@scroll_lock: Was at a rather intimate event Wednesday night and Alec showed up looking dapper- straight from a 30 Rock taping. He touched my arm at the bar. I wanted to reference 30 Rock/Jack Donaghy soooo badly, but it just turned into a dorky "I'm a big fan. You are funny," at the end of the night....I'm way cooler in my head. Sigh.
Tonight's episode was hilarious; I loved every bit of it. And, honestly, I think my favorite part was Liz's reaction when the gay hipster cop said that the fireplace's lack of a duct caused his apartment to smell like Burger King all day and Cinnabon all night.
@pureblarney: Oh, yes -- definitely -- I absolutely love it when we're graced with a mention of/appearance by Kathy Geiss. The episode where they were trying to take her portrait was epic.
Think of all the greenhouse gasses those journalists won't emit by sobbing on the couch in a pile of Cheetos rather than running their dirty ol' laptop 40 hours a week. #currenttv
A wholesale move to LA has been in the works for a while. The fact is this, the production talent pool for cheap cable production is pretty shallow in SF. Thus they've had to ship people in from LA and more far flung places to get skilled staff. A move to LA will bring their overall costs down considerably.
These really are two different types of cars. The Fisker is a plug in hybrid that will go 30-50 miles on battery before buring oil.
The Tesla goes 200+ miles and never burns any gas. The new sedan will go 300 miles.
Fisker's car is EXACTLY the same technology as the plugin Prius--which you can install for $10k on a used Prius (which would cost $15-20k).
If you drive under 50 miles a day (which some folks do) you're better off spending $25-30k on a plug in Prius today than waiting to drop $90k on the same thing from Fisker.
If you want to go 200-300 miles you should wait for the $50k Model S from Tesla.
Whats unfortunate is that hydrogen technology offers benefits over the electric cars, but for some reason the government isn't investing in it that much. Hydrogen doesn't lose its charge over time, a tank of H is analagous to a tank of gas (in terms of miles,) and we have the ability to produce a lot of hydrogen cheaply, and in a renewable fashion. What happens when these companies use battery technology that's up to date and not 20 years old? Electric cars are merely a stop-gap when 80% of our electricity is generated using fossil fuels. Honda has a hydrogen car on the market. $465 million to build hydrogen infrastructure would go a long way to having people adopt a viable technology.
Both of them are just wiring together about a thousand laptop batteries and then sticking the whole thing on a motor. The first one to get a reliable, new battery technology into a car will win whatever grudge they have going now.
@Pope John Peeps II: It's actually not trivial even going with laptop cells. First you have to balance all the cells properly or you risk over charging them. Then there is the extensive safety features like 2 fuses for each cell, one fuse and a microcontroller for each module of 621 cells and for the whole pack, as well as a variety of sensors for acceleration, smoke, humidity, etc; this is esp. necessary for laptop cells since they are the only type of lithium battery which have a chance of catching on fire/ exploding so you must have a very good safety system in place if you want to pass FMVSS with laptop batteries. Then you have to run coolant and control the temperature. You also have the battery charging management to control the charge depth of the cells for cell longevity. Of course you have a whole bunch of computers on board to control all of this. Tesla also did a lot of work on traction control and power control for the motor. The way they implemented their regen braking gets a lot of good reviews. The reason they go with laptop cells is so far they still provide the best energy density and they are the only lithium cells made in enough volume today to make a good amount of EVs in the absence of automotive ready lithium cells. I imagine with their deal with Daimler that they will be moving to the newer cells Daimler is using if it makes sense.
So it is not as trivial as the garage conversion that everyone makes it to be (strapping some batteries together and putting it on top of a motor). And you can't ignore their contribution to igniting the current interest in EVs.
On Fisker though, I don't think they are using laptop cells. They basically contracted out all their drive train engineering to Quantum Technologies for the Karma and Sunset. The bulk of the money is going to be used for their third model ($40k) in the US, while the rest goes to US suppliers for their Karma.
As for the rivalry, isn't that even better, since competition means they will be trying to do better than each other, which ultimately results in a better product.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Al Gore has been making the rounds, and all his appearances have been entertaining and informative.
Anyone else overly appreciative of Gore's aspirated "H" in whale? No, just me? Ok.
11/20/09
11/13/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
10/13/09
10/12/09
09/29/09
The Tesla goes 200+ miles and never burns any gas. The new sedan will go 300 miles.
Fisker's car is EXACTLY the same technology as the plugin Prius--which you can install for $10k on a used Prius (which would cost $15-20k).
If you drive under 50 miles a day (which some folks do) you're better off spending $25-30k on a plug in Prius today than waiting to drop $90k on the same thing from Fisker.
If you want to go 200-300 miles you should wait for the $50k Model S from Tesla.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
So it is not as trivial as the garage conversion that everyone makes it to be (strapping some batteries together and putting it on top of a motor). And you can't ignore their contribution to igniting the current interest in EVs.
On Fisker though, I don't think they are using laptop cells. They basically contracted out all their drive train engineering to Quantum Technologies for the Karma and Sunset. The bulk of the money is going to be used for their third model ($40k) in the US, while the rest goes to US suppliers for their Karma.
As for the rivalry, isn't that even better, since competition means they will be trying to do better than each other, which ultimately results in a better product.
09/25/09