<![CDATA[Gawker: benefits]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: benefits]]> http://gawker.com/tag/benefits http://gawker.com/tag/benefits <![CDATA[Wanted! Part-Time Freelancers For Full-Time Crap Jobs]]> Oh dippy Gourmet magazine, with your oxymoronic job ads. There's no such thing as a "full-time freelance" job, sillies! Not that the Cond&#233; Nast magazine is alone with this shifty little recruitment tactic, designed to get the most out of contractors for as little as humanly possible. So bothersome, those taxes and benefits. More exploity media job ads after the jump. Apply at your own risk!

"In-house proofreader" wanted, says the ad! You're lucky if they let you out of this house:
Picture 10-1 Go get your flack on for Web Nation Video, where they promise to teach you to "provide these Reporters and Editors the proper number of words" for "the story they desire." Pitches from Publicists&#8212;so hot right now.
Picture 10

Sadly, the actual duties of this CNBC position are far less fun/disgusting than they sound:
Picture 9

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002965&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[1,000 MTVN Permalancers To Earn Staff Positions]]> Mtv Over 1,000 lucky MTV Networks contractors are being converted to staff from their previous freelancer status, we've been told, in a move to appease angry contractors upset over December benefit cuts. "In the HR meeting they had yesterday with the middle- to upper-management peeps that have the honor of conveying this (mostly good) news: They paused early on in their presentation to say, "By the way, this is not about the writing and the Gawker...these discussions have been going on for a long time," an MTV source said. We're sure it had nothing whatsoever to do with all those people chanting in the streets, either. And introduced by a definite article? We've arrived. Congratulations on the benefits, kids. Go nuts at the orthopedist's.
Earlier: Memo: Judgment Day On Permanent Jobs For MTV Freelancers]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002747&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Memo: Judgment Day On Permanent Jobs For MTV Freelancers]]> Mtvmemo-2 The time has come for MTV Networks beleaguered slavey permalancers to learn their fate. Brand-new human resources lady Catherine Houser issued a memo an hour ago to the Viacom subsidiary's contractors, announcing they would learn if they were among the lucky group whose positions will be converted to staff jobs, as promised in December. On what basis will a permalancer earn job security and benefits? Among the benchmarks: "The position would be staff if there was headcount." Uhh...what? "The position transcends a specific project or show," is another. Considering that a key issue in the uproar over Viacom's benefit cuts last month centered around the frequent rotation of workers (which made it hard for them to accrue the required time needed to qualify for benefits), it sounds like MTVN has given itself a whole lot of leeway with that one. So you've been an MTVN cameraman for nine years? As far as Viacom is concerned, you only spent four months at a time on Pimp My Ride and Cribs, so you're shit out of luck, pal. God be with you, and also with you and you. Let us know how it goes. After the jump, the memo in full.

Mtvmemo

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002745&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['NYTimes' To Charge Staff More For That Adorably-Named 'Newsroom' Maki Roll]]> Nytimescaf Better start brown-bagging it if you're a New York Times employee; starting February 4, the cost-cutting newspaper will increase cafeteria prices by 3.9%, according to an email announcement to staffers today. But don't worry! Management would like you to know that coffee prices won't change—hungry employees hopped up on caffeine are both prettier and more industrious! Wonder if those catered lunches for masthead-occupiers are going to get a price-jump? Oh wait, they're already free! To be fair, prices will still be "8% to 10% below the average for the neighborhood," according to the memo. The Times cafeteria is run by Restaurant Associates, which also manages the eateries at Conde Nast, Hearst and Google—anyone know if those companies are also bumping up their prices? Let us know. Memo after the jump.

————— Forwarded message ————— From: NYTIMES MAIL <nytmail@nytimes.com> Date: Jan 18, 2008 2:06 AM Subject: Cafeteria pricing To: NY TIMES INTERNET <NY_TIMES_INTERNET@nytimes.com>, NY TIMES NOTES <NY_TIMES_NOTES@nytimes.com > Dear Colleagues,

In an effort to keep up with the increasing cost of food and supplies, we have authorized Restaurant Associates to raise food prices in the cafeteria by an average of 3.9%, effective February 4. This will be the first cafeteria price increase in nearly three years.

