<![CDATA[Gawker: Andrew Sullivan]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Andrew Sullivan]]> http://gawker.com/tag/andrew sullivan http://gawker.com/tag/andrew sullivan <![CDATA[ Hitch Joins All-Star Roster of Anti-McCain "Smart" Republicans ]]> Noted Bush-supporting former Trotskyite Christopher Hitchens has endorsed Democrat Barack Obama for president! In Slate today, the beloved British alcoholic raves about how Obama isn't a sad old man, like McCain, or an offensive joke, like Sarah Palin. Hitch, like a Nader voter, declares that there are no substantial differences between the candidates, but McCain's temperament is too unstable, and Obama's is much more reassuring. This is basically the argument of a number of noted conservative intellectuals who have, in recent weeks, either endorsed Obama, resigned themselves to an Obama presidency, or simply unendorsed McCain. As the intellectual conservatives abandoned Bush, now they find themselves abandoning the GOP.

Atlantic blogger Andrew Sullivan was once a very prominent, very influential conservative. As recently as last year, even as he largely abandoned Bush, he was still complimenting McCain. Now, not so much.

Times columnist David Brooks scarcely deserves to be called an intellectual, but as we're using that term strictly to mean "East Coast elitists who write about politics professionally" he'll have to do. This "I'm disappointed in McCain but he'll be a good president" column was but a prelude to Brooks' statement during an interview that Obama was a perceptive intellectual surrounded by impressive people and Sarah Palin is a cancer.

Christopher Buckley was hardly a doctrinaire conservative. As a satirical novelist and a smart-ass, one imagines he's not too pleased with the rise of creationist rubes in his beloved GOP (his dad made that fucking bed, obvs, but that's neither here nor there). And Chris claims he wrote in George H.W. Bush in 2004 rather than vote for the son. But that's far different from explicitly endorsing a Democrat, as he did last week. Once again: Obama's temperament and obvious intelligence sealed the deal.

Charles Krauthammer is basically a reliable party hack, always willing to subvert his own intelligence for the good of the party. But the once-influential psychiatrist can't help but see that his movement is not served by the buffoonery of the McCain campaign. He wrote this mild quasi-endorsement of Obama this month:

Obama has shown that he is a man of limited experience, questionable convictions, deeply troubling associations (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko) and an alarming lack of self-definition — do you really know who he is and what he believes? Nonetheless, he's got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament. That will likely be enough to make him president.

And, also at The Atlantic, Ross Douthat, who wrote a book about how Republicans can save themselves, finds himself bewildered by McCain's campaign and unimpressed with the Ayers bullshit and Sarah Palin.

So. Is all that a trend? In the way that the closing of the New York Sun was indicative of the slow death of a movement if not necessarily caused by that death, we think we're seeing the further erosion of the always uneasy GOP pact between libertarian true believers, Christan fundamentalist true believers, nationalists, "just keep my taxes low" rich assholes, and the crowd that just likes to hitch their wagons to winners. A reorganization is on the way. Then most of these listed commentators will probably hop back on the bandwagon.

Also this is how we were originally planning on reporting the Hitch endorsement:



 BREAKING: HITCH SMOKES TWO PACKS, DRINKS 5TH OF SCOTCH, ENDORSES TERRORIST 
]]>
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:46:31 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5062721&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Most Popular One-Man Political Blogger In the World' Demands Palin Baby Truth! ]]> Andrew Sullivan, wow. Just wow. The gay British conservative who over the course of a decade went from proud publisher of racist pseudo-science just for a larf to virulent Obama supporter has spent a month obsessing over everything Sarah Palin has ever said and done and even maybe done. So. He's written some stuff on the bizarre circumstances of the birth of Trig Palin. He defends it (reasonably in our estimation) by arguing that Palin's pro-life position and the politicization of her familial circumstances (special needs kids, son in Iraq, family on stage at convention) makes inquiry into her pregnancy relevant. Sullivan sent this crazy email to the McCain campaign, asking for comment:

"I'm very sorry to say, it's come to this: can you confirm on the record that Trig Palin is Sarah Palin's biological son? . . . Since this is a crazy idea, it should be easy for you or someone to let me know, the most popular one-man political blog site in the world, what the truth is."

