• Profile logout login

#allensalkin

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:10 AM
Tue Dec 8
49 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #allensalkin more →

    Your Last Chance to Buy Gawker's James Franco-Endorsed Sarah Palin SlamBook: Tonight

    The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)

    The Gawker Sarah Palin Slam Book: Bid on This Literary Treasure for Charity

    It's the 2009 National Book Awards and These People Feel Fine

    The Gray Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche"

    NYT: Did DJ AM's MTV Show Kill Him?

    Aspiring Young Whites Found in Neighborhood Full of Same

    Josh Harris' Sunday Styles Treatment: The Ultimate Tech Cautionary Tale

    Oversharing Culture Breaking Point Broken By Anti-Overshare Society

    NYT Styles Profiles Annie Leibovitz's Financial Problems And Enablers
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Aatom Aatom
    11/30/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    We are all aware that we're using the term "dating" in some sort of perverse postmodern way that means anything but actually dating, right?
     Reply
    Aatom was starred Aatom was unstarred
    Image of manchops manchops
    11/30/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    I'm guessin this guy is seriously packin
     Reply
    manchops was starred manchops was unstarred
    Image of ShawnP ShawnP
    11/30/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    Perhaps Madonna should branch out into gospel.
     Reply
    ShawnP was starred ShawnP was unstarred
    Image of ShawnP ShawnP
    11/30/09

    @ShawnP: Shit. Embedding disabled.
     Reply
    ShawnP was starred ShawnP was unstarred
    Image of Conchie Birdie Conchie Birdie
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    Wouldn't those Kabbalah people frown upon this? For shame, Madge, FOR SHAME!
     Reply
    Conchie Birdie was starred Conchie Birdie was unstarred
    Image of Baroness Baroness
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    I hear he's nervous about his upcoming PhD dissertation in DJoreagraphy and throwing style-faces over the turntables. Bitch is living some sort of Zoolander dream.

    What must life mean for an unbright young man to aspire to become Samantha Ronson's iPod? Pretending to play trite music for horrible people night after night, and having to go home to that vortex of dominatricism.. fuck, the comedy writes itself.
     Reply
    Baroness was starred Baroness was unstarred
    Image of hughman hughman
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    Zhay-ZOOSE wept.
     Reply
    hughman was starred hughman was unstarred
    Image of Foster Kamer Foster Kamer
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    Obligatory.
     Reply
    Foster Kamer was starred Foster Kamer was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    The NYT was really really really late on this, no? Or is this what we called in the old days, "Turkey Copy" -- the evergreen feature story laid in months in advance for the looooong weekend.
     Reply
    Edited by If_I_Had_a_Poodle at 11/29/09 9:19 PM If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Zira Zira
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    He'll be shopping around sex tapes of Madonna by next year.
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle promoted this comment Zira was starred Zira was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    11/29/09

    @Zira: I'd watch that
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Zira Zira
    11/29/09

    @If_I_Had_a_Poodle:

    Just make sure you don't watch it on a full stomach. (Remember Madonna will be in it.)
     Reply
    Zira was starred Zira was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    11/29/09

    @Zira: Other than her frighteningly sculpted and scarily veined arms, I thinks she's pretty hot. If she'd wear opera length gloves in the sex tape I'd definitely purchase it.
     Reply
    ShawnP promoted this comment ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of Lysergic Asset Lysergic Asset
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    The narcissistic/blasphemous "Jesus Loves You" shirt should win him the support of the Catholic community.

    Related: is the Times aiming for "barely" or "no" shred of dignity left?
     Reply
    Edited by Lysergic Asset at 11/29/09 9:10 PM Lysergic Asset was starred Lysergic Asset was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    Sure is pretty though.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of CheetoBurrito CheetoBurrito
    11/29/09

    @BookishLookish: He does have a nice rack, eh?
     Reply
    BookishLookish promoted this comment CheetoBurrito was starred CheetoBurrito was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/29/09

    @CheetoBurrito: Gadgeous.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    11/29/09

    @BookishLookish: I can't imagine what she sees in him. When you strip away the square jaw, the rippling abs, the piercing blue eyes, the thick head of tousled bed head hair, the perfect teeth, the tawny skin, the lush kissable lips, a 22 year old's sexual stamina combined with hot Latin blood that probably creates insatiable sexual desires, what does he really have to offer?
     Reply
    BookishLookish promoted this comment Edited by ParahSalin at 11/29/09 9:51 PM ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/29/09

    @ParahSalin: Hmm. I bet he is very good at simple, amusing games and he can probably cook a bit, too. And I have never met a Brazilian who did not like to dance.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of La Mareada La Mareada
    11/29/09

    @ParahSalin: Madonna is only interested in him for his deep Kaballah energy.

