• Profile logout login

#allegories#consumerist

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 2:25 AM
Mon Dec 7
13 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of BullfightsOnAcid BullfightsOnAcid
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda

    The 80's series was actually an allegory for the Teapot Dome Scandal of the 1920's as evidenced by this picture. #v
     Reply
    BullfightsOnAcid was starred BullfightsOnAcid was unstarred
    Image of topsy topsy
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    Does it matter what subliminal messages V is sending out, when the overwhelming impression is one of overwhelming crap? The cast tries their best, but this latest version makes the 80s model look like Masterpiece Theatre. #v
     Reply
    topsy was starred topsy was unstarred
    Image of ts4april ts4april
    11/11/09

    @topsy: Thank you. Where is Michael Ironside when we need him?
     Reply
    MissNormaDesmond approved this comment ts4april was starred ts4april was unstarred
    Image of willwriteforfood willwriteforfood
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    Until I see Obama eat a guinea pig whole (guinea pig=freedom, guys! Obama's gonna take away all your cuddly, furry freedom in one swallow!), then I withhold judgment. #v
     Reply
    willwriteforfood was starred willwriteforfood was unstarred
    Image of Presidentpez Presidentpez
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    I was relieved to find the headline and article are sarcastic. #v
     Reply
    Alessar promoted this comment Presidentpez was starred Presidentpez was unstarred
    Image of cocodevaux cocodevaux
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    even more suspicious: what are they trying to do by reviving scott wolf's career now? is juliet in on some subliminal party of five media take over? are they attempting to lull us into a state of complacency with 90's heartthrobs? we want answers! trust no one! #v
     Reply
    cocodevaux was starred cocodevaux was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    Interesante. #v
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of Bruck Bruck
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    So I guess this means Juliet won't be back for the final season of 'Lost' :o( #v
     Reply
    secretagentman promoted this comment Bruck was starred Bruck was unstarred
    Image of secretagentman secretagentman
    11/11/09

    @Bruck: In interviews Mitchell mentioned she will be back in some capacity. #v
     Reply
    secretagentman was starred secretagentman was unstarred
    Image of Gawkerati Gawkerati
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    Is it lost on anyone that this is a remake of a 1980s series? #v
     Reply
    secretagentman promoted this comment Gawkerati was starred Gawkerati was unstarred
    Image of secretagentman secretagentman
    11/11/09

    @Gawkerati: I think what's lost is the sarcasm of the post. #v
     Reply
    secretagentman was starred secretagentman was unstarred
    Image of lionboy lionboy
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    Was the guy getting tortured a Ken doll? He seemed to just be smooth plastic where his junk should be. #v
     Reply
    lionboy approved this comment lionboy was starred lionboy was unstarred
    Image of Swifter Swifter
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    They must have some pretty good dope in NYC. #v
     Reply
    Swifter was starred Swifter was unstarred
    Image of triplethreat triplethreat
    11/11/09

    @Swifter: Some of us actually know what an allegory is. We just don't work at Gawker. #v
     Reply
    triplethreat was starred triplethreat was unstarred
    Image of franklinquinten franklinquinten
    11/11/09

    In reply to The Four Clips That Prove ABC's V Is Anti-Obama Propaganda
    You're giving Hollywood WAY too much thinking credit on this. All they do is try and throw in every possible issue they can think of to maximize every possible type of viewer. Go back to your NYU Critical Theory class. The most interesting thing about what is happening in the show is everyone is white except for the runaway aliens who are black and latino. Why? Because that's how the racist idiots on the west side of LA view life.
     Reply
    Michael Bauser promoted this comment franklinquinten was starred franklinquinten was unstarred
    Image of Michael Bauser Michael Bauser
    11/11/09

    @franklinquinten: Based on responses like yours, I think Adrian was actually giving too much credit to Gawker readers. #v
     Reply
    Michael Bauser was starred Michael Bauser was unstarred
    Image of ninety_nine ninety_nine
    06/14/09

    In reply to Kiss The Ring: Bank Of America Takes Mercy On Their Pitiful, Ant-Like, Broke Customers
    It should be generally noted that banks processing debits and credits in a specific order. Meaning that they take money OUT of your account FIRST, then put money in. Regulatory changes over the past couple years regarding settlement have evolved, but I don't see that stuff regularly, so I don't know what is required (some banks are 'nicer' than others). Generally, think of all daily transactions as happening after the bank closes (say, 6PM). All withdrawals (debits) -- checks, ATMs, etc., occur in order they arrive, followed by credits -- deposits, refunds, transfers -- then flow in. Generally, if you end up with a positive balance after the credits are processed, you will be okay. But if a deposited check is not fully available, you might be overdrawn (which is when your current balance and available balance are unequal). Mileage may vary, due to the type of relationship you have, the bank, etc.