HAH. The most popular one-man political blog site in the world wants the truth, Senator!

The McCain campaign did not answer his question. Instead, they forwarded the emails to Washington Post media "critic" or whatever Howard Kurtz! They knew he'd come down hard on Sullivan for such impudence. Or at least they knew he'd print the emails and ask Sullivan for a comment and let them have a comment and then not come to any conclusions about anything, because he's Howard Kurtz.

If we know anything about spotting liars—and we've watched a lot of Columbo—we know now conclusively that Sarah Palin did not give birth to Trig, because they didn't deny or confirm anything and instead attacked the questioner.

Kurtz: "Sullivan, one of the earliest bloggers, has been on a tear about Palin lately, calling her 'a compulsive, repetitive, demonstrable liar.'" Then of course instead of listing a single example of one of those lies and saying whether or not it counts as a lie Kurtz moves on entirely to documenting a "veiled debate" between Sullivan and Ross Douthat. Howard Kurtz, everyone! (This is why we're never invited on his show.)

Baby Talk [WP]

]]>
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:20:38 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blogger Shot in DC ]]> Yikes. Media Consortium blogger Brian Beutler was shot in Washington DC last night, a block away from my old apartment. Or pretty much directly in front of Andrew Sullivan's apartment. He is expected to make a full recovery. And next time, thanks to the Supreme Court, he will be able to shoot back. [DCist, Photo]

]]>
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:52:08 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021942&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Please Politely Welcome Jeffrey Goldberg to the Internet ]]> introblogging.jpgAtlantic contributor Jeffrey Goldberg started his very first blog this week, with a charmingly naive post mostly about how he knows nothing about blogging but does sit near uber-blogger Andrew Sullivan. "This is almost certainly a mistake," he begins, and it turns out he's 100% right. When the New York Observer's media blogger Matt Haber (the forgotten Gawker Alum!) devoted a post yesterday to basically announcing the existence of Goldberg's blog and needling Goldberg for his initial boneheaded support of the Iraq War, Goldberg blew up with rage. Haber's post was a mugging, he says. Jeffrey, Jeffrey, Jeffrey. We'll show you what a mugging is.

Sitting next to Andrew Sullivan does not mean you have anything to contribute. Especially if you are so inexperienced in this raucous online world that you take such offense at a harmless dig in a post designed to call readers' attention to your brand-new unread online diary.

So Goldberg bitched to Andrew Sullivan, who was understandably "unimpressed." The nice way of saying he didn't give a shit, because he's actually got a thick skin. So Goldberg called Haber, who didn't understand what the hell he was on about. Then, "unappeased," Goldberg called Jack Shafer for some reason to whine that the Observer took his lunch money. And Shafer humored him. Mean Matt Haber should've called you for comment!

The absolute last thing the "blogosphere" needs is another boring old center-left "real journalist" magazine writer dipping his toes into the overcrowded wading pool. Hooray, another liberal hawk is here to write 1,000-word hand-wringing posts about Israel and occasionally link to something terribly interesting he read in the New Republic!

From Goldberg's intro post:

I hope to blog, when the spirit moves me, on the future of Israel, the coarsening of American life, the Jewish predisposition toward dissatisfaction, the Mets (see previous), Dylan and Springsteen, the perfidies of Wal-Mart, genocide in Africa, gun control, the civilizational struggle within Islam, airline delays, screenwriting and the bleakness of journalism.

Lord fucking save us.

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:36:42 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385659&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chris Hitchens' "Lesbian" Moment With Andrew Sullivan ]]> Picture 5-14The great fun of Christopher Hitchens is that the commentator so often says things in formal settings you'd expect to hear around the dinner table after many hours of wine and whisky. The Vanity Fair columnist usually pulls this off, in part because a ribald manner is now expected of him, but there's always the risk of pushing it too far, as in the following clip from MSNBC's Tim Russert. Just after Hitchens jokes with pundit Andrew Sullivan to get on with his point and "don't be such a lesbian," he takes a regretful look toward his navel, apparently realizing he may have just put his foot in it. Ah, Hitch, your public expects nothing less. If MSNBC gives you a hard time, the first ten rounds are on us. Video and transcript (via Media Matters) after the jump.

