Enter your username and password.
New York, 7:10 PM
Thu Nov 26
21 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/18/09
11/15/09
11/15/09
Sorry Hollywood, YouTube wins again. This is the best movie of the past week as far as I am concerned. #2012
11/16/09
11/15/09
11/15/09
Nah, I don't know what it means, either.
11/15/09
I don't see why you think the movie version is doing well. Six-million wouldn't cover the production costs of even the lowest crap movie. It's good for writers that "Saffire's" ode to crap writing fails. And I am glad that after getting an outrageous amount of money for the book--which I bet the publisher never earned back--that the movie is failing.
If you want to know why shitty writers are sucking up all the money in publishing--and I don't mean shitty writers who sell best-sellers, but shitty writers who are the darlings of The New Yorker for months--it begins with Saffire.
Stop complimenting the awful movie of her awful book. She's a grotesque, offensive hack. #2012
11/15/09
Yeah, I could give a shit about Shove or whatever. Its per-screen is, statistically, doing well. I'm not a fan of the movie (and I haven't even seen it). Read the last graf! It's populist hokey heart-tug bullshit marketed well. But I still think Armond White is wrong about Up, and if I ever see him in a bar, I will throw something at him about this.
Also: Ian! Hi!
11/15/09
(Really. You go look up the reviews on NY Press. I'm not giving him the page views.) #2012
11/15/09
11/15/09
I think Up looks cool. I'll watch it on HBO. #2012
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Even if you go with ten million, which I'm assuming you pulled from boxofficemojo and doesn't jive with the public records of Lionsgate, it's STILL a financial success. I'm with you about the quality of the film and it being in the long line of Crash type white guilt offerings... but you're shooting your own argument in the foot trying to act like it's a financial failure. #2012
11/15/09
11/15/09
Debates about the adverse effects of a Muggle medication mixed with magic potions such as Felix Felicis would then ensue and break off into more microscopic dissections of how each character trait dominant in various Hogwartians might be enhanced by the same (for instance, wouldn't such a thing make Luna Lovegood just fucking lose it and start Avada-Kedavraing the shit out of everyone, a veritable Columbine-meets-Hogwarts situation?).
Eventually a British member of the board would stalk an American member and it would end in tragedy and become a major, International news story and sadly, forever taint the Potter franchise. JK Rowling would go into seclusion and years later the NYT would track her down in a Glaswegian slum, still a billionairess but living in purposeful squalor and doing little but snorting Adderall and watching a DVD of 2012, all day, every day, chanting softly to herself the nonsense word, "fek... fek..." #2012
11/15/09
You know Fred and George already do smoke it. They'd probably be the first ones to market Adderall to the students, via some joke shop item.
Ohh the possibilities.... #2012