Someone needs to show that delusional old poop a computer soon... Even if whoever finally does it ends up getting fired for keeping this fascinating invention from him for all these years.
Sounds like GC has been spending a little too much time in the Conde bunker. The Times, like a lot of papers, breaks big stories all the time and they're still screwed. Those five '09 Pulitzers weren't for basket-weaving.
Unless by "big stories," Graydon means monthly features on the Kennedys and Marilyn Monroe, and anything loathsome hack Dominick Dunne feels like writing.
@BooWahBabe: Why does not the rest of the world see this? Jarvis simply has skimpy credentials in the new media space and the stuff he has done sucks. Those who can't, blog.
The reason for his popularity is that he used to be a print guy, he's loud, and he spews ideas all the time, albeit with a low signal-to-noise ratio. No lack of that in the blogosphere.
It's sort of the same problem Lee Abrams has. Anyone can spout off a bunch of "new" ideas. Actually making them work is what takes talent.
That's why some credit is due to the people throwing money at Politico, HuffPost, Daily Beast, etc. At least they're willing to try a new model for journalism that doesn't involve piggybacking on the work of print reporters, which is what 99.9999999% of new media/blogs do now.
Oh come on, that's the quid pro quo in interviews. You give an interview, they mention your book. It's not print welfare - he's giving something to get something. If all media executives his age had his philosophy, they'd be a lot further along in the media world. And I wouldn't have to explain to my boss what an ad impression is for the 10th time.
And a mention of his book in that article would have sold -- what? -- one book, maybe two, tops? Damn that offending journalist, who cost Jeff Jarvis a grand total of $5.80 in royalties!
06/03/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
Unless by "big stories," Graydon means monthly features on the Kennedys and Marilyn Monroe, and anything loathsome hack Dominick Dunne feels like writing.
06/03/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
11/26/08
The reason for his popularity is that he used to be a print guy, he's loud, and he spews ideas all the time, albeit with a low signal-to-noise ratio. No lack of that in the blogosphere.
Should be BlatherMachine, not BuzzMachine.
11/26/08
It's sort of the same problem Lee Abrams has. Anyone can spout off a bunch of "new" ideas. Actually making them work is what takes talent.
That's why some credit is due to the people throwing money at Politico, HuffPost, Daily Beast, etc. At least they're willing to try a new model for journalism that doesn't involve piggybacking on the work of print reporters, which is what 99.9999999% of new media/blogs do now.
11/26/08
11/26/08
Yes, I know the latter is a lift from "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche," which sold well enough to actually off a few oaks.
11/26/08
11/26/08