SULLIVAN: Two things. One, it's important to clear up that he [Wright] did not say "The Jews are going to get you" in some conspiratorial, classic anti-Semitic fashion. I think that's just —

HITCHENS: He [Wright] thinks only Jews are going to object to [Rev. Louis] Farrakhan and [Libyan leader Moammar] Gadhafi. Excuse me?

SULLIVAN: No, he didn't say "only."

HITCHENS: No, but —

SULLIVAN: Again, you keep playing with that quote. We're happy to have it on the record. And now you've made me forget my second point, which is —

HITCHENS: Oh, well, don't be such a lesbian. Get on with it.

SULLIVAN: I'm sorry, I've forgotten my second point. But I do think that's important. And I don't think Wright is Farrakhan. And I don't think Obama, in any conceivable way, represents anything but racial inclusion and integration. And anybody that looks at any part of his career and can be in any doubt about that is beyond me.

The reason he went to that church, clearly, if you read his biography, is he wanted to understand what it was to be black in America. He didn't understand. He's a very polyglot person. He grew up in Hawaii, he had some time in Indonesia.
]]>
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:15:00 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5005176&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Last Thing On Comments, I Swear ]]> firingsquad500.jpgLike you, I'm over this whole commenting, what it says about you, what it says about me and our Internet society at large thing. But there's a Wall Street Journal article on the subject, and it's my beat. Atlantic writer Andrew Sullivan, whose website does not have commenting, recently ran a poll about allowing them. The results will shock you. (How's that for an incentive to click the jump?)

Readers voted 60-40 against comments. Their reasoning? It's distracting. As one potential commenter put it:

In truth we would rarely opt not to read them. ... Blog comments have the power to hammerlock one's attention. ... We'd be impotent to resist looking over the rantings and counter-rantings. ... Not only would comments be an incredible drain on one's time (especially if we check your blog several times a day from work), but it also exposes readers to the nasty underbelly of blogging.

As Drugman pointed out yesterday, every blog has its own commenting culture. But I suppose reiterations of "Premature shift key lifters for Obama!!1" could get distracting.

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:03:28 EDT rebecca http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370271&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The December Atlantic will have bear-blogger ... ]]> sullyThe December Atlantic will have bear-blogger Andrew Sullivan on Barack Obama as its cover. Can you hold your breath until then? Let's hope Sully is as right on Obama as he's historically been on everything from "the end of AIDS" to publishing excerpts from The Bell Curve in The New Republic to his participation in a religion that hates him to his misreadings of Susan Sontag to supporting the war in Iraq to linking the 2001 anthrax mailings somehow to the war to endorsing Bush in 2000! [Folio]

]]>
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309648&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan, Theatre Critic ]]> andrew%20sullivan.jpg
Later that night, at the Vanity Fair party held at Christopher Hitchens' house, The Transom pried loose a few wedding details from Mr. Sullivan's fianc , Eric, an actor (last name withheld at Mr. Sullivan's request): It's going to be a small affair, mostly family, to take place in Provincetown, Mass.

"We haven't done much yet to prepare," said Eric, who is currently starring in the Studio Theatre production of The Pillowman. "We've rented the house where we're going to have it—that's about it. It's on the beach."

That's from today's New York Observer (online only for now!). And regarding The Pillowman, from that company's website:
"It's the best contemporary play I've seen in a very long time."—andrewsullivan.theatlantic.net

]]>
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:15 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255174&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gossip Roundup: Spears To Become A Simpson? ]]> britney
  • Though Jessica Simpson's rep denies it, rumors are swirling that her dad Joe wants to svengali up Britney Spears. [R&M]
  • Designer Marc Jacobs' ex-rentboy on and off bf still has notably loose lips, offering up quotes like "Marc has found his way; he's going to be sober for the rest of his life" and bragging about their "like, five fake break-ups." A Jacobs spokesperson says they're not back together. [NYO]
  • Gay, gay wedding bells are ringing for blog queen Andrew Sullivan and an actor named Eric. [NYO]
  • Anderson Cooper keeps his goodies under wraps in the showers at Equinox. [Page Six]
  • Russell Simmons and Tyra Banks "forgot" to pay their lunch tab. [Gatecrasher, 2nd item]

