers that carried his famous face didn't move at the newsstand. Well, let's see how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #brittanymurphy" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #brittanymurphy" href="http://gawker.com/tag/brittanymurphy/">Brittany Murphy</a> fares this week.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5432262/does-tiger-woods-not-sell-magazines-covers-because-hes-black" title="Click here to read more about Does Tiger Woods Not Sell Magazines Covers Because He's Black?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5432262/does-tiger-woods-not-sell-magazines-covers-because-hes-black]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5432262]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[run for cover]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brittany Murphy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[celebrity industrial complex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Life And Style]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rob Shuter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:28:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432262&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine" href="http://gawker.com/gossip/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">gossip</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine" href="http://gawker.com/5405751/new-contender-for-survivor-ok-magazine" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine" alt="Click here to read New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/11/okcover.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Getting an editorial job at <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/ok!-magazine/">OK! Magazine</a> has proven to be similar to riding a merry-go-round where you get your head chopped off after one go-round. That said, we'd like to welcome <em>OK!</em>'s new editorial boss! We hear many things.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5405751/new-contender-for-survivor-ok-magazine" title="Click here to read more about New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5405751/new-contender-for-survivor-ok-magazine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5405751]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Atoosa Rubenstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[OK! Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:45:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405751&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Imus To Fox Business, Glenn Beck's Losses Mount]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; Confirming the rumors from a few weeks back, Fox Business says it will begin simulcasting <a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/don-imus" class="profile-link">Don Imus</a>' radio show beginning next month. [<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/09/don-imus-signs-deal-with-fox-business-network.html">LAT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/507145/imus-to-fox-business-glenn-becks-losses-mount" title="Click here to read more about Imus To Fox Business, Glenn Beck's Losses Mount">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/507145/imus-to-fox-business-glenn-becks-losses-mount]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-507145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Abc News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Charles Gibson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Clinton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diane Sawyer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dr. Phil]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Erin Andrews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Espn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travel channel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Warner Music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:35:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=507145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian Joins OK!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				If you're an unemployed fashion/beauty editor and you can't find a job, you officially have one more reason to be depressed about your career prospects today: <em>OK!</em> says Kim Kardashian has joined its staff as a &quot;contributing beauty editor.&quot; [<a href="http://www.okmagazine.com/2009/08/kim-kardashian-joins-ok-as-contributing-beauty-editor/">OK!</a>] 				<a href="http://gawker.com/507098/kim-kardashian-joins-ok" title="Click here to read more about Kim Kardashian Joins OK!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/507098/kim-kardashian-joins-ok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-507098]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[kim kardashian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:44:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=507098&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Jackson Memorial, The WSJ, Another NYT Scandal]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; How many networks covered the Jackson memorial? Count 'em yourself: ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, HLN, MTV, VH1, VH1 Classic, VH1Soul, BET, E!, TV Guide, TV One, Univision and Telemundo. [<a href="http://cityfile.com//">AdWeek</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/506457/the-jackson-memorial-the-wsj-another-nyt-scandal" title="Click here to read more about The Jackson Memorial, The WSJ, Another NYT Scandal">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/506457/the-jackson-memorial-the-wsj-another-nyt-scandal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-506457]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Barry Diller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bob Iger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Porn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun valley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:39:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=506457&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The End of Vibe, Wall-to-Wall Jackson Coverage]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; The urban/music magazine <em>Vibe</em> is shutting down. [<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/20http://cityfile.com/vibe-magazine-shutting-down/">Daily Finance</a>] 				<a href="http://gawker.com/506376/the-end-of-vibe-wall+to+wall-jackson-coverage" title="Click here to read more about The End of Vibe, Wall-to-Wall Jackson Coverage">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/506376/the-end-of-vibe-wall+to+wall-jackson-coverage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-506376]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Katie Couric]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Roger Friedman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vibe magazine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=506376&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, Atlantic]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/why%3f/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">why?