Enter your username and password.
New York, 8:26 AM
Fri Dec 4
53 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
As for Baruchel, I'd put twenty bucks on the warlock. Just the fact that his name looks familiar to me is astonishing and clearly the work of the devil and some potion featuring eye of newt. The truth is, he may have comedic chops and therefore not be so bad at SNL, but I find the show a lot less enjoyable when I'm not familiar with the host's work.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
[www.imdb.com]
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
06/06/09
the message here is that obama used the race card in nominating sotomayor. notice that none of the republicans is using the stick (honest debate will be perceived as striking a hispanic woman/pinata with racism/a stick) to strike the pinata, because none of them will because she's hispanic. it turns conventional wisdom about which party is racist on its head, and it may very well be correct because, yeah, the debate will, in the end, be very light.
does she deserve to be confirmed? absolutely. will the debate on her merits ever prove that? absolutely not. republicans will not risk alienating the hispanic vote and the public's ire by beating up on a pinata.
06/06/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
You know, the one about The Oklahoman being a newspaper.
06/05/09
06/05/09
This is not racist.
Here is how you numbskulls read the cartoon:
Cartoonist shows Hispanic woman characterised as pinata = Racist. Stop any further thought or reflection.
Here is how thinking people read the cartoon:
Obama smugly daring the republicans to publically come out and show their stripes in front of the cameras, daring them to blather on about La Raza and all the other bullshit stereotypical stuff (SYMBOLIZED as a Soto Pinata) associated with Mexican Americans.
BTW, I am Mexican American, I take ZERO offense to this.
And an note to all you gentle readers.... Bad taste does not automatically equal racism.
I swear "Racist" is the least understood but most overused word is the English language.
06/05/09
06/05/09
Hope that clears it up for ya!
06/05/09
I'm not defending the quality of the cartoon- it obviously isn't very clear. But I THINK it's actually poking fun at racism, and not using racism to be funny.
06/05/09
And that's in addition to being horribly ignorant of current events.
And that's just talking about you, never mind the idiot who drew this crap.
06/05/09
06/06/09
06/06/09
06/08/09
Apologies for the blasted late reply.
06/05/09
06/05/09
Also, I think it's actually in Idaho. Or one of those other square states.
06/05/09
Like "Obama is really a Senagalese Muslim"?
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
[www.amazon.com]
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09