<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Op-ed]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/op-ed</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Op-ed]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New York Times Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section" href="http://gawker.com/internal-memos/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">internalmemos</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section" href="http://gawker.com/5764544/new-york-times-launches-inexplicable-reinvention-of-week-in-review-section" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/02/small_nytbuildinggetty.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyorktimes" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyorktimes" href="http://gawker.com/#!newyorktimes/">New York Times</a> </em>staffers just received the following exciting memo from editor <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billkeller" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billkeller" href="http://gawker.com/#!billkeller/">Bill Keller</a> and editorial page boss <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #andyrosenthal" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #andyrosenthal" href="http://gawker.com/#!andyrosenthal/">Andy Rosenthal</a>. The paper is reinventing the "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #weekinreview" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #weekinreview" href="http://gawker.com/#!weekinreview/">Week in Review</a>" section! We've read this memo twice, and it sounds to us like the new section will be... exactly like the current one? But maybe with more letters to the editor? See if you can spot what the fuss is about.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5764544/new-york-times-launches-inexplicable-reinvention-of-week-in-review-section" title="Click here to read more about New York Times Launches Inexplicable 'Reinvention' of Week in Review Section">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5764544/new-york-times-launches-inexplicable-reinvention-of-week-in-review-section]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5764544]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[internal memos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Andy Rosenthal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bill Keller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:21:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5764544&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?" href="http://gawker.com/5458215/free-publicity-who-do-we-help" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?" alt="Click here to read Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/01/custom_1264608946477_applebama.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>On messiah machine day, blogger <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #anildash" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #anildash" href="http://gawker.com/tag/anildash/">Anil Dash</a> wonders if all the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #freepublicity" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #freepublicity" href="http://gawker.com/tag/freepublicity/">free publicity</a> mustered by Apple's marketing machine might just be better directed at something else. This piece was <a href="http://dashes.com/anil/2010/01/free-publicity-who-do-we-help.html">originally published on his blog</a>.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5458215/free-publicity-who-do-we-help" title="Click here to read more about Free Publicity: Who Do We Help?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5458215/free-publicity-who-do-we-help]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5458215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anil Dash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flackery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[free publicity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:18:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anil Dash]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5458215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti" href="http://gawker.com/existentialism/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">existentialism</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti" href="http://gawker.com/5449865/obamas-camus+dy-moment-in-op+ed-on-haiti" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti" alt="Click here to read Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/01/albert_camus.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Obama's upcoming <em>Newsweek</em> editorial ("Why Haiti Matters") is online. Near the end: "In the aftermath of disaster, we are reminded that life can be unimaginably cruel....That "time and chance" happen to us all." He could've just ended it there. [<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/231131">Newsweek</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5449865/obamas-camus+dy-moment-in-op+ed-on-haiti" title="Click here to read more about Obama's Camus-dy Moment in Op-Ed on Haiti">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5449865/obamas-camus+dy-moment-in-op+ed-on-haiti]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5449865]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Existentialism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[At least it's not bono]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foster Kamer]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5449865&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Game Change Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Game Change&lt;/em&gt; Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Game Change&lt;/em&gt; Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt" href="http://gawker.com/5447356/game-change-authors-admit-they-were-trying-to-bait-palin-and-steve-schmidt" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Game Change&lt;/em&gt; Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Game Change&lt;/em&gt; Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/01/custom_1263407510892_gamechangecover.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Gross itchy scabs <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #markhalperin" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #markhalperin" href="http://gawker.com/tag/markhalperin/">Mark Halperin</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnheileman" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnheileman" href="http://gawker.com/tag/johnheileman/">John Heileman</a> want to sell books by setting up <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveschmidt" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveschmidt" href="http://gawker.com/tag/steveschmidt/">Steve Schmidt</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sarahpalin" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sarahpalin" href="http://gawker.com/tag/sarahpalin/">Sarah Palin</a> in a cage match, argues Wonkette founding editor and Gawker Media alumna <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #anamariecox" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #anamariecox" href="http://gawker.com/tag/anamariecox/">Ana Marie Cox</a> <a href="http://airamerica.com/theinsidestorywithanamariecox/blog/01-12-2010/time-columnists-egg-political-rivalry/?p=all">on her Air America Radio blog</a>.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5447356/game-change-authors-admit-they-were-trying-to-bait-palin-and-steve-schmidt" title="Click here to read more about Game Change Authors Admit They Were Trying to Bait Palin and Steve Schmidt">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5447356/game-change-authors-admit-they-were-trying-to-bait-palin-and-steve-schmidt]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5447356]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Air America Radio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ana Marie Cox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Heileman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mark Halperin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Steve Schmidt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:35:53 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ana Marie Cox]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5447356&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block" href="http://gawker.com/5440500/katie-roiphes-big-cock-block" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block" alt="Click here to read Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_b06928d3446a75771c5843155a3c2b7a.