In determining the increase, we researched prices at Times Square area shops like Metro Marche, Europa and Pax. We are pleased that we will be able to keep prices 8% to 10% below the average for the neighborhood.

While cafeteria and vending prices will increase, coffee bar and catering prices will not change.

If you have any questions, please contact Patricia Sharp, cafeteria general manager, at Redacted@restaurantassociates.com or 212-556-XXXX.

Thank you.

Brian Banks Executive Director, Building Services

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002369&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Freelancers Union Founder Apologizes For 'Glitches']]> Sara%20Horowitz.JPG Freelancers Union founder Sara Horowitz wants everyone to calm the hell down please! "Health insurance is so central to a sense of security and I realize that this is making people feel really vulnerable, but if they could just know one thing, it's that they really do have health insurance coverage," she told us when we spoke to her this afternoon about the hue and cry raised by the union's membership over a recent change in their benefits. Passing Damage Control 101 with fairly flying colors, Horowitz copped to mishandling how the details of the union's recent health plan switch were circulated to members. "People are clearly frustrated. We really truly apologize for some of these glitches," she said. "It's really our obligation and for a lot of people, we've failed."

Previously: Freelancers Union Is 'Inconvenient Mess Of An Organization' Says One Member

Billed or not, in possession of an insurance card or not, Horowitz said union members who signed up are covered under the organization's new plan with Empire. Maybe so, but they won't receive insurance cards till the middle of the month and that's got some freelancers concerned. Those who might need proof of coverage before then should head over to the FU's website, where Horowitz has posted a mea culpa and more information.

"We really are desperately learning from this, especially trying to get information to people more quickly," she told us. "A lot of what people are saying is true. I wish our phone wait times were two minutes, that our call system was perfect." Huh! Maybe they picked up some skills from the Viacom boondoggle after all! The FU took about five hours to publicly address member concerns—Viacom took nearly as many days.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339743&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Freelancers Union Is 'Inconvenient Mess Of An Organization' Says One Member]]> The Freelancers Union is telling its irate members today that enrollment forms for new health plans were sent to their new provider on Monday and that all of its members should have ID numbers by tomorrow. Or maybe not! According to one freelancer, Empire's customer service says that FU "had sent over 'only a handful' of enrollment forms, and that it could be weeks before everything is processed." Another union member tells us just the opposite: Blue Cross will backdate applications so that FU enrollees can visit health practitioners today, should they need to. Confusion! Mixed messages! "Needless to say, the Union fucked up completely," said the same member. Did the Freelancers Union learn nothing after helping organize striking Viacom permalancers last month? Cost-cutting happens everywhere and always will. But the way bad news is delivered is, in large part, how people will remember you as an organization. Quit screwing it up!

Previously: Freelancers Union Health Benefits SNAFU Has Members Fuming


"They gave us three weeks to find new doctors, psychiatrists, etc. I was outraged," a union member told us. "FU bills itself as a savior and friend to the freelancers, but instead it's an inconvenient mess of an organization that seems like it's being run by a third party company that doesn't fully understand what it's doing."

Since the health plan switch was announced, we hear that FU's phones have been so clogged with members seeking guidance from customer service that the department was effectively shut down at certain points during the holidays. In fact, the Freelancers Union seems to have been rather unresponsive since November, according to several reports.

The package on offer to union members doesn't provide dental coverage—the old plan did. "Now I'm forced to switch to a new plan that offers no dental coverage at all, and I can't enroll in separate dental coverage until next fall—ridiculous," a freelancer (perhaps one with children in braces?) told us. "And you thought the
MTV freelancers were screwed." Well...yeah, we did.

Even with the rate bumps under the new plan, the union still provides more affordable health care to its members than Viacom wanted to provide for its permalance army. The FU's new plan covers care at Memorial Sloan-Kettering (the previous one didn't) and offers a larger physician network. And wait a second—the Freelancers Union used to offer dental? Talk about the life of Reilly!