</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5263121/ok-sure-have-a-hip-hop-roundtable-atlantic" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;" alt="Click here to read Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/nas.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				"In an email roundtable, <i>Atlantic</i> correspondent and Vassar College assistant professor professor Hua Hsu, frequent Atlantic.com culture contributor Alyssa Rosenberg, and <i>Government Executive</i> staff correspondent Gautham Nagesh discuss rap's future in the age of Obama." [<strike>XXL</strike> <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200905u/hip-hop-roundtable">The Atlantic</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5263121/ok-sure-have-a-hip-hop-roundtable-atlantic" title="Click here to read more about Ok, Sure, Have a Hip Hop Roundtable, Atlantic">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5263121/ok-sure-have-a-hip-hop-roundtable-atlantic]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5263121]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[why?]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Monthly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hip-Hop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[I'm not a government executive, i'm a business, man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Roundtables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Things we didn't read]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 20 May 2009 15:36:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5263121&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Geffen's Bid, Palin's Book, A New NEA Chair]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; Veteran theater producer <a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/rocco-landesman" class="profile-link">Rocco Landesman</a> has been nominated to be the next chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/20http://cityfile.com/theater/13nea.html">NYT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/505793/geffens-bid-palins-book-a-new-nea-chair" title="Click here to read more about Geffen's Bid, Palin's Book, A New NEA Chair">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/505793/geffens-bid-palins-book-a-new-nea-chair]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-505793]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bertelsmann]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Book Publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cannes Film festival]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Geffen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harpercollins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Louis Vuitton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LVMH]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[National Endowment for the Arts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[richard abate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rocco landesman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Showtime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tom Friedman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[William Morris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[XXL Magazine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 May 2009 12:26:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=505793&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Times Backs Down, Wolverine's Big Weekend]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; Tense negotiations over proposed budget cuts continue between the New York Times Co. and unions that represent workers at the <em>Boston Globe</em>; in the meantime, the Times has postponed plans to shut down the paper. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/20http://cityfile.com/business/media/05paper.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">NYT</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124127085602080301.html#mod=rss_media_marketing">WSJ</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/505643/the-times-backs-down-wolverines-big-weekend" title="Click here to read more about The Times Backs Down, Wolverine's Big Weekend">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/505643/the-times-backs-down-wolverines-big-weekend]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-505643]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chesley Sullenberger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast Traveler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DirectTV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jenny Mccarthy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Fallon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Malone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV Guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[William Langewiesche]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[William Li]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 04 May 2009 12:07:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=505643&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OK!'s US Edition a Big Failure?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s US Edition a Big Failure?" href="http://gawker.com/media-crack/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mediacrack</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s US Edition a Big Failure?" href="http://gawker.com/5167526/oks-us-edition-a-big-failure/gallery/" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s US Edition a Big Failure?" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s US Edition a Big Failure?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/03/custom_1236709198792_okmag.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In your meaty Tuesday media column: rumors of coming layoffs (and a die-off?) at <em>OK! </em>magazine, a golf magazine is killed, advertising plummets, media companies may default, and Americans don't know a damn thing:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5167526/oks-us-edition-a-big-failure/gallery/" title="Click here to read more about OK!'s US Edition a Big Failure?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5167526/oks-us-edition-a-big-failure/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5167526]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media Crack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clear Channel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Golf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Great magazine die-off]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Money Matters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politico]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[univision]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:31:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5167526&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cuts at Page Six Magazine, More Changes at OK!