    Kind of the way Irish Priests feel the holy spirit of their young charges or evangelical mega-church youth pastors enjoy the praise singing of the teen group.
     Reply
    BookishLookish promoted this comment La Mareada was starred La Mareada was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/29/09

    @La Mareada: Ah, but get right up close to him, he smells like cachaça and deep, deep consent.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    11/29/09

    @La Mareada: I have no doubt they are doing it religiously and with fervor!!!! Probably a few times a day.
     Reply
    ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of Baroness Baroness
    11/29/09

    @BookishLookish: I mistrust his wolfish blue eyes. They freak me . He must embody some Dolce Vita gigolo fantasy of Madonna's, I suppose. Which I can only applaud, though he's far from my type.
     Reply
    Baroness was starred Baroness was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/29/09

    @Baroness: I am really much more partial to the blonds these days, but still, I am very inclined to maintain a Good Neighbor Policy with Jesus.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of jrhys jrhys
    11/29/09

    @Baroness: He works for my Dolce Vita gigolo fantasy too!
     Reply
    jrhys was starred jrhys was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    11/29/09

    In reply to The New York Times is Not Amused by Jesus (Luz)
    But, we still don't know if he was born in a manger.
     Reply
    momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of Atilla the Bun Atilla the Bun
    11/29/09

    @momof3wildkids: I don't think it is a coincidence that she is dating a guy named Jesus. Though I think that was a matter of P.R. rather divine intervention.
     Reply
    Atilla the Bun was starred Atilla the Bun was unstarred
    Image of jburnaway jburnaway
    11/26/09

    In reply to The Gawker Sarah Palin Slam Book: Bid on This Literary Treasure for Charity
    Foster, your mock/serious excitement almost makes me want to bid... unfortunately, I am only about 8 drinks into the night..... give me 4 more beers and I will SO win this thing
     Reply
    Foster Kamer promoted this comment jburnaway was starred jburnaway was unstarred
    Image of Foster Kamer Foster Kamer
    11/27/09

    @jburnaway: Not at all mock! I am totes serious. You need to get more drunk and bid the fuck out of this thing. #TAXDEDUCTIBLE.
     Reply
    Foster Kamer was starred Foster Kamer was unstarred
    Image of jburnaway jburnaway
    11/27/09

    @Foster Kamer: #TAXDEDUCTIBLE =best hashtag EVER... and i just sobered up enough to realize sloane crosley signed it... ugh... cruel world!
     Reply
    jburnaway was starred jburnaway was unstarred
    Image of Jamie Peck Jamie Peck
    11/25/09

    In reply to The Gawker Sarah Palin Slam Book: Bid on This Literary Treasure for Charity
    Sorry to bust yr ballz again Foster, but I didn't write that ish about wolves. Anyone who knows me will tell you that my writing isn't half as legible as that.
     Reply
    Foster Kamer promoted this comment Jamie Peck was starred Jamie Peck was unstarred
    Image of Foster Kamer Foster Kamer
    11/25/09

    @Hunter_Suicide: Surprises! Well then. You signed, didn't you? Mysteries!
     Reply
    Foster Kamer was starred Foster Kamer was unstarred
    Image of Jamie Peck Jamie Peck
    11/25/09

    @Foster Kamer: no, didn't think I was fancy enough. Note the wistful look on my face as I watch Bercovici go to town.
     Reply
    Edited by Jamie Peck at 11/25/09 4:34 AM Jamie Peck was starred Jamie Peck was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    11/24/09

    In reply to The Gawker Sarah Palin Slam Book: Bid on This Literary Treasure for Charity
    Yikes! Bidding is over a thousand bucks and nine days to go! You're over the limit for what I can get away with without my husband saying "what the hell did you buy???? You're NEVER even gonna to wear those shoes! I bet you can't even walk in them. Walk. Yes, now, WALK! You look like a moron and you're gonna kill yourself in those, enjoy the five hundred dollar blisters, idiot. And change your emergency contact info for when they cart you off to the emergency room in the wahmbulance, cause if it's a shoe-related injury, I ain't comin to get you."
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    11/24/09

    @misslinda: It is back down to $700ish.... what happened?

    My husband would say something similar about shoes.....
     Reply
    momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    11/24/09

    @momof3wildkids: Oh really...hmm...another couple of days and it'll be down into my price range! And if I got another copy of her book (bargain bin, natch), I could strap them to my feet and wear them as shoes (just anticipating the "what the hell are you going to do with that? You're not even going to read it, and if you are, it's just going to make you angry. At least you can wear a pair of expensive shoes. Idiot." rant).
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.