<![CDATA[Gawker: am new york]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: am new york]]> http://gawker.com/tag/amnewyork http://gawker.com/tag/amnewyork <![CDATA['amNY' Asks: Is This Show Too Awesome?]]> Look! Those Gossip Girl ads the whole world is talking about (or at least the part of the world that lives in New York and probably "curates" a "linklog" or something) made the front page of am New York, a free tabloid daily owned by Tribune Co. You know what's funny? Gossip Girl airs on the CW, the network most people still mistake for the one that failed after canceling Homeboys in Outer Space. Also the CW has something called a "ten-year affiliation agreement" with—wait for it!—Tribune Co! Which also owns the CW affiliate WPIX, right here in (am) New York. SYNERGY. [Maura] (Related: watch Mad Men! It's a show about men in suits who smoke or something.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028612&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[amNew York hawkers are suing parent company...]]> amNew York hawkers are suing parent company Tribune Co. because they're not getting paid minimum wage. (That's $7.15 an hour, in case you don't remember.) Maybe there was some confusion since the paper is free, they didn't think they needed to pay people? [NYS]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291723&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Serial killer David "Son of Sam" Berkowitz...]]> Serial killer David "Son of Sam" Berkowitz used to correspond with Jimmy Breslin at the Daily News; now he's reduced to sending missives to A.M. New York. Sure, the guy's a psychopath who murdered six people, but you've got to feel a little sympathy for him: A.M. New York? Really? [AMNY]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291617&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Conrad Black Even Swears Like Nixon]]> conrblalordladyblack.jpg
  • In an interview with the Guardian, Conrad Black calls his fraud trial "bullshit" and announces that he's at war with the U.S. government. The paper also has an excerpt from Black's forthcoming biography of Richard Nixon, which praises the former president's "surpassing dignity." Read into that what you will. [Guardian]
  • Fashion mag ad pages sales: Count Vogue, W, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Marie Claire, Lucky, Men's Health, Men's Journal, and (maybe) Details and Teen Vogue as winners. Your losers: Esquire, InStyle, Seventeen, Cosmogirl, and Maxim. [WWD]
  • San Francisco Chronicle to cut 100 jobs, or 25% of the staff. [WSJ]

  • The business magazine segment is getting too crowded. That's bad news for titles like Business 2.0. [AdAge]
  • AM New York, Metro take their battle to the web. We've just realized that the guys at the subway entrances shoving their papers at you are the real world equivalent of pop-up ads. [NYT]
  • Time Warner shareholders passed resolutions calling for more control over the company's decisions. CEO Dick Parsons says the board will "carefully consider" the proposals, which sounds a lot like "no way in hell" to us. [WSJ]
  • Former Bloomberg employee Jon Friedman says that Bloomberg has nothing to worry about from the recent Thomson-Reuters merger. [MarketWatch]
  • Simon Dumenco: "The print-media industry is not only filled with f—k-ups, it coddles them." [AdAge]
  • Who reads England's Daily Mail? The paper says "web-savvy early adopters," the paper's critics say "troglodytic, white van-driving bigots." [Independent]
  • Former veep Dan Quayle wrote a book review for the weekend Wall Street Journal. Insert your own spelling joke here. [NYT]
  • Is Jane Pratt headed west? The former Sassy/Jane editor has put her townhouse on the market for $3.65 million. She once had sex with Drew Barrymore, you know. [NYM]

    ]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262078&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Julia Allison's Sad Breakup With AM New York]]> Julia Allison, our generation's very own brain-damaged Bradshaw, and free newspaper AM New York have mutually decided to end their relationship. We're sensing this won't be the kind of breakup where sometimes the former couple unites for intense hatefucks and crying: "We've enjoyed working with Julia for the past year and a half. We wish her all the best in her career," is all AM New York wanted to say when we asked whether Julia had been fired. We're guessing that maybe the blog post where Julia called AM on its lack of "journalistic integrity" might have had something to do with the split. But Julia's not looking back: "There's other shit I want to do, most of which involves marrying rich, but I've wanted to leave AM for a while now, and I was really passive aggressive in the last few weeks ... oh yeah, baby, it's all downhill from here. ;) i do hope i can stick with tv. writing is far too much effort ;)" she volunteered to us via (obvs) instant messenger. We have nothing to add.

