<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Polls]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/polls</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Polls]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida" href="http://gawker.com/election-2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">election2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida" href="http://gawker.com/5881100/mitt-romney-shouldnt-get-excited-even-if-he-wins-florida" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida" alt="Click here to read Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_db680a6a8ff6c1efc3bec0ae7bf22ada.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				As Mitt Romney settles in to gloat over his inevitable victory in tonight's Florida primary, it is worth noting that he and the rest of the Republican candidates are still viewed as losers by an increasing number of Republican voters. A new <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/01/30/gop-voters-continue-to-give-field-subpar-ratings/?src=prc-headline">Pew Research poll</a> finds that the number of GOP voters who let out an annoyed sigh when you ask them about their crop of candidates is larger than even a few weeks ago:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5881100/mitt-romney-shouldnt-get-excited-even-if-he-wins-florida" title="Click here to read more about Mitt Romney Shouldn't Get Excited Even if He Wins Florida">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5881100/mitt-romney-shouldnt-get-excited-even-if-he-wins-florida]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5881100]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[florida primary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:24:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nell Jensen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5881100&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama" href="http://gawker.com/5879729/rick-perry-is-now-less-popular-in-texas-than-barack-obama" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama" alt="Click here to read Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_e97c05494b7a484d95f206c61a727931.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				How would Texans greet their three-term governor, their invincible hero, their great culture warrior, Rick Perry, upon return from his humiliating presidential run? <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/perry-watch/headlines/20120125-perrys-job-approval-plunges-after-failed-presidential-run-news-poll-shows.ece">With a giant thumb down.</a> Maybe they'll forget by 2014, when he runs for governor again.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5879729/rick-perry-is-now-less-popular-in-texas-than-barack-obama" title="Click here to read more about Rick Perry Is Now Less Popular in Texas Than Barack Obama">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5879729/rick-perry-is-now-less-popular-in-texas-than-barack-obama]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5879729]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:20:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5879729&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season" href="http://gawker.com/election-2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">election2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season" href="http://gawker.com/5872704/a-complete-peoples-history-of-the-iowa-presidential-campaign-season/gallery/" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season" alt="Click here to read A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_8afd2a0add78e3810efca32527280784.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Today is that great quadrennial celebration in American democracy: The eve of the day that our political system can completely stop caring about Iowa for another few years, aside from delivering the annual Christmas card of billions of dollars in useless farm subsidies. The Iowa caucuses, however, must be dealt with first, as Republican caucus-goers prepare to crown either Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, or Ron Paul as their new Harvest King tonight. How did things go so wrong? Let's go back and relive the crucial moments of this Iowa campaign season, together, by looking at some funny pictures and making dumb jokes. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5872704/a-complete-peoples-history-of-the-iowa-presidential-campaign-season/gallery/" title="Click here to read more about A Complete People's History of the Iowa Presidential Campaign Season">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5872704/a-complete-peoples-history-of-the-iowa-presidential-campaign-season/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5872704]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iowa caucuses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:13:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5872704&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule" href="http://gawker.com/5869392/newt-gingrichs-collapse-arrives-ahead-of-schedule" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule" alt="Click here to read Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_fb5204f04420007b3cff5a2c7c675629.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Alright, it was cute when Republican base trolled us with the Trump, Bachmann, Perry, and Cain surges and collapses (surglapses, we'll call them, or perhaps anti-boners), but throwing Newt Gingrich onto the heap of other Potemkin candidates after he was leading by 20 points everywhere like a week ago, this late in the process, is cruel.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5869392/newt-gingrichs-collapse-arrives-ahead-of-schedule" title="Click here to read more about Newt Gingrich's Collapse Arrives Ahead of Schedule">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5869392/newt-gingrichs-collapse-arrives-ahead-of-schedule]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5869392]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:23:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5869392&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" href="http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" alt="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_421c7320fea7b8a344a57393cc9f8f66.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Seems like it was only last week when we decided that we needed to come up with <a href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro">a new word for "bro."</a> What a journey it's been.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three" title="Click here to read more about A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5867350]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Biffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5867350&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" href="http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" alt="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_bde29c7ff66aab1b4445071bacc64667.