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>On Sunday Katie Roiphe published <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/books/review/Roiphe-t.html?ref=books&pagewanted=all">a big essay</a> (<a href="http://gawker.com/5439159/katie-roiphes-nyt-book-review-essay-on-sexuality-of-male-authors-condensed-into-40-words">and pink charts</a>) labeling this generation of male novelists "too cool for sex." Author Steve Almond replies <a href="http://therumpus.net/2010/01/katie-roiphe%E2%80%99s-big-cock-block/">in a piece first published on The Rumpus</a>, one of our favorite literary sites.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5440500/katie-roiphes-big-cock-block" title="Click here to read more about Katie Roiphe’s Big Cock Block">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5440500/katie-roiphes-big-cock-block]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5440500]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[katie roiphe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times Book Review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Steve pond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The rumpus]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:33:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Almond  :  The Rumpus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5440500&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem" href="http://gawker.com/5432233/malcolm-gladwells-stickiness-problem" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem" alt="Click here to read Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/12/gladwell.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>It's tough out there for science writers following in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #malcolmgladwell" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #malcolmgladwell" href="http://gawker.com/tag/malcolmgladwell/">Malcolm Gladwell</a>'s footsteps. Not because he's so good, but because he's so wrong. Here's a rant by author Jeff Wise, <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/extreme-fear/200912/gladwells-stickiness-problem">republished from</a></em><a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/extreme-fear/200912/gladwells-stickiness-problem"> Psychology Today</a><em>, on undoing Gladwell's damage to the facts</em>.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5432233/malcolm-gladwells-stickiness-problem" title="Click here to read more about Malcolm Gladwell's Stickiness Problem">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5432233/malcolm-gladwells-stickiness-problem]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5432233]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Gladwell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:20:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wise]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432233&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Washington Post Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention" href="http://gawker.com/excuses/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">excuses</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention" href="http://gawker.com/5423633/washington-post-explains-palin-op+ed-we-did-it-for-attention" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention" alt="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/12/custom_1260477331777_wapo.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<i>The Washington Post</i>, as we all know, <a href="http://gawker.com/5383303/the-washington-post-has-the-worst-opinion-section-in-america">has the worst opinion section in America.</a> The people who run it <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1004052650">don't understand all the fuss</a> about them running an op-ed by Sarah Palin on climate change!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5423633/washington-post-explains-palin-op+ed-we-did-it-for-attention" title="Click here to read more about Washington Post Explains Palin Op-Ed: We Did It For Attention">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5423633/washington-post-explains-palin-op+ed-we-did-it-for-attention]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5423633]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[excuses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editor & Publisher]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The washington post is just a terrible blog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:39:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423633&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Washington Post Has the Worst Opinion Section in America]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Has the Worst Opinion Section in America" href="http://gawker.com/newspapers/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">newspapers</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Has the Worst Opinion Section in America" href="http://gawker.com/5383303/the-washington-post-has-the-worst-opinion-section-in-america" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Has the Worst Opinion Section in America" alt="Click here to read The &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; Has the Worst Opinion Section in America" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_ea5d94fc8c75049ffa4d9f3c4a084b64.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				On the occasion of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/15/AR2009101502277.html">this wonderful op-ed</a> on how Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize is a violation of our nation's founding document, let us examine the recent crimes of the <i>Washington Post</i> opinion section.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5383303/the-washington-post-has-the-worst-opinion-section-in-america" title="Click here to read more about The Washington Post Has the Worst Opinion Section in America">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5383303/the-washington-post-has-the-worst-opinion-section-in-america]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5383303]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fred hiatt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nobel prize]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:36:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383303&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Of Grownups, Mascots and the New York Observer]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Of Grownups, Mascots and the &lt;em&gt;New York Observer&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Of Grownups, Mascots and the &lt;em&gt;New York Observer&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5324575/of-grownups-mascots-and-the-new-york-observer" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Of Grownups, Mascots and the &lt;em&gt;New York Observer&lt;/em&gt;" alt="Click here to read Of Grownups, Mascots and the &lt;em&gt;New York Observer&lt;/em&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/DSC_0065_02.JPG"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHAEL M. THOMAS" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHAEL M. THOMAS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/michael-m%27-thomas/">Michael M. Thomas</a> &mdash; who left the </em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW YORK OBSERVER" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW YORK OBSERVER" href="http://gawker.com/tag/new-york-observer/">New York Observer</a><em> after 22 years with a <a href="http://midaswatch1.blogspot.com/2009/07/it-looks-as-if-ny-observer-and-i-are.html">declaration that owner Jared Kushner "stands pretty much squarely on the side of those whom I consider the bad guys"</a> &mdash; reflects on the paper.