    ]]> Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:45 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255100&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ David Bradley To Form Suspiciously Gay Cadre Of Extremely Sadistic Super-Bloggers ]]> 300-2.jpgDavid G. Bradley, the owner of the Atlantic Monthly, today announced in the Washington Post that he seeks to "recruit a cadre of uber-experts to form what he calls the Atlantic Society, 'where we will find 300 of the smartest human beings across the main intellectual terrains we're likely to cover and to go out and ask them, would they be essayists for the Atlantic?'" And if they decline the opportunity, he slits their throats on the spot. We knew things were going to get deliciously freaky over there after they hired that perv Andrew Sullivan away from Time.

    Consultancy Founder Devotes Himself To Remaking Atlantic Media Online [WaPo]

    ]]>
    Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:14:20 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243753&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan's New Look ]]> After addled former-con blogger Andrew Sullivan's one-year contract was up at Time last month, he hopped his buns over to the Atlantic, and had his illustration redone.

    The HuffPo notes at least ten differences between the old and new drawings. A few items they missed that the drawings omitted altogether: crazily vascular forearms; bear paunch; rolling papers. Also the crazy nerd-chick in the background of the new drawing? Is that the secret crazy tranny that tells him what to change his mind about each week? Or does the Atlantic permanently employ Velma from Scooby Doo? Are they besieged by ghosts?

    ]]>
    Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:58:49 EST Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235867&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ JoeJournalist Had Better Be James Fallows, Because We're Getting Pretty Goddamned Tired Of This Story ]]> joethatyou.jpgSo, JoeJournalist: We figured this scintillating story had run its course but, unfortunately, no. In a segment on the consistently incendiary BloggingHeads.tv, suspected self-aggrandizer Mickey Kaus claims that he knows who the solipsist is, and that it isn't Andrew Sullivan (or Kaus). Mickey won't give up the name, but he does volunteer that the journalist in question is "an important figure in the New America Foundation."

    Well. We went to the NAF's website, and, quite frankly, we know what we're going to do the next time we're having trouble sleeping. Should you be made of sturdier stuff, we invite you to explore and send us your suggestions. One name, however, did pop up before the silky fingers of Morpheus danced about our eyes: James Fallows, Atlantic Monthly National Correspondent and tech-savvy mofo. (We understand that he's currently in Shanghai.) We're actually pretty sure this is your man, but suggestions to the contrary can be sent to the usual address.

    Mickey: It Wasn't Me [BloggingHeads]
    New America Foundation
    At Home In Shanghai [Slate]

    Earlier: JoeJournalist.com: Could One Of These Men Be JoeJournalist? Yeah, Maybe.

    ]]>
    Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:20:39 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218247&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ JoeJournalist.com: Could One Of These Men Be JoeJournalist? Yeah, Maybe. ]]> This morning we asked you to help us identify the mystery journalist who had the effrontery to start his own website in the early days of the Internet. While the general consensus remains fixated on Andrew Sullivan, there are a few other ideas out there. We present them after the jump.

    • "Perhaps Joe Journalist was Tom Wolfe? Would fit the description. TomWolfe.com was created July 20, 1998. Gladwell's site went up in September of 2004, BTW."
    • "Reeks of Brit Hume. He was a computer geek before most of the world knew what a computer geek was. But don't quote me on that!"
    • "I'd always assumed that stupid Kinsley column was referencing Josh—excuse Joshua Micah Marshall's—excruciatingly self-infatuated blog"
    • Isn't it Adam Nagourney?
    • "Wouldn't it be Matt Drudge?" [No. —ed.]
    • "It's definitely Andy Glass."

      We'd actually be inclined to buy that last one, assuming we knew who the fuck Andy Glass is. Thanks for playing. More on this stunning story if it ever develops.