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Yesterday we asked you, the professional etymologists that make up the vast bulk of the Gawker readership, <a href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro">to suggest a new word to replace "bro,"</a> so that we may be freed from the yoke of having to called people "bro," as we do now on a regular basis.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now" title="Click here to read more about A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5866714]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Men]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:55:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5866714&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally" href="http://gawker.com/5865606/republican-strategists-warn-against-attacking-obama-personally" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally" alt="Click here to read Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_bf64ed8c8197534554149bdd956e3dfb.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Being a carefree Republican gasbag isn't always as fun as it seems. All they want to do is call President Obama the worst names and insult his heritage. And yet personally attacking the president, as Republican strategists said in what was <i>supposed</i> to be a private conference call today, would seriously turn off the many swing voters needed to win a general election. Having to build majority coalitions on a national scale just takes the joy out of life, doesn't it?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5865606/republican-strategists-warn-against-attacking-obama-personally" title="Click here to read more about Republican Strategists Warn Against Attacking Obama Personally">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5865606/republican-strategists-warn-against-attacking-obama-personally]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5865606]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conference Calls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Thompson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rnc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:40:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5865606&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers" href="http://gawker.com/5865240/mitt-romney-reminds-voters-of-their-horrible-horrible-fathers" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers" alt="Click here to read Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_264464edcbaa22b6d3c581ea04069667.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				What flavor of eternal hatred for Mitt Romney are Republican primary voters trying out this week? He's not merely a liar, an opportunist, a socialist, and a member of the Utahan Space Jesus cult anymore. Now he's also the dad who went out for <a href="http://gawker.com/5861604/mitt-romney-is-impure-going-to-mormon-hell">cigarettes</a> and never came back, or did come back, only to ignore you.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5865240/mitt-romney-reminds-voters-of-their-horrible-horrible-fathers" title="Click here to read more about Mitt Romney Reminds Voters of Their Horrible, Horrible Fathers">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5865240/mitt-romney-reminds-voters-of-their-horrible-horrible-fathers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5865240]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[focus groups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:50:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5865240&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News" href="http://gawker.com/fox-news/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">foxnews</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News" href="http://gawker.com/5861733/poll-fox-news-viewers-less-informed-than-those-who-read-no-news" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News" alt="Click here to read Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_263ca502105992e3d6fd7f24e542da51.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Get this: Fox News is&mdash;gasp!&mdash;not all that informative, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's latest PublicMind poll.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5861733/poll-fox-news-viewers-less-informed-than-those-who-read-no-news" title="Click here to read more about Poll: Fox News Viewers Less Informed Than Those Who Read No News">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5861733/poll-fox-news-viewers-less-informed-than-those-who-read-no-news]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5861733]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Farleigh dickinson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:54:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TPM]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5861733&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special" href="http://gawker.com/patriotism/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">patriotism</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special" href="http://gawker.com/5860983/america+hating-americans-dont-think-americas-special" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special" alt="Click here to read America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_7f035c2ebdc5b6874717c334fcab1faf.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's been well proven that some of the most reliable haters of America <a href="http://gawker.com/5832662/americans-hate-america">are Americans ourselves</a>. We just can't stand this crappy place. Which should not be interpreted as meaning that we don't love this great nation. Or should it?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5860983/america+hating-americans-dont-think-americas-special" title="Click here to read more about America-Hating Americans Don't Think America's Special">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5860983/america+hating-americans-dont-think-americas-special]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5860983]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Patriotism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American exceptionalism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pessimism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Usa]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:15:41 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5860983&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes" href="http://gawker.com/5860557/voters-would-most-trust-newt-gingrich-with-our-nukes" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes" alt="Click here to read Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_3f1a80496679e703d6b3ba1257c22876.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Okay, I get that there aren't many good choices out there, but still: <em>Newt Gingrich</em> <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/11/16/fox_poll_gop_voters_rush_to_newt_trust_him_with_nukes.html">gets the most support in this Fox News poll asking,</a> "Which Republican presidential candidate would you trust MOST with nuclear weapons?" We're finished.