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5324575/of-grownups-mascots-and-the-new-york-observer" title="Click here to read more about Of Grownups, Mascots and the New York Observer">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5324575/of-grownups-mascots-and-the-new-york-observer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5324575]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jared kushner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael m. thomas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Observer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael M. Thomas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5324575&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?" href="http://gawker.com/5316975/why-so-much-hand+wringing-over-techcrunchs-decision-to-publish-hacked-twitter-documents" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?" alt="Click here to read Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/custom_1247843838596_socrates.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>With nabobs still nattering about TechCrunch's decision to publish internal Twitter documents, copyright lawyer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEN SHEFFNER" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEN SHEFFNER" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ben-sheffner/">Ben Sheffner</a> reminds us that getting people to spill unauthorized info is commonly known as "journalism." Sheffner's post <a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/why-hand-wringing-over-techcrunchs.html">originally appeared on his blog, Copyrights & Campaigns</a>.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5316975/why-so-much-hand+wringing-over-techcrunchs-decision-to-publish-hacked-twitter-documents" title="Click here to read more about Why So Much Hand-Wringing Over TechCrunch's Decision to Publish 'Hacked' Twitter Documents?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5316975/why-so-much-hand+wringing-over-techcrunchs-decision-to-publish-hacked-twitter-documents]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5316975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ben sheffner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Techcrunch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:21:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Sheffner]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5316975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?" href="http://gawker.com/questions/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">questions</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?" href="http://gawker.com/5271253/why-wont-weiner-run-for-mayor" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?" alt="Click here to read Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/custom_1243522359642_84258918_01.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Because Mike Bloomberg has more money and name recognition, and you, like all New York Democrats, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/opinion/27aweiner.html">are scared to actually take him on</a> and end your comfortable career?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5271253/why-wont-weiner-run-for-mayor" title="Click here to read more about Why Won't Weiner Run for Mayor?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5271253/why-wont-weiner-run-for-mayor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5271253]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2009 09:55:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5271253&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Inside Fort Polio: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Inside &lt;em&gt;Fort Polio&lt;/em&gt;: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Inside &lt;em&gt;Fort Polio&lt;/em&gt;: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong" href="http://gawker.com/5229944/inside-fort-polio-a-former-staffer-on-what-went-wrong" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Inside &lt;em&gt;Fort Polio&lt;/em&gt;: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong" alt="Click here to read Inside &lt;em&gt;Fort Polio&lt;/em&gt;: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/04/fort_polio.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Paul Smalera, a </em>Portfolio<em> staff writer who was laid off before it shut down today, argues that it was hubris and an obstinate editor &mdash; not the economy &mdash; that doomed Conde Nast's business mag.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5229944/inside-fort-polio-a-former-staffer-on-what-went-wrong" title="Click here to read more about Inside Fort Polio: A Former Staffer on What Went Wrong">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5229944/inside-fort-polio-a-former-staffer-on-what-went-wrong]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5229944]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fort polio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Joanne Lipman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[post-mortem]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:47:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Smalera]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5229944&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cause of Death Determined for Print Media]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Cause of Death Determined for Print Media" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Cause of Death Determined for Print Media" href="http://gawker.com/5170088/cause-of-death-determined-for-print-media" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Cause of Death Determined for Print Media" alt="Click here to read Cause of Death Determined for Print Media" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/03/death_of_marat-400.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<i>Heart disease is the leading cause of death among humans. As Clay Shirky points out in his incisive piece <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/"></i>Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable</a><i>, an inability to adapt is what killed print. Coroner's report follows.</i>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5170088/cause-of-death-determined-for-print-media" title="Click here to read more about Cause of Death Determined for Print Media">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5170088/cause-of-death-determined-for-print-media]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5170088]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[print is dead]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:00:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clay Shirky]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5170088&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn'" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn'" href="http://gawker.com/5037849/roseanne-on-brangelina-vacuous-evil-spawn" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn'" alt="Click here to read Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/10848825_ori.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
Comedian Roseanne Barr took to her website yesterday and unloaded on <em>everyone</em>. Hey, it's fun! On Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie: "jon voight your evil spawn angelina jolie and her vacuous hubby brad pitt make about forty million dollars a year in violent psychopathic movies and give away three of it to starving children trying to look as if they give a fuck about humanity as they spit out more dunces that will consume more than their fair share and wreck the earth even more." And that's tepid compared with what she serves up for Voight himself, George Bush, John Edwards, and his former mistress Rielle Hunter.