That's not to say that union members don't have anything to complain about: besides this gap in coverage and the disappearance of their dental coverage, the union's new plan will set freelancers back $750 for a hospital stay. Lab tests performed as a result of any doctor's visit are subject to a member's $3,000 annual deductible, which is about a grand more than it used to be. Hey, diagnose yourselves, people! We suggest watching a lot of House or becoming a rabid clipper of the "Diagnosis" column from the Times magazine.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339624&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Freelancers Union Health Benefits SNAFU Has Members Fuming]]> What's this? Members of the Freelancers Union are up in arms over badly-executed changes to their health insurance benefits! Oh, the irony! On November 30, the union, which says it "represents the needs and concerns of America's growing independent workforce," sent a memo out to its 15,000 New York metropolitan-area members who receive health insurance through the organization, announcing that coverage under their current health plan, HIP, would end December 31 in favor of more expensive coverage under Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield. "If you want to wake up with insurance on New Year's Day, you have to let us know which of the plans from Empire or PerfectHealth you want," the announcement read. We're hearing that, despite having completed all the paperwork required for the union-wide switch, plenty of freelancers are indeed waking up this morning to an uninsured New Year! "FU dropped the ball on this," one union member complains on the chat section of the organization's site.

"My wife has doctor's appointments today and I have been trying to get our new insurance ID numbers since the new cards have not been sent," another freelancer told us. "Empire doesn't have my SS# on file and my bank has yet to withdraw the new amount for my bill. I AM NOT EVEN SURE IF I'M INSURED AT ALL!!!" Freelancers are complaining that getting through over the phone to FU (yeah, we know, but nah—too easy) is near impossible. Automatic bank payments meant to go toward health plan deductibles have yet to be processed by FU—the union explained the tardiness to at least one freelancer who repeated it on the nonprofit's site: "They said they are backed up b/c of the holiday." Oh! Well then, we'll just tell that freelancer in labor over there to hold it till you guys get caught up, 'kay? People flooding Empire this morning with calls are being told they don't exist in the HMO's system and that information from only a fraction of union members who signed up to switch health plans has been sent over by the union. According to the November memo, co-pays under Empire are higher across the board than they were under previous provider HIP. Know anything else? Drop me a line.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339510&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Times' Rescinds Buyout Packages For Six Laid-Off Employees]]> We're hearing that the New York Times has changed its mind about giving buyout packages to six of the employees eliminated in newsroom layoffs announced last month. Instead of a package that would have included benefits for a time, they'll walk away with severance packages, which don't include benefits. A source tells us that the severance packages are worth about a third less than the buyouts originally promised. In November, the Times announced it would cut a dozen newsroom positions and "a number" of clerical administrative jobs.

Earlier: 'Times' Announces Newsroom Layoffs

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336418&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lydia Hearst Betrays The People Of Darfur!]]> According to Page Six, socialite and girl genius Lydia Hearst is peeved that Darfur benefit-throwers kept "slapping" her name on their invites after she did a single party with them. Well, now we hear the other side of the story, in a lengthy letter from Malcolm Harris, of Designers for Darfur. EXCLUSIVE! MUST CREDIT THE PEOPLE OF WESTERN SUDAN!

As to avoid dragging Designers For Darfur into some sort of public scandal or faux feud between Lydia Hearst and myself, I have decided to share my side of the story with the Gawker after reading the article printed in today's New York Post "Exploited Name". It has been made blatantly apparent that the folks of the New York Post will not give me fair shake against their "celebrity reporter" Lydia Hearst, and I simply would like to have my side of the story told....

