<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Star]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/star</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Star]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt; to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie" href="http://gawker.com/lawsuits/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">lawsuits</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt; to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie" href="http://gawker.com/5796299/star-to-katie-holmes-sorry-for-calling-you-a-drug+addicted-zombie" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt; to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie" alt="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt; to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/04/small_holmes.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Katie Holmes' <a href="www.thewrap.com/media/article/exclusive-katie-holmes-sue-american-media-50-million-25131">$50 million libel lawsuit</a> against <i>Star</i> magazine has ended. In today's issue, <i>Star</i> apologized for a January story about how Tom Cruise and Scientology control Katie. <i>Star</i> says it "did not intend to suggest that Ms. Holmes was a drug addict or was undergoing treatment for a drug addiction." And <em>Star</em>'s parent company, American Media, has made an "substantial donation" to an undisclosed charity in Katie's name.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5796299/star-to-katie-holmes-sorry-for-calling-you-a-drug+addicted-zombie" title="Click here to read more about Star to Katie Holmes: Sorry for Calling You a Drug-Addicted Zombie">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5796299/star-to-katie-holmes-sorry-for-calling-you-a-drug+addicted-zombie]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5796299]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[american media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Katie Holmes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:40:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5796299&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pecker-Loving Star Editor Fired by Pecker]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Pecker-Loving &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt; Editor Fired by Pecker" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Pecker-Loving &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt; Editor Fired by Pecker" href="http://gawker.com/5791580/pecker+loving-star-editor-fired-by-pecker" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Pecker-Loving &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt; Editor Fired by Pecker" alt="Click here to read Pecker-Loving &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt; Editor Fired by Pecker" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/04/small_trunzogetty.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Earlier this year, we heard<a href="http://gawker.com/#!5732783/is-a-revolt-brewing-at-ami"> rumors of a revolt</a> brewing among dissatisfied employees at AMI, publisher of <em>Star</em> and <em>The National Enquirer</em>. This prompted every last AMI editor and executive <a href="http://gawker.com/#!ami/5733925">to email us</a>, insisting in the most strenuous terms that AMI is just fine! For example, <em>Star</em> editor Candace Trunzo (pictured, at left) <a href="http://gawker.com/#!ami/5733925">wrote</a>, "What revolt? This is a crock! Your source clearly has an axe to grind. At Star, we are committed to the magazine, AMI and most especially David. He is a superb leader!"				<a href="http://gawker.com/5791580/pecker+loving-star-editor-fired-by-pecker" title="Click here to read more about Pecker-Loving Star Editor Fired by Pecker">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5791580/pecker+loving-star-editor-fired-by-pecker]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5791580]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[candace trunzo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Pecker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:46:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5791580&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jake Tapper Is King of Television]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Jake Tapper Is King of Television" href="http://gawker.com/media-crack/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mediacrack</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Jake Tapper Is King of Television" href="http://gawker.com/5726669/jake-tapper-is-king-of-television" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Jake Tapper Is King of Television" alt="Click here to read Jake Tapper Is King of Television" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/01/small_tapper.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In your congratulatory Thursday media column: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jaketapper" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jaketapper" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jaketapper/">Jake Tapper</a> wins the Game of TeeVee, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newscorp" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newscorp" href="http://gawker.com/tag/newscorp/">News Corp</a> cleans up its UK tabloid, Star and the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nationalenquirer" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nationalenquirer" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nationalenquirer/">National Enquirer</a> merge newsrooms, a new <em>Newsweek</em> publisher, and a new job for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #helenthomas" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #helenthomas" href="http://gawker.com/tag/helenthomas/">Helen Thomas</a>.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5726669/jake-tapper-is-king-of-television" title="Click here to read more about Jake Tapper Is King of Television">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5726669/jake-tapper-is-king-of-television]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5726669]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media Crack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Helen Thomas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[National Enquirer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The daily beast]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:39:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5726669&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition" href="http://gawker.com/update/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">update</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition" href="http://gawker.com/5703746/the-mysterious-case-of-britneys-black-eye-falsified-audio-edition" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition" alt="Click here to read The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/12/small_britney2.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Today <i>Star</i> <a href="http://www.starmagazine.com/britney_spears_abuse/news/17638">reported</a> that Britney Spears' ex-husband Jason Alexander had a phone conversation about current boyfriend Jason Trawick "beat on me." Hours later, Radar <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/12/world-exclusive-audio-britney-spears-my-boyfriend-beat-me#audio">published audio</a> of the alleged conversation. But Britney's lawyers <a href="http://www.accesshollywood.com/manager-audio-recording-is-100-percent-not-britney-spears_article_40494">say it's all a fake</a>.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5703746/the-mysterious-case-of-britneys-black-eye-falsified-audio-edition" title="Click here to read more about The Mysterious Case of Britney's Black Eye: Falsified Audio Edition">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5703746/the-mysterious-case-of-britneys-black-eye-falsified-audio-edition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5703746]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Billy Bush]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jason Alexander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[larry rudolph]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Radaronline]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:48:41 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5703746&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment" href="http://gawker.com/chat-%c3%a0-trois/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">chatatrois</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment" href="http://gawker.com/5341088/the-mcsteamy-naked-threesome-gets-the-celebrity-weekly-treatment/gallery/" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment" alt="Click here to read The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_4d9fc7529cd2fc23a477c0bd64771e34.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				All the tabloids threw something together on deadline after our tape of Eric Dane, Rebecca Gayheart, and Kari Ann Peniche went up. So many questions: Will their marriage survive? Who is the other woman? And just who wore it better?