bulllshiiiitt. i submited a complaint about some group whose description is "you weren't raped you're a skank!" and they haven't done anything about it. apparently the gawker post was more abusive
I also tried to post a link to the Gawker article on FB, and it magically disappeared. It remains on my wall, but gets wiped off the News Feed. Why does Big Brother hate Gawker?
@bitch_pleaze: Or, if you're not a defeatist, you could try to solve the problem, instead of just giving up using something you enjoy. Why is this such a bizarre idea to so many people? I've gotten back in touch with people I haven't seen for twenty or thirty years on FB, some of whom are thousands of miles away. It's a great tool, I like using it, I dislike what they've done, and I don't get why the only two options should be "Like it or lump it".
@MissNormaDesmond: The sense of entitlement around Facebook is bizarre to me. Facebook is not a social institution. Facebook is not a basic human right. Facebook is in existence for one reason only. To generate revenue for Facebook.
If they want to fuck around with their customers then their customers should look elsewhere for a better alternative.
@bitch_pleaze: Yeah, I'm aware that that's the way a lot of people view business relationships. What's particularly dumb about that attitude is that it generally results in the golden goose dying an untimely death.
@MissNormaDesmond: I disagree. If your phone company started selling your personal information would you stick with that provider? Or would you seek out a provider that respected your privacy?
I guarantee you that the market will provide an alternative to Facebook if the demand is there (and no... I'm not talking about Myspace).
@bitch_pleaze @MissNormaDesmon: the phone company has been selling your personal information for YEARS. That's why you have to opt-out of the telemarketer calls through the government. I don't get why this is such a big deal. If you're paying attention and reading privacy agreements you can very easily protect your information.
@bitch_pleaze: I think you're absolutely right, but the problem is, for the first time ever, after all the previous attempts (sixdegrees, friendster, even myspace) never before has a social network been so much the rage that everyone is on it, including the oldes who often take months to get the inspiration to join something online. The legwork has been done by getting everyone on FB, it would be virtually impossible for even an awesome badass competitor to start fresh and amass all the people you know and love from FB onto it.
It is the mere fact that everyone's kindergarten friends and old neighborhood pals are on FB that makes it so appealing. Hell, I'm sure there are tons of awesome ripoff FB-types out there already, but no one gives a fuck because no one's using them.
@LysanderNewt: I think you're missing the point. Substitute Heidi Fleiss for phone company - maybe that's a more relevant example. If your "VIP social planner" was selling your personal info you would probably get a new VIP social planner.
@bitch_pleaze: The phone company analogy is obviously inapt. It would be stupid to stick with a phone company that behaved in ways I dislike when there are multiple other companies that currently provide the exact same service. There is no other company at the moment that provides the service that Facebook does, nor will there be for some time, since I would not only need to switch there myself, but to cajole scores of other people, who are the reason I have any interest in being on Facebook, to join as well.
By the way, maybe I wasn't clear -- the attitude I was referring to wasn't yours, it's Facebook's. There are plenty of other ways they could be making money off of their site, but they're choosing ones that will bring in short term profit, at the expense of customer loyalty. Eventually, when there really is a viable alternative -- and you're right that there will be one at some point -- it's going to bite them in the ass, hard.
@bitch_pleaze: Your second analogy isn't any better than your first, for the same reason: you keep acting as if there's more than one service that does what Facebook does. There isn't.
@MissNormaDesmond: The point I'm trying to make (and admittedly doing a bad job) is that there will never be an alternative to Facebook as long as sheeple err... people are afraid or unwilling to leave Facebook.
And on a related note... I liked my second analogy. I thought it was topical (see Tiger) and edgy. It was sexy too goddammit. That's right. Sexy.
it's really narrow-minded and lazy to construct an argument around "but facebook is really good and all of my friends are on it, so facebook should bend to my will and be the way I like it. i can't possibly imagine that someone would create something that might compete with it...and exploit all the shit that fb is currently getting wrong in terms of social networking..."
sorry. i like fb (most of the time) too. some of the decisions they've made over the last year are beyond retarded. still, it is free and I've slowly unburdened myself of the notion that they actually give a shit about what their "customers" actually like.
so, I guess adjusting your privacy settings or making lists or removing photos or doing less crazy shit in real life that might possibly be captured and put on facebook where your boss or your HR person or whomever you decided to friend might see it is "solving the problem"
@bitch_pleaze: There are more options here than "Facebook should do whatever its users say" and "Users should leave Facebook the instant there is any problem."
Good customers (using that term loosely) provide feedback to businesses, and good businesses listen to that feedback (but are not bound to follow it of course). Taking your business elsewhere is a powerful option that we should have, but it ends up hurting both the user as well as the company.
I believe they exposed this problem in the 1990 film "Ski Patrol," in which a diverse bandy of fun-loving ski bums take on the big bad ski resort developer.
@Botswana Meat Commission FC: Actually, I think it all began when Lane Meyer, pursued by a debt-collecting paperboy, raced Roy Stalin to the bottom of the K-12.
