Remember when Sean Hannity was defending Mark Foley because the incriminating emails were "suspicious" in their origin.
And hey, now Mark "I want to fuck underage pages" Foley is getting his own conservative radio talk show! [www.politicsdaily.com]
So, just to be clear. Republicans get very upset if you tell a conflicted kid to wear a condom , but actually trying to fuck underage kids makes you a conservative media personality. Not to mention a respected member of Congress.
@braak: Absolutely. These wingnuts are the same people that get up-in-arms if a hot female teacher is arrested for having sex with one of her 15 or 16 year-old students. In those situations, they just think its "boys being boys," with the strength of their outrage directly correlating to how good-looking the teacher is. It's only when its boys-being-boys with other boys or men that the wingnuts get their hackles up.
@braak: When are conservatives ever genuinely concerned about the welfare of the human beings they claim to be defending? Look at their efforts to outlaw abortion. They fight to ensure the woman has to have the child, but cut funds to medical programs for unwed and underprivileged mothers. They also gut programs designed to provide health care and education for the children that they INSISTED be born. So what's new? They just want to get their cheap political points.
Let's leave "gay" & "truck stop" out of this equation for a moment and use 16-yr-old girl and public restroom instead. Sounds like a daily occurrence in the NYC public school system. Maybe telling the person to use a condom isn't ideal advice but wanting to save someone's life first before judging them isn't the worst place to be coming from either.
@once: agreed. I knew Jennings not long after this incident occurred, when I was a gay kid who benefited from his openness as a teacher. He's an absolutely decent guy who deserves his position. The Obama team simply needs better, more vigilant PR to combat media idiocy.
The Dems have GOT to stop giving into these whining, closet cases and date rapists. It's not like they'll ever be satisfied, and scattering drops of blood on the water only makes them hungrier.
Soft target. If the kid was a footballer screwing older women in the bathrooms this wouldn't have even come up. We all know it's because he's gay and Jennings is gay and so it's the easiest thing in the world to incite fear about.
Legally as long as the kid was above the age of consent Jennings is fine. Morally, a teacher giving any kind of encouragement to a student to have sex (even safe sex) outside marriage is going to stir some people; gay sex moreso, gay sex with older men in bathrooms especially so.
He did have a legal obligation to report it, because the age of consent was 16 and the boy was 15.
Do I understand why he didn't? Of course! It would have outed the boy and outed Jennings (why else would Jennings have been the confidant?). You think things are bad now for the GLBT community, well, then you'd be shocked at 1988. Reporting it may or may not have been the best thing he could have done for this child, and I understand that.
But he had a legal duty, unfortunately, so the right wing radicals may win this battle. Yes, I know that Beck and Hannity and freerepublic and the rest are really only going after Jennings because he is gay. That is PAINFULLY obvious. But they may be able to make it stick because Jennings didn't meet his legal obligation(which may have differed from his moral one in this case).
note: approximately half the students in any given high school are over 16, which is the age of consent in many states. Do we have ANY information about how old this student actually was?
edit: ah, yes. from the mediamatters link:
"...Jennings' attorney wrote in a 2004 letter that the student was 16 years old, which is -- and was at the time -- the legal age of consent in Massachusetts."
so, basically, the student had the right to have sex with this "older man" and Jennings had no right to stop it. "use a condom" was about the best advice he could give.
@theysaidwhat: Does it say how much older the man was? I'm given to understand that there's a kind of margin if one person is below the age of consent.
My high school always had it at five years, but now that we're on the subject--why the hell didn't anyone at my high school actually know what the law was?
Jennings point is probably equally valid--he's got this job precisely because teachers don't have the training to correctly handle situations like this.
They are so predictable. I wish Vegas or at least my bookie took bets on the GOP. I could make some serious cash betting on idiotic statements from Steele, Palin and all of Fox news. Although I doubt the odds would be that great in terms of payout.
This is so, so, so awfully painfully for a gay man such as myself to have to say, but they have a legitimate point. Were the tables turned and the guy worked for Bush, Olberman would be all over this for at least a week. For the love of god, didn't somebody at the White House read the book first?
@lionboy: Keith Olbermann might. My mom might. But I don't think I'd be that upset about it. I'd like to think I'd be relieved that a conservative took a student's practical best interests into consideration, rather than feverishly devoting themselves to some prudish ideology.
Quick everyone! Grab your pitchforks and torches. This monster is trying to create homosexuals!! OMG, teh gays will destroy our precious, precious children.
10/02/09
10/01/09
And hey, now Mark "I want to fuck underage pages" Foley is getting his own conservative radio talk show! [www.politicsdaily.com]
So, just to be clear. Republicans get very upset if you tell a conflicted kid to wear a condom , but actually trying to fuck underage kids makes you a conservative media personality. Not to mention a respected member of Congress.
Nope, nothing wrong with that. Nothing at all.
10/01/09
This has absolutely nothing to do with the relative danger or lack thereof that that student was placed in.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Legally as long as the kid was above the age of consent Jennings is fine. Morally, a teacher giving any kind of encouragement to a student to have sex (even safe sex) outside marriage is going to stir some people; gay sex moreso, gay sex with older men in bathrooms especially so.
I think Obama needs to hire some new vetters.
10/01/09
Do I understand why he didn't? Of course! It would have outed the boy and outed Jennings (why else would Jennings have been the confidant?). You think things are bad now for the GLBT community, well, then you'd be shocked at 1988. Reporting it may or may not have been the best thing he could have done for this child, and I understand that.
But he had a legal duty, unfortunately, so the right wing radicals may win this battle. Yes, I know that Beck and Hannity and freerepublic and the rest are really only going after Jennings because he is gay. That is PAINFULLY obvious. But they may be able to make it stick because Jennings didn't meet his legal obligation(which may have differed from his moral one in this case).
10/01/09
edit: ah, yes. from the mediamatters link:
"...Jennings' attorney wrote in a 2004 letter that the student was 16 years old, which is -- and was at the time -- the legal age of consent in Massachusetts."
so, basically, the student had the right to have sex with this "older man" and Jennings had no right to stop it. "use a condom" was about the best advice he could give.
10/01/09
10/01/09
My high school always had it at five years, but now that we're on the subject--why the hell didn't anyone at my high school actually know what the law was?
Jennings point is probably equally valid--he's got this job precisely because teachers don't have the training to correctly handle situations like this.
10/01/09
10/01/09
[www.thepantaloon.com]
09/30/09
10/01/09
Unless the hypocrisy issue came up, which isn't so in this case.
10/01/09
09/30/09
/ralph
09/30/09
But when is Fox News going to report on the allegations that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990?
09/18/09