It makes perfect sense that this guy would say "no, I'm not comfortable." Because the reason he stalked Travolta and took notes was so that he could sell the story later. Of course he didn't want to be PART of the story.
This is the absolute best one.
[www.youtube.com]
[www.youtube.com]
@talithaghetto: Stilted is the new hot.
He looks evil, and always has. So I'm not surprised by any of this.
I advocate a return to shallow judging of others. Lindsay Lohan looks like a skeevy tweaker. She is! The Pope looks evil. He turns out to be pretty bad! George W. Bush looks beady-eyed and dumb. On the money again! Cheney looks beady-eyed and like "Napoleon" from Animal Farm. Once more accurate!
This does not work, however, with Botox. That is why in today's world we are destined to get fooled.
@Sgt.Hatred: I see what you are saying - that the signals a woman gives off should be consistent.
HOWEVER.
The counterargument, once and always, is this: don't have sex with a woman who is so stumbling drunk that her judgment is compromised. We all know what drunk looks like, and what the limit of passing-out is, so it's not hard.
See how that works? Good judgment on BOTH parts? It's genius, really.
@Mackintosh-Toffee: Ha, it's okay. Why am I thinking that anyone with the screen name "that 70s dude" is not spending a lot of time getting play?
@Julia Allison: Thanks for the advice. If I take it, can I be just as pathetic as you? I suggest you get a conscience!
Oooh! Oh! I know! Pick me!
I hate Julia Allison because she is hateful. She is angry and bitter and in order to get back at her ex-boyfriend revealed that he had a psychiatric disorder, in public. It's not that she's famous, it's that she's famous despite being such a miserable, pathetic excuse for a human being. She's like the OJ Simpson of empty social bunnies, except she's convinced so many people that the glove doesn't fit.
@Matt Cherette: If they dress in matching clothes, their shared psychosis must make them adorable.
@ConnieMortadella aka Jzb2: The wax comes with the vajazzling. So her "stubble" is not even an hour old. She's not 9 years old, you know.
@registered: It's really an ad, rather than a trend. Always be wary if the "trend" has already been named by a company for financial purposes. Since Completely Bare had an ad describing "vajazzling," this is just a victory for their marketing folks.
@ConnieMortadella aka Jzb2: What offends you? The removal of hair from one's inner buttocks, or the price?
@aedude01003: I think I saw this movie. Are you Tracy Flick in Election?
The point is that not everyone in media who can't get a job is lazy or coasted through college. Many have media experience; nearly ALL worked on their goddamn "high school magazines," princess, and most were also editors of their college paper, not that that means shit for shit. Also, "communications (broadcast)" is not a real major taken seriously by most real-life prestigious media employers, so perhaps that's why you had to bust your butt to prove you had a brain.
Also, 2007 was three years ago. There wasn't a recession on then. THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.
The point, INSTEAD, is that the media industry AS A WHOLE, has fewer openings through which to appreciate the abilities of young people. And that these young people who DID NOT GRADUATE BEFORE THE RECESSION are going to be frustrated not because they are lazy and not because they coasted but SIMPLY BECAUSE they are looking for jobs at a time when THERE ARE NO JOBS.
Because you know what? I've had a long career in media and I've worked with a lot of lazy fuckers. Work ethic is really not an employment determinant.
For what it's worth, I would never hire someone like you, because you seem to lack basic social skills. Like empathy. And mathematical skills, like reading the unemployment rate.
@CJRWickedWitch: Harvard, MAYBE.
@Baroness: The bigger question is: how is this related to Rahm?
@Coldouglas: Apparently it will be someone named Julianna Smoot. Not of the Smoot-Hawley Smoots, I presume.
@heywhat: I think you're right about racism. But she also really got things wrong. This was a detail-oriented job and she is not a detail-oriented person. There's only so much you can delegate.
@thatgirlinnewyork: Cuomo was a would-be governor even before Spitzer. In fact, I bet it was Cuomo's people that took down Spitzer AND Bruno. Cuomo's gubernatorial ambitions have been a long time coming.
OMG, relax.
Richard Lawson, you are a keen observer of this show you hate.
The only thing I would add is that the judges keep saying that the girls are very strong this year. I...don't see it.
