<![CDATA[Gawker: Censored]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Censored]]> http://gawker.com/tag/censored http://gawker.com/tag/censored <![CDATA[ The Tibetan Protest Videos That Made China Ban YouTube ]]> tibet-protest-flags.pngIs switching off the Internet for 1.3 billion people the ultimate demonstration of power since the Atomic Age? The Chinese government has blocked YouTube across the country since this weekend. The censorship campaign is blocking reporters (both foreign and domestic) from covering the story and blocking Chinese residents from hearing about it, apparently trying to kill the story at both ends. Below are the videos that allegedly made the government ban YouTube.

The videos show some of the violence of the March 15 protest in Lhasa.

Of course international media still got reports out:

Al Jazeera:

Police harass a British journalist:

Meanwhile, there are many ways to break through the Great Firewall of China and bypass all its filters, including the YouTube block.

So no, blocking the Internet and trying to hide massive protests from reporters isn't much of a demonstration of power if you can't pull it off.

]]>
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:36:32 EDT Nick Douglas http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369477&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Parents Fight For 13-Year-Old's Right To Call Principal A Student-Raping Hitler Worshipper ]]> princeypal.pngParodying a high school principal? Weak but understandable. Making a MySpace profile for him which reads "I like to give anal to the little boys at my school"? Less defensible and possibly libelous! But after a thirteen-year-old boy was expelled from school for making the profile (which also lists Hitler, Michael Jackson and a purple strap-on as the principal's heroes), his parents are suing the school for violating the boy's free speech rights, since he made the joke on his own computer and because it's so clearly not a serious accusation of child rape. Below is the now-deleted profile, or at least the terribly grubby copy used in the court filing. If anyone has a better screencap, send it to tips@gawker.com.

0221081principal1b.gif

The more I think about it, the more it sounds like the kid has a case, even if he's a nasty (and uninspired) little demon.

]]>
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:53:49 EST Nick Douglas http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359343&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This Site Full Of Leaked Documents Is So Good, The Government Just Broke The Constitution To Shut It Down ]]> fbi-pedophile-symbols.jpgI hadn't heard of Wikileaks until a California judge granted an injunction against the site, where anyone can upload a leaked document, shutting it down summarily at the request of Bank Julius Baer. Wikileaks had published and analyzed sensitive documents that legally implicated the Cayman Islands bank. The Daily Kos has a roundup and points to the many copies of the site that won't be as easily shut down. The site has also survived a denial-of-service attack, and a fire. Good thing too, because this site makes the Smoking Gun look like TMZ.

The day after the injunction, Wikileaks' web servers (hosted in Sweden by the company who used to host the world's most infamous site for illegal downloads, The Pirate Bay) caught fire. Apparently that's under control now, so you can still read secret documents like the US Rules of Engagement for Iraq, secret CIA funding for torture research, records of the U.S. violating the chemical weapons ban, FBI pedophile symbols, and operating procedure for Guantanamo.

(A technical note: What the government shut down was the domain, not the actual web host; if this happened to a bigger brand-name site, losing a domain could be devastating even if the site moved elsewhere. Plus this could lead to censorship of domain names themselves.)

Strangely, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the legal org which basically exists to scream bloody murder about this sort of censorship, hasn't written a thing about the shutdown; not even a link on their blog. It'd be nice to see some attention, since if this shutdown goes unchallenged, it sets a precedent for shutting down sites at the whims of their critics. Which would put a slight crimp on Gawker's style!

]]>
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:54:28 EST Nick Douglas http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357812&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rick Moody and the Times Square trannies ]]> moody2.jpgRick Moody's Black Veil is a pretty standard nonfiction novel memoir travel book literary critical recovery tome. (Yes, that's his description. More interesting than the Ice Storm author's struggle with alcohol: what he didn't publish). A description of a trip to a tranny bar didn't make it past the publishers. Don't worry: Moody, the envy of his peers after two books were made into movies, has posted the deleted account to the Five Chapters website. The author's preamble: "I asked a writer friend who is an expert on the subject if he would take me to a tranny bar in New York City, and off we went," he says. (Yes, that's what they all say!) "I really liked this passage, still do, but I think my publishers were genuinely uncomfortable about it, as if it suggested a genuine inner disturbance of some kind." The girls, and their residuary knobs, after the jump.

The guys, many of whom were no doubt wearing wedding rings, fashioned disguises of routine heterosexuality, paid their taxes like anyone else, made sure to brush their teeth, to recycle beer cans, but their girls were concealing that extra special surprise underneath. Subsequent researches into the rhetoric of the tranny chaser always turned up variations on this particular turn of phrase, so I use it advisedly: I'm looking for a girl with a little something extra...

Dean was a frequenter of the old Times Square bars, Sally's, Edelweiss, the vanished demimondes of transsexual hookers, and he constructed a forceful argument about the inferiority of this club — there were regulations now, in the Giuliani administration, on how decadent a business of this kind could really be, and so there was an abridgement of the pure expression of transgender madness...

We stood around watching, as the bouncer stood around watching, as the pool of available men stood around watching. There was no privacy to be had. We watched as the girls peeled back layers, hiked up miniskirts, flung halter tops on the floor, so that you could see their boys' hips and the residuary knob in their thongs that no amount of female hormones had yet been able to obliviate. One guy in the corner was desperately trying to achieve satisfaction, such that his Asian girl, weighing in at about ninety-three pounds, was athletically cycling through a half-dozen different poses. Abrading the front of him. What would happen to this pair? Dean, with his slightly weary brand of curiosity offered a guess: They'll negotiate some price for going back to a hotel. Or she'll take him to her room.

...I thought I had learned everything I needed to know, and I was downstairs getting ready to take leave when we beheld, across a crowded room, the Radcliffe Girl. Her ambitions were far more interesting than the post of receptionist. She didn't simply want to be in the bar, she wanted to own the bar, or maybe she wanted to replace Anna Wintour at Vogue, or Tina Brown at Talk, and, along the way, she wanted to make men yearn and suffer. Her chestnut hair, just a bit shorter than shoulder length, was pulled back, and she wore a black sheath minidress, black fuck-me pumps. No stockings. A discreet lipstick, very little makeup. Her demeanor was both insouciant and resolutely aristocratic, as if, after she had danced a few lap dances, the driver might pull around front with the Mercedes, and she would head home for a nightcap. And in the morning, there would be her squash lessons over at the club.

The attraction was tribal. I mean, I could have easily seen her in Connecticut — she was very Greenwich — or perhaps at my boarding school class reunion; in fact, she looked a little like my famous classmate, the failed actress, Catherine Oxenberg. Except that this Oxenberg imposter would more likely incline toward restraints.

]]>
Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:40:03 EST Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340280&view=rss&microfeed=true