• Profile logout login

#celebrityscience#msg18067topicseen

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:01 AM
Thu Dec 3
50 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    "Tiger, you do know the Gosselins, Jon and Kate, don't you? No? Here, let me introduce you."

    Welcome, Tiger and wife, to the non-abating news cycle for the next month at least... expect revelations, tearful denials, fervent protestations, and someone wailing, "And what about the children?!"

    Yes, a mighty thing you've done for publishing this Holiday season. Jingle-Bell Balls in Your Face!
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Isn't 24 too young to have a facelift? Her eyebrows are in the freaking ionosphere.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Incomprehensible to think he'd go for that unattractive piece of trash over the rather hot Swedish wife. Golfers..
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of heywhat heywhat
    12/01/09

    @lobstr: Agreed. Would it kill Tiger to have a hot mistress? How hard can it be to find an attractive piece of ass?
     Reply
    Edited by heywhat at 12/01/09 6:17 PM heywhat was starred heywhat was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    As Kwanzaa Charlie Brown would say, that girl has more clap than an auditorium.
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Image of LeftCoastLady LeftCoastLady
    12/01/09

    @Brad Brown: Franklin would like to have a word with you.
     Reply
    Brad Brown promoted this comment LeftCoastLady was starred LeftCoastLady was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Very rarely do you see the words "24 year-old cocktail waitress" in a news story without the word "affair" nearby.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    @A Message To Rudy: Those daring young bitches should just be fitted with chastity belts from the get-go.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    @BookishLookish: Actually, I was trying to suggest that it's the guys who get themselves in trouble by always courting the aforementioned 24 year-old cocktail waitresses.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of noonecaresowen noonecaresowen
    12/01/09

    @A Message To Rudy: And of course she spells her name "Jaimee".
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy promoted this comment noonecaresowen was starred noonecaresowen was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    @noonecaresowen: And yet "Grubs" only has one "B". Go figure.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of pollyannacowgirl pollyannacowgirl
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    I have a feeling that we're going to be hearing from Rachel U, and this time, she's going to admit to being Tiger's hooer. These bimbos can't STAND being upstaged.

    *rubs hands gleefully*
     Reply
    Little Green Frog (Wise Latina) promoted this comment pollyannacowgirl was starred pollyannacowgirl was unstarred
    Image of ArtfulSlinger ArtfulSlinger
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    This chick was from the first season of Tool Academy, who was there with her fake boyfriend, so I can only assume she was trolling for money the whole time!!!!
     Reply
    ArtfulSlinger was starred ArtfulSlinger was unstarred
    Image of Matt Cherette Matt Cherette
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Seeing that TMZ comment makes me crave the return of the "The Unapproved" feature even more. Can we please bring it back? Hell, I'll even do it.
     Reply
    Matt Cherette was starred Matt Cherette was unstarred
    Image of IpsoFacto IpsoFacto
    12/01/09

    @Matt Cherette: yes! I miss them too.
     Reply
    IpsoFacto was starred IpsoFacto was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    What are those circular, white stains just above her zipper?
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    The most amazing thing is that Tiger is allowing this to occur. He's on track to be the first athlete to bank one billion dollars - and people are getting these contracts for $150,000?

    If I were him, every woman who has ever touched the 1-wood would immediately get a million dollars and a legally binding non-disclosure agreement, or they'd end up at the bottom of a very deep lake.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: He's handling this all wrong.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    12/01/09

    @m4ximusprim3: You're right. He should have allowed the interview with the FHP to go forward. The less disclosure the more shit will fly in to fill the void. (e.g. picture of rather whorish woman above)
     Reply
    Edited by momof3wildkids at 12/01/09 4:53 PM momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    12/01/09

    @momof3wildkids:

    He's handling it as perfect as one could. There appears to be no chance for arrest, for he or his wife. Continue with the no comment, no comment, no comment. This is the only chance the story will die.

    Media loves to argue that if he just tells the truth, this will all die down. Bullshit. If he says nothing he has a much better chance that it will all die down. If the mistresses come out of the wood work, they are coming out of the work -- there is nothing he can do to stop it. Attempting to get ahead of the story by admitting to the affairs is a sucker's bet, one that will not work and one that the media hopes he takes.

    If there are mistresses out there and they want airtime they will get airtime, regardless of whether Tiger admits to his affairs or not.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    12/01/09

    @resipsaloquacious: He is trying to keep his wife out of the pokey salad weeds. If she hit him, he cannot hide behind the 5th to protect her.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious promoted this comment GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    12/01/09

    @GregorMendel:

    From the reports, it seems he achieved his goal. I call that a win. Who mentioned the 5th Amendment? It concerns self-incrimination. The more relevant issue would be Florida's law on whether the state can force a spouse to testify against his/her will against his/her spouse, which I do not know.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    12/01/09

    @resipsaloquacious: I'm with you on the "no comment" thing - his business is his business, and admitting to an affair is not going to appease the vultures.

