@if_i_only_had_a_heart: I am serious, she said they also got flack for covering some farm workers in florida i believe that were virtual prisoners but luckily that story and exposure changed it up a bit. She also spoke about her mother and that was really something. It's a really good interview. #gourmet
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: Then to quote Racheal Zoe , they will D I E . Seriously , she said that for doing a Latin issue , featuring the wide range of Latin cuisine and so forth , some readers told them to "Keep their politics out of the magazine" It is crazy because Gourmet had also landed a lot of cross promotional stuff and seemed to be on the come-up. Oh well, hopefully it will reemerge elsewhere. #gourmet
Ruth Reichl was on NPR two days ago and it was pretty sad when she she described how Si told her the magazine was closing. She said that this last issue, November, wold have been very different if they had known that "this was it".She also spoke about the political aspect of Gourmet and how their Latin special stirred up some angry comments and letters regarding immigrants in America. She spoke about food sustainability and the politics of food. I made me really miss the magazine even more #gourmet
Gordon and his father-in-law were probably given the cash before they guaranteed the loans.
It's not uncommon for privately-held businesses to give loans to equity holders. If the company gives Gordon a loan (versus a dividend) he's not draining the balance sheet and Gordon doesn't have to pay taxes on the amount he took out.
Hopefully his money from his television shows is separate from Gordon Ramsay Holdings. I mean, it makes sense his restaurants would be suffering- who wants to spend over $300 on a meal for two? I hope he isn't personally in dire financial straits, then again if he's broke that means more Ramsey shows. (By the way, does anyone else think that the British Hell's Kitchen is way better than the American one?)
@anonymousryan: I've never seen the British one, but I can't imagine it could be any worse than the American one.
Do they have any contestants who have IQ's over 40 and weigh less than 200 pounds? I still watch the US HK but it's getting more difficult every season. I don't know who at Fox thinks a bunch of fat, disgusting morons is what people actually want to see on a cooking show. I wouldn't want any of these people anywhere near my food, and I sure as hell don't want to watch them for an hour. Hasn't Bravo proven that you can actually have regular, fairly smart people on a cooking competition show and still have it be interesting? (You can allow them to wear makeup too!) And that's even before you throw Gordon Ramsay into the mix.
The only somewhat competent person this season was Ji, and I'm convinced that she was a ringer. How convenient that she left voluntarily just as the biggest idiot on the girl's team was about to be kicked off. All I've got left this season now is Carol, who's cute and at least doesn't seem like a complete buffoon, but there's still like 2 months left.
I guarantee I'll forget that I borrowed $5 million in unmarked bills from you. When you try to collect and I feign confusion, we'll have a big laugh at the absurdity of it all, hack violently when the laughter gets too much and then wonder what we were laughing about, become quiet as we ponder the meaning of life and grow bitter about unfulfilled hopes and dreams.
Few celebrities actually have a ton of cash on hand. Most of them have the majority of their money working, and just liquidate when necessary.
It's actually less likely that it's even liquidity - they probably have lots of unrealized losses on their portfolios and don't want to sell assets to raise money. If the cost of borrowing is less than the cost of realizing it makes sense to take out a loan and put those selfsame assets up as collateral.
That way, if they keep losing, no biggie! But if they start turning around, it'll be easy to sell the excess collateral to amortize the loan.
Gordon Ramsey is a little brusque but I can get over it because he can cook well. He is fun to watch, because he doesn't drag out the recipes like other television chefs do.
On the other hand, that other famous British television chef, Jamie Oliver, I find absolutely intolerable.
10/16/09
wtf? srsly? if that was their audience, then let them have their butlers figure out what's for dinner on their own #gourmet
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/17/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
03/05/09
It's not uncommon for privately-held businesses to give loans to equity holders. If the company gives Gordon a loan (versus a dividend) he's not draining the balance sheet and Gordon doesn't have to pay taxes on the amount he took out.
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
Do they have any contestants who have IQ's over 40 and weigh less than 200 pounds? I still watch the US HK but it's getting more difficult every season. I don't know who at Fox thinks a bunch of fat, disgusting morons is what people actually want to see on a cooking show. I wouldn't want any of these people anywhere near my food, and I sure as hell don't want to watch them for an hour. Hasn't Bravo proven that you can actually have regular, fairly smart people on a cooking competition show and still have it be interesting? (You can allow them to wear makeup too!) And that's even before you throw Gordon Ramsay into the mix.
The only somewhat competent person this season was Ji, and I'm convinced that she was a ringer. How convenient that she left voluntarily just as the biggest idiot on the girl's team was about to be kicked off. All I've got left this season now is Carol, who's cute and at least doesn't seem like a complete buffoon, but there's still like 2 months left.
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
This.
Few celebrities actually have a ton of cash on hand. Most of them have the majority of their money working, and just liquidate when necessary.
It's actually less likely that it's even liquidity - they probably have lots of unrealized losses on their portfolios and don't want to sell assets to raise money. If the cost of borrowing is less than the cost of realizing it makes sense to take out a loan and put those selfsame assets up as collateral.
That way, if they keep losing, no biggie! But if they start turning around, it'll be easy to sell the excess collateral to amortize the loan.
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
03/05/09
12/05/08
On the other hand, that other famous British television chef, Jamie Oliver, I find absolutely intolerable.