When Designers For Darfur was originally formed, Lydia Hearst and I agreed that we would hold periodic events and initiatives in order to raise awareness, particularly within fashion industry, as to the ongoing crisis/genocide currently taking place in Darfur.... Unfortunately, Lydia's participation in the "real work" and/or "decision making process" for these events and initiatives left a great deal to be desired. That being said, Lydia and I both have always known the deal - the trade was simple - we do "all" the real work and you use your name to promote the events (the absolute least a "co-founder" should be able to do is to show up, look pretty for the cameras, and smile)... I can assure you that I have taken no great pleasure in always having to explain Lydia's absence at every single event instead of focusing on explaining to guests what they can do to assist in ending the genocide taking place in the Sudan.

Whilst Lydia is most certainly a delightful person and I have nothing bad to say about her character, I do believe that today's breed of "socialite" simply pales in comparison to the ideals set forth by great women such as Brooke Astor, Nan Kempner, Pat Buckley and many others that felt innately compelled to participate in a lifetime of charitable efforts. I simply believe that Ms. Hearst wasn't fully aware of the seriousness nature of the "grassroots" organization that she "committed" to join. It is my belief that Ms. Hearst was under the impression that after the "runway shows" and "pretty parties" the folks in Darfur would certainly now be out of harms way.... Unfortunately a crisis as serious at the situation in the Sudan does not simply go away after the disco ball of the most recent gala stops spinning....

You must forgive me for my heartfelt response, but I don't have the luxury of being able to afford a mouthpiece or publicist to speak on my behalf therefore, I am more than willing to be Malcolm Harris/designer/activist/"party-promoter"/humanitarian/or backslash anything else... But what I do have on my side is the sheer commonsense of humanity... I continue to wish Lydia Hearst well in all of her efforts.

Best regards,

Malcolm Harris

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335275&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Boss Tweed makes a comeback outside the...]]> Boss Tweed makes a comeback outside the offices of MTV Networks this morning! Hey, at least he's marginally cuter than the Union Rat, who's needed a serious upgrade since, like, 1974. Viacom is having an information session for freelancers on benefits changes today, according to Mediabistro. When? At the same time as the WGA-MTV protest of course! Tricky and clever!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333523&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Uh oh, things almost got ugly up at Viacom...]]> 200566003-018.jpgUh oh, things almost got ugly up at Viacom today (where there will be a walkout by disgruntled contract workers in a few minutes!) "Today they brought in an Aetna rep to talk about the 'plan' and he was almost lynched. People were yelling at him and the HR people." Hey! No stringing up the Aetna guy! He's an insurance salesman, you can't put him in any hell he's not already in. Of course, if Sumner Redstone walks in, by all means, have at.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332602&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Viacom Freelancers: "We Want Teeth"!]]>
Video guy Nick McGlynn hung out this afternoon with the outraged Viacom contractors. (Freelancers? Permalancers? Slave labor?) Actual employees in the eyes of the law, probably, considering how one staffer described her freelance staff. "They're here everyday, these guys comes in Monday to Friday, Saturday, Sunday, weekends, holidays, everything, to work and make this channel run," she told us. Steady paychecks render such commitment completely obsolete—most fully employed people we know support a wide-ranging interpretation of the conventional five-day-workweek. Best slogan heard at the (first!) Viacom Networks Walkout Of 2007: "No one sucks dick for free." (Also great: "No pills, no 'Hills.'" Ha!) Damn straight—we don't even tongue-kiss for anything less than one employer-sponsored retirement plan and a reasonable deductible.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332188&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How To Tell If You're A Freelancer Or An Employee]]> Is anyone confused by all the fuss over freelancer benefits in the Viacom mess? Freelancer, permalancer, part-time employee, full-time employee: What's the difference anymore? Why are Viacom's independent contractors complaining about having their benefits cut when the general impression is that freelancers don't qualify for benefits in the first place? Where does the actual, you know, law come down on this issue? And do most media companies abide by it? Let's learn more!

The basics of freelancing: Contractors complete a piece of work in exchange for a fee, not a salary. They can't be bound by specific hours or be required to attend meetings or work at the office. Employers aren't actually required to provide health or retirement benefits to anyone. If they're big enough, most companies provide those benefits at some level in order to get and keep happy employees. But if they provide benefits to some employees, they have to provide them for all. And that's where it gets sticky, because many freelancers, whether they know it or not, fit the (maddeningly loose) definition of employee.