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5860557/voters-would-most-trust-newt-gingrich-with-our-nukes" title="Click here to read more about Voters Would Most Trust Newt Gingrich With Our Nukes">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5860557/voters-would-most-trust-newt-gingrich-with-our-nukes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5860557]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nukes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:19:21 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5860557&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress" href="http://gawker.com/failed-state/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">failedstate</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress" href="http://gawker.com/5860272/the-irs-is-more-than-four-times-more-popular-than-congress" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress" alt="Click here to read The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_cf9695f8d91265ca9c181cdbfd5e0135.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Remember that old joke regarding Dick Cheney's 18% approval rating, about how there's a higher percentage of dentists who recommend chewing sugary gum than there is of Americans who approve of Dick Cheney? Now let's do a version of that with the 112th and current Congress, with its comical, dumpy rating of 9%.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5860272/the-irs-is-more-than-four-times-more-popular-than-congress" title="Click here to read more about The IRS Is More Than Four Times More Popular Than Congress">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5860272/the-irs-is-more-than-four-times-more-popular-than-congress]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5860272]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Failed state]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Approval Ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:10:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5860272&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading" href="http://gawker.com/5859326/newt-gingrich-is-now-leading" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading" alt="Click here to read Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_3fbc8721a227707da86007f2c9ab3b46.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Newt Gingrich is now in first place in <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls/status/136134244954152960">Public Policy Polling's monthly survey,</a> with 28% of the vote. CNN <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/14/cnn-poll-gingrich-soars-cain-drops/?hpt=hp_t1">shows him in second place,</a> trailing Mitt Romney by only two percentage points. <a href="http://gawker.com/5858702/the-newt-gingrich-surge-is-on">Fat Head has Made Good,</a> people.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5859326/newt-gingrich-is-now-leading" title="Click here to read more about Newt Gingrich Is Now Leading">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5859326/newt-gingrich-is-now-leading]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5859326]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Public policy polling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:23:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5859326&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Should America Steal From British English?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What Should America Steal From British English?" href="http://gawker.com/language/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">language</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What Should America Steal From British English?" href="http://gawker.com/5858806/what-should-america-steal-from-british-english" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What Should America Steal From British English?" alt="Click here to read What Should America Steal From British English?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_be7e09ed10e4181330d79d387f0720a0.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>The Economist</em> ran a fascinating (and popular) poll of British readers, asking which "Americanisms" they use. Many, it turns out, have taken to saying "apartment" instead of "flat" and "sidewalk" instead of "pavement." So let's flip it around: Which dreadful Americanisms would you trade for something from the mother country? <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5858806/what-should-america-steal-from-british-english" title="Click here to read more about What Should America Steal From British English?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5858806/what-should-america-steal-from-british-english]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5858806]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The brits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:22:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Tate]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5858806&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On" href="http://gawker.com/5858702/the-newt-gingrich-surge-is-on" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On" alt="Click here to read The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_20d4c8768818a75e13c3f1add4324c7b.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Around this time last week, <a href="http://gawker.com/5856456/herman-cain-is-indestructible">we gave the fickle Republican base voters 10 days</a> to start getting over this Herman Cain thing and commence with the "Gingrich Surge," "Newtmentum," "The Newtening," "Fat Head Makes Good" &mdash; whatever you prefer. With three days to go, it looks like they're complying. We were just screwing around. Oops!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5858702/the-newt-gingrich-surge-is-on" title="Click here to read more about The Newt Gingrich Surge Is On">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5858702/the-newt-gingrich-surge-is-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5858702]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Herman cain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:15:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5858702&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Herman Cain Is Indestructible]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Herman Cain Is Indestructible" href="http://gawker.com/herman-cain/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hermancain</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Herman Cain Is Indestructible" href="http://gawker.com/5856456/herman-cain-is-indestructible" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Herman Cain Is Indestructible" alt="Click here to read Herman Cain Is Indestructible" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_bec6992f31f0fcc12437b34cef73a585.