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5037849/roseanne-on-brangelina-vacuous-evil-spawn" title="Click here to read more about Roseanne on Brangelina: 'Vacuous Evil Spawn'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5037849/roseanne-on-brangelina-vacuous-evil-spawn]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5037849]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brad PItt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jon Voight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roseanne barr]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:50:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian spiegelman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5037849&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!" href="http://gawker.com/5005700/there-is-only-one-way-to-repair-the-olympics-destroy-them" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!" alt="Click here to read There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/04/7f/4c/small_7f4c57482a9f9426b13f5b0982a58f44.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
With the exception of women's gymnastics, the Olympics have pretty much been a big bag of turds for the last forty years. Aside from the general boredom, there was the the massacre of hundreds of student protestors in Mexico City in 1968, the massacre of Israeli athletes in Munich in '72, our boycott of the Commies in 1980, the Commies' boycott of us (and Mary-Lou Retton!) in 1984, East German women, and now all this blah-blah-blah about Tibet. What to do? "There is only one way left to improve the Olympics: to permanently end them."  
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5005700/there-is-only-one-way-to-repair-the-olympics-destroy-them" title="Click here to read more about There is Only One Way to Repair the Olympics: Destroy Them!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5005700/there-is-only-one-way-to-repair-the-olympics-destroy-them]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5005700]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Filthy Hippies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:30:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian spiegelman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5005700&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks" href="http://gawker.com/op_ed/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks" href="http://gawker.com/5004775/dowd-screams-her-point-backtracks" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks" alt="Click here to read Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/03/7c/3f/small_7c3fbf7f2dcf6f6b9ae89e8304056497.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
<em>Times</em> columnist and walking self-parody <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/maureen-dowd/" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAUREEN DOWD" class="autolink" rel="nofollow">Maureen Dowd</a> insists today that "Democrats are trying to sneak up on Hillary, throw a burlap sack over her head, carry her off the field and stick her in a Saddam spider hole until after the Denver convention." Yep, the party is through with Senator <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/hillary-clinton/" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HILLARY CLINTON" class="autolink" rel="nofollow">Hillary Clinton</a>. "Democrats are coming around to the point Jay Rockefeller made 10 days ago after introducing Obama in West Virginia: 'Democrats always make a mistake by nominating people who know everything on earth there is to know about public policy. I introduced both Al Gore and John Kerry at their rallies. They knew all the policies, but people didn’t connect with them. You don’t get elected president if people don’t like you.'" Plus, the ladies of <em><a href="http://gawker.com/tag/the-view/" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE VIEW" class="autolink" rel="nofollow">The View</a></em> find Barack Obama "sexy," so surely the race is over.