There is no legal definition for an independent contractor, but courts uphold the common law definitions of "master" and "slave." That's less fun than it sounds. Whether someone is an employee or a contractor is based on the amount of control their boss has over them. The implied relationship determines if you're a contractor or an employee, entitled to the benefits every other employee gets. Vague enough? Sound like you're in a relationship with a high-strung high-schooler?

You're Basically An Employee If:

  • Your employer gives you company equipment to complete your work.
  • You have to get prior permission to take a day off.
  • You spend all your time working for one company—likely you don't have the time to work for anyone else.
  • You submit oral or written reports to our boss.
  • Your employer trained you for your position.
  • Your employer bought, trained and supervises your lovely assistant.
  • You have your own work station on company premises.
  • The business couldn't maintain its success or performance without your services. (In reality, not just in your mind!)
  • You're reimbursed for expenses.
  • You've been instructed where, when, or how to complete the job you've agreed to. (Having a picky boss doesn't qualify.)

  • None of these are legal definitions and many companies blur the lines. Newspapers and magazines, who often fill their pages with freelance work, occasionally set up "freelance stations," where a contractor can work, sometimes daily, without being given their own station and thus qualifying for employee status.

    Not every employer is out to exploit cheap labor. In the media industry in particular, a company is hard-pressed not to use freelance workers. Many of the most ambitious contractors are young and happy to do the work for a byline or are established enough to want independence—both are attractive. Giving those people steady work or a few perks seems only natural. Unfortunately for employers, it also qualifies them for more.

    In September, Governor Spitzer issued an executive order [PDF] establishing the Joint Enforcement Task Force On Employee Misclassification. Spitzer's order rattled the cages of a few media companies—the governor wants to look under rocks most of them would prefer remain undisturbed.

    Viacom may have faced a choice common to media companies: eliminate benefits to independent contractors, or hire them on as employees. Take away paid vacation, company-provided healthcare and a retirement plan, and it becomes a lot easier to make the case that a freelancer is just a freelancer. Many newspapers spent the summer cleaning house in anticipation—those who haven't may find themselves in a bind.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332170&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Viacom Freelancers Disinvited From Tonight's Holiday Party?]]> "Word has it that Viacom permalancers will be barred from their holiday party tonight over concerns that there will be protests/disturbances related to the decision to slash benefits and salaries," an insider tells us. "The organizers of the holiday party are concerned about the bad press and potential for outbursts." Bad press! Outbursts! We are shocked! "Employees are afraid to contact Viacom security to find out of (sic) this is true." We were less (slightly) afraid, but when we got through to MTV's security desk and asked whether freelancers would be allowed at tonight's holiday shindig, a security guard, sounding more than a little cranky, said "I have no idea," and promptly hung up on us. Cheeky! Not like we can blame the guy, what with the headache he's got in keeping all those rowdy sticker-making, t-shirt-screening non-employee "employees" in line. So? What's the haps? We're sure Viacom wouldn't do something this stupid—oh, wait.

Previously: MTF WTF
Earlier: MTV Permalance Troops To Attack Holiday Party (With T-Shirts)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330865&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MTV Memo Barely Mentioned Drastic Benefits Changes]]> Was MTV trying to get away with snowing contractors into signing away benefits by just sort of, you know, not mentioning it and hoping for the best? "We were distributed the paperwork and told that we were to fill it out because MTV was changing payroll companies. There was no mention of the insurance change AT ALL," says one freelancer, who was not pleased to learn of the change in her work conditions from the Internets. Full memo after the jump.

The memo distributed with the forms mentions the company "will be transitioning payroll" for its permalancers. "We are including several items in this packet that you will need to complete and hand in to your manager in order to be paid," is about as detailed as the memo gets regarding the 3,982 other changes to the Viacom freelance life.