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's a frustrating day for pundits! The political world just wants to see Herman Cain's rapid, painful demise, right now, so we can get on with the business of a "Gingrich surge," which can then be brought to its own rapid, painful demise, leading us to the eventual acceptance of Mitt Romney. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5856456/herman-cain-is-indestructible" title="Click here to read more about Herman Cain Is Indestructible">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5856456/herman-cain-is-indestructible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5856456]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Herman cain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:19:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5856456&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed" href="http://gawker.com/marijuana/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">marijuana</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed" href="http://gawker.com/5850707/record+high-50-percent-of-americans-support-legalizing-weed" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed" alt="Click here to read Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/10/small_marijuana.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				For the first time, more Americans <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/150149/Record-High-Americans-Favor-Legalizing-Marijuana.aspx">support legalizing marijuana</a> than oppose it. (Talk about a record "high"! Am I right?) The greatest support comes from liberals and people 18-29; the strongest opposition from the 65-and-up crowd. So just wait!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5850707/record+high-50-percent-of-americans-support-legalizing-weed" title="Click here to read more about Record-High 50 Percent of Americans Support Legalizing Weed">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5850707/record+high-50-percent-of-americans-support-legalizing-weed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5850707]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Marijuana]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:59:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Read]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5850707&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support" href="http://gawker.com/occupy-wall-street/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">occupywallstreet</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support" href="http://gawker.com/5850573/occupy-wall-street-has-new-york-citys-support" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support" alt="Click here to read Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/10/small_occupyws500_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1302.xml?ReleaseID=1662">Quinnipiac poll finds</a> that NYC voters "agree with the views of the Wall Street protesters" by a 67%-23% spread, while 87% say that it's "okay that they are protesting." Congratulations on not annoying everyone to death!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5850573/occupy-wall-street-has-new-york-citys-support" title="Click here to read more about Occupy Wall Street Has New York City's Support">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5850573/occupy-wall-street-has-new-york-citys-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5850573]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Quinnipiac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:45:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5850573&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?" href="http://gawker.com/5849197/how-in-the-world-is-herman-cain-on-top" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?" alt="Click here to read How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/10/small_1012_cain1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Yet another poll confirming Herman Cain's rise to the top of the presidential candidate pyramid has come out today. Public Policy Polling finds him securing 30% of the national primary vote in its monthly poll, a 22 percentage point gain from last month. What is going on here? <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5849197/how-in-the-world-is-herman-cain-on-top" title="Click here to read more about How in the World Is Herman Cain on Top?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5849197/how-in-the-world-is-herman-cain-on-top]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5849197]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[999]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Herman cain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:40:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5849197&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible" href="http://gawker.com/5845166/herman-cains-presidential-chances-becoming-slightly-more-plausible" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible" alt="Click here to read Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/09/small_hermancainarms_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Herman Cain has taken our and everyone else's snide <a href="http://gawker.com/5777931/pizza-man-makes-savory-gop-presidential-candidate">"pizza man for president"</a> jokes and stuffed them right in our fat faces! How? By having a week of political success, and at least briefly reaching the top tier of presidential candidates. He prefers to be called Sir President McWinning Pizza Man, now, please, thank you.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5845166/herman-cains-presidential-chances-becoming-slightly-more-plausible" title="Click here to read more about Herman Cain's Presidential Chances Becoming Slightly More Plausible">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5845166/herman-cains-presidential-chances-becoming-slightly-more-plausible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5845166]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Herman cain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:22:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5845166&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever" href="http://gawker.com/we.re-number-one/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">werenumberone</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever" href="http://gawker.com/5837652/america-is-the-coolest-declare-foreign-losers" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever" alt="Click here to read Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/09/small_shutterstock_55311256.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The people at Badoo, a social networking site largely used by non-Americans, asked some 30,000 users to rate the world's coolest nation, and guess what?  They chose America.  OF COURSE they did.  