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5341088/the-mcsteamy-naked-threesome-gets-the-celebrity-weekly-treatment/gallery/" title="Click here to read more about The McSteamy Naked Threesome Gets the Celebrity Weekly Treatment">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5341088/the-mcsteamy-naked-threesome-gets-the-celebrity-weekly-treatment/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5341088]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Chat à Trois]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Defamer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Eric Dane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[In Touch Weekly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kari ann peniche]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Life & Style]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Gayheart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:16:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341088&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet" href="http://gawker.com/oh-mom/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ohmom</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet" href="http://gawker.com/5194290/michael-phelps-mom-gives-book-excerpt-to-enemy-news-outlet" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet" alt="Click here to read Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/04/phelps.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Hold on to your <a href="http://gawker.com/5044772/michael-phelps-mom-has-her-own-frumpy-endorsement-deal">frumpy Chico's fashions</a>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHAEL PHELPS" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHAEL PHELPS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/michael-phelps/">Michael Phelps</a>' mom has written a tell-all book! <em>Star</em> has an <a href="http://www.starmagazine.com/debbie_phelps_book/news/15428">exclusive excerpt</a>. Can you guess why that fact alone is very, very strange?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5194290/michael-phelps-mom-gives-book-excerpt-to-enemy-news-outlet" title="Click here to read more about Michael Phelps' Mom Gives Book Excerpt to Enemy News Outlet">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5194290/michael-phelps-mom-gives-book-excerpt-to-enemy-news-outlet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5194290]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Oh Mom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Athletes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Phelps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Money Matters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:04:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5194290&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over" href="http://gawker.com/wasilla%2c-alaska/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wasillaalaska</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over" href="http://gawker.com/5168150/apparently-the-levi-johnstonbristol-palin-love-affair-is-over" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over" alt="Click here to read Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_LeviJoshnston2_200.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In this week's <i>Star:</i> <a href="http://www.starmagazine.com/news/15341?cid=RSS">hilarious and slightly depressing "gossip"</a> from Levi Johnston's bitchy, MySpace-y sister Mercede! Do you care about the petty dramas of unwed teen parents in far-off Alaska?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5168150/apparently-the-levi-johnstonbristol-palin-love-affair-is-over" title="Click here to read more about Apparently the Levi Johnston/Bristol Palin Love Affair Is Over">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5168150/apparently-the-levi-johnstonbristol-palin-love-affair-is-over]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5168150]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wasilla, Alaska]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bristol palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hillbillies of wasilla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Levi Johnston]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:23:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168150&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ben Widdicombe Out at Star? (Yes)]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Ben Widdicombe Out at &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt;? (Yes)" href="http://gawker.com/rumormonger/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">rumormonger</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Ben Widdicombe Out at &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt;? (Yes)" href="http://gawker.com/5138784/ben-widdicombe-out-at-star-yes" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Ben Widdicombe Out at &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt;? (Yes)" alt="Click here to read Ben Widdicombe Out at &lt;em&gt;Star&lt;/em&gt;? (Yes)" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/01/widdicombe2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEN WIDDICOMBE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEN WIDDICOMBE" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ben-widdicombe/">Ben Widdicombe</a> <a href="http://gawker.com/5007053/ben-widdicombe-will-gossip-no-more">wrote his last Gatecrasher column</a> for the <em>Daily News</em> last April. Three months later, he replaced Julia Allison as <em>Star</em>'s gossip maven. Is he already leaving? [UPDATED BELOW: Yes.]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5138784/ben-widdicombe-out-at-star-yes" title="Click here to read more about Ben Widdicombe Out at Star? (Yes)">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5138784/ben-widdicombe-out-at-star-yes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5138784]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ben Widdicombe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gatecrasher]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5138784&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits Star]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/rumormonger/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">rumormonger</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5125968/celeb+mag-contagion-hits-star" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" alt="Click here to read Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/01/56756.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Anyone know about the purported layoffs at <em>Star</em>? A tipster tells us the second-tier celebrity magazine is firing a "bunch of people."				<a href="http://gawker.com/5125968/celeb+mag-contagion-hits-star" title="Click here to read more about Celeb-Mag Contagion Hits Star">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5125968/celeb+mag-contagion-hits-star]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5125968]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity-industrial complex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magagzines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Recessionomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:13:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Tate]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5125968&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage" href="http://gawker.com/sad-things/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sadthings</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage" href="http://gawker.com/5070511/grading-the-celebrity-glossies-jennifer-hudson-coverage" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage" alt="Click here to read Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/Picture_1_14.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Yesterday we took a look at the celebrity glossies' websites, to get a sense of how this weeks issues <a href="http://gawker.com/5070046/handicapping-how-the-gossip-glossies-will-cover-jennifer-hudsons-family-tragedy">would cover the Jennifer Hudson story.</a>  <em>People</em> and <em>Us Weekly</em> seemed like they planned to devote the most space reporting on the murders of the singer/actress's mother, brother, and nephew.  And, sure enough, they were the only two to run the story as the <a href="http://www.jossip.com/jennifer-hudsons-family-tragedy-pushed-madonnas-divorce-off-the-radar-20081029/">main image on their covers.</a>  But what's inside? 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5070511/grading-the-celebrity-glossies-jennifer-hudson-coverage" title="Click here to read more about Grading The Celebrity Glossies' Jennifer Hudson Coverage">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5070511/grading-the-celebrity-glossies-jennifer-hudson-coverage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5070511]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sad things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[InTouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jennifer hudson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:04:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5070511&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
