airplanes - Gawker

posts about #airplanes more →
Congress Will Only Get Four Brand-New Jet Planes for Christmas
Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
The Salvage of US Airways Flight 1549
Before We All Forget the Photo-Op Terror of 4/27
'We're Going to Be In the Hudson'
Are the Google boys flying their jumbo jet?
Google boys are "sofa king" rich
How Larry and Sergey's jet stacks up to other men's

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

shostakobitch
08/11/09

In reply to Congress Will Only Get Four Brand-New Jet Planes for Christmas
optics?
Reply

shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred

dado
08/11/09

In reply to Congress Will Only Get Four Brand-New Jet Planes for Christmas
What's the big deal? They are the ruling class. To the victors go the spoils. Let's stop pretending they are public servants and our representatives.
Reply

Edited by dado at 08/11/09 11:21 AM dado was starred dado was unstarred

Nice Beaver
08/11/09

In reply to Congress Will Only Get Four Brand-New Jet Planes for Christmas
Remember the good old days when members of Congress lived in D.C. while in session? When Dems and GOPs dined together and struck compromises? WHEN MEMBERS DIDN'T TRAVEL TO FUCKING CALIFORNIA EVERY FUCKING WEEK TO RUN FOR RE-ELECTION FOR THE TOTALITY OF THEIR FUCKING TERMS IN FUCKING OFFICE????
Reply

Nice Beaver was starred Nice Beaver was unstarred

Little Green Frog (Wise Latina)
08/11/09

@Nice Beaver: Term limits, baby. Impose them, and they don't have to spend time running for re-election endlessly anymore.
Reply

SidAndFinancy
08/11/09

@Nice Beaver: Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd don't remember a moment of that time period.
Reply

SidAndFinancy was starred SidAndFinancy was unstarred

skippywasserman
08/11/09

@Nice Beaver: Neither do you.
Those times never really existed. There was no vaunted age of compromise nor a respite from constant campaign. The scale of campaign (mass vs private) and the mode of transit has changed, but the basic craptacularity of a representative politics hasn't. Go back and read up on the shenanegans of Representatives from the 1800's. For crying out loud we had a Senator whacking another with a hickory stick and others taking shots at rival's families with artilery.
So jet-setting fund-raising self-promoting greedy slimeballs don't change, just the technology around it.
Reply

Nice Beaver promoted this comment skippywasserman was starred skippywasserman was unstarred

Nice Beaver
08/11/09

@skippywasserman: I don't disagree entirely, but you can't just gloss over the "scale of campaign (mass vs private)" point. It seems to me that the job of governing is now completely secondary to the job of staying in office. Because the scale of the campaign has escalated exponentially in terms of cost, the fund-raising and glad-handing never, ever let up. In the interest of full disclosure, I just realized I heard this line of argument in a Daily Show interview with Bill Clinton.
Reply

Nice Beaver was starred Nice Beaver was unstarred

Swifter
08/11/09

In reply to Congress Will Only Get Four Brand-New Jet Planes for Christmas
Members of Congress should be made to take the bus. The short bus.
Reply

Swifter was starred Swifter was unstarred

WitteeFool
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
The only thing they need to work on is getting better pilots. And that means higher pay. Sully went to Congress to talk about this problem-- why are we letting pilot quality decline?
Reply

WitteeFool was starred WitteeFool was unstarred

PandoraSpocks
06/30/09

@WitteeFool: Because it is better to lose an occasional plane than fix what needs fixing? Because the FAA and NTSB and DOT and whatever other acronyms are in charge of flying are not doing so great? All of that and 9/11 and well, all I know is airline travel has become a real pain and I avoid it whenever I can?
Reply

PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred

badasscat
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
Airplane seats have been improved dozens of times over the years, most recently with a complete redesign of the support structure within the last decade. Not sure how much better it's going to get with current technology. But it's not like anybody's been standing still on this. They say that changes in this industry are written in blood, and that's been true with seat design.

There is a point at which better seat design is not going to help you. When the airplane is crumbling all around you, or rather crumpling in front of you, a seat that can't hold itself to the floor is not your biggest problem. But yes, there have been survivable accidents in the past where the seats failed and killed people. That probably won't happen again. Better seats would not have saved anybody in AF447.