America wins, coolly! <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5837652/america-is-the-coolest-declare-foreign-losers" title="Click here to read more about Foreign Losers Declare America the Coolest Nation Ever">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5837652/america-is-the-coolest-declare-foreign-losers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5837652]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[We're number one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Badoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Coolness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:57:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5837652&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race" href="http://gawker.com/the-palins/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">thepalins</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race" href="http://gawker.com/5836989/republicans-really-dont-want-palin-to-enter-presidential-race" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race" alt="Click here to read Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/09/small_palinthumbs500_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Do Sarah Palin's visits to Iowa and New Hampshire this Labor Day weekend augur a presidential candidacy announcement in the near future? A whole <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/09/02/poll-republican-voters-say-palin-should-stay-out-of-race/">71% of Republican voters</a> sure as Hell hope not.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5836989/republicans-really-dont-want-palin-to-enter-presidential-race" title="Click here to read more about Republicans Really Don't Want Palin to Enter Presidential Race">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5836989/republicans-really-dont-want-palin-to-enter-presidential-race]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5836989]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[The Palins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:25:12 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5836989&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits" href="http://gawker.com/5834055/rick-perry-leads-every-national-poll-by-double-digits" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits" alt="Click here to read Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_perry081811_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				So far, at least, it seems like Texas Gov. Rick Perry made a fine last-minute decision to enter the presidential race. From our side, we applaud his magical ability to produce daily blog material. And for him, he's already leading every national poll! Now the question is whether he'll completely flop and go down in American political history as a grand failure, no big deal.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5834055/rick-perry-leads-every-national-poll-by-double-digits" title="Click here to read more about Rick Perry Leads Every National Poll by Double Digits">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5834055/rick-perry-leads-every-national-poll-by-double-digits]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5834055]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Public policy polling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rasmussen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:26:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5834055&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?" href="http://gawker.com/5833713/has-michele-bachmann-peaked" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?" alt="Click here to read Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_bachmann081911_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				There have been several chapters in the still-extremely-early 2012 presidential race. There was the time that Newt Gingrich's smarts and policy chops was going to shake up the contest. That <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/as-newt-implodes-democrats-pass-the-popcorn.php">ended</a>. There was the time Herman Cain's business acumen and tea party ties were going to be a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/05/us/politics/05cain.html?pagewanted=all">real factor in the race</a>. That <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=4891E0DB-932A-4563-8DD3-9155BA3F644C">didn't work out</a>. Then, of course, there was Donald Trump. Remember him?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5833713/has-michele-bachmann-peaked" title="Click here to read more about Has Michele Bachmann Peaked?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5833713/has-michele-bachmann-peaked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5833713]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:54:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TPM]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5833713&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama" href="http://gawker.com/5833615/supposedly-ignored-ron-paul-in-dead-heat-with-barack-obama" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama" alt="Click here to read Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_paulfair_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Have you, <a href="http://gawker.com/5833007/why-the-media-is-ignoring-ron-paul">too,</a> heard <a href="http://gawker.com/5831167/jon-stewart-why-is-the-media-ignoring-ron-paul?tag=ronpaul">Jon Stewart</a> and every other hand-wringer complaining about how the media "ignores" Ron Paul, the politician who's been covered extensively for four or five years despite being a cranky old man representing a narrow ideological strand of libertarian thought?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5833615/supposedly-ignored-ron-paul-in-dead-heat-with-barack-obama" title="Click here to read more about Supposedly 'Ignored' Ron Paul In Dead Heat With Barack Obama">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5833615/supposedly-ignored-ron-paul-in-dead-heat-with-barack-obama]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5833615]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Presidential Candidates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:28:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5833615&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul" href="http://gawker.com/5833007/why-the-media-is-ignoring-ron-paul" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul" alt="Click here to read Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_paulsmall.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's been clear for some time now that the media <a href="http://gawker.com/5831167/jon-stewart-why-is-the-media-ignoring-ron-paul">is ignoring Ron Paul</a>. Now it's a mathematical fact. Pew Research has crunched the numbers, and it turns out the media's giving less love to Ron Paul than to fellow presidential candidate Jon Huntsman.