Attack of the Clones: The fleeting chance...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read " href="http://gawker.com/star-wars/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">starwars</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read " href="http://gawker.com/5056636/" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read " alt="Click here to read " src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2008/09/vader_google_maps.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<i><a href="http://defamer.com/5056636/">Attack of the Clones</a></i>: The fleeting chance at tourist-snapshot immortality is enough to roil most of the costumed geeks outside Mann's Chinese from their Yoda jammies in the morning. But Google Maps immortality is nothing less than the Force itself at work &mdash; the Dark Side specifically, which commanded Darth Vader from <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=manns+chinese&sll=34.102841,-118.33919&sspn=0.006814,0.011963&layer=c&ie=UTF8&ll=34.102841,-118.339298&spn=0.006814,0.011963&z=17&cbll=34.101553,-118.341047&panoid=b3aOPzTDtg49IEZ_ZW6Q1g&cbp=1,23.23966899767464,,1,8.653013809164806">his Chinese perch</a> to <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?cbp=1,344.41778929735796,,0,13.112925749045557&cbll=34.101558,-118.34014&ll=34.101558,-118.34014&layer=c">a bit of stormtrooper recon</a> down the street at the Kodak Theater. A disapproving George Lucas's <a href="http://defamer.com/5035599/vengeful-george-lucas-crushes-critic-opposed-to-stinky-the-hutt">cease-and-desist letter</a> is no doubt on its way to Sergey Brin and Larry Page as we speak. [<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?cbp=1,344.41778929735796,,0,13.112925749045557&cbll=34.101558,-118.34014&ll=34.101558,-118.34014&layer=c">Google Maps</a> via /Film]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5056636/" title="Click here to read more about 
Attack of the Clones: The fleeting chance...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5056636/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5056636]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Darth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Defamer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maps"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vader]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[STV]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5056636&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money" href="http://gawker.com/bonnie-fuller/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bonniefuller</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money" href="http://gawker.com/397629/bonnie-fuller-can-never-get-enough-money" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money" alt="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/small_bonniefuller2-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/bonniefuller2.jpeg"></a>Bonnie Fuller was <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/bonnie-fuller/?i=397458&t=times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure">axed last month </a>from her job as editorial chief of American Media. But the company <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/126154">gave her $2.4 million in fiscal year 08</a>, which is 50% more than even CEO David Pecker got. And AMI, which is facing some serious financial challenges of its own, was planning a $2 million severance package for her if she left by the end of March (since she didn't, they haven't revealed her actual severance&mdash;but it's surely in that ballpark). Fuller's rich, but she's still a well-known neurotic about money issues, dating back to her own mother's rough period of being broke after a divorce. Understandable&mdash;but it doesn't really give one the right to start yelling at the good people from the freaking <em>Make-A-Wish foundation</em>, as Fuller once famously did when she thought they were being too stingy: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/397629/bonnie-fuller-can-never-get-enough-money" title="Click here to read more about Bonnie Fuller Can Never Get Enough Money">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/397629/bonnie-fuller-can-never-get-enough-money]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-397629]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Millionaires]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Good stories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Millionaires]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:51:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=397629&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Times Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" href="http://gawker.com/bonnie-fuller/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bonniefuller</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" href="http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_bonniefuller-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/bonniefuller.jpeg"></a>For unclear reasons, the <em>Times </em>felt compelled to hand a huge chunk of its Sunday Business section over to a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/business/media/29bonnie.html?pagewanted=1&sq=bonnie%20fuller&st=cse&scp=1">profile</a> of Bonnie Fuller&mdash;the woman most responsible for creating our nation's soul-destroying cast of powerful celebrity magazines&mdash;<a href="http://gawker.com/tag/breaking/?i=5008884&t=the-witch-is-dead">who was recently axed </a>from her multimillion-dollar gig as editorial chief of American Media. A sympathetic profile! The news peg, purportedly: Bonnie Fuller is doing some vague new project on the internet. For women! With specifics to be determined! Color us skeptical. The Fuller that the <em>Times </em>describes does not sound like the woman who was so despised by her assistants that they <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/editors-from-hell/?i=5009037&t=bullied-assistant-put-snot-in-bonnie-fullers-mini-souffl">put snot in her food</a>. What's the major malfunction here?				<a href="http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure" title="Click here to read more about Times Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-397458]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Corrections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[celebrity magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Corrections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mistakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Self Awareness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:38:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=397458&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Julia Allison Out At Star]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Julia Allison Out At &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/julia-allison/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">juliaallison</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Julia Allison Out At &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5017500/julia-allison-out-at-star" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Julia Allison Out At &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" alt="Click here to read Julia Allison Out At &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/43/24/small_095304fc0387954408fdc9be4ab1748b.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/06/SafariScreenSnapz001-6.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/06/SafariScreenSnapz001-6.jpg','popup','width=504,height=375,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"></a>It's another sad breakup for Julia Allison. The fameball's sweetheart, six-figure gig as editor-at-large for <em>Star</em> magazine <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06182008/business/blogger_gets_boot_at_star_116069.htm">has come to a close</a>, the <em>Post</em>'s Keith Kelly is reporting. A few months after a <a href="http://gawker.com/news/julia-allison/julia-allisons-sad-breakup-with-am-new-york-242000.php">fling with</a> <em>AM New York</em>, the self-promoting young dating columnist was hired <a href="http://gawker.com/news/our-celebrities-are-now-yours/julia-allison-is-new-star-editor-at-large-272708.php">one year ago</a> by <em>Star</em> under the tenure of American Media editorial director Bonnie Fuller. Her work for the tabloid consisted not of writing, but of showing up on cable news shows to talk about, say, the <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1152997">Texas polygamists</a> ("I was sitting there <em>seriously disturbed</em>"), or about singer <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1153615">Britney Spears' love life</a> ("the guy is a user, a loser and a mooch"). With Fuller gone, save for her own editor-at-large gig, Allison's yearlong contract was allowed to expire. <em>Star</em> isn't talking publicly about exactly why that is.