    I just can't believe someone with his money and influence can't corrall some fugly bitches, especially when his public image is worth something like $80-$90 million a year. 5 million to silence some road meat seems like a pittance.
     Reply
    Edited by m4ximusprim3 at 12/01/09 5:37 PM m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    12/01/09

    @resipsaloquacious: When this all started, my legal brethren were all a-flutter about the fact that Tiger did not have to talk to the police as we are all protected by the 5th amendment. The difference, however, is that if he is in no danger of self-incrimination he can be compelled to talk to them. And spousal privilege does not apply in domestic violence cases in the vast majority of states.
     Reply
    GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    12/01/09

    @m4ximusprim3: Win.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 promoted this comment GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    12/01/09

    @GregorMendel: Thanks! I don't know anything about the legal aspects of it, but as a practical matter, it seems like someone with nearly unlimited financial resources could do a better job at damage control.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    12/01/09

    @GregorMendel:

    The police/DA cannot establish probable cause to file a domestic violence charge (as the hospital reports cannot support such a claim). Tiger will not file a report against his wife for abuse. Therefore, Tiger will not have to testify in Court. The legal aspect of this story appears over.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    12/01/09

    @m4ximusprim3:

    We are on the same page.

    But there is a risk in drafting a "road meat" non-disclosure agreement. If such an agreement became public, then, he would have serious sponsor issues.

    The lesson for the young, insanely wealthy and uber-famous: don't get married. See Jeter, Derek.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    @resipsaloquacious: Mmm, I love when res gets all lawyery.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of sweetpickles sweetpickles
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    Like Letterman, this is another public figure that made no claims to being a moral saint. Just because corporations gave him buckets full of money for hitting a golf ball, he holds no obligation to the public. In fact, it seems rather inane that the public and media is out for blood. I mean, if he cheated on his wife with this surgical wonder, why does it make such a big sound? OK, yes: It sells papers and news. With politicians, it's understandable: a lot of them use taxpayers' money for their sex romps and always emphasize their prudence while being completely hypocritical. But here's a case of everyone getting all worked up and the battle of the sexes raging testosterone/estrogen for nothing. If Tiger Woods wants to bang bimbos and run away from his family, I don't think we need to hear about it as much as we are. (CNN was breaking updates on my phone about it every 30 minutes the other day.) I think he's doing the right thing by not talking. Trust me, the guy doesn't need any more money, so holding over his head that his sponsors leave doesn't hold too much weight. He'll win a few tournaments and no one will care anymore. As for the big lips, she'll marry rich and stay in all day with her dogs.
     Reply
    sweetpickles was starred sweetpickles was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    Okay, so I read that as Education: Bachelors (men). And not Education: Bachelors (degree).

    Is this wrong? (Probably.) Accurate? (Probably.)
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    12/01/09

    @Spirit Fingers: I read "director of VIP services" as "gives head to famous people." Is that wrong? Probably not.
     Reply
    momof3wildkids promoted this comment ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of sanyucat sanyucat
    12/01/09

    @Spirit Fingers: Your reading was indeed inaccurate, given that she does not seem to be interested in "bachelors," but rather "married men whose Scandinavian bikini model wives are waiting at home with a 9-iron."
     Reply
    sanyucat was starred sanyucat was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    12/01/09

    @sanyucat: Ah, but I think it all fits rather well under the heading there that says "Employed," since from the looks of it, anything not involving boning celebrity dudes is slightly out of her job description.
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of AzureTexan AzureTexan
    12/01/09

    @ParahSalin: As a chronically obscure sybarite whose Very Important Personhood is confined to the intimate solicitations in his Spam box, I hereby submit that VIP directors who service only celebrities are guilty of violating the antidiscrimination standards that have made America great.
     Reply
    AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/01/09

    @sanyucat: Yes, and we know of premeditation because of that phone call to his caddy about club selection.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    12/01/09

    @AzureTexan: I concur, but not to worry. I'm creating a New World Order where discrimination will be a thing of the past (also penis enlargement solicitations via email will be history). I'm going to make America great, and groovy, again. All I need to get started is a hairless cat, a Nehru jacket, a ring with a secret compartment that holds poison, an island lair and a billion dollars. I'm also going to need minions in identical suits. Lots of minions. The pay is not very good, but the benefits will be excellent. Now, if you know where I can get the cat, the ring, the jacket, the lair and the money, please let me know.
     Reply
    Edited by ParahSalin at 12/01/09 10:29 PM ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of AzureTexan AzureTexan
    12/02/09

    @ParahSalin: I don't know about the cat, the ring, the jacket, the lair and the money, but as for the minions, I'm in.
     Reply
    AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred
    Image of ParahSalin ParahSalin
    12/02/09

    @AzureTexan: Exxxxxcellent!
     Reply
    ParahSalin was starred ParahSalin was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    Also:
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    Nice rack.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of arirang arirang
    12/01/09

    @BookishLookish: correction. Nice pre/never-gave-birth-to-one-let-alone-two-rugrats rack. In other words, no distractions just the goods.
     Reply
    BookishLookish promoted this comment Edited by arirang at 12/01/09 1:52 PM arirang was starred arirang was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    @arirang: Men do like the lure of the new, rugrat-free or not.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    Playboy spread posing with the latest Ping Zings. A business card that says "More celebrity dicks than 'Bewitched'."
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.