• Profile logout login

#chadhurley

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 9:46 PM
Sat Nov 14
16 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #chadhurley more →

    Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend

    Google Execs Pay $150,000 for Obama Bash

    Jim Clark's new wife puts "sex" back in "sexagenarian"

    "Has one made any money from this?"

    YouTube founder Chad Hurley a parody of himself

    Why YouTube's desperate revenue hunt is on the money

    FaceMelter

    YouTube founder claims text is dead by 2018

    What Viacom really wants to know about YouTube videos

    YouTube announces paid downloads, DVD sales for filmmakers

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of avoidz avoidz
    03/22/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    It's true love... of money.
     Reply
    avoidz was starred avoidz was unstarred
    Image of GuyBitchy GuyBitchy
    03/21/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Oh, baby... surely you could have found a sugar-daddy with more sugar, less daddy. That's like a grizzled gramps daddy...


    What? Sorry?


    Oh. You're a hopelessly vapid whore? And totally in it for the money? I see.


    Nevermind!

     Reply
    GuyBitchy was starred GuyBitchy was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Oh, well. Nonetheless, each has something the other wants.
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of ellagood ellagood
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    may-december?


    more like 1945-1981

     Reply
    ellagood was starred ellagood was unstarred
    Image of Inhaler Inhaler
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    "Trimspa, baby!"
     Reply
    Inhaler was starred Inhaler was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Jim Clark isn't bad-looking. Also, he's rich, and I can't blame him for not marrying an older, set-in-her-ways, ugly person. I'm poor and I wouldn't do that.
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of son of spam son of spam
    03/20/09

    @aurora*raby: Good point. Because there are no non-set-in-her-ways, non-ugly women over the age of 30.
     Reply
    son of spam was starred son of spam was unstarred
    Image of limber limber
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: I think what disturbs me most in that litany is "set-in-her-ways".


    Because god knows the first thing I look for in a partner is malleability. All the better for conforming to my iron grip! Bwa ha ha!

     Reply
    limber was starred limber was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    @son of spam: But not my point at all. If you had enough money to buy (or attract) anything you wanted and sustain it, what would you buy?
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    @limber: I'm a phoenix in my late forties and date often. For normal people in my age-group and older, the routine often becomes manifest, making compromise extra difficult. Keep laughing. You'll see.
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of limber limber
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: What does "I'm a phoenix" mean?
     Reply
    limber was starred limber was unstarred
    Image of withapologies withapologies
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: yeah, wtf is a phoenix? is this some b.s. term for an old dude who just got divorced and is trying to bang hot young chicks? gross.
     Reply
    withapologies was starred withapologies was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    @withapologies: Self-righteous indignation is HOT! How old are you, honey?
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of limber limber
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: No, seriously -- what's a "phoenix" in that context? I've never heard of the term used like that; who's the bird, what are the ashes?
     Reply
    limber was starred limber was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    @limber: Ach. Your perseverance and literalness frighten me. Go watch Jean Cocteau's "Le Testament d'Orphee," and then speak to me of birds and

    ashes.


    And you're lucky I'm a sphinx only when I'm drowsy.

     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of darina darina
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: Call me old fashioned, but I don't want to buy my spouse. And I'd never sell myself either.


    I've been asked out by several men who are old enough to be my father. Not once have I been even remotely tempted to say yes.

     Reply
    darina was starred darina was unstarred
    Image of limber limber
    03/21/09

    @aurora*raby: Definitely my favourite comment of the day. Like interpretive dance in prose.
     Reply
    limber was starred limber was unstarred
    Image of aurora*raby aurora*raby
    03/21/09

    @darina: I can relate: Whenever I'm asked out by men old enough to be your brother, I laugh. BTW, what do you think a marriage contract is?
     Reply
    aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Great photo. Someone else's hand on Jim Clark's ladyfriend.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of gwendemarco gwendemarco
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Netscape? What's Netscape?
     Reply
    gwendemarco was starred gwendemarco was unstarred
    Image of PersonOfInterest PersonOfInterest
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Is every model now called a supermodel? I've never heard of her.
    Do men really believe that young beautiful women love unattractive older men for who they are or do men not care if women love them as long as they are having sex with a young beautiful woman?
     Reply
    PersonOfInterest was starred PersonOfInterest was unstarred
    Image of Kid Twist Kid Twist
    03/20/09

    @PersonOfInterest: Grade inflation has spilled over into the modeling world.
     Reply
    Kid Twist was starred Kid Twist was unstarred
    Image of DevilsAvocado DevilsAvocado
    03/20/09

    @PersonOfInterest:


    Speaking as Gawker's resident token Orstraylyan... Kirsty is SUPER DOOPER, and she's a model. Which makes her a SUPER DOOPER model.


    Actually, I only know her as a sometime catwalk model and cover girl. I'm not sure what, exactly, catapults a clothes horse to 'super' status. But I don't think she's there. And, now, is unlikely to ever get there. But, hey! Cha-ching.


    And in other rather surprising news, this infamous Aussie (well, infamous here, anyways) is her grandfather: [www.news.com.au]

     Reply
    DevilsAvocado was starred DevilsAvocado was unstarred
    Image of kookla kookla
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    Necker? I hardly knew her!
     Reply
    kookla was starred kookla was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    She's a trophy -- check out the little television screen on her forehead.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of Weegee's bored Weegee's bored
    03/20/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming: Her secret is that she's the love child of Tinki Winki and Po.
     Reply
    Weegee's bored was starred Weegee's bored was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    03/20/09

    @Weegee's bored:


    That's a lotta woman. Do billionaires by them by the pound? Okay, okay, too bitchy... it's probably true love.

     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of PaisleyPajamas PaisleyPajamas
    03/20/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming: And here I thought it was the stamp for the mail order bride.
     Reply
    PaisleyPajamas was starred PaisleyPajamas was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    03/20/09

    In reply to Netscape Billionaire to Wed Supermodel This Weekend
    I'm sure she really loves him just for him.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of ludwigk ludwigk
    03/20/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: Well, she is turning 29. In Super-Model world, unless your Heidi or Tyra, its time to settle.
     Reply
    ludwigk was starred ludwigk was unstarred
    Image of Pinekatz Pinekatz
    03/20/09

    @blimpyboy: That just short-circuited any interest I may have had in anthropology, true as it is. Billionaire is the new hunky he-man (or maybe its always was).


    When I was 28, I would have have made the wrong decision and said, "Ewwwww," in keeping with the rest of my decision-making failures.

     Reply
    Pinekatz was starred Pinekatz was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    12/27/08

    In reply to Google Execs Pay $150,000 for Obama Bash
    hey, if i had that much, i'd give that much to o, too.


    heck, i'd have the inauguration at my house.

     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of LanceStormDropkick LanceStormDropkick
    12/27/08

    In reply to Google Execs Pay $150,000 for Obama Bash
    His hair looks like a Hologram created by googles' newest project, the "googlegram."
     Reply
    LanceStormDropkick was starred LanceStormDropkick was unstarred
    Image of mmstk101 mmstk101
    12/27/08

    @LanceStormDropkick: Don't tell CNN. They like to believe they've cornered the market on silly holograms.
     Reply
    mmstk101 was starred mmstk101 was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.