• Profile logout login

#celebrityscience

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:47 PM
Sat Dec 19
24 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #celebrityscience more →

    Why Tiger Woods Is the First Internet-Scale Scandal

    Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2

    Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future

    Jude Law Will Hurl Oranges at Any Girl Watching Him Do Yoga

    Scrawled, Childish 'Contract' Perfectly Captures Jon Gosselin and Kate Major's Fairy Tale Romance

    New Contender for Survivor: OK! Magazine

    Ellen Exploits Twitter's Lists for Fun and Profit

    Celebukid's Birth Celebrated With Terrifying Cake

    David Spade Explains: He Really Needed the Money

    Tinsley Mortimer Pancaked and Robbed
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Mike Jahn Mike Jahn
    12/17/09

    In reply to Why Tiger Woods Is the First Internet-Scale Scandal
    The supreme undercurrent, of course, being the presence of an attractive black man boning a flock of blue collar white babes. (And just when we have an attractive black man in the White House boning the middle class [says ClusterFox]).
     Reply
    Mike Jahn was starred Mike Jahn was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    12/17/09

    In reply to Why Tiger Woods Is the First Internet-Scale Scandal
    I agree with everything except the last sentence. There's only one richest sportsperson in the world, and that's tiger.

    Any other scandal in the near future will inevitably try to live up to this one and be a letdown.
     Reply
    Edited by m4ximusprim3 at 12/17/09 5:11 PM m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of daveyjonesisdead daveyjonesisdead
    12/17/09

    In reply to Why Tiger Woods Is the First Internet-Scale Scandal
    I don't know, I think it was unprecedented - well organized, run like a business, employees handling it, regular disbursements made. I've never seen anything on this scale before.
     Reply
    daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred
    Image of matheson.randy matheson.randy
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    As a brother, shouldn't Tiger be into thick white women?
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy promoted this comment matheson.randy was starred matheson.randy was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    @matheson.randy: He's only partly a brother so he settles for thick in the head.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of QueenCeleste QueenCeleste
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Sure, she's 24. And has been for the last 15 years. Just like me.
     Reply
    IpsoFacto promoted this comment QueenCeleste was starred QueenCeleste was unstarred
    Image of IpsoFacto IpsoFacto
    12/01/09

    @QueenCeleste: Eh. she looks like she could be a 24 year old to me, albeit one with a hell of a lot of mileage.
     Reply
    IpsoFacto was starred IpsoFacto was unstarred
    Image of mexiback mexiback
    12/02/09

    @IpsoFacto: Yeah, LiLo looks like a 35 year old, so anything can happen.
     Reply
    mexiback was starred mexiback was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    "Tiger, you do know the Gosselins, Jon and Kate, don't you? No? Here, let me introduce you."

    Welcome, Tiger and wife, to the non-abating news cycle for the next month at least... expect revelations, tearful denials, fervent protestations, and someone wailing, "And what about the children?!"

    Yes, a mighty thing you've done for publishing this Holiday season. Jingle-Bell Balls in Your Face!
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of WordyNinja WordyNinja
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    You know what bothers me the most about this whole thing? That they're describing it as a "31 month affair. " When did we, as a society, stop acknowledging the passage of time via the accepted delineation of "years"?

    31 months-; you can't say 2-1/2 years? And it's not just with this, you ask someone how old their kid is and they say "26-months." Really? I thought he was two-years-old. Or someone says they've "only been at this job for 18 months" just say over a fucking year!!

    Oh, did Tiger Woods rape any of these women? Drug them? Take steroids in front of them? No? Then I don't care.
     Reply
    Gabriel Snyder promoted this comment Edited by WordyNinja at 12/01/09 5:42 PM WordyNinja was starred WordyNinja was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    12/01/09

    @WordyNinja: Here here. This, I predict, stems from the annoying practice new mothers use when quantifying the age of their child. Why must we always have to divide by 12 in order to know how old little Jablapdyn is?

    (same goes for weeks of newborns... "31 weeks".. just gimmie the damn months... ) :[]
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Isn't 24 too young to have a facelift? Her eyebrows are in the freaking ionosphere.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Incomprehensible to think he'd go for that unattractive piece of trash over the rather hot Swedish wife. Golfers..
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of heywhat heywhat
    12/01/09

    @lobstr: Agreed. Would it kill Tiger to have a hot mistress? How hard can it be to find an attractive piece of ass?
     Reply
    Edited by heywhat at 12/01/09 6:17 PM heywhat was starred heywhat was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    As Kwanzaa Charlie Brown would say, that girl has more clap than an auditorium.
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Image of LeftCoastLady LeftCoastLady
    12/01/09

    @Brad Brown: Franklin would like to have a word with you.
     Reply
    Brad Brown promoted this comment LeftCoastLady was starred LeftCoastLady was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Very rarely do you see the words "24 year-old cocktail waitress" in a news story without the word "affair" nearby.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    12/01/09

    @A Message To Rudy: Those daring young bitches should just be fitted with chastity belts from the get-go.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    @BookishLookish: Actually, I was trying to suggest that it's the guys who get themselves in trouble by always courting the aforementioned 24 year-old cocktail waitresses.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of noonecaresowen noonecaresowen
    12/01/09

    @A Message To Rudy: And of course she spells her name "Jaimee".
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy promoted this comment noonecaresowen was starred noonecaresowen was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    12/01/09

    @noonecaresowen: And yet "Grubs" only has one "B". Go figure.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of pollyannacowgirl pollyannacowgirl
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    I have a feeling that we're going to be hearing from Rachel U, and this time, she's going to admit to being Tiger's hooer. These bimbos can't STAND being upstaged.

    *rubs hands gleefully*
     Reply
    Little Green Frog (Wise Latina) promoted this comment pollyannacowgirl was starred pollyannacowgirl was unstarred
    Image of ArtfulSlinger ArtfulSlinger
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    This chick was from the first season of Tool Academy, who was there with her fake boyfriend, so I can only assume she was trolling for money the whole time!!!!
     Reply
    ArtfulSlinger was starred ArtfulSlinger was unstarred
    Image of Matt Cherette Matt Cherette
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Seeing that TMZ comment makes me crave the return of the "The Unapproved" feature even more. Can we please bring it back? Hell, I'll even do it.
     Reply
    Matt Cherette was starred Matt Cherette was unstarred
    Image of IpsoFacto IpsoFacto
    12/01/09

    @Matt Cherette: yes! I miss them too.
     Reply
    IpsoFacto was starred IpsoFacto was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rachel Uchitel, This Is Your Future
    What are those circular, white stains just above her zipper?
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.