I suppose it might have been implicit in your +2 points award, but if not, you neglected to give them an extra point for not only being married by the bride's father the priest, but also by an *Episcopal* priest.
The thing is, no one who is actually friends with the owner would do this. In restaurants where I am friends with the owner, I come in, wave to the waitstaff, walk through the kitchen, and hang out with my friend, the owner, in his office, assuming he's not working in the kitchen.
Actually, I thought that she was trying to say that they're rich but tacky... which goes along with living in McLean and owning a sleigh bed.
There would be a major family blowup which would be discussed for decades in the event that I got married and my father didn't get to invite his siblings (along with his nieces and nephews). Incomprehensible.
That, and you're plagiarizing from a letter-to-the-editor published in "The Economist."
The first 20-30 minutes with the handheld entertaining as a gimmick. After that I thought to myself, "Wait. You mean I have to sit through the entire movie like this?" That said, I'm sure it saved tons of money over having to do wide shots of the city that required lots of special effects. When everything is a close-in shot, it's all cheap.
I have found that I prefer the term "dis-engaged."
In that sense, it is only distinguished from the Washington Times in that it is free.