Back in the nineties, the short megalo Gingrich drew a four million advance from Murdoch. The book was to be standard fascist drool, lists about corporate godism or something. Incidentally, on another front, unbeknownst to either of them, there was in Congress a move to allow bloated tycoons to own more and more of everything newsy in every city.
Let's apply Forbes' flat-tax philosophy to this book thing, shall we?
Which scenario is more of a burden to the individual in each scenario:
a.) Billionaire buys 1,000 copies of this shitty book for $17,160.
or
b.) One of Forbes' furloughed copy editors earning $37,000 buys the exact same number of books for the exact same price.
You see? Real equality! The financial burden of these men are exactly the same!
Flat tax rules!
Excelsior!
And as far as the poor copy editor making ends meet:
CHARITY, people.
Charity is the solution.
For example:
Instead of big guv-mint redistributing these books to the poor, the billionaire should have the personal freedom to donate the extra 999 copies *out of his own personal choice* to the furloughed copy editor -- who can then burn these books in his Franklin stove for heat during the winter months!
@Gosukusan:
If the books are expensed, then then the cost of them is written off on Forbes. Inc taxes.
We, the taxpayers pick up 50% of the cost & Silly Steve gives the books away as gifts for buy a subscription to his dieing & doomed mag!
Friends, let us not remember the broken, talentless hack that we see before us, but the Nicolas Cage of Wild At Heart, Raising Arizona and Valley Girl. The Nicolas Cage that we all knew before his rebranding as an "action hero." That's the way that he would have wanted us to think of him.
Tagline: "If you didn't hate Next, the 'Twilight Zone'-y movie in which knowing the future makes Nicolas Cage go goofy, then you might not mind Knowing, the more recent 'Twilight Zone'-y movie in which knowing the future makes Nicolas Cage go even goofier. See it now, while there's nothing on TV!"
Not to give anything away, but if you like disaster porn, you will be hard pressed to find a movie that can match the shear destruction featured in Knowing.
08/15/09
The book bidness, it used to mean something.
08/15/09
08/15/09
Which scenario is more of a burden to the individual in each scenario:
a.) Billionaire buys 1,000 copies of this shitty book for $17,160.
or
b.) One of Forbes' furloughed copy editors earning $37,000 buys the exact same number of books for the exact same price.
You see? Real equality! The financial burden of these men are exactly the same!
Flat tax rules!
Excelsior!
And as far as the poor copy editor making ends meet:
CHARITY, people.
Charity is the solution.
For example:
Instead of big guv-mint redistributing these books to the poor, the billionaire should have the personal freedom to donate the extra 999 copies *out of his own personal choice* to the furloughed copy editor -- who can then burn these books in his Franklin stove for heat during the winter months!
08/15/09
08/15/09
Does not compute
08/15/09
08/15/09
If the books are expensed, then then the cost of them is written off on Forbes. Inc taxes.
We, the taxpayers pick up 50% of the cost & Silly Steve gives the books away as gifts for buy a subscription to his dieing & doomed mag!
08/15/09
07/15/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
Truth. Let us never forget Cage's greatest moment: chasing a couple down the street and screaming "I'M A VAMPIRE!!!"
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
Little things make us happy, non?
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
The airplane scene was actually impeccably done, no?
07/15/09
Also this is one of my favorite movies ever. TRUE FACT.
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/16/09
It is a wax statue of him! I walked by it in Vegas. Encased in glass. I pressed my face against the glass. (I could feel him).