• Profile logout login

#advertising#msg176001

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:40 PM
Wed Nov 11
59 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    05:32 PM

    In reply to Never Say Advertising Is Not a Talent
    Wait copywriting is a bullshit hack job done by joke-y and moneyed youngsters tending to the whims of dullards? I thought it was like "The Right Stuff" or some shit.

    what if one of these young waggish copywriters is engulfed in flames out on the sidewalk, and maybe I'm walking down the other side of the street with a Venti coffee loaded in my bladder? Should I cross and extinguish? I just can't know for sure until I'm there I guess. #marketing
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    05:32 PM

    In reply to Never Say Advertising Is Not a Talent
    Cute story, but even Darren Stevens or those guys on Mad Men would know that you can't leave the word "juice" unmodified, if the product has no juice. #marketing
     Reply
    Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of SpyMagician SpyMagician
    03:28 PM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    At least she has the good sense to cloak that alluring neck. I only hope the ankles are properly covered as well, lest shopkeepers be distracted as she walks down the street. #americanapparel
     Reply
    SpyMagician was starred SpyMagician was unstarred
    Image of Hamilton Nolan Hamilton Nolan
    01:46 PM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    Was this post really too subtle? #americanapparel
     Reply
    Hamilton Nolan was starred Hamilton Nolan was unstarred
    Image of DTurkin DTurkin
    12:49 PM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    I prefer to see nipples than someone giving birth. #americanapparel
     Reply
    DTurkin was starred DTurkin was unstarred
    Image of RonMwangaguhunga RonMwangaguhunga
    03:14 PM

    @DTurkin: This was like an eye bath #americanapparel
     Reply
    RonMwangaguhunga was starred RonMwangaguhunga was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    12:19 PM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    Oh, geez. They're almost dainty. I could see if they were like huge cow utters ready to slap you in the forehead. These are like junior-nips. Not really classy, classy, but in terms of obscenity from American Apparel, I was expecting much more...like nipples, socks, a puddle of milk and nothing else in the shot. #americanapparel
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of iplaudius iplaudius
    12:06 PM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    At least, they are very nice looking nipples. #americanapparel
     Reply
    iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11:58 AM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    It's intentional. Nips are a fact, HamNo.

    Team Nip Display Banish the Padded Bra Bring Back the Balcony Corset #americanapparel
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    11:38 AM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    Thousands of years ago Victoria's Secret showed nipples quite freely. They also showed pubic hair back when women had it.

    Women do have nipples after all and this is honest advertising. If you have nipples and you wear this garment, then your nipples will show.

    Why Barbie-ize us all? #americanapparel
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of PrincessOfPower PrincessOfPower
    11:40 AM

    @Tart of Darkness: pubic hair? what's that? #americanapparel
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness promoted this comment PrincessOfPower was starred PrincessOfPower was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    11:47 AM

    @PrincessOfPower: I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. #americanapparel
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of topsy topsy
    11:49 AM

    @Tart of Darkness: I actually agree with what you said but I really don't think American Apparel was trying to make a feminist statement. In fact, I don't think anyone at American Apparel know how to SPELL feminist. If the model's nipples were exposed it's probably because the sad folks at American Apparel got off on the 'naughtiness' of it all. #americanapparel
     Reply
    topsy was starred topsy was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    12:14 PM

    @topsy: Well, what's wrong with that?

    I can't believe I'm defending AA, but a little naughtiness never hurt anybody. And neither did being turned on by it. If we weren't turned on by naughtiness, nobody would bother having sex and the species would have died out a long time ago. #americanapparel
     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of topsy topsy
    02:50 PM

    @badasscat: I can't believe that you're defending AA either. #americanapparel
     Reply
    topsy was starred topsy was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    05:34 PM

    @topsy: Well, I agree they are not intending to make a feminist statement but I really don't have a problem with the lack of air-brushing. Back in the late 70s/early 80s sometimes lingerie models in newspaper ads had visible nipples. Why have we decided that feminist = prudish while at the same time feminist = promiscuity, too?

    I find today's sexuality confusing. We are supposed to faint and scream at the sight of a nipple in a catalog, but have sex freely as we choose with as many people as we like.

    And for men it's even more confusing. They are all supposed to be addicted to porn, masturbate furiously on an hourly basis while hoping to get laid and this all at the same time that they pretend not to notice any sexual features on the woman they are standing next to on a bus.

    And I'd like to say I can't believe I'm defending AA either even as I'm starting to wonder why I'm supposed to defame them. #americanapparel
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of naugahydeinplainsight naugahydeinplainsight
    11:30 AM

    In reply to American Apparel in Mortifying Nipple-Reveal
    Well, twice does represent the usual complement.

    Oh, you meant two separate models. (Second one makes my neck hurt.) #americanapparel
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight was starred naugahydeinplainsight was unstarred
    Image of Z und Vielpunkt's chick Z und Vielpunkt's chick
    11:57 AM

    @naugahydeinplainsight: The second picture's a little strange, but then again I'm totally stumped about a more effective way to sell bow ties and suspenders to women. I think in this case just plain distracting from the product is the only reasonable choice. #americanapparel
     Reply
    Z und Vielpunkt's chick was starred Z und Vielpunkt's chick was unstarred
    Image of Z und Vielpunkt's chick Z und Vielpunkt's chick
    11:57 AM

    @Z und Vielpunkt's chick: ...and I just ordered a dozen of each. I'm such a sucker.
     Reply
    Edited by Z und Vielpunkt's chick at 11/11/09 11:58 AM Z und Vielpunkt's chick was starred Z und Vielpunkt's chick was unstarred
    Image of Shadowlayer Shadowlayer
    10:16 AM

    In reply to The Insanely Rich Young Mobile Ad Broker You've Never Heard Of
    Thats the difference between real founders (like this guy) and oportunist big talkers like, well, almost everybody else in the valley these days...

    Scammers follow money, and sadly this deserved homerun here will attract even more gold diggers with little or no knowledge about actual IT, but lots of "street smart" capabilities.

    Kudos to Omar anyways, he's a living proof than even in these twittertimes real skills trumps over snake oil marketing. #omarhamoui
     Reply
    Shadowlayer was starred Shadowlayer was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/10/09

    In reply to Is Julia Allison Supposed to Be Famous or Something?
    I heard the ads with Julia Allison in them were Web-only, and she wasn't in any of the ones broadcast on television.

    Is that wrong? Hamilton, do you know for a fact that this one was broadcast on TV, not just posted on the web?

    Just curious ... #advertising
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of heywhat heywhat
    11/10/09

    In reply to Is Julia Allison Supposed to Be Famous or Something?
    I've never seen this commercial before. Does it even play in the U.S.? Besides from that, it is a very odd commercial. Why was she even up there? And why didn't the "Can you here me now" guy get to say anything? Odd indeed. #advertising
     Reply
    heywhat was starred heywhat was unstarred
    Image of RollsRoyceRevenge RollsRoyceRevenge
    11/10/09

    In reply to Is Julia Allison Supposed to Be Famous or Something?
    She's become the female version of the Mac Guy.

    Minus the annoying not-quite facial hair.

    I think. #advertising
     Reply
    RollsRoyceRevenge was starred RollsRoyceRevenge was unstarred
    Image of BadUncle BadUncle
    11/10/09

    In reply to Is Julia Allison Supposed to Be Famous or Something?
    Nothing odd about it at all. There are lots of models with great racks who have no name recognition. #advertising
     Reply
    BadUncle was starred BadUncle was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.