Jewish employees will be receiving a list of their Christian coworkers addresses and are expected to show up on Christmas Day to make sure they are not celebrating and to make sure their children are not receiving inappropriately large gifts. Christian coworkers are expected to visit their Jewish coworkers' homes throughout the 8 nights of Channukah.
The parties are cancelled because the GS executives know the true meaning of Xmas. This year they have started adding temps to their books when reporting their Bonus figures. By adding the temps they are representing that the average Bonus per employee has shrunken... meanwhile the Execs are enjoying the same supersized bonus that they've always had. Perhaps there's also a Starbucks giftcard in it for temps.
@Gabriel Snyder: can you be a bit more specific? i mean it makes a bit of sense when you post henry's "rich people porn" - but when the content is something you could easily have sourced, opined about and published on your own... its curious.
@narnio: It's a pretty simple arrangement: Business Insider publishes some of the posts they like on Gawker and we do likewise. The two sites have pretty different audiences and this allows us to introduce BI to our readers and vice versa.
Glad you guys got along so well after the bounty. Guess this means no competing property short-term, eh? I'd always wondered why Mr. Nick Leeson's Trading Account didn't have a finance property, I guess it's going to stay that way.
CUT TO: frenzied streeteasy.com discussion about how this is great for New York Real Estate because Goldman employees will buy second apartments so they can have parties in their "vacation homes" and escape the ban.
The credit rating agencies obviously were a huge problem in this disaster, but blaming them, alone, for AIG is pretty asinine. There were a whole number of issues with AIG, including the fact that all of the i-banks (including Goldman) who did business with AIG knew that AIG's credit rating was problematic (after all, they do their own due diligence, with people who are paid a lot more than S&P's analysts).
The problem with the rating agencies is that they were being asked to be the gatekeepers/quasi-regulators in a scheme of private securitization where everyone's incentives are skewed. The whole promise that an unregulated private label securitization could be more efficient and better managed than if it were regulated is the key here. You can replace the rating agencies all day, but unless you start aligning incentives at the origination, securitization, and marketing levels, you'd still have this problem.
The reason the GOP is blaming the rating agencies and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac for the crisis is because if you buy into their silly narrative (as the author of this post clearly has), you can maybe pretend that this whole crisis isn't in fact a massive indictment of their ideological worldview that unregulated markets can produce optimal outcomes. Because if you don't believe that, then you basically have no reason to ever vote Republican again, other than because you hate minority groups.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Is this an acquisition?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
I like it.
Glad you guys got along so well after the bounty. Guess this means no competing property short-term, eh? I'd always wondered why Mr. Nick Leeson's Trading Account didn't have a finance property, I guess it's going to stay that way.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Buy now or be priced out forev-*OOF*!
11/20/09
11/18/09
The problem with the rating agencies is that they were being asked to be the gatekeepers/quasi-regulators in a scheme of private securitization where everyone's incentives are skewed. The whole promise that an unregulated private label securitization could be more efficient and better managed than if it were regulated is the key here. You can replace the rating agencies all day, but unless you start aligning incentives at the origination, securitization, and marketing levels, you'd still have this problem.
The reason the GOP is blaming the rating agencies and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac for the crisis is because if you buy into their silly narrative (as the author of this post clearly has), you can maybe pretend that this whole crisis isn't in fact a massive indictment of their ideological worldview that unregulated markets can produce optimal outcomes. Because if you don't believe that, then you basically have no reason to ever vote Republican again, other than because you hate minority groups.
11/17/09