@Colonel Mustard: Ugh. Sorry — that was reactionary and not well-supported. What I meant to say is that I'm sick of little twits like him who halfway support gay rights and use this grudging "favor" like a bargaining chip for more political or intellectual credibility. What he's saying here is, "Well I don't support gay marriage, obviously, but I'm not a monster."
I'm done with civil unions and I would like equality now, you self-obsessed twerp.
Not ideology or sexual taste, but something much simpler: clout. Not who I fuck or who fucks me, but who will come to the phone when I call, who owes me favors. This is what a label refers to. Now to someone who does not understand this, a homosexual is what I am because I have sex with men, but really this is wrong. A homosexual is somebody who, in 15 years of trying cannot get a pissant anit-discrimination bill through the city council. A homosexual is somebody who knows nobody and who nobody knows. Who has zero clout. Does this sound like me Henry?
I would put Charlie here two, perhaps three short steps away from being the guy who writes sixteen-page letters addressed "to the editor" in blue crayon about the Jews.
Of course, writing for the Weekly Standard or The Corner is pretty much the post-grad equivalent of writing windy, incoherent letters to your high school alma mater, so maybe this is just an internship ask.
Whoa! For Shizzle! Here is the content provider for Michael Steele's "so far out of the box there is no box" GOP Website. And something tells me he is already a commenter on Gawker.
03/16/09
03/16/09
I'm done with civil unions and I would like equality now, you self-obsessed twerp.
03/17/09
03/16/09
Yes, Charles. Yes, it does.
03/16/09
03/16/09
03/10/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
Feels good, though.
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09