<![CDATA[Gawker: bright ideas]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: bright ideas]]> http://gawker.com/tag/brightideas http://gawker.com/tag/brightideas <![CDATA[The Hipster Grifter Has a Great Reality TV Show Pitch]]> It's a weekday, and that means the Hipster Grifter is back, with some more sexxxy jail correspondence! Besides her usual ho-hum tales of imaginary lesbian jail sex, Kari reveals her wacky idea for a reality TV show. Snag her now!

Self-deprecation and crazy sex teases, together at last. Anyhow she says she could be getting out of jail any day now, and you better believe we have big plans for her when she gets out. We haven't thought them up yet, though. Read her entire long-ass letter, as always, at Animal NY.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400610&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Can We Lose Some Weight?]]> We as Americans are not in the shape we once (1942) were. Is it possible to "lose" the accumulated weight of decades of Cap'n Crunch, Nestle Quik, and Quarter Pounders? America's willing to give it a shot. With crazy schemes.

  • Posting Calorie Counts on All Restaurant Menus: NYC Overseer and Lord Michael Bloomberg has tried this, but a new study says people are actually eating more at fast food outlets since the calorie postings went up.
  • Banning Fast Food Restaurants Altogether: They want to do this is South Los Angeles, at least until enough health food stores open up to even things out. Researchers say it won't accomplish anything.
  • Fewer Junk Food Snacks in Schools: The CDC now says fewer American schools are selling candy and soda! Nevertheless—although the American school system produces more NBA players than any other nation's—American kids are only fit in their video game avatars. In real life they are not fit, but rather unfit.
  • The Biggest Loser: It's not just a disturbing television show any more—now it's a franchise with cookbooks, a Wii fitness game, and even a god damn "Biggest Loser Resort" weight loss spa where you pay money to go live the life of a loser. Unless 300 million of us can fit in there, it's just a tiny chocolate chip on the vast sea of frosting that is American obesity.
America needs to stop thinking it's all about a number on a scale, and start looking at the big picture: Its 20-rep squat max.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5375374&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Report: Coast Guard Fires on a Boat on Potomac River in Washington, D.C.]]> CNN just reported that the Coast Guard fired on a "suspicious" vessel on the Potomac in D.C., but the Coast Guard says it was a training exercise and no shots were fired.

According to Fox, the exercise took place "moments before President Obama and his motorcade crossed a nearby bridge."

Hey that's a great idea—a training exercise in public in our nation's capital close to the president on the eighth anniversary of 9/11. Maybe they could fly some planes really low over the city, too, just to train on how to do it?

UPDATE: CNN says "there were reports on police scanners that the Coast Guard fired 10 rounds of ammunition, but those reports could not immediately be confirmed. It was not immediately clear from the reports whether they referred to warning shots." The incident took place near the Memorial Bridge, in part of the river that was closed to boat traffic as a security precaution during 9/11 memorial ceremonies.

UPDATE: Washington news-radio station WTOP explains—the Coast Guard conducted a training exercise this morning that included radio instructions to fire 10 rounds. But the rounds were not actually fired, and there was no suspicious boat. CNN picked up on the radio chatter and reported it, causing a minor panic. According to Drudge, departures at National Airport were halted briefly as a precaution.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5357326&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[That's What She Said]]> Vanity Fair contributing editor and Graydon Carter pal Fran Lebowitz has some words of advice for a certain similarly named colleague. Annie Leibovitz, your ears are burning.

The Observer caught Lebowitz at a Graydon Carter-hosted book party last night and asked her what she thought of the McKinsey consultants descending on Condé Nast:

"Well, I don't think it's anyone working there who hired them!" Ms. Lebowitz said. "The thing is, everyone seeks a lot of advice now. People who make $40,000 a year have financial consultants. 'How should I deal with my money?' Don't spend all of it! It's just common sense."