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5017500/julia-allison-out-at-star" title="Click here to read more about Julia Allison Out At Star">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5017500/julia-allison-out-at-star]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5017500]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[julia allison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Protocelebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity-industrial complex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Tate]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017500&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure" href="http://gawker.com/celebrity_industrial-complex/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">celebrityindustrialcomplex</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure" href="http://gawker.com/5013783/tabloid-editors-insane-from-brangelina-pressure" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure" alt="Click here to read Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/f0/8d/small_f08dd4ea444e7d26b6d8e9348fd28a90.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/06/wenn1745355.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/06/wenn1745355.jpg','popup','width=300,height=450,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"></a>The birth of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's twins is, for celebrity tabloid editors and producers, like a presidential election night, the Superbowl and a moon landing all rolled into one, and the incredible pressure is destroying them one at a time. Bonnie Fuller was an early victim, <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/gossip-wars/?i=5004767&amp;t=brangelina-married-no-its-not">losing all grip on reality</a> at the end of March, when the magazine she then ran, <em>Star</em>, described a New Orleans wedding between the power couple that <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/rumors_swirl_that_brad_pitt_and_angelina_jolie_wed">never took place</a>. Then, earlier this month, <em>Entertainment Tonight</em> reported that Jolie had given birth to the twins in France, a story that was <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/celebrity_industrial-complex/?i=5012556&amp;amp;t=angelina-jolies-secret-15-million-birth">swiftly denied</a> by reps for the couple and that is <a href="http://www.jossip.com/entertainment-tonight-knew-all-along-its-angelina-jolie-source-was-bunk-20080605/">raising questions</a> about the show's standards (apparently it was like the <em>New Yorker</em> of celebrity journalism). Now, Fuller's replacement at <em>Star</em> is also messing up the Brangelina story, <a href="http://coverawards.com/2008/06/04/breaking-news-star-magazine-uses-may-4-2008-photo-to-pregnant-angelina-collapses/">cropping a month-old photo</a> to make it look like Jolie "collapsed" in the south of France:
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5013783/tabloid-editors-insane-from-brangelina-pressure" title="Click here to read more about Tabloid Editors Insane From Brangelina Pressure">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5013783/tabloid-editors-insane-from-brangelina-pressure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5013783]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity-industrial complex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brad PItt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment tonight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:51:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Tate]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5013783&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton" href="http://gawker.com/nonsensical-gossip/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">nonsensicalgossip</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton" href="http://gawker.com/388999/gay-cowboy-dated-littlest-clinton" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton" alt="Click here to read Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_jake.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				WTF. Wooden almost actor Jake Gyllenhaal apparently <i>dated</i> wooden former first daughter Chelsea Clinton, according to <i>Star.</i> In 1999! When he wasn't even famous! Apparently their parents knew each other. We don't buy a word of this. Why is it coming out now? Last-ditch effort to rescue Hillary Clinton's campaign with star power? Also according to this story, Chelsea Clinton thinks Jake should marry Reese Witherspoon. According to a "source." That "source" is drugs. [<a href="http://www.starmagazine.com/news/14165?cid=RSS">Star</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/388999/gay-cowboy-dated-littlest-clinton" title="Click here to read more about Gay Cowboy Dated Littlest Clinton">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/388999/gay-cowboy-dated-littlest-clinton]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-388999]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nonsensical gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Clinton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jake Gyllenhaal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[made-up bullshit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 May 2008 12:09:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=388999&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Us Calls Bullshit on Star!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Us&lt;/i&gt; Calls Bullshit on &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;!" href="http://gawker.com/update/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">update</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Us&lt;/i&gt; Calls Bullshit on &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;!" href="http://gawker.com/5004770/us-calls-bullshit-on-star" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Us&lt;/i&gt; Calls Bullshit on &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;!" alt="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Us&lt;/i&gt; Calls Bullshit on &lt;i&gt;Star&lt;/i&gt;!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/03/cd/28/small_cd287014c9d76e8a937e46b5d01aba35.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
<em>Star</em> overlord Bonnie Fuller is getting her ass <em>kicked</em> this morning. "Online reports that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt tied the knot in New Orleans Saturday are 'complete and total bulls&mdash;t,' a source tells <em><a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/rumors_swirl_that_brad_pitt_and_angelina_jolie_wed">Us</a></em>. 'Bottom line, they aren't even in New Orleans.'"
