<![CDATA[Gawker: Cablevision]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Cablevision]]> http://gawker.com/tag/cablevision http://gawker.com/tag/cablevision <![CDATA[ Precious Liberty Rescued By Federal Judges ]]> "With the stroke of a pen, the appeals court has opened the door to a massive increase in the penetration of DVR capabilities." [Hollywood Reporter]

]]>
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:57:09 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033126&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Newsday Reporters Crushed By Weight Of The World ]]> newsday.jpegWhen Cablevision's ruling Dolan family—famous for making reporters' lives hell as they try to cover the Dolan-owned New York Knicks—became the new owners of Newsday , every media reporter in the city simultaneously realized that they could write a funny story about how the asshole Dolans probably won't even speak to their own company's new reporters. And everyone obliged! The Observer wraps the story in a nice little bow, detailing how Newsday editors got "screamed at" for sending a reporter to the Dolans' house. And while the paper's top editors are now obliged to be nice to the Dolans, most of the reporters are pissed off or just sad, as their quotes show pretty plainly:

"They're the only owners who could make you wish for Murdoch."

"It seemed to show a lack of respect and a lack of desire to be helpful to your new property."

"People are so beaten down here there's not much of anything that could cause much of a reaction."

"Everything is different," said one. "The parking lot is half-empty, the cafeteria is half-empty. It's unbelievable. I remember when I couldn't get a space! You get to work after 10 a.m. or so, and the lines at the cafeteria used to be long. Now there's nothing. There's no one there."

Sounds like fun!

[NYO]

]]>
Wed, 14 May 2008 10:03:28 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390305&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cablevision Would Like Some Help Running <i>Newsday</i>, Please ]]> Lli Having bought Newsday for $650 million, Cablevision executives, who pretty much suck at making money on anything that's not a cable system, are now interested in maybe having an actual newspaper company print, distribute and sell advertising into the tabloid. A printing deal with Post owner News Corp. or Daily News owner Mort Zuckerman would make eminent financial sense, since Newsday has an outdated printing plant and both the Daily News and Post stand to cut their own printing costs if they can sign up the Long Island newspaper as a customer. And cross-selling ads could drum up some extra revenue. But if Cablevision were to do a comprehensive deal covering pretty much all business-side operations, it would beg the question, why did Cablevision buy Newsday in the first place? Were the cross-selling opportunities between cable, internet and the newspaper really worth an $80 million premium over bids from News Corp. and Zuckerman? Prediction: Whichever media company ends up doing this deal with Cablevision, and one of them will, is going to end up owning the newspaper in a few years when Cablevision's high expectations are deflated. [Times]

]]>
Tue, 13 May 2008 05:47:04 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008824&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Uncomfortable Family Psychodrama Purchases 'Newsday' ]]> Rupert Murdoch's secret, sneaky plan to destroy Long Island tabloid Newsday: let a dysfunctional company buy it for more money. Cablevision purchased the paper for $650 million and Murdoch withdrew his bid this weekend. Now, everyone is a bit confused. Because Cablevision owns many odd things, but none of them have been newspapers up til now. "The Newsday bid had the backing of both Charles Dolan, who founded the company, and his son James L. Dolan, the chief executive," the Times reports, even though generally the Dolans hate each other and disagree about everything. And according to witnesses of the meetings between the Dolans and former Newsday owner Sam Zell, the "tension between the two has been obvious." As have the tensions between Cablevision and its shareholders. Because Cablevision is a company that does one thing quite well and everything else quite poorly.

Cablevision makes a lot of money with its cable system. Madison Square Garden and the Knicks and the Rangers? Not quite managed as effectively. And now Cablevision owns a newspaper and no one knows why except maybe it's just the Dolans being insane or Jimmy trying to prove to dad that he knows how to run a company or something. Obviously owning a Long Island newspaper will present some synergistic benefits to a company that owns a cable tv system, but not necessarily $650 million worth. Plus the deal comes right after Cablevision inexplicably bought the Sundance channel for almost $500 million. That deal made even less sense, really, though at least the price wasn't as embarrassing as everyone worried it might be.