The actual legalese includes this particularly priceless line: "Moreover, you hereby waveforfeit, relinquish and abandon all rights of attribution and/or integrity that you may have otherwise had with respect to Works." Of course, one thing won't be changing: freelancers still aren't invited to tomorrow's MTV holiday party.

Memo explaining New Start Paperwork to freelance, in-house temp, and project-based employees

To all freelance, in-house temp, and project-based employees:

On December 22, 2007 we will be transitioning payroll for our freelance, in-house temp, and project-based employees to an outside payroll processing company, Cast & Crew. We will no longer be processing payroll in-house. For all work performed on or after December 22, 2007, payroll will be processed through Cast & Crew. If you will be working in late 2007 and/or in 2008, you will need to fill out this new start paperwork to receive paychecks (even if you submitted a "Blue Book" in the past). We will no longer be using the Blue Book.

We are including several items in this packet that you will need to complete and hand in to your manager in order to be paid by Cast & Crew in 2008.

If you will be working for more than one company, you will need to complete and submit new start paperwork for each one. For example: if you will be working for Vh1's production company (namely, New Pop Culture Productions Inc.) as well as MTV's production company (namely, New Remote Productions Inc.), you must fill in start paperwork for both companies. The name of the company (e.g., New Games Productions Inc.) is listed at the top of the forms.

This start packet includes several items:

□ Employee Information Sheet
□ Voluntary Self-Identification Form
□ I-9 Form. Please note the requirement to show documents that verify your identity and eligibility to work (employees must bring in the appropriate documents)
□ W-4 Form
□ IT-2104 (NY employees only) or
□ California Withholding Allowance Form (CA employees only)
□ Direct Deposit Authorization Form
□ Benefits 2008 sheet

There will also be new timesheets, which we will begin to use for work performed as of December 22. These will be distributed under separate cover in December.

We are asking this population to return the completed forms to their hiring managers by Friday, December 7. Then, hiring managers will forward all the packets to Cast & Crew. Feel free to submit paperwork sooner, as well.

Please address any questions to the freelance management email: [redacted]@mtvstaff.com or to the hotline: (212) 846-[redacted].

Thank you all for helping to make this important transition.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330403&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Viacom Permalance Slave System]]> nickHere's what we hear from what we believe has truly become the Viacom sweatshop. (One Viacom permalancer estimates that almost 50% of the staff are contract workers at this point.) A 50-hour workweek will now be standard, at least at MTV Digital (which means no overtime until after 50 hours, and no overtime at all for higher-level people, like producers and segment producers), and all will go from a day rate to an hourly rate. Healthcare, which was offered to permalancers after a staggering year of service, will now be offered only to employees who have worked 1,280 hours (25 of those 50-hour workweeks) in any one division. And that's the catch: Get transfered, as often happens, from VH1 to MTV or the like, and you start over on that clock.

Here's how they were planning on telling people: Viacom sends out Christmas party invites to staff, but permalancers have to go pick them up. (Nice caste system.) So when permalancers went to pick up the invites, they were told "go across the table to pick up your new paperwork."

We hear that at least one manager will give his or her permalancers "off the books flex holiday days," but that's not a company initiative by any stretch.

What's more:

Tuition reimbursement is gone. Dental is gone. Commuter pre-tax deductions via WageWorks is gone. The healthcare goes from United Healthcare to Aetna.

