• Profile logout login

#arthursulzbergerjr

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 12:00 PM
Wed Nov 25
49 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #arthursulzbergerjr more →

    New York Times Celebrates Its Continued Existence

    Times Publisher Sucks Up to Robber-Baron Investor

    Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile

    Blogging Job For Arthur Gregg Sulzberger

    Times Publisher's Longtime Affair

    Sulzberger's Married Girlfriend

    Times Takes Subprime Mexican Loan

    The Caroline Times File: Maureen Dowd's Insane Love Letter

    Times Finally Runs Display Advertising on Front Page

    The Caroline Times File: She's Kind of a Snob
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Joe Mitchell's Secret Joe Mitchell's Secret
    06/25/09

    In reply to New York Times Celebrates Its Continued Existence
    What's with the duo's overuse of the term "secular?" I guess it's a very kind way of saying print has been hurting since the 1950s, but twice in one email? Janet Robinson was probably trying to prove that she really is so, so clever: she is such a big fat overpaid epic fail--the Stan O'Neal of media.
     Reply
    Joe Mitchell's Secret was starred Joe Mitchell's Secret was unstarred
    Image of Hamilton Nolan Hamilton Nolan
    06/25/09

    In reply to New York Times Celebrates Its Continued Existence
    Way, way out of context re Hirschorn. They are sweating.
     Reply
    Hamilton Nolan was starred Hamilton Nolan was unstarred
    Image of Kid Twist Kid Twist
    06/25/09

    In reply to New York Times Celebrates Its Continued Existence
    Of course, Hirschhorn didn't actually predict that the Times would stop printing in May. He just raised the possibility to show how dire NYT Co.'s predicament really is. The fact that his "prediction" is cited waaay out-of-context here leads me to believe that this memo was ghost-written by Maureen Dowd.
     Reply
    Kid Twist was starred Kid Twist was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    05/01/09

    In reply to Times Publisher Sucks Up to Robber-Baron Investor
    Big brass ones, Mr. Tate.


    I salute you.

     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    04/30/09

    In reply to Times Publisher Sucks Up to Robber-Baron Investor
    The Lebanese took control of Mexico, and nobody even noticed.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of ifstone ifstone
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    Ken Auletta wrote a long piece about Sulzberger a few years ago that was not too flattering.

    [www.newyorker.com]
     Reply
    ifstone was starred ifstone was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    I hear he wears stripes with plaid.
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of Peter Feld Peter Feld
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    I think Pinch may have been confused by the lyrics to the Shriekback song Malaria:


    Will you lie for me, cry for me

    Die for me, will you please?

    Oh, never never never never never never never say no

     Reply
    Peter Feld was starred Peter Feld was unstarred
    Image of Tweezergal Tweezergal
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    I haven't read the piece yet, but if this is ALL there is to the embarrassing tidbits, who cares? Are you kidding, thinking this is damning in any way! It's sounds like a badly put together hodgepodge of pure nothing, all intended to denigrate the publisher, but its intentions apparently fall short. Who cares about a quote from Winston Churchill that may or may not be literal? Who cares if Sulzberger passed on ads with Amazon? Who cares if he talks about his reporter days? REALLY, WHO CARES? Let the Vanity Fair writer take a look at his own publisher, Graydon Carter, who does all kinds of stupid if not illegal things. Sulzberger is actually a very bright guy, who made a few mistakes -- like we all do -- but who runs The Times better than any of his naysayers would do, if given the chance. And that wasn't a damning quote by Rattner; that was just more malevolent spin aimed at Sulzberger, who as publisher of the most influential paper in the world is, of course, an easy target, and would be, whether his name was Sulzberger or not.
     Reply
    Tweezergal was starred Tweezergal was unstarred
    Image of DaveCrabtree DaveCrabtree
    03/30/09