      Earlier: JoeJournalist.com: World's Most Boring Guessing Game Continues

    ]]>
    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:40:51 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218108&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ JoeJournalist.com: World's Most Boring Guessing Game Continues ]]> 061127_RM_DogTN.jpgOkay, so that Kinsley piece: We'll start you off with the "blind item" in question:
    The first person I knew who had a Web site of his own was a fellow Washington journalist. This was when many journalists were still just getting into e-mail, but the URL for this Web site quickly circulated around town and around the world. Why? Well, we were all impressed by the technological savvy. But we were absolutely astounded by the solipsism. What on earth had gotten into Joe (not his real name)? This was a modest, soft-spoken, and self-effacing fellow, yet his Web site portrayed him as an egotistical monster. Or so it seemed at the time. All of the elements that struck us as obnoxious maybe eight years ago no longer seem that way. In fact, they are now virtually required for any writer's Web site. The Web address, of course, was his name: JoeJournalist.com. It's hard to recapture why that even seemed pretentious. But it did. Then there was his deadpan list of books he'd written and awards he'd won. And quotes from other journalists about how wonderful he is.
    So who's the mystery journalist?


    biopic.jpgSpeculation, naturally, has centered around Andrew Sullivan and Mickey Kaus. (Kaus denies that it's either of him, although his disavowal of Sullivan is more a case of getting a dig in at Andrew, which is pretty much Mickey's raison d' tre these days.) In any event, a well-connected tipster raises another possibility: "Kinsley's talking about Gladwell, I believe. When www.malcolmgladwell.com first appeared — 97? 98? — it caused much twitter in such circles. Gladwell was modest and self-effacing at the time, and may well still be — I never see him." (Note to tipster: You can't miss him; it's the hair. Ba dump bump.) Sounds good to us, except that Kinsley mentions the "deadpan list of books he'd written"; did Gladwell write anything before Blink? Could Kinsley be changing a few of the details around? Is this maybe the least interesting blind item guessing game ever? Answers or further candidates here.

    Like I Care [Slate]
    Michael Kinsley Holds Our Interest For Record One Paragraph [Wonkette]

    ]]>
    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:10:31 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217951&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Here Is The Internet ]]>

    • We think it's kind of tacky to mock a Parkinson's patient for writing a doddering, fogeyish column about the Internet. So we'll let Wonkette do it. Anyway, our guess as to the mystery journalist is Kaus. [Slate]
    • Boo hoo hoo, Washington Post reporters now have to go through the same appraisal system everyone else in the white collar world goes through annually. [NYO]
    • Allison Benedikt officially named Voice film editor. [The Reeler]
    • Military fantasist/departing Cond Nast Steve Florio to open a restaurant. Damn it, Graydon, see what you started? [NYP]
    • Tribune wants to delay its buyout, presumably because no one was dumb enough to pay the premium on what they're selling. [LAT]
    • "Tomato-haired beauty" Maureen Dowd "has the greatest job in America." Also, she is not Tony Dungy. There's a reason some stuff is only published on the Web. [The Nation]
    • Jon Friedman is the meat in a Julia Allison/Melissa Lafsky sandwich. Yes, there's a reason we didn't throw the picture up here. [ETP]
    • We're just gonna quote Romenesko on this one: "Dobbs overdose." [Mother Jones]
    • What we need more of is Tory Burch profiles. Thanks for making that dream come true, Vanity Fair. [WWD]
    • Portfolio should just buy the Wall Street Journal and be done with it. [NYP]
    • "Fuck IvyGate." [NYO]
    • Correction of the Day: "An article and headline on Saturday about the Staten Island Museum, which is celebrating it's 125th anniversary, referred incorrectly to one item in the museum's collection of curiosities. It is a four-legged - not four-headed - chicken." [NYT]
    • Bonus Correction: "An article last Wednesday about Jim Leff, a founder of the Internet discussion group www.chowhound.com, misstated the number of continents on which the food writer Mimi Sheraton has searched for bialys. It is five, not two." [NYT]
    ]]>
    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:50:32 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217920&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ CNN Covers All the Gay News ]]> 20060621cnnheds.gif
    In fairness to the daycare center, they only got freaked out when Andrew Sullivan couldn't provide a good reason for his visit.

