Everyone is always so surprised that rewarding and promoting antisocial activity results in more antisocial activity. As a species we are amazingly prolific and unbelievably immune to learning from the consequences of our own acts. #thisisengland
As if I needed additional proof that "Banksy" is a douche. And while we're at it, can Lazerides Gallery in London, which reps him, please stop spamming my e-mail? I wrote something about Banksy a while ago and though I blocked them all, they still found a weasely way to constantly inform me of their current exhibits of douchery.
@Baroness: Well, he's doing what he wants and at the same time making things people want to see, and not ejaculating on human skulls or whatever the more "principled" artists are doing. That's not a bad thing.
@Pope John Peeps II: I find Sean Delonas a more provocative artist, to be honest. The sheer ghastly animus that goes into that freak's work is about ten times more interesting than Banksy's ever done, even though I loathe the crude, nasty, vicious politics and bigotry.
Banksy pretends to be as transgressive as that, but he's an overrated bore. I just compared him to a horrible racist cartoonist, unfavorably. Because Banksy's cartoons are even less revelatory and interesting. They're weak jokes and puns anyone can "get" in about five seconds and instantly forget, because they're meaning-free, devoid of any complexity whatsoever. Banksy is a media star first and foremost, tabloids his real medium. He ought to be a fifth-rate cartoonist, but he's not even that good.
No, the whole tired "mystique" angle is why he's desperately trying to cash in- stupid and ugly stuff, watch the rich morons line up to buy because the tabloids here and in the UK adore him. It's still terrible, stupid, smug and condescending "art". As said, the cleverness evaporates in about five seconds. Lame jokes and puns, ugly art that took zero effort. Yet he craps all over the anonymous craftsman who created that angel he dumped a bucket of paint over. Nasty, hostile, disrespectful and ugly. Fuck Banksy.
@Baroness: Jesus you're such a little bitch about this. The thing is that that's what Banksy's ALWAYS done. Whatever else you can say about him, his whole schtick is pretty genuine. And what exactly does that mean? Was he EVER trying to make any real subtle exquisite statements about art? NO. Obviously not. Is he the art world's equivalent of a really good t.v. show? Yes. I mean... You don't tune into The Office and expect a tense and verbally complicated musing on the state of modern society.
So what exactly are you complaining about? That Banksy's somehow "cashed in" on what he does? Well what's your fucking problem with that? You spend a lifetime doing something because it tickles you to do that thing, then maybe you SHOULD get to cash in on that once in a while. Why shouldn't the world work like that? Lots of illustrators and animators get to "cash in" on their work and somehow when you put art on walls in galleries it becomes qualitatively different?
I think you're just complaining because he does something that you disapprove of aesthetically and he gets to make money. And that's not a real complaint. That's just an illusory complaint based on the statement "oh the world's not FAIR TO ME".
11/02/09
That's not ironic. It's just proof. #thisisengland
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
06/13/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/13/09
Banksy pretends to be as transgressive as that, but he's an overrated bore. I just compared him to a horrible racist cartoonist, unfavorably. Because Banksy's cartoons are even less revelatory and interesting. They're weak jokes and puns anyone can "get" in about five seconds and instantly forget, because they're meaning-free, devoid of any complexity whatsoever. Banksy is a media star first and foremost, tabloids his real medium. He ought to be a fifth-rate cartoonist, but he's not even that good.
No, the whole tired "mystique" angle is why he's desperately trying to cash in- stupid and ugly stuff, watch the rich morons line up to buy because the tabloids here and in the UK adore him. It's still terrible, stupid, smug and condescending "art". As said, the cleverness evaporates in about five seconds. Lame jokes and puns, ugly art that took zero effort. Yet he craps all over the anonymous craftsman who created that angel he dumped a bucket of paint over. Nasty, hostile, disrespectful and ugly. Fuck Banksy.
06/13/09
So what exactly are you complaining about? That Banksy's somehow "cashed in" on what he does? Well what's your fucking problem with that? You spend a lifetime doing something because it tickles you to do that thing, then maybe you SHOULD get to cash in on that once in a while. Why shouldn't the world work like that? Lots of illustrators and animators get to "cash in" on their work and somehow when you put art on walls in galleries it becomes qualitatively different?
I think you're just complaining because he does something that you disapprove of aesthetically and he gets to make money. And that's not a real complaint. That's just an illusory complaint based on the statement "oh the world's not FAIR TO ME".