An airbag, well, that just sounds foolish.
Reply

badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred

Robert Synnott
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
It's probably impractical to expect seats which won't come loose at any stress that a crashing plane is expected to undergo. Making them stronger will add weight, thus reducing passenger capacity. Since the increases in strength would presumably have to be considerable (these things crash at considerable speed) it would likely make commercial passenger aviation economically impractical.

So not gonna happen.
Reply

Robert Synnott was starred Robert Synnott was unstarred

CaptainFantastic
06/30/09

@Robert Synnott: No sense making them stronger than the g-force that will cause the seat belt(s) to slice the human body into pieces.
Reply

CaptainFantastic was starred CaptainFantastic was unstarred

Mymoustache
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
Why not just make the plane out of the same thing you make the black box? **crickets chirping** And airplane food....what's the deal with that?
Reply

Mymoustache was starred Mymoustache was unstarred

Dave J.
06/30/09

@Mymoustache: In former Soviet Union, plane crash dies in YOU!
Reply

Dave J. was starred Dave J. was unstarred

Scout 3.0
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
How about sleeping pills that knock you out until after you've landed?
Reply

Scout 3.0 was starred Scout 3.0 was unstarred

MsMuffinMcGuffin
06/30/09

@Scout 3.0: My dog used to travel on the plane that way. I was always somewhat envious.
Reply

MsMuffinMcGuffin was starred MsMuffinMcGuffin was unstarred

BookishLookish
06/30/09

@Scout 3.0: A Dramamine and two airplane mini-vodkas works pretty well.
Reply

BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred

Buenavista
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
Like that red arrow is really necessary.
Reply

Buenavista was starred Buenavista was unstarred

Lizawithazee
06/30/09

@Buenavista: You Are Here. Here, formerly known as 14F.
Reply

Lizawithazee was starred Lizawithazee was unstarred

lobstr
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
If I may, I will use this opportunity to yet again vent how the crash of AA flight 587 (NYC to Dominican Republic, crashed in a Queens neighborhood) about a month after 9/11/01 was duly swept under the rug and categorized as an accident due to it being IN THE WAKE of a JAL plane which was at least a mile ahead of it on the takeoff pattern.

If an airplane with all its might cannot withstand the wake of another plane's jetstream far ahead of it, then they need to ground every single airline. Every plane that takes off is behind another one not far in front of it. If we are really to just shut up and believe there was nothing more to that crash, then the NTSB really knows how to get everyone to STFU. Let the four letter acronyms fly!

I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any means, but there was something awfully fishy about that crash, and the general perception was "if it was ruled terrorism in any fashion, the entire flying public would bail on flying immediately" since we were so reassured a lot of lessons were learned (and security was unbelievably tight) after 9/11.
Reply

lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred

Dave J.
06/30/09

@lobstr: You should find one of the available-on-YouTube NTSB re-enactments of what the pilot (or co-pilot's) rudder inputs did to the plane when it hit the wake vortex. Watch that, and it's not hard to imagine how the tail could essentially fall right off. And the CVR indicates that they hit some serious turbulence, the pilot says something like "holy shit, we're really into it" just as it hits. Yeah, the timing was pretty bad, but I really do think that one was an accident.
Reply

Dave J. was starred Dave J. was unstarred

Atilla the Bun
06/30/09

@lobstr: The plane did not just fall apart because of wake turbulence; as Dave J. pointed out, pilot error in handling the wake turbulence via the rudder is what likely caused the rudder to fail/fall off. That has never really made me feel any better, though. "Pilot error" always seems like a much more amorphous, uncontrollable thing than structural or mechanical issues with the aircraft itself. So yes, I'll take an airbag, please, or at least a large dose of Ambien before my next flight...
Reply