Some Wall Street types are pretty sure the crazy Dolans are just trying to mismanage the company to annoy all the shareholders who didn't let them go private last year. We suspect Jimmy just decided to buy a newspaper because he wishes he could be an awesome media baron like Rupert Murdoch.

Cablevisison Strikes Deal to Buy Newsday [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 12 May 2008 10:44:52 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389492&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Murdoch Loses <i>Newsday</i> Bid ]]> Rupert Murdoch Tokyo"News Corporation, the global media conglomerate controlled by Rupert Murdoch, is withdrawing its bid to purchase Newsday. The withdrawal of the bid was first reported on the Web site of The Wall Street Journal, which is owned by the News Corporation.The bid withdrawal appears to be a reversal from Wednesday, when in the News Corporation’s earnings conference call Mr. Murdoch voiced skepticism that Cablevision could succeed in its bid for Newsday, even as he vowed not to get into a bidding war for the newspaper, which was at the center of a tussle among three New York moguls."

"Mr. Murdoch spoke on the call with Wall Street analysts and the press after the release of quarterly earnings from the News Corporation, the global media conglomerate he controls. On the call, he said, 'No, I don’t think Cablevision will prevail; just be patient for a couple days.'

"Several weeks ago it appeared that News Corporation had a tentative deal to buy Newsday, based on Long Island, for about $580 million, but two other bidders have come forward.

"Mortimer B. Zuckerman, the owner of The Daily News, matched Mr. Murdoch’s offer, while Cablevision, the Long Island cable operator that also owns Madison Square Garden and the New York Knicks and Rangers, was a late entrant but upped the ante to $650 million." [NYT]

Also? Murdoch gave bubonic plague to three of the Seven Dwarves.

]]>
Sat, 10 May 2008 14:43:11 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008561&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Sundance Kid's Big Haul ]]> Rainbow Media, that gay-sounding TV group actually owned by the macho Dolan family, is adding the Sundance Channel to its portfolio. One wouldn't have thought there was much money in broadcasting obscure documentaries and independent movies. But Sundance Channel reaches 30 million homes and is going to Cablevision unit Rainbow for $496m. One of the beneficiaries: actor Robert Redford, who played a bank robber in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and applied the Sundance name to the annual film festival in Park City and the premium cable channel.

]]>
Wed, 07 May 2008 13:42:27 EDT Nick Denton http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Newsday</i> Slipping From Murdoch's Clutches ]]> 80641604"Cablevision is preparing a $650 million offer for Newsday, $70 million more than bids by Rupert Murdoch and Mortimer B. Zuckerman... Executives... interested in Newsday said they learned over the last month that printing, trucking and subscription operations were more troubled and inefficient than they knew. Paradoxically, that has persuaded them that the paper was worth more... 'These are problems that can be fixed, so there’s a lot of room for improvement,' one executive said." [Times]

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 04:55:10 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007454&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Newsday</i> Is Hot Sheet ]]> Picture 19-5Since when is Newsday so hot? The paper consistently publishes the most boring front page of any of the Gotham tabloids, but the publication is clearly stirring the passions of corporate tycoons. Rupert Murdoch's interest emerged yesterday; now it's clear that the News Corp. CEO and Post owner must queue with other suitors interested in winning Newsday from money-hemorrhaging Tribune Company. Daily News owner Mort Zuckerman wants the paper for largely the same reason as Murdoch, which is to merge business-side offices and cut costs enough to drive the remaining, unaffiliated tabloid out of business. Long Island cable operator Cablevision Systems Corp. is bidding, perhaps so it can cross-sell ads from its cable system and local news channel into Newsday. It's not clear that the other two bidders are as serious as Murdoch, or can afford to be, but broker Citigroup is apparently planning a "soft auction." Newspaper analyst John Morton estimates Newsday could fetch $350 million to $400 million, down about half from its value five years ago. Kind of sad for what Morton described, in the Times' retelling, as "probably one of Tribune's more lucrative papers." [Times, WSJ]