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5833007/why-the-media-is-ignoring-ron-paul" title="Click here to read more about Why the Media Is Ignoring Ron Paul">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5833007/why-the-media-is-ignoring-ron-paul]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5833007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jon huntsman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:52:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon K. Thorp]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5833007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Americans Hate America]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Americans Hate America" href="http://gawker.com/patriotism/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">patriotism</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Americans Hate America" href="http://gawker.com/5832662/americans-hate-america" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Americans Hate America" alt="Click here to read Americans Hate America" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_gallupusa.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Americans: what are they fed up with now? Mexicans? Thuggish pro athletes? All those potholes? Well, let's see, sez here... <em>America itself.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5832662/americans-hate-america" title="Click here to read more about Americans Hate America">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5832662/americans-hate-america]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5832662]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Patriotism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Usa]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:10:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5832662&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll" href="http://gawker.com/5830649/bachmann-wins-iowa-straw-poll" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll" alt="Click here to read Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_iowa.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Well holy prize-winning cow: Minnesota Congresswoman and <a href="http://gawker.com/5830447/the-sp-downgrade-was-basically-michele-bachmanns-fault">downgrade instigator</a> Michele Bachmann did it, she won the GOP straw poll in Iowa. Time to fry up your <a href="http://gawker.com/5829686/deep+fried-butter-on-a-stick-a-real-thing-you-can-eat-in-iowa">butter stix</a> and celebrate/beckon death's call! <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5830649/bachmann-wins-iowa-straw-poll" title="Click here to read more about Bachmann Wins Iowa Straw Poll">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5830649/bachmann-wins-iowa-straw-poll]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5830649]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[competitions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Herman cain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa State University]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iowa straw poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jon huntsman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marcus bachmann]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polidicks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Poll Results]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sliding dollar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Thaddeus McCotter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tim pawlenty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:30:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauri Apple]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5830649&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard" href="http://gawker.com/on-the-trail/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">onthetrail</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard" href="http://gawker.com/5829261/tim-pawlenty-is-still-trying-too-hard" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard" alt="Click here to read Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_timpawlenty_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Check out the rad flier that Timmy "Two Percent" Pawlenty has been <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/08/09/i_am_a_hunter_i_m_going_hunting_.html">handing out to supporters in Iowa.</a> He protects guns. He has protected guns! <i>He will continue to protect guns.</i> There he is in orange, even, with a gun, and cute gun mittens. Vote TPAW! Please? Ehh... no.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5829261/tim-pawlenty-is-still-trying-too-hard" title="Click here to read more about Tim Pawlenty Is Still Trying Too Hard">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5829261/tim-pawlenty-is-still-trying-too-hard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5829261]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[On the trail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tim pawlenty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:45:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5829261&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time" href="http://gawker.com/politics/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">politics</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time" href="http://gawker.com/5827969/this-is-americas-most+hated-congress-of-all-time" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time" alt="Click here to read This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_0804_boehner.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				This particular class of legislators is, we can all agree, <a href="http://gawker.com/5818729/members-of-congress-not-even-capable-of-casting-votes-correctly">an exceptionally stupid group of people</a>. But they are more than just stupid! They are also widely hated: A new poll has congress' disapproval rating at 82 percent&mdash;the lowest since the poll was first taken in 1977. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5827969/this-is-americas-most+hated-congress-of-all-time" title="Click here to read more about This Is America's Most-Hated Congress of All Time">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5827969/this-is-americas-most+hated-congress-of-all-time]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5827969]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Failed state]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[House Of Representatives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Legislative branch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polidicks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:34:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Read]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5827969&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now" href="http://gawker.com/the-president/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">thepresident</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now" href="http://gawker.com/5826013/president-obama-is-very-unpopular-right-now" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now" alt="Click here to read President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/07/small_obamaspeech_500.