Annie, you should listen to Frannie.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5356594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Radio Shack Embraces Shantytown Image]]> Sometimes it really does make sense for a famous brand to change its name. It happened to Uncle Adolf's Old-Tyme KKKandy, and now it's happening to Radio Shack. Too bad the new name is even worse.

Radios are old, right? Get rid of that 'Radio' anchor weighing down your valuable forward-thinking brand of the future, by all means! But for god's sake, replace it with something. Otherwise you get this:

[Our] tipster says that in-store signs will reflect the change this week, and storefront signage will begin to be reworked as "The Shack" sometime later this year.

Forget the old "Radio Shack." The new home of sophisticated electronic retailing is "The Shack."
With everyone broke, this should go over well.
[Endgadget. Pic via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5328912&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Branding Weed]]> With the inevitable recession-inspired legalization of marijuana in mind, Print magazine asked some design shops to propose packaging ideas for legal weed. And they agreed, because they love drugs! Click through for a good one, and a bad one.

GOOD: The updated stash box, by Base. People already like their own stash boxes so they'll probably like these. Keeps weed dry!


BAD: Corny ass stickers, by The Heads of State. Weed is cool. Slapping corny stickers with slogans like "Uptown Schwag" on your weed package is not cool. Why would you do such a thing? Narcs.

See all the designs at Print Mag [via Fast Company]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5325447&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Does One Survive a McKinsey Visit?]]> Floundering Conde Nast has hired McKinsey & Co. to help them "rethink" the way they do business, which usually involves layoffs. Not to worry, Conde Nasties! Our worldly readers will help you survive this trying time.

We'd like to put together a guide to Surviving McKinsey, for the beleaguered Conde employees who want nothing more than to make it out of this thing with their jobs intact (expense accounts be damned). So we're asking you: Have you ever survived a McKinsey visit to your company, without getting canned or otherwise screwed? How'd you do it? Send us your brilliant tips for making yourself invisible to job-hungry outside consultants, and we'll incorporate them into our handy survival guide. Do it for the love of gloss.

Subject line: "McKinsey survival." Email us now!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5320398&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Cokehead Excuse of the Day: 'I Kissed a Girl With Coke on Her Lips']]> Richard Gasquet is a professional tennis player who was suspended in May after testing positive for cocaine. But now he's been reinstated, thanks to one of the most thrilling Positive Drug Test Excuses of the 2009 season!

"...the Tribunal accepted Mr Gasquet's plea of No Significant Fault or Negligence, on the basis that he was able to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities how the cocaine entered his system (through inadvertent contamination in a nightclub the night before his scheduled match)"

He said he kissed some girl in a club and she had, like, cocaine all over her lips or something, and that excuse totally worked! This excuse will join "Stepped on a needle in the park" and "It seeped through my pores while I was holding money contaminated with coke, unbeknownst to me" in the Classic Cokehead Excuse Lexicon.
[Pic: Getty]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5316001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Let's Screw Up the Entire Internet to Save Newspapers]]> The hot new idea among people who think about "journalism," and the sanctity thereof: let's ban linking, on the internet! Let's also ban wheels, in order to save the horse industry. Let's also ban talking about things!

This whole argument is premised on the assumption that we must save newspapers. At the cost of making the internet into an inefficient mess! So Richard Posner, professional smart man and US Appeals Court judge who writes 23,000 words per day, floated the idea of banning links (and more!), so internet cannibals don't keep stealing newspaper content for nothing:

Expanding copyright law to bar online access to copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, or to bar linking to or paraphrasing copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, might be necessary to keep free riding on content financed by online newspapers from so impairing the incentive to create costly news-gathering operations that news services like Reuters and the Associated Press would become the only professional, nongovernmental sources of news and opinion.

Periods, Richard Posner. Try them. To break up text. What you may notice here is that Posner proposes banning linking or paraphrasing copyrighted materials. The problem: this is America dude, we say what we fucking want, amirite?