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				More layoffs in medialand: <em>Page Six Magazine</em> is now planning to go quarterly and 23 staffers have been laid off. Over at <em>OK!</em>, <a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/kent-brownridge" class="profile-link">Kent Brownridge</a> is out as general manager, and Sarah Ivens will take over as editor until a permanent replacement is found. [<a href="http://gawker.com/5142315/page-six-magazine-going-quarterly">Gawker</a>, <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/magazines-newspapers/e3i4a91743e701a2ac62bc256d3efb10f1e">Mediaweek</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/504162/cuts-at-page-six-magazine-more-changes-at-ok" title="Click here to read more about Cuts at Page Six Magazine, More Changes at OK!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/504162/cuts-at-page-six-magazine-more-changes-at-ok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-504162]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Page Six Magazine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:47:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=504162&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OK! Melts Down]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Fashion Week Daily <a href="http://www.fashionweekdaily.com/news/fullstory.sps?inewsid=6626168">reports</a> <em>OK!</em> editor in chief Susan Toepfer was dismissed today, just a few months after taking over for Sara Ivens at the second-rate tabloid weekly. A number of <em>OK!</em> staffers have been cut as well, although additional layoffs are expected in the coming days. [<a href="http://www.fashionweekdaily.com/news/fullstory.sps?inewsid=6626168">The Daily</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/504152/ok-melts-down" title="Click here to read more about OK! Melts Down">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/504152/ok-melts-down]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-504152]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sara Ivens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Susan toepfer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:55:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=504152&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ad Pages Plummet, Mags Cut Salaries and Staff]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				&bull; Bad news: Magazine ad pages were down 11% in 2008 and 17% in the fourth quarter. Good news: They now take up less room in your bag. [<a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=133757">AdAge</a>]&nbsp; 				<a href="http://gawker.com/503898/ad-pages-plummet-mags-cut-salaries-and-staff" title="Click here to read more about Ad Pages Plummet, Mags Cut Salaries and Staff">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/503898/ad-pages-plummet-mags-cut-salaries-and-staff]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-503898]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[david vigliano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Mayer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lenny Dykstra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Msnbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Magazine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:18:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=503898&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cuts at Newsday, Rush & Molloy Go Weekly]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<font color="#990000">&diams; </font><em>Newsday</em> is slashing 100 jobs. [<a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/local/ny-bznews1206,0,367953.story">Newsday</a>] 				<a href="http://gawker.com/503347/cuts-at-newsday-rush--molloy-go-weekly" title="Click here to read more about Cuts at Newsday, Rush & Molloy Go Weekly">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/503347/cuts-at-newsday-rush--molloy-go-weekly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-503347]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bill O'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cnbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[George Rush]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[joanna molloy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lauren Zalaznick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[neal boulton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newsday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Hertzberg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:06:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=503347&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OK!'s Strategy: Don't Publish]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s Strategy: Don't Publish" href="http://gawker.com/ok%21/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ok!</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s Strategy: Don't Publish" href="http://gawker.com/5102494/oks-strategy-dont-publish" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s Strategy: Don't Publish" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;OK!&lt;/em&gt;'s Strategy: Don't Publish" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/12/okmag2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Why does the public not sufficiently appreciate the hardworking people at <em>OK!</em> magazine? Last month there were rumors that Richard Desmond, the billionaire British publisher of the laughable celebrity mag, <a href="http://gawker.com/5086432/ok-mag-boss-is-very-tired-of-losing-money">actually flew to America</a> to personally investigate why new <em>OK!</em> boss Kent Brownridge was losing money. The magazine's flack denied this, saying they where "doing fine." Shockingly, it appears what that flack said was <em>not entirely true,</em> because <em>OK!</em> has decided to <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/12052008/business/no_wintour_discontent_142756.htm?page=0">skip four issues</a> at the end of this year:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5102494/oks-strategy-dont-publish" title="Click here to read more about OK!'s Strategy: Don't Publish">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5102494/oks-strategy-dont-publish]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5102494]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Recessionomics]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:13:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5102494&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A-Rod and Madonna Head South]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<font color="#990000">&diams;&nbsp; </font>It's the question that has been keeping you up for <em>days</em> now: Where <em>is</em> <a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/alex-rodriguez" class="profile-link">Alex Rodriguez</a> going to spend Thanksgiving? First it was reported that A-Rod planned to stay in New York. Now <em>People</em> now says he plans to have dinner with his ex-wife and their two kids in Florida. But Madonna is on the scene, too! Maybe in the spirit of the holiday, they'll all just join together and be thankful for what