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5004770/us-calls-bullshit-on-star" title="Click here to read more about Us Calls Bullshit on Star!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004770/us-calls-bullshit-on-star]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5004770]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brad PItt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:43:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian spiegelman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5004770&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Smell The Innuendo]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Smell The Innuendo" href="http://gawker.com/blogs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">blogs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Smell The Innuendo" href="http://gawker.com/362004/smell-the-innuendo" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Smell The Innuendo" alt="Click here to read Smell The Innuendo" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/02/small_breath-BAD.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				There's a new book about blogs that the <a href="http://gawker.com/355123/blogs-make-the-best-books">blogs</a> <a href="http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/18/072921.php">can't</a> <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/02/blogs_make_the_book.php">stop</a> <a href="http://www.ironicsans.com/2008/02/blogs_the_book.html">talking</a> about because bloggers love books about them. But actually reading a book about blogs? Nothing could be more boring. But there are nuggets in <em>Ultimate Blogs: Masterworks from the Wild Web</em> that make reading it, or the reviews of it at least, worthwhile. For one: In <a href="http://www.upsaid.com/Eurotrash/">Eurotrash</a> Geraldine Hayward takes bad breath to new literary heights describing her former (possibly famous!) boss.				<a href="http://gawker.com/362004/smell-the-innuendo" title="Click here to read more about Smell The Innuendo">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/362004/smell-the-innuendo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-362004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:55:13 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[rebecca]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=362004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears" href="http://gawker.com/how-they-sleep-at-night/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">howtheysleepatnight</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears" href="http://gawker.com/322529/bonnie-fuller-is-a-good-mom-compared-to-britney-spears" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears" alt="Click here to read Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/11/small_fuller3.JPG"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				AMI EVP Bonnie Fuller does some ethical backflips to justify the redeeming value of<em> Star</em> magazine and its ilk in a HuffPo blog post: "Now, gossip high priestess Liz Smith wrote in her November 13 column that "celebrity madness fueled by instant technology" is her top choice for <em>Time</em> magazine's "person" of the year. And I have to second her choice." Whoa, way to bite the feeding hand!  "But while Liz may agree that celebrities and celeb newsweeklies like <em>Star</em> serve the purposes of entertaining us, informing us about popular culture, fashion and style," &mdash;wait, <em>what</em>?&mdash;"I bet not even she understands that celeb mommies play an all-important role as guilt-evaporators."  She goes on to tell her "frazzled compatriots" to "give yourselves permission to pat yourselves on the back for a change. You may not be the perfect mom, but you ain't Britney."  But where are we to turn to expiate the guilt we feel over reading <em>Star</em>? [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bonnie-fuller/oops-brit-did-it-again-_b_72531.html">HuffPo</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/322529/bonnie-fuller-is-a-good-mom-compared-to-britney-spears" title="Click here to read more about Bonnie Fuller Is A Good Mom, Compared To Britney Spears">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/322529/bonnie-fuller-is-a-good-mom-compared-to-britney-spears]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-322529]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how they sleep at night]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Huffpo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:40:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=322529&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller's Hair And Makeup Allowance: Twenty Grand]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Once again, American Media Inc., publisher of <i>Star</i>, the <i>National Enquirer</i> and <i>Men's Fitness</i>, <A href= http://www.nypost.com/seven/09012007/business/ami_files_too__little__too_lat.htm>filed its financial statement with the S.E.C. well past the due date</a>. And we can understand why: The company is hemorrhaging money. Is there some way they could cut costs to help the bottom line? Well, maybe they could reduce the amount they shell out on Chief Editorial Director Bonnie Fuller's beauty treatments.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/296137/bonnie-fullers-hair-and-makeup-allowance-twenty-grand" title="Click here to read more about Bonnie Fuller's Hair And Makeup Allowance: Twenty Grand">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/296137/bonnie-fullers-hair-and-makeup-allowance-twenty-grand]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-296137]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[the beauty myth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a.m.i.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:32:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=296137&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
Star magazine will miss its first-half targets;...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<i>Star</i> magazine will miss its first-half targets; the title has been selling about 600,000 copies per week, a number which may drop further as the summer winds down. [<a href= http://www.wwd.com/issue/article/117663?src=rss>WWD</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/283745/" title="Click here to read more about 
Star magazine will miss its first-half targets;...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/283745/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-283745]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[catch a collapsing star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a.m.i.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:40:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=283745&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Terrorism Expert Assesses Threats]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
								<a href="http://gawker.com/274692/terrorism-expert-assesses-threats" title="Click here to read more about Terrorism Expert Assesses Threats">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/274692/terrorism-expert-assesses-threats]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-274692]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nice bombs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[julia allison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[our celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Red Eye]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Terror]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:00:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=274692&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large" href="http://gawker.com/our-celebrities-are-now-yours/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ourcelebritiesarenowyours</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large" href="http://gawker.com/272708/julia-allison-is-new-star-editor-at-large" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large" alt="Click here to read Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/06/small_Julia Allison Jill Dobson FoxNews.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 "Oh yeah, baby, it's all downhill from here. ;) i do hope i can stick with tv. writing is far too much effort ;)" <a href="http://gawker.com/news/julia-allison/julia-allisons-sad-breakup-with-am-new-york-242000.php">asserted</a> Julia Allison back in March, when she was <s>fired</s> amicably separated from her job as <em>AM New York</em>'s online dating advice columnist.  Maybe she's been reading <em>The Secret</em>, because it seems like Julia just got her wish!  She'll be <em>Star</em>'s new Editor at Large, a position that really plays to her "strengths:" "She won't be editing or writing, but she will be appearing as a talking expert whenever TV comes calling for someone to go on air to comment on the latest celebrity gossip or scandal."  Congratulations, Julia!  We knew you when, and for some reason we still know you now. As for those "wondering why <em>Star</em> actually needs a permanent full-time TV person, since Editorial Director Bonnie Fuller relinquished day-to-day control at <em>Star</em> to Candace Trunzo and seems to have more time on her hands these days," we'd meekly posit that maybe it's because Bonnie Fuller doesn't have an ass on which you can bounce a quarter.				<a href="http://gawker.com/272708/julia-allison-is-new-star-editor-at-large" title="Click here to read more about Julia Allison Is New 'Star' Editor At Large">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/272708/julia-allison-is-new-star-editor-at-large]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-272708]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[our celebrities are now yours]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[julia allison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sick victories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sunrise, sunset]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:40:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=272708&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