Best of all: The company has asked workers to sign the paperwork before they attend the informational session that explains it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google's freebie problem: "They don't know where to draw the line."]]> You've seen one Google office, you've seen them all. But Brier Dudley of the Seattle Times had a column to write, so he ate some free food and turned in yet another dutiful profile of the lavish cafeterias in Google's Kirkland office. The outpost of Google is mostly notable for being a stone's throw from Microsoft and Amazon.com's headquarters, whence it's poached countless engineers with free food and other soft benefits.Perhaps the infusion of competitors' DNA has some value. Unlike the hordes of programmers at Google's Mountain View headquarters, who have gone straight from the cocoon of college dorms to the comforting swaddle of the mothership, Google Kirkland's engineers are a bit more skeptical, having seen office perks come and go as their former employers' fortunes wax and wane. Says Googler Steve Yegge:
"We've got perks for perks. You go on a company ski trip, and there's this bag for going on the ski trip — it's like the trip was a reward unto itself, right? You know, I got a perk for moving offices — I showed up and there was this box and it had this big red stapler from 'Office Space' in it. It was like, 'Oh, my office moved twice in a quarter.' They don't know where to draw the line."
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267780&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The 'Paris Review' Revel 2007]]> Doree and Nikola headed to the Puck Building last night for a Paris Review fundraiser. Their account, and photos, follow.
There are certain ways that one announces one's place in the social pecking order. Dalton or Spence. Summers in Nantucket, winters in Palm Beach. Really all out is the board of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. For those truly interested in becoming a part of the literary establishment, there is the Paris Review and its annual gala. Most parties for the quarterly literary journal take place at its offices in Tribeca and are generally attended by the expected assortment of nattily attired lower-level publishing types and a couple of famous writers enticed by the free drinks or the comely assistants who drink too many of them. But the Revel, as the annual benefit is called, is an entirely different animal. Tickets started at $500 and one was welcome to purchase a table for $50,000, which is the annual salary of two assistants.

At the Puck Building last night, then, the crowd was comprised of a rather jaw-dropping list of names—the writers and their patrons both—as well as the anonymous rich, the women identifiable only by their Chanel suits and the men by their horn-rimmed glasses. One tended to overhear conversations that began: "When [so-and-so] was on the board of the New York Public Library..."

At a table in the corner, Mayor Michael Bloomberg chatted with Norman Mailer. Salman Rushdie put on a brave, Padma Lakshmi-less face. Paris Review editor and New Yorker writer Philip Gourevitch mingled, as did his wife, New Yorker writer Larissa MacFarquhar. A frail-looking Joan Didion was surrounded protectively by a shifting coterie of women, as if she might break in two or melt away. Former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld looked none the worse for wear after his embarrassing aborted attempt at running for the governorship of New York. A jeans-clad Dana Vachon spoke to men twice, perhaps three times, his age, presumably about the follies and foibles of The Street. Nathaniel Rich (son of Frank, brother of Simon) is an editor at the magazine, which has a very small masthead. "You've met practically one-third of us," he remarked, in conversation with this reporter and one of the Review's interns. Another reporter was covering the party for the Harvard alumni magazine 02138, on account of so many of the magazine's editors and affiliates having gone to that institution. The Review's late, great founder, George Plimpton, was of course a Harvard man himself, though one can only assume that he, like so many of his fellow Crimson, modestly told people he went to school "in Boston."

Midway through the cocktail hour, Mr. Gourevitch (Cornell, 1986) took the podium to try to quiet down the crowd so the Mayor could say a few words about Norman Mailer, the evening's honoree. "We have a lot in common," the Mayor said, referring to himself and Mr. Mailer. "We're both from middle-class Jewish families. We both attended Harvard—he went to the College, I went to the Business School—and we're both distinsguished authors." Laughter. "And we've both run mayoral campaigns." The Mayor said that Mr. Mailer had had two buttons when he campaigned. One said "I would sleep better if Norman Mailer were mayor." The other said "No more bullshit." Then the Mayor said he had used his senior citizens' Metrocard to get to the affair, and as such, it had only cost him $1. "I suggest that everyone become a senior citizen," he remarked. Much of the crowd, it appeared, already had. A long line of Town Cars idled outside however.

We were not invited to stay for dinner, so on our way out we peeked into one of the gift bags arrayed neatly on a table by the entrance. In a Paris Review tote bag were the Spring issue of the magazine (perhaps partygoers had not yet gotten around to reading it?); a copy one of Mr. Mailer's novels, Harlot's Ghost, which is about the CIA; a Paris Review T-shirt (American Apparel, size large); and various other promotional items (a nip of whiskey, a calendar, etc.). The tote would be perfect to bring along to Nantucket this summer.

The Paris Review Revel Gallery

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=254699&view=rss&microfeed=true