they have? Kidding! [<a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20242800,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines">People</a>, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/20http://cityfile.com/madonna-and-a-rod-have-landed-together">TMZ</a>]<font color="#990000"></font>				<a href="http://gawker.com/503227/a+rod-and-madonna-head-south" title="Click here to read more about A-Rod and Madonna Head South">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/503227/a+rod-and-madonna-head-south]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-503227]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Alex Rodriguez]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ashlee Simpson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Austin Cregg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Carson Daly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cynthia Rodriguez]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gordon ramsay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Guy Ritchie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Heidi Montag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jake Gyllenhaal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jessica Stam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gyllenhaal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rachael Ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ricki Lake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spencer pratt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=503227&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Graydon's Oscar Plans, Koppel Departs Discovery]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<font color="#990000">&diams;&nbsp; </font><a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/graydon-carter" class="profile-link">Graydon Carter</a> says <em>Vanity Fair</em> plans to go ahead with its annual Oscar party, but &quot;the party will be a much more intimate affair than in years past; we're going to scale back the guest list considerably.&quot; [<a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/vanity-fair-going-ahead-with-oscar-party/">DH</a>]<font color="#990000"></font>				<a href="http://gawker.com/503215/graydons-oscar-plans-koppel-departs-discovery" title="Click here to read more about Graydon's Oscar Plans, Koppel Departs Discovery">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/503215/graydons-oscar-plans-koppel-departs-discovery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-503215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[alan colmes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ann Moore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Discovery Channel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[houghton mifflin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Laura Bush]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sumner Redstone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ted Koppel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Inc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=503215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy" href="http://gawker.com/sad-things/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sadthings</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy" href="http://gawker.com/5070046/handicapping-how-the-gossip-glossies-will-cover-jennifer-hudsons-family-tragedy" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy" alt="Click here to read Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/1095875.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				When the celebrity weeklies unveil their new covers tomorrow, we can bet they'll be dominated by coverage of the terrible Jennifer Hudson news story, in which the singer and actress's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew were murdered on Friday.  And we suppose they're right to, it being big news and all.  Since the issues went to print yesterday, it's up to the websites to tease what each publication has in store (and to keep up with breaking developments).  So what might each magazine be featuring?  We took a look at five magazines' websites today to try to see if there were any hints of what their coverage will look like tomorrow.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/5070046/handicapping-how-the-gossip-glossies-will-cover-jennifer-hudsons-family-tragedy" title="Click here to read more about Handicapping How the Gossip Glossies Will Cover Jennifer Hudson's Family Tragedy">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5070046/handicapping-how-the-gossip-glossies-will-cover-jennifer-hudsons-family-tragedy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5070046]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sad things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[InTouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jennifer hudson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:13:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5070046&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Times Endorses Obama, Radar Closes]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<font color="#990000">&diams;&nbsp; </font>The <em>New York Times</em> has endorsed Barack Obama, not surprisingly. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/20http://cityfile.com/opinion/24fri1.html">NYT</a>]<font color="#990000"></font>				<a href="http://gawker.com/502619/the-times-endorses-obama-radar-closes" title="Click here to read more about The Times Endorses Obama, Radar Closes">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/502619/the-times-endorses-obama-radar-closes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-502619]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Anderson Cooper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bravo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hearst]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Maer Roshan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Meet The Press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Project Runway]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Radar Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sumner Redstone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Inc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:29:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=502619&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!'" href="http://gawker.com/dustin-hoffman/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">dustinhoffman</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!'" href="http://gawker.com/5064627/dustin-hoffman-feigns-interest-in-the-new-yorker-but-reaching-for-the-latest-ok" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!'" alt="Click here to read Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2008/10/DHoffman101508_001_X17-1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