    This, strictly speaking, isn't how it happens, allowing for things like deposit availability (when a check clears), but understand that if you deposit cash at 4PM Monday that covers a series of transactions from the weekend that would make you overdrawn does not guarantee you won't get hit with a bundle of overdraft fees. Rationally speaking, it should (after all, if the bank is zeroing out all your daily transactions at once, no money has been lost if you end up with a positive balance), but, you know, banks. If you imagine that an overdrawn amount as a bell that rings every time you are mathematically in the red, you can see how the bell rings five times before you cash deposit hits, and voila, 5 overdraft fees, even though by 7PM Monday your account is adequately funded.


    Until federal bank regs are overhauled so that settlement occurs immediately (something that is, generally speaking, technically viable), you can fume at banks all you want, but you can't really stop them, so keep the above in mind, since it mirrors the way accounts were processed before ATMs (this is the 'batch processing' that Gladwell was referring to in his latest opus of idiocy) and various settlement advances happened. It should generally protect you from fee problems, but also will constrain your spending. Just because online banking looks immediate and feels like it is the last word, it may well not be the case.


    Generally, avoid combo ATM/Debit cards, and use a monthly intermediary like AMEX to fund card purchasing, or online payments (like PayPal), unless you check on or manage your frequently. AMEX requires more discipline, but the liability issues about a Debit card are not worth the headache, and AMEX has excellent fraud management. When you use AMEX, you are basically withholding final settlement of your liability, which is not a bad personal policy, provided you manage your cash. It will be the only leverage you get, so take what you can, since everyone else is. Your employer makes you wait two weeks for pay, the government holds your estimated takes up to a year before issuing the refund you are due, so why shouldn't you delay final settlement as long as possible?

     Reply
    ninety_nine was starred ninety_nine was unstarred
    Image of Foster Kamer Foster Kamer
    06/14/09

    @ninety_nine: Don't I owe you a beer or something?
     Reply
    Foster Kamer was starred Foster Kamer was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    06/13/09

    In reply to Kiss The Ring: Bank Of America Takes Mercy On Their Pitiful, Ant-Like, Broke Customers
    And I promise you these fucks are protected by every relevant congress member and senator of both parties. The ownership class of America see us all as being beneath dirt and worthy only of stealing from. Usury protection? Don't ask for help from Joe Biden or Chris Dodd. They're laughing their asses off about this.
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    06/13/09

    In reply to Kiss The Ring: Bank Of America Takes Mercy On Their Pitiful, Ant-Like, Broke Customers
    Here's a suggestion for changing the banking system permanently and making them heel to consumers: stop paying your credit card balances. Sure, if just one of us does it, they'll be screwed. If everyone does it, the banks will be fucked. As they should be. Fuck. Them.
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of JuliaJolie JuliaJolie
    06/13/09

    In reply to Kiss The Ring: Bank Of America Takes Mercy On Their Pitiful, Ant-Like, Broke Customers
    Here's what happened to me:

    - Checked my Online Banking at 2am, morning of June 9th

    - Went in to deposit $140 cash as a $575 cheque was going to be pending any day now, which would have left me $60 overdrawn without the $140

    - Put in cash, avail immediately, went back home, Online Banking statement AND branch employee says it went through

    - June 10: OB statement says $575 cheque went through on 8th (???)

    - 0.47 transaction (charge for international cancer donation, why??)

    - MBTA transaction had been pulled out on 28th June and re-posted on June 8th

    - 7 transactions rearranged from highest to lowest including cheque and processed BEFORE $140 cash went in, resulting in 6 overdraft fees


    So they fudged the date on my cheque, pulled out and put back in a transaction, and rearranged the transactions from highest to lowest to maximise their overdrafts.


    And then they tell me to use Online Banking to keep track of my fucking account!


    FUCK BofA. No sane human being can keep up with these constant mindfucks. Instead of having almost $80 in my account I am now $98 overdrawn.

     Reply
    JuliaJolie was starred JuliaJolie was unstarred
    Image of AndIAmTellingYou AndIAmTellingYou
    06/15/09

    @JuliaJolie: BofA does this all the time with me, too. I check my balance before purchases or withdrawals, yet they constantly change the dates on transactions, and then by payday I'm been down nearly $100 in overdraft fees.


    Their shady "accounting" has me looking for another bank.

     Reply
    AndIAmTellingYou was starred AndIAmTellingYou was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.