The Roman Empire would have mercilessly crucified Santa and all his Elves. We merely enslaved and sold them off to Keebler where today they work in heartless cookie factories worthy of the literary talents of Upton Sinclair. Enjoy some with your tea today! #barackobama
Well, as you all know, I'm a raging bitch. And as you may not know, the total number of tweets I've made seems to be going DOWN rather than up lately. I'd hate to be the intern assigned to "cleaning up the raincoaster stream". Augean stables, anyone? #twitter
1. Make a new Twitter account (or use an already-established one),
2. make sure it's public -- so that its tweets will show up on search.twitter.com -- and then send out several tweets,
3. make sure that the tweets have variety: normal, trivial ones; @replies to non-famous people; nice @replies to famous people; mean @replies to famous people (to both some of the same people that some of the nice @replies were sent to and new ones); etc.,
4. conduct a ton of different searches on search.twitter.com and track the results: search immediately after sending tweets, a couple of hours after, a day after, etc. and then see which ones a) never showed up in the search, b) showed up but then disappeared, and c) showed up and stayed,
5. see what the results tell you about the question you're trying to answer.
I'd be happy to test it out if you'd like me to do so. Let me know. #twitter
I think it'd be hilarious if I did it with either @dinalohan or @kiera_knightley. The problem, though, is that Dina technically doesn't really know how to @reply to people and Keira is too much of a snob to really bother. #twitter
@narnio: I'll probably create a new one and not "reveal" the identity until I'm done testing it (who knows, Ev Williams could read Gawker), but I'm tempted to just use @helen_thomas. #twitter
12/16/09
12/16/09
12/16/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
If Facebook is causing you to lose sleep over privacy concerns then stop using Facebook.
The end.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
If they want to fuck around with their customers then their customers should look elsewhere for a better alternative.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
I guarantee you that the market will provide an alternative to Facebook if the demand is there (and no... I'm not talking about Myspace).
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
The art of the kvetch.
You don't have to be Jewish.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Now if you'd be so kind as to pass me the orange gag ball I'll get down off of my soap box for the evening.
12/15/09
12/15/09
It is the mere fact that everyone's kindergarten friends and old neighborhood pals are on FB that makes it so appealing. Hell, I'm sure there are tons of awesome ripoff FB-types out there already, but no one gives a fuck because no one's using them.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/16/09
By the way, maybe I wasn't clear -- the attitude I was referring to wasn't yours, it's Facebook's. There are plenty of other ways they could be making money off of their site, but they're choosing ones that will bring in short term profit, at the expense of customer loyalty. Eventually, when there really is a viable alternative -- and you're right that there will be one at some point -- it's going to bite them in the ass, hard.
12/16/09
12/16/09
And on a related note... I liked my second analogy. I thought it was topical (see Tiger) and edgy. It was sexy too goddammit. That's right. Sexy.
Thank you and good night.
12/16/09
it's really narrow-minded and lazy to construct an argument around "but facebook is really good and all of my friends are on it, so facebook should bend to my will and be the way I like it. i can't possibly imagine that someone would create something that might compete with it...and exploit all the shit that fb is currently getting wrong in terms of social networking..."
sorry. i like fb (most of the time) too. some of the decisions they've made over the last year are beyond retarded. still, it is free and I've slowly unburdened myself of the notion that they actually give a shit about what their "customers" actually like.
so, I guess adjusting your privacy settings or making lists or removing photos or doing less crazy shit in real life that might possibly be captured and put on facebook where your boss or your HR person or whomever you decided to friend might see it is "solving the problem"
for now.
sounds like a great way to spend time.
12/16/09
Good customers (using that term loosely) provide feedback to businesses, and good businesses listen to that feedback (but are not bound to follow it of course). Taking your business elsewhere is a powerful option that we should have, but it ends up hurting both the user as well as the company.
12/15/09
Hijinks did indeed ensue.
12/15/09
12/15/09
3. Where we will then go to experience second-hand the twee epiphanies of the overprivileged?
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
11/16/09
fortunately, this shirt is still available in China #barackobama
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
10/30/09
10/29/09
1. Make a new Twitter account (or use an already-established one),
2. make sure it's public -- so that its tweets will show up on search.twitter.com -- and then send out several tweets,
3. make sure that the tweets have variety: normal, trivial ones; @replies to non-famous people; nice @replies to famous people; mean @replies to famous people (to both some of the same people that some of the nice @replies were sent to and new ones); etc.,
4. conduct a ton of different searches on search.twitter.com and track the results: search immediately after sending tweets, a couple of hours after, a day after, etc. and then see which ones a) never showed up in the search, b) showed up but then disappeared, and c) showed up and stayed,
5. see what the results tell you about the question you're trying to answer.
I'd be happy to test it out if you'd like me to do so. Let me know. #twitter
10/29/09
10/29/09
I think it'd be hilarious if I did it with either @dinalohan or @kiera_knightley. The problem, though, is that Dina technically doesn't really know how to @reply to people and Keira is too much of a snob to really bother. #twitter
10/29/09