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				President Obama's approval rating in Gallup's three-day rolling average has <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/07/obama-hits-low-of-40-in-gallup-tracking-poll/1">fallen</a> to 40%, an all-time low for him. The American public can stomach many things, but <a href="http://www.examiner.com/reality-tv-in-fayetteville/president-obama-interrupted-the-bachelorette-last-night-photo">interrupting</a> <i>The Bachelorette</i> is not one of them.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5826013/president-obama-is-very-unpopular-right-now" title="Click here to read more about President Obama Is Very Unpopular Right Now">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5826013/president-obama-is-very-unpopular-right-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5826013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[the president]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Approval Ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:37:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5826013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching" href="http://gawker.com/media-roundup/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mediaroundup</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching" href="http://gawker.com/5824478/what-reporters-really-need-to-do-is-stop-snitching" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching" alt="Click here to read What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/07/small_stopsnitching.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In your balmy Monday media column: the ethics of getting journalistically blazed are debated, the WSJ yes-persons defend their hefty salaries, a Sudanese journalist is jailed, AOL's sales chief is out, the NYT chronicled, and no one trusts the media.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5824478/what-reporters-really-need-to-do-is-stop-snitching" title="Click here to read more about What Reporters Really Need to Do Is Stop Snitching">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5824478/what-reporters-really-need-to-do-is-stop-snitching]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5824478]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media Crack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters in peril]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:03:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5824478&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating" href="http://gawker.com/5823507/god-has-a-52-percent-approval-rating" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating" alt="Click here to read God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/07/small_sistine500_ss.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Public Policy Polling dove into the surreal with its latest survey, <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_721.pdf">asking voters,</a> "If God exists, do you approve or disapprove of its performance?" She&mdash;that's <b>she</b>&mdash;scores a 52% approval rating, with 9% disapproving.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5823507/god-has-a-52-percent-approval-rating" title="Click here to read more about God Has a 52 Percent Approval Rating">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5823507/god-has-a-52-percent-approval-rating]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5823507]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Approval Ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Public policy polling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:57:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5823507&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[America Is the Funniest Country in the World]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read America Is the Funniest Country in the World" href="http://gawker.com/usa-usa/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">usausa</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read America Is the Funniest Country in the World" href="http://gawker.com/5809958/america-is-the-funniest-country-in-the-world" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read America Is the Funniest Country in the World" alt="Click here to read America Is the Funniest Country in the World" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/06/small_shutterstock_78439168.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A recent online poll asked 30,000 thousand users of social networking site Badoo (so, not Americans basically) to pick the funniest and least funny countries from a list of fifteen, and the good old Red, White & Blue came out on top. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5809958/america-is-the-funniest-country-in-the-world" title="Click here to read more about America Is the Funniest Country in the World">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5809958/america-is-the-funniest-country-in-the-world]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5809958]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Usa usa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Badoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:05:09 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5809958&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate" href="http://gawker.com/5807467/jon-huntsman-the-zero-percent-candidate" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate" alt="Click here to read Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/06/small_huntsman500_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Former Ambassador to China and Utah Governor Jon Huntsman could do well against President Obama, head-to-head! But in a <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/ppp-poll-romney-starts-out-ahead-in-iowa-crowd.php">new poll of Iowa Republicans,</a> just <i>one</i> respondent out of 481 wants him to win the nomination. Maybe his cousin?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5807467/jon-huntsman-the-zero-percent-candidate" title="Click here to read more about Jon Huntsman, the Zero Percent Candidate">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5807467/jon-huntsman-the-zero-percent-candidate]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5807467]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jon huntsman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:12:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5807467&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most" href="http://gawker.com/5807254/doctor+assisted-suicide-is-the-issue-that-divides-us-most" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most" alt="Click here to read Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/06/small_assistedsuicide.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In these rapidly changing times, it's almost comforting to know that some issues can still divide the country right down the middle. Gallup has conducted its 2011 Values and Beliefs poll, which presented a sample of Americans with <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147842/Doctor-Assisted-Suicide-Moral-Issue-Dividing-Americans.aspx">17 controversial issues</a> facing the nation today &mdash; everything from "wearing fur" (56% find it morally acceptable vs. 39% thinking it's morally wrong) to "pornography" (30% vs. 66%) to "gay or lesbian relations" (like fur, also 56% vs. 39%) to "cloning humans" (12% vs. 84%). One topic, however, produced the least amount of public consensus, with just 3% separating the moral yays from the moral nays: "doctor-assisted suicide."				