That "tell-all manuscript" about her relationship...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				That "tell-all manuscript" about her relationship with Brad Pitt that Jennifer Aniston was seen holding on the cover of <i>Star</i>? Actually an airbrushed art catalog! We always figured her for illiterate anyway. [<a href=http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/06/jennifer-anistons-5-million-art-catalog.php>Radar</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/265208/" title="Click here to read more about 
That "tell-all manuscript" about her relationship...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/265208/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-265208]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[STAR MAGAZINE'S SHOCKING ANISTON DECEPTION]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brad PItt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=265208&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" href="http://gawker.com/tabloid-media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">tabloidmedia</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" href="http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" alt="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/05/small_vinceproposes.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A two-page spread in this week's <em>Us Weekly</em> calling out other magazines for fabricating stories has their competitors scoffing. "I find it amusing that <em>Us Weekly</em> and [editor in chief] Janice Min thinks they are above all else in the celebrity category of weekly gossip magazines. How can she point fingers when Page Six had to run a retraction from picking up her stories in the last year?" a <em>Star</em> spokesman asked <em>WWD</em> today. "We don't say that we don't make mistakes; that is the nature of any news gathering operation. What we don't do is wholesale fabricate stories to sell magazines," a Wenner spokesman responded.  No, never! But fabricating controversy is another story, apparently, as a peek at the 2-page spread in question, headlined "Creative Writing: All The News That's Fake!" reveals. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth" title="Click here to read more about Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-257733]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tabloid media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glass houses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 May 2007 11:00:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257733&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The $40 Million Question: Define "Nappy"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The $40 Million Question: Define &quot;Nappy&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/media-bubble/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mediabubble</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The $40 Million Question: Define &quot;Nappy&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/257358/the-40-million-question-define-nappy" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The $40 Million Question: Define &quot;Nappy&quot;" alt="Click here to read The $40 Million Question: Define &quot;Nappy&quot;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/05/small_imusgobye2.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>Don Imus' contract with CBS said: "Services to be rendered are of a unique, extraordinary, irreverent, intellectual, topical, controversial, and personal character." Legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin thinks that makes Imus's $40 million lawsuit against CBS a bit more plausible. [<a href=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0705/02/acd.01.html>CNN</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/257358/the-40-million-question-define-nappy" title="Click here to read more about The $40 Million Question: Define "Nappy"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/257358/the-40-million-question-define-nappy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-257358]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media Bubble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Adam Moss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dan Peres]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Remnick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Details]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Don Imus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Keith Blanchard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mark Whitaker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[National Enquirer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ron Burkle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wenner Media]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 09:56:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257358&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?" href="http://gawker.com/bring-back-joe-dolce/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bringbackjoedolce</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?" href="http://gawker.com/257102/does-star-editor-edit-or-even-read-star" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?" alt="Click here to read Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/05/small_editorletter.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 "What's WRONG With Brit's Baby!" screams the cover of today's <em>Star</em> magazine. But new editor Candace Trunzo's editor's letter makes no mention of poor possible Britney flipper-baby Jayden James. Instead, it's all about... Britney's weight loss? "Britney Spears really is this year's Comeback Kid," Trunzo crows. She ends with, "This issue's amazing new pics on page 44 say it all&mdash;Eat your heart out, K-Fed." And the 4-page story that begins on page 44 <em>is </em>about how Britney is losing "a pound a day." It's not until page 52 that <em>Star</em> asks, rather more briefly, "Why Is Brit Hiding Jayden James?" A: "It's all about the Benjamins!" (Duh.)  Also: "'Britney did so much partying after Jayden was born, she doesn't feel as close to him [as Sean Preston],' maybe says another source." <em>Maybe says another source!</em>  It's a new low in tabloid journalism, or maybe a new high!  Congratulations, Candy. <span class = "byline">&mdash;Emily</span>				<a href="http://gawker.com/257102/does-star-editor-edit-or-even-read-star" title="Click here to read more about Does 'Star' Editor Edit Or Even Read 'Star'?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/257102/does-star-editor-edit-or-even-read-star]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-257102]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bring back joe dolce]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jayden James]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 May 2007 13:04:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257102&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo" href="http://gawker.com/candace-trunzo/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">candacetrunzo</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo" href="http://gawker.com/253616/searching-star-for-candace-trunzo" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo" alt="Click here to read Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/04/small_editorletter.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				What's conspicuously missing from this week's <em>Star</em> magazine?  Sure, you could make a case for "anything remotely interesting"&mdash;that "Brad and Angie might not be together forever" cover really must represent a new low&mdash;but we're actually talking about the magazine's Editor's Letter.  It's gone!  Why?  Was it that a bunch of readers picked up last week's issue, read new ed-in-chief Candace Trunzo's enthusiastic endorsement of some celebrities' "smooches and seaside frolics," and thought "Ewww, Mom!  We don't talk about that stuff!" That's our guess.  That or something to have to do with the layout.  Anyway, we'll be anxiously waiting to see whether Candace and her scarf return next Wednesday.  <span class = "byline">&mdash;Emily</span>				<a href="http://gawker.com/253616/searching-star-for-candace-trunzo" title="Click here to read more about Searching 'Star' For Candace Trunzo">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/253616/searching-star-for-candace-trunzo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-253616]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[candace trunzo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[not testing well]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:59:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=253616&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!" href="http://gawker.com/star/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">star</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!" href="http://gawker.com/250243/you-suck-trunzo-bring-back-dolce" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!" alt="Click here to read You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/04/small_candace.JPG"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				What's that unfamiliar face peering out at all us trashy housewives from the masthead of <em>Star</em>?  