								<a href="http://gawker.com/5064627/dustin-hoffman-feigns-interest-in-the-new-yorker-but-reaching-for-the-latest-ok" title="Click here to read more about Dustin Hoffman Feigns Interest In 'The New Yorker,' But Reaching For The Latest 'OK!'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5064627/dustin-hoffman-feigns-interest-in-the-new-yorker-but-reaching-for-the-latest-ok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5064627]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Dustin Hoffman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[A Call To The Bullpen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brentwood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Defamer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Hudgens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[X17]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Zac Efron]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:41:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas  Reinhardt]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5064627&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator" href="http://gawker.com/celebrity_industrial-complex/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">celebrityindustrialcomplex</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator" href="http://gawker.com/5060139/minnie-driver--baby-business-innovator" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator" alt="Click here to read Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/Picture_1_02.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Actress Minnie Driver recently gave birth to her son Henry last month, and in lieu of some splashy magazine cover (I mean, not that she's <em>that</em> big of a star to warrant that, but you know), she decided to just <a href="http://www.scandalist.com/2008-10-07/the-cutest-celeb-baby-photo-ever/">post a humble, makeup free, mom and baby photo</a> on MySpace.  It's a refreshingly un-self-indulgent photo that is heartening to see in this time of the splashy <a href="http://gawker.com/5003102/giving-you-baby-max-for-15m">money-making</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/5032664/the-most-expensive-cover-in-history">high gloss</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/384177/jennifer-lopez-wants-more-money--i-mean-children--i-mean-children-money">celebrity baby industry.</a>  Maybe it represents a new era? 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5060139/minnie-driver--baby-business-innovator" title="Click here to read more about Minnie Driver:  Baby Business Innovator">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5060139/minnie-driver--baby-business-innovator]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5060139]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity-industrial complex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Babies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Minnie Driver]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:42:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5060139&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Letterman Rants, Ivens Leaves]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<font color="#990000">&diams;&nbsp; </font><a href="http://cityfile.com/profiles/david-letterman" class="profile-link">David Letterman</a> ripped into John McCain once again last night, which he'll probably continue to do as long as he gets this much attention for it. [<a href="http://nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-McCain-Letterman.html">NYT</a>]<font color="#990000"></font>				<a href="http://gawker.com/502110/letterman-rants-ivens-leaves" title="Click here to read more about Letterman Rants, Ivens Leaves">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/502110/letterman-rants-ivens-leaves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-502110]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brigitte Quinn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cityfile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Faber]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mpa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Page Hopkins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sarah Ivens]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityfile]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=502110&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shuter Ankles OK!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Shuter Ankles OK!" href="http://gawker.com/ok%21/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ok!</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Shuter Ankles OK!" href="http://gawker.com/5049300/shuter-ankles-ok" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Shuter Ankles OK!" alt="Click here to read Shuter Ankles OK!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/09/shuter.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				We just heard&mdash;and <a href="http://www.jossip.com/rob-shuter-axed-from-ok-by-kent-brownridge-20080912/">Jossip confirms!</a>&mdash;that exec editor Rob Shuter is OUT at OK!(.) He says "resigned," we hear "fired." Shuter was the hated lying flack who we accused of <a href="http://gawker.com/5017549/the-creepy-brit-whos-destroying-the-honorable-craft-of-celebrity-journalism">destroying an honorable craft</a> when he ascended to head the celeb weekly. His <a href="http://gawker.com/5045430/creepy-ex+flack-is-a-magazine-role-model">"celebrity-fair"</a> style of coverage made his magazine the friendliest and also least interesting of the tabs. <i>OK!'s</i> new GM, Kent Brownridge, is probably behind the shake-up. Also: we were told former <i>Daily Newser</i>  Laura Schreffler got canned too. Can anyone confirm?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5049300/shuter-ankles-ok" title="Click here to read more about Shuter Ankles OK!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5049300/shuter-ankles-ok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5049300]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rob Shuter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:38:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5049300&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[People Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?" href="http://gawker.com/brangelina/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">brangelina</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?" href="http://gawker.com/5031483/people-wins-brangelina-baby-pics" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/brangelina2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>People</em> magazine has won the heated bidding war for the new Brangelina baby pictures, according to a report (unconfirmed, so far) on<a href="http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/07/29/brad-angelina-twins-people-magazine/"> JustJared.com</a>, who puts the winning bid at "between $10 million and $15 million." Rumors of a <a href="http://gawker.com/5012556/angelina-jolies-secret-15-million-birth">$15 million payday </a>for the tot photos surfaced almost two months ago. <em>People</em> was <a href="http://gawker.com/5025548/brangelina-baby-shoot-booked-even-before-bidding-complete">bidding against</a> <em>OK!