<a href="http://gawker.com/5807254/doctor+assisted-suicide-is-the-issue-that-divides-us-most" title="Click here to read more about Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the Issue That Divides Us Most">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5807254/doctor+assisted-suicide-is-the-issue-that-divides-us-most]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5807254]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[assisted suicide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Morals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:34:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Abramovitch]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5807254&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins" href="http://gawker.com/afterlife/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">afterlife</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins" href="http://gawker.com/5803665/fox-news-poll-most-americans-dont-think-osama-got-his-virgins" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins" alt="Click here to read Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/05/small_0519_osama.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				So which secret fairy-tale chamber in the skies or, alternately, below the earth's crust, is Osama bin Laden kickin' it in these days?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5803665/fox-news-poll-most-americans-dont-think-osama-got-his-virgins" title="Click here to read more about Fox News Poll: Most Americans Don't Think Osama Got His Virgins">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5803665/fox-news-poll-most-americans-dont-think-osama-got-his-virgins]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5803665]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Afterlife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[72 Virgins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jihad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 May 2011 17:03:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5803665&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost" href="http://gawker.com/5800710/obama-still-enjoying-post+assassination-popularity-boost" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost" alt="Click here to read Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/05/small_barack_obama_birth_certificate_killing_osama_bin_laden.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The results of a new Associated Press-GfK poll are out, and President Obama's approval rating now stands at 60 percent &mdash; his highest mark in two years (attributed mainly to the return of independent voters and the capping of Osama bin Laden). Good news for Barack Obama! His standing also improved on national security, with 73 percent saying they trust him to handle the threat of terrorism. Meanwhile, we still get to enjoy that <a href="http://gawker.com/5800509/bin-ladens-dead-but-the-war-on-terror-expands">never ending clusterfuck</a> called the War on Terror and will continue to for some time. Yay, us.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5800710/obama-still-enjoying-post+assassination-popularity-boost" title="Click here to read more about Obama Still Enjoying Post-Assassination Popularity Boost">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5800710/obama-still-enjoying-post+assassination-popularity-boost]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5800710]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 May 2011 08:36:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Neumann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5800710&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over" href="http://gawker.com/2012/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">2012</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over" href="http://gawker.com/5800414/the-era-of-surprisingly-high-donald-trump-poll-numbers-is-over" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over" alt="Click here to read The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/05/small_trumpcpac_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Boorish heretical flap-jaw Donald Trump was regularly leading Republican presidential polls about this time last month, mostly by juicing up the birther segment of the GOP electorate. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5800414/the-era-of-surprisingly-high-donald-trump-poll-numbers-is-over" title="Click here to read more about The Era of Surprisingly High Donald Trump Poll Numbers is Over">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5800414/the-era-of-surprisingly-high-donald-trump-poll-numbers-is-over]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5800414]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Public policy polling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 May 2011 12:39:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5800414&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Birthers Do Respond to Hard Evidence]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Birthers &lt;i&gt;Do&lt;/i&gt; Respond to Hard Evidence" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Birthers &lt;i&gt;Do&lt;/i&gt; Respond to Hard Evidence" href="http://gawker.com/5799008/birthers-do-respond-to-hard-evidence" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Birthers &lt;i&gt;Do&lt;/i&gt; Respond to Hard Evidence" alt="Click here to read Birthers &lt;i&gt;Do&lt;/i&gt; Respond to Hard Evidence" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/05/small_birthcertificate_ap.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Some considered President Obama's decision to release his birth certificate last week a fool's errand, since those who didn't think he was born in the United States wouldn't ever respond to more definitive evidence. It still may have been a silly argument to engage &mdash; that press conference of him showing his papers will always seem beyond surreal, if not plain depressing. But now a whole 70 percent of Americans believe he was born in Hawaii! You know what that means: This issue is coming dangerously close to something that we'll never have to write about again.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5799008/birthers-do-respond-to-hard-evidence" title="Click here to read more about Birthers Do Respond to Hard Evidence">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5799008/birthers-do-respond-to-hard-evidence]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5799008]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[birth certificate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 May 2011 14:35:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5799008&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