Atilla the Bun was starred Atilla the Bun was unstarred

badasscat
06/30/09

@Atilla the Bun: People are people, and they will always make mistakes. All you can do is try to minimize them. But even a fully automated system is not infallible because they, too, are designed by humans, and there have probably been just as many accidents that have been ascribed to software or hardware design over the past two decades as there have been to pilot error. At some point, you have to just have a little trust. It is better than getting in a car with another driver, because at least pilots go through intensive and continuous training, unlike most people on the roads.
Reply

badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred

badasscat
06/30/09

@Dave J.: IIRC, it was actually the captain who said "shit, we're really into it", and he said it after the tail had snapped off. He was reacting to the fact that control had already been lost, not to the turbulence. His reaction to the turbulence was to try to calm the first officer down (the FO was flying), because he was clearly overreacting and, according to the accident report, was well known to other pilots for overreacting to turbulence. The captain only really got alarmed when it became clear that control was lost, though he did not understand why. (There's no gauge or warning light for "tail missing").
Reply

badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred

lobstr
06/30/09

@badasscat: You gotta admit, a "Tail Missing" light would be kind of awesome. Not a lit one, of course :p But it's essentially the same as a "You're Fucked" light.

This may be one of those 9th party rumors, but I did hear more than once that two firemen on the ground watching the plane out of control said they saw flames while it was still in the air... Of course, there's so much jet fuel and electrical shit going on on an airplane, bursting into flames seems commonplace in a catastrophe -- the really strange thing to me, though, is that after that crash, there has not been another major one over the US since (unless you count Continental Express over Buffalo a few months ago).. you'd think planes all the time would be getting ripped apart from wake turbulence, even if the pilot freaks out on the rudder.. I'd expect the plane to slam into the ground as a result of that as opposed to it just ripping up in air..

Hard to believe in this day and age, a PILOT can fuck an entire plane up WHILE IN AIR just by fiddling with the controls..
Reply

lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred

BookishLookish
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
I posted this earlier: the "airbag" was the brave mother or father of the five-year-old who shielded the little one's body with his/her own, and that is why the child survived, no doubt.
Reply

BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred

Dave J.
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
Last night, a Yemenia Airways flight ditched in the Indian Ocean, killing 152

Minor quibble, but isn't "ditching" when you intentionally land the plane in the ocean/river/etc., a la "Sully" and the heroic Hudson landing? I think what the Yemenia Airways did is what we usually call "crashing." I don't think there was anything controlled about that one.
Reply

Dave J. was starred Dave J. was unstarred

MattGaymon
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
What a lovely thing to read before I fly away on vacation. Tx.
Reply

MattGaymon was starred MattGaymon was unstarred

Phyllis Nefler
06/30/09

@MattGaymon: Pretty hair-raising, amirite?
Reply

Phyllis Nefler was starred Phyllis Nefler was unstarred

MattGaymon
06/30/09

@Phyllis Nefler: What he said
Reply

MattGaymon was starred MattGaymon was unstarred

SelbyNoser
06/30/09

In reply to Coming Soon: Airplane Air Bags
Oh. God.

I already need to be heavily medicated when I get on an airplane - any more of these stories and I'll just starting swimming everywhere.
Reply

SelbyNoser was starred SelbyNoser was unstarred

bboston88
06/30/09

@SelbyNoser: Word girl.

Let's talk about why Airbus can't seem to keep their planes in the sky when the wind starts getting above 10mph. Really? Planes aren't supposed to just CRASH when there's some bad weather. 2x in one month? Airbus is DONE in my book.
Reply

bboston88 was starred bboston88 was unstarred

ElleL
06/30/09

@bboston88 (star please?): I am flying to Vegas in less than a week, and sure enough it's an Airbus.

Aaaaand I'm officially freaking out.
Reply

ElleL was starred ElleL was unstarred

Crustaceans Rarely Get Past Me
06/30/09

@bboston88 (star please?): Yeah, give me a break. Boeing and Airbus are the two manufacturers providing planes for basically all commercial airlines. While Boeing has a larger number of aircraft in service currently (something like 3 to 1), you can hardly point to these two chance crashes as somehow being a reflection on the safety of the entire Airbus fleet.
Reply

ElleL
06/30/09

@Crustaceans Rarely Get Past Me: After doing my paranoid research, you are correct. It's like saying Honda's kill everyone on the highway.

Feeling slightly better.
Reply

ElleL was starred ElleL was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment