"Panicked and dispirited" . This is worthy of ruthless mockery by Mr. Tate.
Even if the story were true, what of it? "Suicidal" might be a font of mirth too.
Don't care a damn if I'm executed here, this particular item exulting in a young person being destroyed by gossip, with tinges of homophobia, is pretty fucking dreadful. Even if he did gay porn, don't know what makes you think this is newsworthy, and the nastiness is contemptible.
What I meant was that I read Jessa Crispin's "Blog of a Bookslut" daily, and frankly no, I don't often venture into Bookslut proper to read her in-depth book reviews, because frankly life is too short, and her salty snark is only enjoyable to me in small bites. And in those, she makes clear that her tastes aren't mine. Why she was a lone option for an American reviewer in this misguided botch of a poll escapes me.
I'm not aware of her qualifications to tell me what I might like, and in taste and temperament I can barely stand her sarcastic capsules on her blog. I was curious as to why someone like Jessa Crispin was an option for book reviews while oh, say, John Updike wasn't, and the peculiar skew towards British print publications for book reviews is hugely questionable.
Yes, do pick away at me for not noting Anthony Lane's nationality. Because I was meant to research and think out every random reviewer's life history before noting that most of the supremely arbitrary choices wrote for British newspapers.
I stand by what I said; the poll was laughably limited, hugely and mysteriously foreign press, Jessa Crispin is talented but not in anyone's top 5, and you have my hearty and sincere fuck-you.
Sorry to be harsh, but that poll was not very well-thought out.
Except that Carter joins Diller lately in the proprietor's pin-up pantheon of where he wants to be in 10 years, I think. Just mho. And fascinating, not at all wrong, not a bad thing to do.
Not really. But yeah, the Times plastering the girl on their front page today, above the fold iirc, and then declaring, "A Harsher Spotlight", as if there were any more harsh spotlight than the front of the Times- was mind-boggling.
Because the curious machinations behind this highly unusual Federal-level investigation , from the saintly Bush DOJ no less, is completely erased in the prurient, serious, absolutely serious need for all of us to see the girl who worried about being asked to do anal with Spitzer. The Times has done its civic duty today, getting to the bottom of the banal life of this girl who fretted about taking it in the ass. Well done, Pinch.
Meanwhile, the Wall St. firms who Spitzer was investigating, the ones who've effectively cratered the US economy with their subprime mortgage legerdemain, were literally popping the Champagne, celebrating his destruction.
But he's not a teen, and his gobbling, puppyish seeking of media attention..
there I go feeling sorry for him again. I don't know why. Oh yeah, the laughter.
He seems prickishly confident in his friendships with the Tinsleys, and seems to think that's the universe. And that no press is bad press. Dreadfully wrong, there.
It was widely reported at the time that she had been battling neighborhood boards because it was a landmarked building and she wanted drastic renovations. So she intentionally damaged the roof , let the elements in, to render it uninhabitable- destroyed.
She's kind of a creep.
I'd still do 'im though.
Sontag's son David Rieff is furious about those photos by the way; he thinks them exploitative and is said to loathe Liebovitz for taking them.
Ronn (Sick (sic)) Torossian
At least they saved "Ferocia will spray your eyes out" til faux-Tim came along.
MattGaymon, excellent job there.