Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 7:16 PM
Mon Nov 30
40 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
We don't need no stinkin' ID cards. Little chip under the skin on your forearm and you're good to go.
04/22/09
According to the ACLU, the ACLU is not in favor of national ID cards:
[www.aclu.org]
04/22/09
Yes, not unlike a couple of years ago when they were all staid, level-headed rationalists who harbored pragmatic and Constitutionally sound solutions to the jihadist problem.
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
Maybe we should have them wear some kind of patch on the clothing or get them tattooed?
04/22/09
while we're at it we should put them all in one neighborhood surrounded by a wall and gate.
You know, like Beverly Hills.
04/17/09
1) Be crazy on TV
2) Invoke MLK on TV
3) Recreate the Lucy in the Chocolate Factory episode on TV
4) ????
5) PROFIT!
Watch for Hannity to pop into the frame in the next couple of days bellowing "SPEED IT UP A LITTLE!"
04/17/09
Also, way to lovingly invoke the image of MLK, only to let his picture drop back to the desk with a clatter as soon as you're finished with him. I am awed by your level of respect.
04/16/09
I know my conclusion must sound shocking to you all.
04/16/09
Not literally, of course. Why the fuck would they care about that?
04/16/09
Does your gaydar go off with Glenn Beck? I mean, the guy seems to be holding something back, right?
04/17/09
It's like staring at the sun. I'm afraid my eyes are going to melt out of my head.
04/16/09
The issues he was talking about on his show today were about how the protests yesterday are about government corruption in general - it's not a Republican issue or a Democratic issue.
FNC and CNN both did their parts yesterday to make the protests a partisan issue - so that America is divided along party lines rather than united in rising up against those who have bought and sold our country.
As Karl Denniger says, "The "Captains of Finance" didn't get caught up in a whirlwind - they intentionally created loans to be made to anyone who could "fog a mirror" and they intentionally claimed these loans were safe when they were sold on to investors. The number of co-conspirators involved in this episode of generational theft numbers in the tens of thousands, and not only is it unjust to demand that Americans as a whole pay for it, it is flatly impossible for such a path forward to succeed."
[tinyurl.com]
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
If you said you were siding with a view of an issue, I could see that. But, as long as you think in terms of "Obama" and "Beck" and not in terms of issues, you are part of the problem.
So you voted for Obama, eh? What da heck is that supposed to mean? How does that fact contribute to discussing anything of relevance? I don't give a flying crap of who you voted for or what you think of Glen Beck, unless you are out to snark and gossip and make fun of people, which by the way, is really what this is all about. I mean, either that or a relevant discussion. The problem is, you are not doing either.
If you are really non-partisan, can you pretty please re-post, this time without mentioning Obama, Beck, Fox or CNN... or anybody or anything politically loaded in name. Stick to the damn issues, or drop the pretense of objective analysis.
04/17/09
Liar liar pants on fire.
04/16/09