I'd like to Douthat to actually detail the mysterious forces that can propel a person to the Presidency independent of their merit. Because I think he'd be hard-pressed to describe them in ways that don't resemble the way Jimmy Stewart got to Congress in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington: ie, powerful people engineering cynical manipulations.
Is Douthat not able to see that the very reason most of us love her is because her bumbling and rambling are so damned entertaining? How else would you explain her poll numbers that went down after the election. People are fascinated with what mistake she will make next that they can't turn away. That 85% of voters said that she's unqualified to be president (during the election) should she need to take over the rains demonstrates this. She's pure entertainment.
Have we considered that Palin's popularity has more to do with the morbid fascination some people have of seeing really truly bad things happen? Like when you slow down to see if there's blood on the ground in the midst of a car accident, or when you watch Funniest Home Videos to see the dad get hit in the nuts by the kid with the baseball bat. I truly believe there are people out there who want her to succeed so that it feeds some prehistoric need of witnessing an utter bloodletting or some other rancid crime. "Oh, let the mayhem ensue" and all that Disney villain nonsense.
Because other than that, I can't see a reason for why anyone would want this delusional loon in public office.
@Spirit Fingers: The alternative is she actually seems to resonate with some people. Think about it: the family that's happy in name only, the thinly-veiled bigotry and hostility to everything "non-American", the oblivious conservative values that willfully ignore reality, the hunting and love of firearms, the religiousness...That describes a good portion of Americans.
@Our Lady of the Massacre: Yes, absolutely true. But that's what, 40% of voters? Definitely not the silent majority that Douthat would lead us to believe exists.
They all miss the thrilling days of yesteryear when a moron with no merit whatever infested the Offal Office for 8 years. Anybody can be president, and nobody said it better than the Crawford Cretin. And he quit on the job, too, though they sent his paychecks to the ranch.
As some Repugnant from Hawaii said about Nixon's Carswell nomination to the Extremes: "Don't the mediocre deserve representation?"
In ten years, she'll come back to the big screen Sarah Palin: The Motion Picture and in 18 years to the small screen as Sarah Palin: The Next Generation, followed by several more iterations on TV and in movie. (This includes an all-too brief run as Sarah Palin: The Animated Series with James Doohan doing most of the voice-overs.)
People will wear Sarah Palin ears and make Sarah Palin hand salutes in that dark period between the cancellation of the original Sarah Palin series and her triumphant return to the millions of adoring fans everywhere. But! J.J. Abrams won't ask her to be in the newest movie, leaving Sarah to be angry on the Interwebz and guesting on Conan O'Brien, crying about what might have been.
I think what he meant is that while Obama's career has meant that anyone who is smart and applies him/herself and is diligent can be President, Palin's meant that any dumbass who is lazy but loud, has sharp enough elbows, is not afraid to spout senseless aphorisms and proud of her political and religious prejudices (small towns vs. cities, Christians vs. infidels, PAC-sponsored partisan politicians vs. community organizers) can be President, provided her handlers repeat incessantly that she's qualified for the job.
Encouraging that the NYT's token conservative for the editorial page knows that saying "fuck it" in the middle of the term for the job that made people take you seriously because she was too hard was a career ender. Unlike his brilliant predecessor.
It's one thing for an attention whore to whine about the glare of the media spotlight, it's quite another to complain about the job being too difficult or too boring.
(1) I had highish hopes for Douthat at the Times, but apparently what they're looking for is not so much intelligent discourse from a conservative point of view as a warm body to reiterate the same tired-ass tropes that have turned the GOP into a total joke.
(2) I'm pretty fucking weary of dudes who went to Harvard championing good ol' ordinary American populism.
(3) "All of this had something to do with ordinary partisan politics. But it had everything to do with Palin's gender and her social class." Y'know, I think it also had to do with the fact that the lines lifted verbatim from Palin's Katie Couric interview were the funniest part of the SNL parody of said interview.