Why, it's former <em>Globe </em>editor Candace Trunzo, who took over the reins from our beloved punching bag Joe Dolce on April 1st.  How will <em>Star </em>be different under Candace's leadership?  "I'm on a mission," she declares in her first editor's letter, promising "more celebrity news stories, more revealing must-see photos, more fun, more pop!"  Oh boy!  Unfortunately, when Candace says "more," she seems to mean "less" &mdash; her first <em>Star</em> contained only three Normal/Not Normals (there are usually at least five!) and only three "Worst of the Week" fashion violations!  Even a particularly gruesome shot of Courtney Love's fresh lipo couldn't compensate.  Bring us the trash we crave, Candy!  You're veering dangerously close to <em>In Touch</em> territory here.  <span class = "byline">&mdash;Emily</span>				<a href="http://gawker.com/250243/you-suck-trunzo-bring-back-dolce" title="Click here to read more about You Suck, Trunzo! Bring Back Dolce!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/250243/you-suck-trunzo-bring-back-dolce]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-250243]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[candace trunzo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Joe Dolce]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:59:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=250243&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: Tribulations]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Tribulations" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Tribulations" href="http://gawker.com/250217/media-bubble-tribulations" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Tribulations" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: Tribulations" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/04/small_zellsammon.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>Tribune: The Chandler family <a href=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003568116>hits the road,</a> Sam Zell <A href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117580985297861446.html?mod=mm_hs_media>talks to David Geffen</a>, gets veto power <A href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/business/media/06tribune.html?>on the board</a>, bashes Google. [<a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-zell6apr06,1,3684937.story?coll=la-headlines-business>LAT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/250217/media-bubble-tribulations" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: Tribulations">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/250217/media-bubble-tribulations]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-250217]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bambi francisco]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conrad black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Geffen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Janice Min]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jann Wenner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sam zell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tribune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:55:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=250217&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Star' Brutally Cleans House, Ditches 10 Staffers]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				In a clearly well-thought-out attempt to make right American Media's <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/114289?page=0">$160-million loss last year</a>, <i>Star</i> magazine ditched 10 staffers in their New York offices today. Reportedly among the missing: editor Joe Tirella, film and TV critic Marshall Fine, three photo editors, two reporters, a designer&mdash;and former CNN producer and current <i>Star</i> executive editor Jon Auerbach. The state of the office is unsurprisingly being described as "miserable."				<a href="http://gawker.com/247499/star-brutally-cleans-house-ditches-10-staffers" title="Click here to read more about 'Star' Brutally Cleans House, Ditches 10 Staffers">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/247499/star-brutally-cleans-house-ditches-10-staffers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-247499]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:12:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choire]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=247499&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: Fox Hunts]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				<li>Keith Kelly gets the "exclusive": Time Warner is selling its Time 4 Media properties to the Bonnier Group for a sum considerably less than the $300 million they wanted. Tough break for <i>AdAge</i>, which <a href=http://gawker.com/news/media/media-bubble-do-not-make-it-live-231032.php>had the story yesterday</a> but pulled it. [<a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/01252007/business/time_warner_sells_mags_under_300m_business_keith_j__kelly.htm>NYP</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/231379/media-bubble-fox-hunts" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: Fox Hunts">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/231379/media-bubble-fox-hunts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-231379]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad age]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American Media Inc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newscorp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time 4 media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tribune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:10:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=231379&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Irresponsible Rumormongering: 'Star' Really IS Moving to Boca]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Despite the Mediabistro job postings that seemed to indicate that AMI would be moving <em>Star</em>'s operations back to Florida from whence they came, <em>Star</em> has thus far <a href="http://gawker.com/news/media/media-bubble-plenty-of-free-time-to-watch-extra-hour-of-today-229257.php">vehemently denied</a> that that was, in fact, the case. But over the transom comes the following: <blockquote>Star staffers are out in March. Star really moving to Boca. Nobody asked to join the ride.</blockquote> The usual caveats apply, but this would seem to be quite a repudiation of Bonnie Fuller's reinvention attempts.				<a href="http://gawker.com/230568/irresponsible-rumormongering-star-really-is-moving-to-boca" title="Click here to read more about Irresponsible Rumormongering: 'Star' Really IS Moving to Boca">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/230568/irresponsible-rumormongering-star-really-is-moving-to-boca]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-230568]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[irresponsible rumormongering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:27:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doree Shafrir]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=230568&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today'" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today'" href="http://gawker.com/229257/media-bubble-plenty-of-free-time-to-watch-extra-hour-of-today" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today'" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_MK-AI046_NBC_20070116202329.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>Another hour of "Today" just means more Al Roker to love. And, you know, Ann Curry. [<a href=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116900537411678552-_sJeIbRe3wrcUcBHNTY_pf_VYas_20070124.html?mod=blogs>WSJ</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/229257/media-bubble-plenty-of-free-time-to-watch-extra-hour-of-today" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/229257/media-bubble-plenty-of-free-time-to-watch-extra-hour-of-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-229257]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Al Roker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ann Curry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cablevision]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Memos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sacramento bee]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The today show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tribune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:40:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=229257&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs" href="http://gawker.com/228320/media-bubble-again-with-the-layoffs" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_27326941.