    Earlier: If Julia Allison is A Media Whore, Does That Make Us a Media Pimp?

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=242000&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[One More Reason To Hate Those Skinny Bitches On The Train]]> http://www.gawker.com/assets/resources/2007/01/subway2-thumb.jpgA distressing report from this morning's AM New York, which you probably read during the interminable wait for your train, revealed one of the possible reasons for the interminable wait for your train: chicks on diets.
    "Sick customer," MTA-speak for a subway delay caused by an ill passenger, was the No. 3 cause of disruptions between October 2005 and October 2006, an analysis of agency statistics shows. "You have women trying to get their bodies tight for the summer and they won t eat," said Asim Nelson, a Transit emergency medical technician based in Grand Central Station. "Not eating for three or four days, you are going to go down. If you don t eat for 12 hours you are going to get weak."
    We're not sure what to make of it all, except to note that it makes that whole new ad campaign (click to enlarge) slightly more understandable.

    Skinny girls to blame for late trains? [AMNY]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=225458&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Field Guide: Julia Allison]]>

    I was sort of annoyed that the New York Times didn't interview me ... I'm sort of surprised no news producers have called me yet.
    That's amNew York sex columnist (or "effing sex columnist" as one source describes her) Julia Allison in Radar, lamenting the insufficient media attention she's received lately. Specifically, Allison figured she'd get more ink from her 2003 relationship with one Harold E. Ford, who happens to be running for a Senate seat in Tennessee. Their thang came back to the surface as part of a Republican smear versus Ford regarding his past attendance at "Playboy parties" and supposed penchant for white chicks (Ford is black). Rather than go for potential Mandingo-mongering, the Republicans actually used a hilariously tawdry TV commercial bit with a sexed-up (white) woman imploring Ford to call her. So anyway — as that imbroglio fades back into the pre-election churn, let's turn our attention back to Julia. For someone who's merely a columnist at a free paper, many New York media types know her — and have a few things to say about her.

    When we ran a party photo of Allison earlier in the week, we immediately received the following in the tipline:

    Ew, please, do not give that attention-seeking girl any more of the coverage she so desperately seeks. We (Georgetown journalism students) were thrilled when she was suspended from the Hoya and given an F in our journalism course for plagiarizing one of her columns. Haaaate that she's screwed her way up here as well.
    A (further) trip down memory lane is in order. Julia Allison used to be Julia Baugher, a sex-dating-relationship columnist for the Georgetown paper Hoya. Way back in December 2002, she wrote a listicle detailing holiday gifts for your lovah, and what those gifts secretly mean. Unfortunately, it appeared that most of the gift ideas (and some of the prose) had been cribbed from iVillage, of all places. Despite complaints about this, Baugher wasn't kicked off the paper; she recalls the paper's internal review as concluding that "I did not plagiarize in any way." The haters were just trying to advance a "personal agenda" of some kind.

    Baugher soldiered on, and it was in April 2003 that Lloyd Grove (then still at the Washington Post) wrote her up as sharing a table with Harold Ford. Mini-media celebrity began to accumulate almost immediately, with sex- or politics-commentary (or both) in various national outlets. In July 2003, Baugher (according to Post reporter Frank Ahrens) attempted to get out of paying for grapefruit at a hotel by throwing the Post's name around, claiming she worked for them. Confronted, Baugher said she was actually (and inscrutably) name-dropping the Hoya. In reality, Baugher had some early discussion about contributing to the Post's free Express tabloid, but nothing was set up yet. Regardless, after a few more laps around the media appearance track, Baugher quit the Hoya as of January 2004, supposedly because her sex column (in a Jesuit university's paper) couldn't be graphic enough to suit her tastes. Not long after, Julia Baugher became Julia Allison, decamped to New York, and began writing another sex column for another free paper.

