Am I the only one that still hasn't seen the RT button show up? Someone said it was next to the reply button that one sees when he/she scrolls over a tweet in his/her feed, but I've not come across it. #twitter
Another example of how Twitter is ultimately headed in the same direction as MySpace. Unlike in Facebook, where user growth tends to be organic, trusted, and authentic, growth in Twitter tends to be forced through spam and shady direct marketing tactics. Eventually Twitter will be overrun with spam and noise (if it isn't already), and the company will suffer. Unless you happen to be using a 3rd party tool to read your feed, chances are it's already overrun with crap and genuine messages get pushed down out of view. The current interface for viewing tweets in Twitter is shit. UX is just another in a long list of things (e.g. systems administration) the people at Twitter have no skill in. How the fuck these guys get so much press and VC is beyond me. #ellendegeneres
Your first spam follower might seem special: "Wow this nice lady found my twitter page and she wants to read updates about my fascinating life. And she is naked."
Then, it dawns on you that she might just be pretending to be interested in your tweets in order to get you buy whatever she might be selling. A trick!
The second time, you know better than to follow back. So I suspect the experienced twitter users will not be too flattered by this. #ellendegeneres
Lists are just Twitter's version of a TweetDeck Killer. One they can control and, if they had been intelligent, which they were not, monetize. #ellendegeneres
Well, as you all know, I'm a raging bitch. And as you may not know, the total number of tweets I've made seems to be going DOWN rather than up lately. I'd hate to be the intern assigned to "cleaning up the raincoaster stream". Augean stables, anyone? #twitter
1. Make a new Twitter account (or use an already-established one),
2. make sure it's public -- so that its tweets will show up on search.twitter.com -- and then send out several tweets,
3. make sure that the tweets have variety: normal, trivial ones; @replies to non-famous people; nice @replies to famous people; mean @replies to famous people (to both some of the same people that some of the nice @replies were sent to and new ones); etc.,
4. conduct a ton of different searches on search.twitter.com and track the results: search immediately after sending tweets, a couple of hours after, a day after, etc. and then see which ones a) never showed up in the search, b) showed up but then disappeared, and c) showed up and stayed,
5. see what the results tell you about the question you're trying to answer.
I'd be happy to test it out if you'd like me to do so. Let me know. #twitter
I think it'd be hilarious if I did it with either @dinalohan or @kiera_knightley. The problem, though, is that Dina technically doesn't really know how to @reply to people and Keira is too much of a snob to really bother. #twitter
@narnio: I'll probably create a new one and not "reveal" the identity until I'm done testing it (who knows, Ev Williams could read Gawker), but I'm tempted to just use @helen_thomas. #twitter
We're talking Pee Wee Herman, and the internet. Without any flack's help, he would have had 40,000 followers in 48-72 hours. I hope he's not overpaying them.
I nearly spewed frappuccino on my monitor after reading that. I imagine Tracy just rolling out of bed, in nothing but tube socks, tighty-whiteys and a fat gold chain clumsily typing that out with his index fingers.
11/11/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
Then, it dawns on you that she might just be pretending to be interested in your tweets in order to get you buy whatever she might be selling. A trick!
The second time, you know better than to follow back. So I suspect the experienced twitter users will not be too flattered by this. #ellendegeneres
11/03/09
11/03/09
When will people learn that Twitter can be kinda cool when it's quality, not quantity. #ellendegeneres
10/30/09
10/29/09
1. Make a new Twitter account (or use an already-established one),
2. make sure it's public -- so that its tweets will show up on search.twitter.com -- and then send out several tweets,
3. make sure that the tweets have variety: normal, trivial ones; @replies to non-famous people; nice @replies to famous people; mean @replies to famous people (to both some of the same people that some of the nice @replies were sent to and new ones); etc.,
4. conduct a ton of different searches on search.twitter.com and track the results: search immediately after sending tweets, a couple of hours after, a day after, etc. and then see which ones a) never showed up in the search, b) showed up but then disappeared, and c) showed up and stayed,
5. see what the results tell you about the question you're trying to answer.
I'd be happy to test it out if you'd like me to do so. Let me know. #twitter
10/29/09
10/29/09
I think it'd be hilarious if I did it with either @dinalohan or @kiera_knightley. The problem, though, is that Dina technically doesn't really know how to @reply to people and Keira is too much of a snob to really bother. #twitter
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
Although on further reflection, I could probably get behind that plan.
10/13/09
10/12/09
Yeah, like be Pee Wee Herman.
Did you watch Pee Wee's Playhouse? The guy was making content for the internet generation before the internet generation existed.
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/13/09
10/12/09
10/08/09
10/08/09
10/08/09