    CNN.com

    ]]>
    Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:10:51 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=182379&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ In Sullivan's Defense, His Gaydar Was in the Shop for Repairs ]]> Heterodox homos just say the darnedest things, don't they? Case in point: Time's blogboy Andrew Sullivan on BlackBook EIC Aaron Hicklin's move to Out magazine:

    Yesterday, Time's blogger Andrew Sullivan announced that the new editor of Out magazine is a heterosexual. "Seriously, I think it's great that a straight guy is now heading up a gay magazine," he wrote.

    While that idea fits nicely with Mr. Sullivan's theories on the continued blurring of straight and gay culture and identity, it doesn't quite deliver, as Mr. Hicklin is actually not a heterosexual.

    Andrew Sullivan Sees Straight in New 'Out' Editor
    [Daily Transom]

    ]]>
    Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:48:14 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=166847&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan Makes Sweet, Bloggy Love to Stephen Colbert ]]> IMG_0204.jpg
    Blogstar Andrew Sullivan — who's now posting his blog on Time.com — took his funny accent to The Colbert Report last night, where pressing issues were deftly tackled:

    Colbert: So edumacate me here: A blog is what? I know the kids do it, I hear it all the time with, like, iPod, I hear those two terms thrown around a lot.

    Sullivan: It's almost like you have truth that you give us every night. But some of us, we just struggle every day to put whatever little bit of truth we can find on the internet and call it a blog. It's literally a web log, it's a log of your random, incessant thoughts, on the web.

    C: So a blog is web log? Is there an apostrophe, or do you guys not even have the strength for that? You're just gonna jam two words together?

    After the jump, Sullivan's impressive answer and truthiness for the Times.

    S: Over time it just became a "blog."

    C: "Blog." It's a beautiful word. It's musical. So, uh, you type your thoughts and they appear on a screen instantly and that's it. That's what you do?

    S: That's what I do.

    C: They used to call that typing. I don't trust you guys, because anybody could do that, right?

    S: You don't. The only way you can trust anybody who blogs is by following them and making sure they're not full of it all the time. The one sign of a good blogger is that he immediately corrects a mistake. And unlike the New York Times, where they can put all of their millions of mistakes in a little box in the corner every day which you never read, a blogger has to fess up, right there, just like you do every night.

    C: Actually, I read the New York Times corrections. It's the most entertaining part of that paper.
    ]]>
    Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:45:38 EST Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=149261&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Right-Wingers Like Judy. Imagine That. ]]> • Is Judy Miller now a right-wing hero? Wait, what was she before the war, then? [NYM]
    Andrew Sullivan to move his blog to Time.com. Sellout! MSM! All those other things we're supposed to say! Yada yada yada. [NYP]
    • Bob Schieffer to stay longer as CBS Evening News anchor. [NYT]
    Times to launch quarterly sports mag. [NYP]
    Esquire likes undulating apartments. [NYT]
    • Google considers offering book rentals, sort of. [Reuters via Yahoo]
    • Ruth Reichl reads The Bruni Digest. Bruni doesn't. Or so he says. [AP via Yahoo]

    ]]>
    Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:01:42 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=137124&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Journo-Jabbing ]]> A quote of the day from Jesse Kornbluth: "No ideas and the ability to express them—that's a journalist." —Karl Kraus (1874-1936)(—MG)
    [swami uptown]

    ]]>
    Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:22:29 EDT mgross http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=101512&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Night Life Pretty Much Dead: Why Was This Man Smiling? ]]>
    We were struck by the opening lines of Andrew Sullivan's most recent Sunday Times column:

    I was visiting New York City last week and noticed something I'd never thought I'd say about the big city. Yes, nightlife is pretty much dead (and I'm in no way the first to notice that).
    Nightlife pretty much dead? What sort of boring parties was Sullivan at while he was in New York City the week before?

    Bastard!

    That's the last time we invite you over and listen to you go on and on about how you can squat 385 pounds, jerk!

    Society is dead, we have retreated into the iWorld [Times.uk]
    Team Party Crash: Pundits on Parade

    ]]>
    Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:18:13 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=34235&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan, a Scissor Sister? ]]> babydaddyvsullivan.jpgOur telegenic sister site (which is currently being manned—har har—by Choire Sicha) clears up a mystery that's been bugging fans of gay music and gay punditry lately: Is Andrew Sullivan in The Scissor Sisters?