    julia%20allison%20who%20am%20i.jpgAnd she's been riding the grapefruit train ever since. (Though it hasn't helped her get recognized by event photographer Patrick McMullan, who couldn't ID her for the pic at right.) In New York, Allison has a whole ecosystem of media industry horny toads to romp among, as opposed to those charming but rather conflicted political types. Eligible men are her favorite playtoy — and eligibility is very generously interpreted. Her habit of purring and flirting with taken or married men frequently brings the claws out from those menfolk's significant others. For a time, she even enjoyed a public companionship and rumored private dalliance with none other than Lloyd Grove. If you happen to be one of the few people who doesn't know about her affair with Harold Ford, she'll certainly fill you in — all the while wondering aloud if she really should go on Fox News again. And don't even get her started about when she dumped a guy in a Jamba Juice, after supposedly stealing him from away from his wife.

    Allison's easy to spot at most any media party of consequence — she's everywhere, it seems — and she's famous for laying it on thicker than a toddler spreading peanut butter. She's so excited to see everyone she meets, she just loves you, you're so great, she really wants to be best friends, and so forth. All this is delivered along with self-deprecating complaints about her own bad habit of relentless self-promotion, but no matter how unsubtle the hint, she's not getting the message that she herself is sending. Who knows, perhaps dialing it down a bit might make that longed-for threesome happen sooner, or make that Silver Bullet finally obsolete.

    Harold Ford's Ex Finds Fame on the Web [Radar]
    [Photo: Nikola Tamindzic]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=211734&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[amNY: You Say 'No' But You Really Mean 'Yes']]> This morning, a blogger heroically saved a copy of am New York from clogging the drains and discovered this story about the city's budget deficit. Or surplus. Same thing.

    In other news, the sky is brown, our city's cabs are pink and the New York Yankees are on the march to the World Series.

    The headline has been changed for the online version, unfortunately.

    amNY Watch: Red with Anger [East Village Idiot]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=211023&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA['Post': Free Papers to Blame for Imagined Future Tragedies]]>
    With every war, there is collateral damage, and then there is wartime propaganda. In today's wonderfully alliterative editorial, New York Post comes out swinging against AM New York and Metro, pointing its fingers squarely at the free dailies for tragedies that may or may not occur sometime in the future. Because they are a major -not the only, or even the most significant- cause of subway floods and fires.

    We agree that, if nothing else, careless distribution of the papers adds to the litter and find the First Amendment rationale to be specious. Though to be honest, Post seems more peeved that it has to play by the rules and the other guys don't.

    The Post and all its paid competitors are limited in how and where they can sell their papers on the subways. The freebies alone shouldn't be given a free pass to ignore those laws.

    But we're taking our eyes off the real issue, that the only way to keep the public safe from a future imagined catastrophe is to get the free papers out of subway stations.
    Especially when doing so creates a threat than can endanger the lives of thousands of straphangers. Now that the MTA has identified the problem, it's up to the agency to work out how to solve it.

    And it's up to the NYPD to enforce the laws evenly and protect the public - before there's a real tragedy in the subways.


    FREEBIES, FLOODS & FIRES [NYP]]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210589&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Casualties of War: Free Papers Cause Subway Flooding]]> There is a war going on in New York, specifically, a war for the hearts and minds of commuters who don't want to pay 25 cents for the Post. And the war has a victim: the subway. Discarded copies of AM New York and Metro had been blamed for track fires in the past, and now, MTA officials are pointing to them as the culprit for the flooding that seemingly occurs every time it rains more than an inch.

    "The drain-clogging freebies were largely responsible for a massive flood in September 2004 that shut down much of the system, MTA board members said yesterday," reports the Post, who surely wants a piece of that market. Newspapers hawkers are supposed to stay off MTA property, but in their zealousness, they ignore the rules of engagement and descend onto the platforms, and worse, leave stacks inside stations, allowing the papers to drift off and into the drainage pipes.

    What will the NYPD do about it? Absolutely nothing, apparently. "When the activity creates an obstruction or other safety concern police officers take action," says the deputy commissioner. "Otherwise we don't infringe on the distribution of the newspapers."

    "I certainly hope it's not us," Lori Rosen, Metro spokeswoman, said while gesturing in the direction of AM New York.

