@markscottmusic: Remember, during the 2008 campaign, Penn was the idiot who didn't hear about the importance of caucus states for delegate-building until Hillary lost a half dozen of them.
This is the soft paternalism way of doing things of the GOP - "But he said he was going to take care of it!" - the same thinking behind deregulated markets.
@abettertomorrow: Yeah except like that fuckstick Penn, Krugman actually defended himself (quite successfully) many times about his connection. [www.pkarchive.org]
@Max Power: Yeah, Krugman says - I was a columnist, not a a journalist, when I wrote for national publications while getting an Enron paycheck - and - I didn't disclose that I was paid, but people should have assumed-. I fail to see how this is in any way different from Mark Penn. At least Mark Penn isn't promoting companies he does PR for in his column. Here are the actual quotes from Krugman's response link:
"I did write monthly columns for two magazines in 1999, but I would not have described myself as a journalist - no more so than, say, Laura Tyson, Robert Barro, or or Gary Becker, respected economists who write monthly columns for Business Week. I wrote a monthly column for Fortune; that column was neither a major commitment of time nor a major source of income. I also wrote a monthly column, for very little money, for Slate. My main sources of income were teaching, consulting, and business speaking.
5. Did I disclose my connection? Yes. I reported it the one time I mentioned Enron in Fortune, almost three years ago. I reported it again the first time I mentioned Enron in the New York Times, in a highly critical article more than a year ago. I didn't say that I was paid to serve on the board, but I thought that was obvious: who volunteers his services to for-profit corporations? "
It's certainly ok to be wrong, and it makes it much more difficult to explain when you're taking $37,500 from the company you're so very, very wrong about.
"Actually, we are giving him a raise because we admire that kind of entrepreneurial spirit here at WSJ. Perhaps we should ask for a finder's fee from future columns.
This ludicrous WSJ quote also applies to the newspaper's view of the big investment banks' looting of the U.S. Treasury: ""Clearly what was done is not something that we liked. But we're pretty sure that it's going to stop."
@Gabriel Snyder: It's around lunchtime right now, so you'll probably get a few phone calls to your tipline from some of them, now untethered from their Dow Jones phones, OR perhaps anonymous emails from an Internet cafe nearby, with journalistic gripes. At least we hope so.
@tailpipebananna: Sad but true. I for one, though, will take a stand and cancel my subscription. By which I mean I'll stop leafing through my neighbor's copy while waiting for the elevator. As long as someone's Times or Post is nearby.
@tailpipebananna: I don't care. I wouldn't have expected anything less from Penn or most other op-ed/columnists with other gigs. This kind of behavior around news articles would be an issue, and also occurs, no doubt. Let's police that.
I'm looking at this piece with a Top Chef ad in the top corner, as in a show that you cover often and fawningly. (I don't actually read your coverage, but a live-blog and a recap on top of it are a bit much, no?)
09/09/09
09/09/09
I hear great things about something called the internets.
09/09/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/27/09
What about the columnist who writes about topics that he thinks will earn him big speaking fees down the line?
What about the columnist who writes about the same topic that her recently published book addresses?
What about the reporter who writes about the topic that he knows his publisher has a personal deep interest in?
Penn is what he his, so this is no defense - your complaint, however seems pretty, pretty vague...
How, exactly, are "journalist" ethics any different than "concrete wholesaler" ethics?
08/27/09
08/27/09
"I did write monthly columns for two magazines in 1999, but I would not have described myself as a journalist - no more so than, say, Laura Tyson, Robert Barro, or or Gary Becker, respected economists who write monthly columns for Business Week. I wrote a monthly column for Fortune; that column was neither a major commitment of time nor a major source of income. I also wrote a monthly column, for very little money, for Slate. My main sources of income were teaching, consulting, and business speaking.
5. Did I disclose my connection? Yes. I reported it the one time I mentioned Enron in Fortune, almost three years ago. I reported it again the first time I mentioned Enron in the New York Times, in a highly critical article more than a year ago. I didn't say that I was paid to serve on the board, but I thought that was obvious: who volunteers his services to for-profit corporations? "
08/27/09
[web.archive.org]
It's certainly ok to be wrong, and it makes it much more difficult to explain when you're taking $37,500 from the company you're so very, very wrong about.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
Best quote? "Clearly what was done is not something that we liked. But we're pretty sure that it's going to stop."
We'll as long as they're pretty sure about it, I'm satisfied.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/26/09
08/26/09