    Apparently, he is not. However, Michelle Malkin did appear as "Cheerleader # 4" in Toni Basil's "Mickey" video.

    Actually, come to think of it, she did not.

    Know Your Bears: The Case of Sullivan vs. Babydaddy [Wonkette]

    ]]>
    Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:19:21 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=32477&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan: Good Blog to All That ]]> pope.jpgIt's with a heavy heart that we report that pundit and headgear aficionado Andrew Sullivan is retiring from blogging. For the most part.

    As Sully himself puts it:

    Much as I would like to do everything, I've been unable to give the blog my full attention and make any progress on a book (and I'm two years behind). It's not so much the time as the mindset. The ability to keep on top of almost everything on a daily and hourly basis just isn't compatible with the time and space to mull over some difficult issues in a leisurely and deliberate manner.

    Say it ain't so! Actually, it probably ain't: "So I'm going to turn this into a far more occasional operation for a while. I'll keep posting when the feeling grabs me."

    Feeling, please grab him! We just don't know if we can go on if you don't.
    THE DISH AS YOU'VE KNOWN IT [Andrew Sullivan]
    [Crying Pop via Old Men Crying]

    ]]>
    Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:12:38 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=31752&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Wake Up, Little Sully ]]> sully_gimp.jpg
    Our nerdy sister site's guest blogger pointed us towards a terrifying piece of video that shows us exactly what pundit Andrew Sullivan wears to bed every night. No, not SpongeBob SquarePants jammies: a face mask that helps him breathe.

    Apparently Sullivan suffers from sleep apnea. Funny, we thought only liberals had trouble sleeping at night in these new dark days.

    Anyway, watch as CNN's Wolf Blitzer bullies Sullivan into talking with the mask on. Anyone else getting a Pulp Fiction vibe off this?
    Andrew Sullivan's Bedtime Headgear [Wonkette]
    Pulp Fiction 'Bring out the gimp' T-Shirts [Amazon]

    ]]>
    Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:22:12 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=27767&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Andrew Sullivan In Foreclosure In Provincetown ]]> sullivanforeclose.jpg

    From the The Provincetown Banner, page 23, Nov, 18, 2004.

    So, what happened to the $6K a month in blog income? See also: "After start-up costs for even snazzy sites, most income is profit." [A Blogger Manifesto, AndrewSullivan.com]

    ]]>
    Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:05:19 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=26790&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Definition of a failed journalist ]]> vf_failedjourno.JPGBlogging makes Vanity Fair's In & Out list. Blogger is In — but only as a new term for a failed journalist. Or, in Andrew Sullivan's case, a new term for a writer out of favor with Howell Raines at the New York Times.

    ]]>
    Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:50:26 EST Gawker http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=11187&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Next Thursday: Hitchens and Sullivan ]]> Christopher Hitchens and Andrew Sullivan, and others, discussing Orwell. And discussing Orwell is a synonym for...

    This is a must-see. Christopher Hitchens and Andrew Sullivan, and others, discussing Orwell. And discussing Orwell is a synonym for a debate about the modern Left. Mark your calendars.
    Thursday, October 24th, 7:00 - 9:00 p.m.
    Basic Books and the NYU Journalism Department present:
    Does Orwell Matter? Social Criticism Today
    Christopher Hitchens, author of Why Orwell Matters
    Vivian Gornick, author of The Situation and the Story
    Andrew Sullivan, author of Virtually Normal
    Michael Walzer, author of The Company of Critics
    Jurow Hall, Main Building
    100 Washington Square East
    New York University
    The Christopher Hitchens Web

    ]]>
    Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:22:32 EDT Gawker http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=10196&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Space Pussy ]]> Kurt Andersen, on Andrew Sullivan's blog: "I derive some tiny but real pleasure in knowing, for instance, as a result...

    Kurt Andersen, on Andrew Sullivan's blog: "I derive some tiny but real pleasure in knowing, for instance, as a result of reading andrewsullivan.com, that you spent the last month in Provincetown attending Space Pussy concerts."
    Are Weblogs Changing Our Culture? [Slate]

    ]]>
    Wed, 04 Sep 2002 16:53:21 EDT Gawker http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=10166&view=rss&microfeed=true