You can copyright a news story, but you can't copyright the news. "The news" just means "things that happen in the world." What would it mean, in practice, to make it illegal to paraphrase a copyrighted news story? Summing up, for example, political events, or a sports controversy, or even a fashion trend, could be interpreted as paraphrasing copyrighted material. So let's ban talking about anything. And banning links will help us make our references even more obscure, by making it impossible for anyone to refer to source materials! Good idea, Posner. This gross oversimplification makes you look none too freedom-loving!

We all know journalism happens only at newspapers. Better to protect them at all costs than to invest in the murky "future."

This idea is supported by a newspaper columnist! Connie Schultz, a columnist for the Cleveland Plain-Dealer (who's married to a senator, btw, nothing to see here), also touts the idea of giving newspapers a 24-hour injunction on news they post, during which time it's all theirs, and can't be aggregated by others online.

Fine. You can have your injunction. But you can't stop anyone from discussing, and writing about, current events. As they happen. Go read all those "Twitter Generation" stories you guys are always writing! The idea that it's worth crippling the entire free flow of information on the internet in order to add to the bottom line of newspaper companies is prima facie idiotic. I guess you could also help save newspapers by passing a law that everyone has to buy one every day, or by making it illegal for TV news to exist. That doesn't make those things good ideas.

If Bill Gates pledged to make it so computers could not be operated properly until the user could prove they had read today's Cleveland Plain-Dealer that might save a reporter and he is a monster for not doing so, QED.
[Pic: Chronicling America]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5305503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Anna Wintour's Plan to End the Recession: Let Them Eat Canapés!]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.NYC's "Fashion's Night Out" stimulus plan: "[Stores] are being asked to stay open, as late as midnight, and to throw parties that will be open to the public." Will they also give out money? [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Smaller, Failing Paper Rebranded as 'Super Successful Bigger Paper']]> Brian Tierney, the boss of the recently bankrupt Philadelphia newspapers, vowed last week he would "never close" the Philly Daily News. But he never said he wouldn't desperately rebrand it to save a nickel!

See, now the Daily News will now be released as "an edition of the Philadelphia Inquirer." But everything else will stay exactly the same!

Philadelphia Media Holdings CEO Brian Tierney said the change will save money on wire services by allowing the publications to act as a single subscriber, and will be helpful in selling advertising.

"Instead of telling advertisers we have 330,000 circulation (at the Inquirer) plus the Daily News, it will help to say we have 440,000 daily circulation," Tierney said.

Instead of telling advertisers and vendors we have two smaller papers, we'll tell them we have one larger paper. Nobody will know. [Philly.com]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5163429&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Unwanted Free Papers Delivered To Uninterested Rich Readers]]> DMN.jpegSometimes the scent of desperation just rolls off the newspaper industry in great waves. The Dallas Morning News, like every other paper, has not been doing well. Their new strategy to get back on track: "a free, one-section version of the paper for home delivery aimed at nonsubscribers who are short on time." Ha, they're not short on time, they just don't want to read your stupid paper! The free version will go to "affluent" neighborhoods. So the company will pay to produce a dumbed-down version of its own poorly-selling paper and deliver it, thereby cannibalizing its own declining circulation and giving a big "fuck you" to not-wealthy readers all at once. It just might work! [DMN]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=395801&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Plastic Surgery, Hamptons, Summertime, Decadence Combined In One Easy Package]]> plasticsurgery.jpegBecause some stories are nothing but blatant cries for condemnation, we're going to allow our disgust to swing around 180 degrees so that we support this idea: A Park Avenue plastic surgeon is offering a $500,000 package deal that includes a summer house rental in the Hamptons, and all the plastic surgery you want! "Within reason," of course. He's also throwing in a chauffeur, personal chef, and a nurse to tend to the surgically wounded. And tickets to the hottest parties, to show off your healing scars! This development is... a good thing.

The positives: $500,000 out of a rich person's pocket. Their absence from the New York metropolitan area from Memorial Day through Labor Day. And Hamptons parties overrun with bandaged, Joker-like figures, grinning grotesquely through their new masks of plastic.