I get angrier the more I think about this column. It seems to me that a useful conservative point of view might be "Things were better for America back when people could man up and admit the mistakes they made were their own fault, instead of insisting for months afterward while staring straight up at the blue sky that the sky isn't blue." Palin was an awful vice presidential candidate. She brought the scorn she did upon herself by being such an awful vice presidential candidate. The only lesson to glean from her treatment by the press and resignation is that if you want to be a vice presidential candidate, it helps a great deal to be at least remotely self-aware and capable of feigning competence, if not competent.
@Moff: "Things were better for America back when people could man up and admit the mistakes they made were their own fault, instead of insisting for months afterward while staring straight up at the blue sky that the sky isn't blue." - When did politicians ever do this?
"...that the old American aphorism about how anyone can grow up to be president might actually be true." Sarah Palin is proof of the terrifying reality of that aphorism. Oh, and that bullshit about "the democratic ideal" rather than "the meritocratic ideal," is what makes us a nation of strip malls and big box stores. Covservatism today has become a front for anyone who wants whatever racist, classist, materialistic, stupid shit that comes out of their mouths to be seen as a legitimate point of view.
It's so fun watching the staunch few that still cling to Family Values Republicanism slowly realize that their only constituents (and sometimes they themselves) are frothing, uneducated, crazies.
@Richard Lawson: Sadly, there real champions (like dimwit Douchehat and Bill Kristol) don't seem to realize this, yet. It's like slowly boiling a frog, if the water were made out of liquid Confederacy.
"Sarah Palin is beloved by millions because her rise suggested, however temporarily, that the old American aphorism about how anyone can grow up to be president might actually be true."
Yeah, and Obama's election totally doesn't suggest this at all.
@leonleonleon: Yeah. You'd figure Obama more vividly suggests that anyone can be president since he's actually the president, not the second-place second-in-command.
Sarah Palin's stumbling to get a (worthless) communications degree was an inspiration to me. Now I know I won't ever be governor of a minor state. This is almost worse than my star's impending layoff.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Because other than that, I can't see a reason for why anyone would want this delusional loon in public office.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
As some Repugnant from Hawaii said about Nixon's Carswell nomination to the Extremes: "Don't the mediocre deserve representation?"
07/06/09
People will wear Sarah Palin ears and make Sarah Palin hand salutes in that dark period between the cancellation of the original Sarah Palin series and her triumphant return to the millions of adoring fans everywhere. But! J.J. Abrams won't ask her to be in the newest movie, leaving Sarah to be angry on the Interwebz and guesting on Conan O'Brien, crying about what might have been.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Encouraging that the NYT's token conservative for the editorial page knows that saying "fuck it" in the middle of the term for the job that made people take you seriously because she was too hard was a career ender. Unlike his brilliant predecessor.
It's one thing for an attention whore to whine about the glare of the media spotlight, it's quite another to complain about the job being too difficult or too boring.
07/06/09
(2) I'm pretty fucking weary of dudes who went to Harvard championing good ol' ordinary American populism.
(3) "All of this had something to do with ordinary partisan politics. But it had everything to do with Palin's gender and her social class." Y'know, I think it also had to do with the fact that the lines lifted verbatim from Palin's Katie Couric interview were the funniest part of the SNL parody of said interview.
I get angrier the more I think about this column. It seems to me that a useful conservative point of view might be "Things were better for America back when people could man up and admit the mistakes they made were their own fault, instead of insisting for months afterward while staring straight up at the blue sky that the sky isn't blue." Palin was an awful vice presidential candidate. She brought the scorn she did upon herself by being such an awful vice presidential candidate. The only lesson to glean from her treatment by the press and resignation is that if you want to be a vice presidential candidate, it helps a great deal to be at least remotely self-aware and capable of feigning competence, if not competent.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
It's so fun watching the staunch few that still cling to Family Values Republicanism slowly realize that their only constituents (and sometimes they themselves) are frothing, uneducated, crazies.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Yeah, and Obama's election totally doesn't suggest this at all.
07/06/09
07/06/09