</em>—where publisher Richard Desmond was reportedly so determined to land the rights that he was <a href="http://gawker.com/5025548/brangelina-baby-shoot-booked-even-before-bidding-complete">leading the negotiations personally</a>. If People really walked away the victor here, they will have succeeded in staving off (temporarily) <em>OK!</em>'s ominous ambition to <a href="http://gawker.com/5023528/is-ok-cornering-the-baby-picture-market">corner the baby picture market</a>. [<a href="http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/07/29/brad-angelina-twins-people-magazine/">JustJared</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5031483/people-wins-brangelina-baby-pics" title="Click here to read more about People Wins Brangelina Baby Pics?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5031483/people-wins-brangelina-baby-pics]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5031483]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Brangelina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[baby pictures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:58:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5031483&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete" href="http://gawker.com/brangelina/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">brangelina</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete" href="http://gawker.com/5025548/brangelina-baby-shoot-booked-even-before-bidding-complete" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete" alt="Click here to read Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/brangelina.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Brangelina spawn photo war update! We hear that Getty is scheduled to do the photo shoot of Angelina Jolie's new twins on Monday. Knox and Vivienne are officially entering the celebrity media machine, and it's about time! The twist, of course, is that the bidding war between <em>OK!</em> and <em>People</em> for the rights to the photos is still ongoing. The price was hovering between $11 and $12 million <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/gossip-roundup/?i=5025255&t=jay-leno-hints-at-abc-gig">this morning,</a> and we hear it hasn't been decided yet. We know you are <em>dying</em> to know who will walk away the victor. A speculative look, and a guess:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5025548/brangelina-baby-shoot-booked-even-before-bidding-complete" title="Click here to read more about Brangelina Baby Shoot Booked Even Before Bidding Complete">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5025548/brangelina-baby-shoot-booked-even-before-bidding-complete]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5025548]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Brangelina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity weeklies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[baby pictures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bidding Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:47:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5025548&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Desperate Lohan Selling Gay Story?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				
"Insiders told <em>Page Six</em> that Lohan and OK! are in talks to do a cover where Lohan 'comes out' about her relationship with gal pal Samantha Ronson, and the mag has offered her "around $1 million to do the cover." [<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06022008/gossip/pagesix/lohan__not_ok_113581.htm">Post</a>]
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5012203/desperate-lohan-selling-gay-story" title="Click here to read more about Desperate Lohan Selling Gay Story?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5012203/desperate-lohan-selling-gay-story]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5012203]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[they gays]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:18:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Tate]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5012203&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls" href="http://gawker.com/new-gossip-girl/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">newgossipgirl</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls" href="http://gawker.com/305579/courtney-hazlett-to-be-the-new-jeannette-walls" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls" alt="Click here to read Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/10/small_courtney.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Gossip gal Courtney Hazlett left <i>OK!</i> magazine last week, we heard, but we didn't know where she was off to. Now we hear she's going to MSNBC, to replace their long-missing gossip columnist Jeannette Walls&mdash;Jeannette stopped writing their "Scoop" column more than a year ago to become a fulltime authoress. Hazlett (fun fact: once upon a time an intern for The Smoking Gun, while she was at Columbia!) will also continue her T.V. talking-headness.				<a href="http://gawker.com/305579/courtney-hazlett-to-be-the-new-jeannette-walls" title="Click here to read more about Courtney Hazlett To Be The New Jeannette Walls">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/305579/courtney-hazlett-to-be-the-new-jeannette-walls]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-305579]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[new gossip girl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[courtney hazlett]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Msnbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:10:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choire]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=305579&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her" href="http://gawker.com/washed-up/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">washedup</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her" href="http://gawker.com/293215/everybody-talks-about-lindsay-lohan-but-nobody-does-anything-about-her" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her" alt="Click here to read Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/08/small_lilookevans.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Why, look here! It's celebrated navigator Lindsay Lohan reading our old pal Bill Evans' meteorological disaster epic <a href=http://gawker.com/news/weather/bill-evans-fortells-our-watery-doom-288727.php><i>Category 7</i></a> in the pages of <i>OK!</i> magazine! Apparently, Lindsay thinks "the people you meet in weather are very inspiring." Uh, whatever the fuck that means! Anyway, if Linds plans hasn't finished the book yet, she might want to bring it along for her upcoming seven-minute jail stint. We hear the people that you meet in prison are very inspiring as well!				