]]>
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:49:00 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Maer Reports To Yusef ]]>
  • Surly Maer Roshan only talks to Yusef Jackson. Yusef talks to Ron Burkle. It's called plausible deniability. You know, allegedly. [NYO]
  • Martha Stewart finds a way to write off her upcoming trip to China: It's a fact-finding mission. [NYP]
  • Cablevision can't do anything right. [NYT]
  • Jon Friedman's political analysis makes Jon Friedman's media criticism seem incisive and original. [MarketWatch]
  • New trend for magazines? Web video! It's like reading, except you watch it. [WWD]
  • Hillary Clinton mean to Asian press, Asian press mean to blacks. [AP]
  • Charlie Gibson is kicking Brian Williams' ass. [Hollywood Reporter]
  • The line on the Wall Street Journal has always been "best news organization in American newspapers, worst editorial section." That divide will now be tested, as Tunku Varadarajan moves over from the crazy, nut-ass, batshit insane editorial side to become assistant managing editor of the newsroom. Let's see how that goes. [NYO]

  • ]]>
    Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:32:22 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240298&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Plenty of Free 'Time' To Watch Extra Hour of 'Today' ]]> MK-AI046_NBC_20070116202329.jpg
  • Another hour of "Today" just means more Al Roker to love. And, you know, Ann Curry. [WSJ]
  • Employees at Time Inc. have one more day to steal all the office supplies they can carry home; layoffs are apparently tomorrow.
  • The Dolans are gonna have to do better than thirty bucks a share if they want to take Cablevision private. [NYP]
  • If nobody buys Tribune, blame the online ad market. [MediaPost]
  • Is AMI moving Star back to Boca? Didn't we ask this last week? [NYP]
  • The Times soft-focus magazines vs. People: which side are you on? And, really, do you care? [WWD]
  • Janet Street-Porter may not be able to edit a bus ticket, but she's handy with the racism. Allegedly. [Guardian]
  • The Sacramento Bee will be sending out a daily memo on what stories are garnering the most online eyeballs. The paper claims that these statistics will not affect what and how they choose to cover, but we think the current headline "Britney Vagina Upskirt Paris Hilton Oral Sex Free Viagara" tells a different story. [Romenesko]

  • ]]>
    Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:40:39 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229257&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Trees Falling in the Forest ]]>

    • Here come the layoffs at the Philadelphia Inquirer. [NYT]
    • The Times might feel confident enough that everyone's forgotten the whole Jayson Blair thing to ditch the Public Editor position altogether. [NYO]
    • Gerry Levin's "inner poet" turned out to be some dude who runs a spa. [NYP]
    • That Allbritton online politics thing scores another defection; this time it's Ben Smith of the Daily News, who snared yesterday's scoop on the stolen Giuliani documents. [NYDN]
    • Radar's John Cook, Jeff Bercovici get all Woodward and Bernstein on some dude who wrote a mean thing in Brit Hume's Wikipedia entry. [Radar]
    • Diane Sawyer's not going anywhere. At least until June. [NYT]
    • Liberty Media's John Malone looking to pick up some Cablevision assets. [NYP]
    • Union representing WSJ reporters and editors takes out ad in NYT lambasting its own paper. [WWD]
    • Did the Times use a source who had an interest in the direction of the story he commented on? We're shocked. [Brooklyn Vegan, first comment]
    • We hope Jon Friedman isn't as quick to pull the plug on his loved ones as he is on Katie Couric. [MarketWatch]
    • WaPo's Richard Cohen makes HuffPo's Rachel Sklar fear for her decayingg ovaries. [ETP]
    ]]>
    Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:00:40 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=225643&view=rss&microfeed=true