This annoying piece of news "technology" was first introduced full-time after 9/11, remember? I do. I was living in Syria, terrified that I would read the name of a close friend, a flight attendant for American on the Boston to LA route. I didn't, thank Christ, but a lot of others did. I didn't find out from "the scroll," however. In fact, I have never found out anything from "the scroll" that was of any value whatsoever. Even as I knew that it would be overdone and become eventually meaningless, never did I imagine it would be a way for one "news" "network" to give its viewers a pulpit for their ignorance and racism.
Boy, was I wrong or what?
But it really goes to show that that other wonderful innovation that appeared after 9/11--that Americans actually took a few minutes to care for and about each other--was more short lived than a Neil Cavuto erection.
So thanks, Fox News, for harming my country every bit as much as The Terrorists. Bin Laden ain't got nothing on you.
When did people start saying, or more usually writing, "chyron"? It sounds like "gryphon", some elusive, mythical beast, like Roger Ailes's sense of decency.
@Spirit Fingers: It's been around much longer than that. I recall seeing it appear in reviews for "The Legend of Bagger Vance" and "The Green Mile", to name but two.
Of course, those could have been Owen Gleiberman reviews...
Maybe it's time for Fox to kill the crawl, like CNN?
Anyway, what if Obama does do a good job? Will these idiots shut up and/or change their minds? My guess, unhappily, is that they won't, because "good" is subjective and these people will always be able to find some fault.
@Claire Buoyant: For a neo con it will not matter how well he does or if he screws up royally. It will amount to the same. He's not even IN office and is being critiqued by some by his performance so far. He's overstepping, etc. For those people it comes down to conservative vs. liberal, Repub vs. Dem and only the people on their team are ever correct. (and, to be perfectly honest, that works both ways)
@IamnotStarJones: Here's a thought, and for a brief moment I am being serious. How soon do you think Fox will head out to western Pennsylvania and the woods of the Carolinas and rural Georgia to ask rednecks , "Do you think of Barack Obama as president of the white people?"
Fox News will claim that that chyron was auto-generated from their website emails. Which is BULLSHIT, since a living, breathing human being actually edits and writes copy for the crawl. Someone needs to be fucking fired, Roger Ailes. Do the right fucking thing.
@Aaron Altman: I had an interview back in February with FOX News, unbeknownst to me it was for the position of the ticker writer for the graveyard shift. I met the person who edited and wrote the copy for the ticker - a shell of a person, I tell you. It was like her face was silently screaming "Help me."
I'm with you on xenophobic Lou Dobbs, and I'm tired of Campbell's speeches already. Wolf is OK. How is Anderson's show "ratings grabbing fluff"? He covers politics and issues of the day. He's not hostile or politicized. Do you want him to be giving portentous speeches to acolytes like O'Reilly and Olbermann? There's already too much of that in American cable news, and demagoguing is the stuff that grabs the ratings and attention in recent years so refusing to take part actually involves some will and sacrifice.
The politicizing of news networks is a big problem in America in my opinion, and that means looking at Fox and MSNBC.
01/02/09
Boy, was I wrong or what?
But it really goes to show that that other wonderful innovation that appeared after 9/11--that Americans actually took a few minutes to care for and about each other--was more short lived than a Neil Cavuto erection.
So thanks, Fox News, for harming my country every bit as much as The Terrorists. Bin Laden ain't got nothing on you.
01/02/09
fuckers.
Shout out to Samanthrax for the gif.
01/02/09
01/02/09
Or does that fact that it was on Fox remove any possibility of irony?
01/02/09
It annoys one.
01/02/09
This is where I remember seeing it for the first time. I know we can blame Owen Gleiberman for much, I'm thinking this should be added to the list.
[www.ew.com]
(last paragraph)
01/02/09
Of course, those could have been Owen Gleiberman reviews...
01/02/09
01/02/09
Stock ticker crawls are strictly for decoration. They're the worst kind of useless - slow, and badly inaccurate.
01/02/09
01/02/09
Anyway, what if Obama does do a good job? Will these idiots shut up and/or change their minds? My guess, unhappily, is that they won't, because "good" is subjective and these people will always be able to find some fault.
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
01/02/09
J: "With a quote thingie!"
J: "No!"
J: "Yes!"
J: "Your wrong, I know it!"
01/02/09
12/29/08
12/29/08
The politicizing of news networks is a big problem in America in my opinion, and that means looking at Fox and MSNBC.
12/29/08
(Wait, since McCain lost does this mean she's already fired? Yes, please.)