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>Next week is layoff week at Time Inc. Also, every week thereafter. [<a href= http://www.wwd.com/issue/article/111934?src=rss>WWD</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/228320/media-bubble-again-with-the-layoffs" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: Again With The Layoffs">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/228320/media-bubble-again-with-the-layoffs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-228320]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ami]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brian Montopoli]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diane Sawyer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Emi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Daily News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Time Inc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:00:38 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=228320&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?" href="http://gawker.com/eat-the-press/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">eatthepress</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?" href="http://gawker.com/227011/star-vs-us--whats-over" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?" alt="Click here to read 'Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_Star - It's Just Like Us-thumb.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 "Because when the breakup's this big, no less than giant yellow coverlines will do," says Eat The Press. Well, yeah, totally . . . except, if you look really closely, each of those covers trumpets the earthshattering demise of an entirely different celebrity couple (or, in the case of <em>Us</em>, "couple.")  Could <em>Us</em> have sort of pulled the Kate and Owen thing out of its ass to compete with <em>Star</em>, which hit newsstands first?  We guess we'll <em>never know.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/227011/star-vs-us--whats-over" title="Click here to read more about 'Star' vs. 'Us':  What's Over?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/227011/star-vs-us--whats-over]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-227011]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Eat The Press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=227011&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" href="http://gawker.com/star/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">star</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" href="http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" alt="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_mk or a.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				We enjoyed <em>Star</em>'s cover story on Mary Kate Olsen's reanorexia as much as or possibly more than most people &mdash; "HER EATING COACH IS GONE" is a great name for a post-hardcore band, by the way &mdash; but we couldn't help but notice that some of the pictures of "Mary Kate" looked suspiciously full-bodied and &mdash; how to put this? &mdash; differently nosejobbed than the others.   Today, WWD confirmed our suspicions: according to their publicist, the twin in at least one of the pictures is indeed Ashley, not Mary Kate.  We guess those tricky twins confuse the <em>Star</em> photo department by periodically switching off haircolors, but we rely on other clues to distinguish one from the other.  We thought we'd help out the <em>Star</em> photo editors with a handy list of our personal Olsen twin "tells" &mdash; subtle clues that reliably determine which platform-booted, layered-looked lady is the rexy twin and which is the relatively healthy-looking fraternal counterpart. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a" title="Click here to read more about Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-225510]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ashley Olsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mary kate olsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=225510&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore" href="http://gawker.com/star/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">star</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore" href="http://gawker.com/223525/leslie-sloane-zelnick-is-just-not-even-trying-anymore" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore" alt="Click here to read Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_drugs_takeout.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's a season of Bests Of, so we're hereby nominating this quote as "Best Publicist Denial 2006."  It's from an article in the print edition of this week's Star magazine about "plate parties,"  at which young Hollywood stars are passing around drug-filled <em>plates</em> (!!) and  "popping pills, guzzling booze, smoking reefer and snorting whatever they can get their hands on,"  according to "one Hollywood producer" who has perhaps seen <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065466/">Beyond the Valley of the Dolls</a> one time too many.  Anyway, we admire Zelnick's laziness, so this is our official favorite. It's better than <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/gossip-roundup/gossip-roundup-paris-hilton-snorts-whipped-cream-221535.php">Elliot Mintz's genius assertion</a> that the white stuff in Paris Hilton's nostril was "stray dessert," even!    Hats off, Leslie &mdash; and here's to more Lohan-enabling in 2007.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/223525/leslie-sloane-zelnick-is-just-not-even-trying-anymore" title="Click here to read more about Leslie Sloane Zelnick Is Just Not Even Trying Anymore">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/223525/leslie-sloane-zelnick-is-just-not-even-trying-anymore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-223525]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Leslie Sloane Zelnick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=223525&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With "Modern Literature"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With &quot;Modern Literature&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/star/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">star</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With &quot;Modern Literature&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/221161/star-eloquently-sums-up-problem-with-modern-literature" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With &quot;Modern Literature&quot;" alt="Click here to read 'Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With &quot;Modern Literature&quot;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_staffer.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				As we <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/joe-dolce/joe-dolce-wishes-he-was-jane-pratt-213945.php">mentioned</a>, we read <em>Star</em> for its incisive "Look Who's Fat Now!" pictorials, not for its words.   But our eyes inadvertently grazed a sentence in this week's issue &mdash; and you know what?  It resonated with us:   <blockquote>The film has the brittle, chilly feel of modern literature, where people are supposed to feel bad about themselves and are slapped down when they try to find a way to feel good.</blockquote> A tiny bit reductive, sure, but pretty much dead-on, and actually, the reason we were reading <em>Star</em> instead of, you know, a book. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/221161/star-eloquently-sums-up-problem-with-modern-literature" title="Click here to read more about 'Star' Eloquently Sums Up Problem With "Modern Literature"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/221161/star-eloquently-sums-up-problem-with-modern-literature]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-221161]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=221161&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay" href="http://gawker.com/stephanie-green/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">stephaniegreen</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay" href="http://gawker.com/219738/stephanie-greens-bonnie-fuller-book-to-open-wide-on-ebay" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay" alt="Click here to read Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_stephanie green dishalicious for sale.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Recall the <a href="http://www.gawker.com/topic/bonnie-fuller-gets-devil-treatment-020175.php">tale of Stephanie Green</a>, a researcher at <em>Star</em> who in 2004 began shopping <em>Dishalicious</em>, her <em>Devil Wears Prada</em>-esque novel featuring a Bonnie Fuller caricature. Green was promptly <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/media/media-bubble-in-other-news-not-related-to-dan-rather-026238.php">sued</a> by American Media for violating her confidentiality agreement, though the lawsuit was finally <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/media/bonnie-fuller/bonnie-fuller-really-hates-books-100173.php">dismissed</a> in 2005. Sadly, the public lust (or publishing's interest) in this genre appears to be waning, as Green has been unable to find a buyer for the manuscript. Ergo, she's <a href="http://dishalicious.blogspot.com/2006/12/buy-it-now.html">hawking copies of the text on Paypal</a>, with plans to upgrade to eBay v. v. soon! After the jump, Green's philosophical take on the death of her book, plus hopes and dreams for a brighter tomorrow.				<a href="http://gawker.com/219738/stephanie-greens-bonnie-fuller-book-to-open-wide-on-ebay" title="Click here to read more about Stephanie Green's Bonnie Fuller Book to Open Wide on eBay">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/219738/stephanie-greens-bonnie-fuller-book-to-open-wide-on-ebay]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-219738]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[stephanie green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American Media Inc.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:10:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Mohney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=219738&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