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5004775/dowd-screams-her-point-backtracks" title="Click here to read more about Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004775/dowd-screams-her-point-backtracks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5004775]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nyt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The View]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:37:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian spiegelman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5004775&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges" href="http://gawker.com/new-york-times/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">newyorktimes</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges" href="http://gawker.com/5003362/a-legendary-newspaper-for-the-price-of-three-floating-fridges" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges" alt="Click here to read A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/02/d3/da/small_50f1b48aa5af67ae21664ce8c49c24d4.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
Newspaper people are impressed (and terrified) by the size of the stake that a pack of hedge funds has built up in the <em><a href="http://gawker.com/tag/new-york-times/" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW YORK TIMES" class="autolink" rel="nofollow">New York Times</a></em>. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/26/business/media/26times.html?ex=1361768400&amp;en=e35a04ac68142465&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">The 19% stake now controlled by Harbinger Capital and scary-sounding Firebrand Partners is now roughly equivalent to the ownership of the Sulzberger family</a>. Here's what's amazing: not that another great American media institution is (snore) at the mercy of ravening capitalists; but that the newspaper is so frakking cheap. 
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5003362/a-legendary-newspaper-for-the-price-of-three-floating-fridges" title="Click here to read more about A Legendary Newspaper For The Price Of Three Floating Fridges">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5003362/a-legendary-newspaper-for-the-price-of-three-floating-fridges]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5003362]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oped]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:48:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5003362&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media" href="http://gawker.com/oped/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media" href="http://gawker.com/5002794/why-microsoft+yahoo-would-be-bad-news-for-media" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media" alt="Click here to read Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/02/49/6d/small_496dfa0e070867553440437ab1f255fc.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
<a href="http://valleywag.com/tag/microsoft/yahoo">In internet land, everybody's very excited about the Redmond software giant's bid for Jerry Yang's languishing internet directory</a>. Where would a combination leave AOL? (Answer: without an obvious acquirer or partner.) What about the challenge to Google? (Finally, a competitor, financed by Microsoft's profits from its bloated operating system and office applications.) Most of the commentary is overblown. Fusing two mediocre internet units, Microsoft's MSN and Yahoo, will not magically produce a dynamic challenger to Google; merely, if business precedent is any guide, mediocrity on a greater scale. Unfortunately, the petrified traditional media companies don't know that. (They don't know anything really.) And that's why the creation of another internet behemoth would be so pernicious.
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5002794/why-microsoft+yahoo-would-be-bad-news-for-media" title="Click here to read more about Why Microsoft-Yahoo Would Be Bad News For Media">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5002794/why-microsoft+yahoo-would-be-bad-news-for-media]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5002794]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[oped]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barry Diller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jeffrey bewkes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sumner Redstone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:57:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5002794&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Career Advice For Barry Diller]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Career Advice For Barry Diller" href="http://gawker.com/oped/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oped</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Career Advice For Barry Diller" href="http://gawker.com/5002676/career-advice-for-barry-diller" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Career Advice For Barry Diller" alt="Click here to read Career Advice For Barry Diller" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_875416b4d2ea2daffaed25796b7c5d1a.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				What should Barry Diller do? The IAC boss is being hung, slowly, by <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/john-malone">his largest shareholder</a>. And for good reason: although online commerce and advertising is growing, the internet conglomerate has shrunk in value from $22bn to just over $7bn over five years. <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/barry-diller">Barry Diller's reputation as a canny businessman, built up over decades in the movie and TV business, is tarnished</a>. IAC has proven completely unable to build new businesses; and the New York group has had little success with the assets it bought. Let us count the fuckups.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5002676/career-advice-for-barry-diller" title="Click here to read more about Career Advice For Barry Diller">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5002676/career-advice-for-barry-diller]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5002676]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[oped]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barry Diller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[college humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Malone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:43:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5002676&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant" href="http://gawker.com/exclusive/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">exclusive</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant" href="http://gawker.com/217452/valleywag-benioff-a-petty-tyrant" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant" alt="Click here to read Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/34/2006/11/small_fatass.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				So, finally, the bottom of the story of the <a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/benioff">Wall Street Journal's clash with web billionaire Marc Benioff</a>. And it gets uglier. <a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/pui-wing%20tam">Pui-Wing Tam</a>, the Journal reporter who was investigating the Salesforce.com CEO's Hawaii getaway, was indeed detained, both by Benioff's construction crew and the police. Benioff told the police that she was a stalker. The detention may have been illegal. And Journal brass in New York decided to cut mention of the incident when the article about Benioff's Hawaii complex was published. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/217452/valleywag-benioff-a-petty-tyrant" title="Click here to read more about Valleywag: Benioff a petty tyrant">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/217452/valleywag-benioff-a-petty-tyrant]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-217452]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benioff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oped]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:58:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=217452&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

