@sweetpickles: here, here. not to mention that the author of this post has no idea what he is talking about, down to the basic details. check out this screenshot: [tinypic.com]
@MisterMuggles: Perhaps Andrew Belonsky, Richard Rushfield, and Brian Moylan would be eligible for some kind of group discount at the Gotham Writers' Workshop grammar intensive courses?
While we're all in a tizzy about errors that make it to print, maybe Gawker should decide between figure dashes, en dashes, and em dashes, 'cus this post is all over the place. See also: the second graf of the Annie Leibovitz piece. Maybe Foster should go the Alessandra route and get a personal copy editor?
@John Cook: It just didn't make much sense to me why you would publicize that you were trying to ambush someone. Why show your cards so early? When trying to surprise someone, maintaining the element of surprise seems more important than congratulating yourself for getting up and leaving your desk. That's what a reporter is supposed to do. Either way, congrats on getting this imbecile.
I'm going to respectfully disagree, but judging by the number of myspace and fox sports net references contained within, it will probably be on forever, because all is well if your network's corporate parent is getting theirs. watch out next season, when rupert murdoch is crowned prom queen and the kids compete to intern at the Weekly Standard.
did a mandate come down in gawker h.q. that all posts must begin with a patronizing explanation of a regular feature as if none of us had been to the site before?
@MikeyLikesTV: Yeah, what the hell was that about? I guess she picked it up at the White House fire sale this weekend. She seems to think an ugly, empty neon knapsack is the great visual aid to she needs prove her point about Bush's accomplishments. That Hasselbeck may finally be onto something!