    @Tweezergal: You know, I was with you half-way through your comment and then you lost me. Yes, a lot of this stuff is pointless, and nobody should really care. But Sulzberger has run into the ground a company that is one of the most respected in the world and that has by far the most recognizable brand in its industry. He's done that through both a willing obliviousness to changes in the marketplace and a sneering superiority that prevents him from seeing or fixing the flaws in his business. He is squandering his patrimony out of arrogance, and the only question is whether the rest of the family will sell it out from under him before it's bankrupt.
     Reply
    DaveCrabtree was starred DaveCrabtree was unstarred
    Image of Tweezergal Tweezergal
    03/30/09

    @DaveCrabtree:
    And how do you know this? How do you know about Sulzberger's "willing obliviousness" or "sneering superiority"? Those two assaults seem to be mantras of a media mob that has chosen Sulzberger as a punching bag, to sell their own rags and to exculpate their own sins. All papers, worldwide, are having financial problems, and many have gone under. But The Times is still putting out a great product.
     Reply
    Tweezergal was starred Tweezergal was unstarred
    Image of DaveCrabtree DaveCrabtree
    03/30/09

    @Tweezergal: Well, we can debate about whether it's still a great product, but my knowledge comes from working with him, not as a Times employee but as an outside advisor. And I think he's been chosen as a punching bag by the rest of the media because he had the most to work with and has done the least. The Washington Post doesn't get the same venom, neither does anyone else other than Sam Zell, who's not a newspaper guy.


    Besides, this is Gawker. We trash people regardless of whether they're deserving of it. Why are you defending him?

     Reply
    DaveCrabtree was starred DaveCrabtree was unstarred
    Image of MrInBetween MrInBetween
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    Just read the article. Sure, it's a write-around, but it's also a thinly reported regurgitation of Arthur's past interviews (Charlie Rose, think tanks) and past profiles. Few people go on the record, which is to be expected, but there's very little that's new here. Arthur "has no rays?" Okay, how's his Kung-Fu grip? And how many times are we going to hear about Arthur's ridiculous stuffed moose? The piece also carries an annoying hectoring tone, as if Bowden is lecturing a pet who just soiled the rug.


    This is Bowden's first piece for Vanity Fair, but it falls short of his usual rigorous reporting standards.

     Reply
    MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred
    Image of westie1984 westie1984
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    First thing I though of:
     Reply
    westie1984 was starred westie1984 was unstarred
    Image of PandoraSpocks PandoraSpocks
    03/30/09

    @westie1984: Pretty good for a Monday.
     Reply
    PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred
    Image of Robert Synnott Robert Synnott
    03/30/09

    In reply to Most Humiliating Moments in Vanity Fair's Arthur Sulzberger Profile
    Er, in a newspaper, SHOULDN'T he care about his journalists more than the business side?
     Reply
    Robert Synnott was starred Robert Synnott was unstarred
    Image of Kid Twist Kid Twist
    03/30/09

    @Robert Synnott: It depends. Do the journalists want to get PAID?
     Reply
    Kid Twist was starred Kid Twist was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    02/18/09

    In reply to Blogging Job For Arthur Gregg Sulzberger
    also: nobody on gawker cares ... a sign of the times
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    02/18/09

    In reply to Blogging Job For Arthur Gregg Sulzberger
    and here's the 5y chart


    [finance.yahoo.com]

     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    02/18/09

    In reply to Blogging Job For Arthur Gregg Sulzberger
    N Y TIMES CL A

    (NYSE: NYT)


    Real-Time: 3.68 Down 0.09 (2.39%) 1:14pm EThelp

    Last Trade: 3.70

    Trade Time: 1:02pm ET

    Change: Down 0.07 (1.86%)

    Prev Close: 3.77

    Open: 3.78

    Bid: N/A

    Ask: N/A

    1y Target Est: 4.25

    Day's Range: 3.67 - 3.81

    52wk Range: 3.73 - 21.14

    Volume: 335,240

    Avg Vol (3m): 1,428,550

    Market Cap: 532.03M

    P/E (ttm): N/A

    EPS (ttm): -0.40

    Div & Yield: 0.24 (5.90%)

    Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. For consolidated real-time quotes

     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.