This is like tee-ball for righteous outrage. Give us a challenge, you decadent monsters.

[NYDN]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392975&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["Seeking A Candidate? Vote For A Journalist"]]> polijourno.jpegThe headline of this post is also the actual headline of a story in the New York Sun today. We didn't even change it, because it was already funny! The peppy little broadsheet reasons that since London just elected an ex-journalist as mayor, hey, why not here? And the neocon paper rounds up the very cream of the city's third-tier columnist crop to explain why such a feat be might hard for a member of the embittered, self-important writing class to pull off: because columnists "have too much integrity."

A columnist for the Sun, Alicia Colon, said writers who pull no punches in their news pieces might not be able handle the give-and-take of political negotiations and campaigning.

"To be a politician you have to compromise, and I don't think a lot of editors or columnists would be able to do it." Ms. Colon said. "Maybe they have too much integrity.

Way to dig deep to find someone to represent extremism, NY Sun. Extremism of integrity, that is. But is it really too much integrity that stops columnists from taking their rightful place as our leaders—or is it that the masses are simply afraid of their intellectual honesty?


"We have a nasty tendency to see complexities in life, and I suspect your average politician likes to think in more terms of black and white," [NYT columnist Clyde] Haberman said yesterday in an interview. "They don't get bothered too much by all the gray that defines life for most people."
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387979&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Starbucks Geniuses To Stop Burning Coffee This Morning, Change World Forever]]> Picture 13-15Starbucks is set to begin selling a "smoother" — read: non-burnt — cup of coffee at all company-owned locations this morning. CEO Howard Schultz told the Journal the new roast is meant to "reinvent brewed coffee." Ah, so now properly roasting your beans makes you a revolutionary. That must be why the press release calls this day "historic" and the roast itself "historic." What could possibly be more hyperbolic than that? Oh, right, a brainwashed barista on StabucksGossip.com saying this will save the lives of children. I almost forgot!

This is the finest coffee that we can make. ALL of this coffee is in the store within 2 weeks of its roasting date, and is fresh everyday, delivered from our new roasting plant, intended for your satisfaction. Its a mild coffee and is made fresh every 30 minutes, instead of every hour. Starbucks spent alot of money on this.
I just would like to share with you, that we are not just about baristas, and frapps. Its about the farmers as well. We help their children eat, and the farmers take great joy into working with us. I encourage all of you on Tuesday to go to your local store and try the new blend. And when you try it, think of the positives instead of just assuming the coffee sucks. To us, coffee is a goal, and a dream. If anything, work together.
We have gone astray with the values that we used to have, so hang in there as we transform that company back to what it was inteded. Quality service, and great tasting, fresh, coffee.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5005201&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[$11,000 Coffee Machine Gets You Same Burnt Starbucks Coffee]]> starbucks2.jpegAs part of its brave new plan to stop hemorrhaging money, Starbucks went out and bought a company called Clover that makes coffee machines. These Clovers cost $11,000 each, and brew one cup of coffee at a time. We're not math whizzes or anything, but at that rate, those better be some good fucking cups of coffee. So the New York Times sent a coffee connoisseur to taste seven kinds of beans from the new machine, and he came to the stunning conclusion: not even a magical $11,000 gadget can make burned coffee beans taste good.

Of the seven varieties of coffee, the reviewer was dissatisfied with five. Among the criticisms: "a long, unpleasantly bitter aftertaste," ""I hate it. That's really spoiled fruit, like really bad wine," and "The drip coffee tasted burned and acidic."

If none of the coffees made a favorable impression, we concluded, it seemed that the problem lay less with the Clover, or the quality of the beans, than with the roast.

All the beans we tried had the oily surface you get in a dark roast, commonly called French and Italian roast. Starbucks and other companies are often criticized by coffee connoisseurs for using over-roasted beans.

Overall, the Clover coffee tasted the same as a French press, just quicker. Wow.

In conclusion, stop burning the beans, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. You could have just read the comments around here to learn that.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372313&view=rss&microfeed=true