    MTA PAPER WAR [NY Post]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210319&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Lidle Crash: 'AM New York' Gets Results]]>
    This is from a letter printed in AM New York this morning. Take about having your finger on the pulse of the zeitgeist! We're have no idea who Stanley Saji of Brooklyn is, but we're pretty sure you don't want to get on his bad side.

    Yankees need a change [AMNY]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=207195&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Freepapers 2006: They're Ba-ack]]> 20060313newsies.jpgYou know how every now and then the Post or the News or even the Journal or the Times is being given away for free somewhere in our fair city, usually in a sponsored-copies promotion? Well, today, apparently, nearly everything's free. Reports a correspondent:

    Why were all the tabloids being give away for free today? My West 4th station had people giving away AM NY, Metro, Daily News, and NYP. I thought a fight was about to break out. Was it: Information just wants to be free? You get what you pay for? If we hook the kids on a freebie of this Page Six stuff we'll have them for life? Or possibly all of the above? I turn to you for answers.

    An answer from little old us? OK, fine. Our best guess is that it has something to do with pushing up May's monthly circ average with sponsored copies. (Although: Do newspapers care about the monthly averages? Or just the twice-yearly reports?) Anyone else catch the papers and see who's sponsoring them? If so, let us know. Meantime, we'll be heading down to West Fourth. A riot among rivalrous gangs of free-paper hawkers is something we totally want to see.

    Earlier: Freepapers 2006: In Sprint to ABC Finish Line, 'Post' Gets Caught 'Roiding Up

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=177332&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[New York's Futuristic Toilets Are Shiny]]>
    How could you skip a story headlined, "City Unveils Pay Toilets of Tomorrow"? You could not skip it. Nor could we. And, as a public service, we pass along amNew York's picture of a prototype of the toilets to be installed on city streets as part of a billion-dollar contract for various "street furniture" in the city, including new bus shelters, new newsstands, and 20 of these "toilets of tomorrow." Study them; know them; be ready to shit in them.

    Also, they're coincidentally the "homeless sleeping places" of tomorrow night.

    City Unveils Pay Toilets of Tomorrow [amNY]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=162459&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Free Newspapers: Highly Combustible Garbage]]> Our beloved officials at the MTA announced yesterday that refuse left behind from riders has resulted in "about 15 tons more trash a day" than in 2004. Authorities noted communter newspapers like AM New York and Metro, which are hawked outside of subway entrances, are particularly responsible in the increase in garbage, and "may be in large part to blame for a surge in track fires."

    We always knew the freebie papers weren't just garbage — they're perfectly good for kindling, too. Also worth noting: When there's a track fire, there will be delays; and when there's delays, what better way to pass the time than with a free paper? Quite the vicious little circle they've got going.

    MTA Blames Commuter Papers for Surge in Track Fires [NY1]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=157447&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[A Basic-Cable Network Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand. Or Can It?]]> While the Times is distracted by that insignificant little Sunni-Shiite battle brewing, and as the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian tensions escalate in the Mideast, and as Democrats and Republicans nationwide hate each other more and more, amNew York gives front-page coverage to the sectarian struggle that really matters.

    amNew York
    Earlier:
    Breaking: Abortion Banned, Bush to Lead NARAL Rallies
    This Just In: Hair Grows

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156806&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[This Just In: Hair Grows]]>
    We've said it before and we'll say it again: With the free dailies, you get what you pay for.

    amNew York
    Earlier: Gawker's coverage of 'amNew York'

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155478&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Let's Just Call It 963,813]]>
    As we said before, you get what you pay for. And that doesn't include a calculator.

    The "am" Stands for About a Million [Copyranter]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=151699&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[A Little Correction, for a Little Fuckup]]> A tiny box on amNew York's second page today:
    20060125amnycorrex.jpg

    Cause, really, what's the big whoop?

    amNew York
    Earlier: Breaking: Abortion Banned; Bush to Lead NARAL Rallies

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=150606&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Breaking: Abortion Banned; Bush to Lead NARAL Rallies]]>
    With free dailies, apparently, you get what you pay for.

    amNew York [Newsday.com]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=150307&view=rss&microfeed=true