<a href="http://gawker.com/293215/everybody-talks-about-lindsay-lohan-but-nobody-does-anything-about-her" title="Click here to read more about Everybody Talks About Lindsay Lohan, But Nobody Does Anything About Her">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/293215/everybody-talks-about-lindsay-lohan-but-nobody-does-anything-about-her]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-293215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[washed up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[also probably a fake photoshop job sent around by bill evans!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill evans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gawker's most news-free day ever!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:00:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=293215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&ntilde;ol]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&amp;ntilde;ol" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&amp;ntilde;ol" href="http://gawker.com/238033/media-bubble-radar-now-en-espaol" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&amp;ntilde;ol" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&amp;ntilde;ol" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/02/small_Photo_021907_002.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<i><small>The scene at Penn Station, where </i>Radar<i> sits alongside </i>Mujer</i>. Many Spanish-speakers are concerned about the heterosexuality of their babies, so this may be a savvy move.</i></small>				<a href="http://gawker.com/238033/media-bubble-radar-now-en-espaol" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: 'Radar' Now En Espa&ntilde;ol">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/238033/media-bubble-radar-now-en-espaol]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-238033]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[louise mcbain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sirius]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Xm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:56:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=238033&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?" href="http://gawker.com/rob-shuter/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">robshuter</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?" href="http://gawker.com/216732/irresponsible-rumormongering-everything-ok-with-rob-shuter" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?" alt="Click here to read Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/11/small_shut.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's the day before Thanksgiving, so we're damned if we're going to bother to do, you know, any real reporting on this one, but a well-placed source tells us that <A href= http://www.gawker.com/news/publicists/rob-shuter-reduced-to-stealing-loaves-of-bread-199334.php>former Jessica Simpson flack Rob Shuter</a> "has been consulting for [marginally less sophisticated <i>InTouch</i> celeb weekly] <i>OK!</i>." We've no idea if the rumor is true, but the current issue includes the following item: <blockquote> It's been a year since Jessica Simpson's split from ex-husband Nick Lachey, and the 26-year-old doesn't seem to be reveling in her singledom. She's been avoiding the party scene. According to several reports, it's because the singer is depressed over her current life status. Her latest album didn't make much of a dent on the pop scene, and her love life has stalled. Jessica also doesn't have a lot of close friends. The short list includes her wardrobe and hair stylists Jessica Paster and Ken Paves, her sister Ashlee and her pet pooch Daisy. "Nothing is lifting her spirits," a source tells OK!..</blockquote> so, uh, not unlikely. Confirm or deny <A href=mailto:tips@gawker.com>here.</a>				<a href="http://gawker.com/216732/irresponsible-rumormongering-everything-ok-with-rob-shuter" title="Click here to read more about Irresponsible Rumormongering: Everything 'OK' With Rob Shuter?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/216732/irresponsible-rumormongering-everything-ok-with-rob-shuter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-216732]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Rob Shuter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jessica Simpson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:35:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=216732&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Law Lords" to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &quot;Law Lords&quot; to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids" href="http://gawker.com/international/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">international</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &quot;Law Lords&quot; to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids" href="http://gawker.com/216351/law-lords-to-adjudicate-dueling-brit-tabloids" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &quot;Law Lords&quot; to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids" alt="Click here to read &quot;Law Lords&quot; to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/11/small_hello vs ok catherine zeta jones.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				For the 2000 wedding of Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas, British tabloid <em>OK!</em> had an exclusive contract with the Douglas-Jones enterprise to run dewy styled photos of the proceedings. Rival exclamatory publication <em>Hello!</em> scammed and ran their own photos, resulting in years of litigation between the two tabs. This week, the <a href="http://www.topix.net/content/ap/2455678865065208373739549493940662483552">dispute reached Britain's highest court</a> &mdash; a panel of "Law Lords" in the House of Lords. <em>OK!</em> claims business interference, <em>Hello! </em>claims the journalistic right to "spoil" its rival's scoop. Concerning a particularly unflattering <em>Hello!</em> shot of Douglas feeding her wedding cake, Zeta-Jones says, "I don't usually like my husband shoving a spoon down my throat to be photographed." Notice the key phrase "to be photographed" &mdash; Douglas can shove a spoon down her throat all he wants, long as it goes undocumented. So amusing that the highest British court has to waste its time with such frivolous celebrity tomfoolery. Silly foreigners! <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/money/supreme-court-dignifies-anna-nicoles-existence-170709.php">Oh, wait.</a>				<a href="http://gawker.com/216351/law-lords-to-adjudicate-dueling-brit-tabloids" title="Click here to read more about "Law Lords" to Adjudicate Dueling Brit Tabloids">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/216351/law-lords-to-adjudicate-dueling-brit-tabloids]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-216351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Catherine Zeta-Jones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hello!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Douglas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ok!]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:10:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Mohney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=216351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

