Just say that you grant that Reagan personally won the Cold War when he, as president, carried forth a decades-old arms race started by others and it came to its conclusion during his terms. if so, he won the cold war by defeating his enemies. You don't get peace prizes for creating peace by defeating your enemy. You get such prizes for gaining peace through negotiation.
@The Curse of Millhaven: Or through deciding to end a conflict even when it means defeat. See: Gorbachev, Mikhail (also listed under Nobel Peace Prize Winner and Leader Who Actually Ended Cold War).
Gibbs: "I think it should be mandatory that pundits spend certain amounts of their days each outside of the friendly confines of the viewership of the Washinton, D.C., media market."
@NightElfMohawk: Bombing Libya in 1986? That whole Korean Air Lines Flight 007 debacle in 1983 that brought US once again on the brink of actual confrontation with the USSR? ..And though G. H. W. Bush was technically in charge during the "Operation Just Cause" in Panama in 1989, I still place some of the blame on Reagan.
@snugbug: And my parents proudly voted for both those guys. *sigh*
Ahh, simply being able to have retained an open mind, pursued an education, and moved away from my Southern Baptist upbringing is a blessed thing indeed...
Coming from these guys, none of the hostility/idiocy was so surprising. What was surprising was that Helen Thomas seemed to be sleeping through most of the press conference.
I'm tempted to point out that the press seems to have found some sort of balls to ask a president tough questions, then I remember that the jackass who used to have the office didn't actually take questions for the first three years of his term.
@optical_allusion: Chuck Todd, too. An inane question posed ineptly. After the campaign, I want to love Todd, but his live shots are awkward and his voice-overs unnatural. I know it's early in his own White House career, but not that early.
I'm surprised that the ABC correspondent asking about race didn't make it onto this list. Questions that focus on the historical nature of Obama's presidency should have climaxed the week of inauguration and passed out promptly thereafter. I will read about his thoughts on race in his memoirs ten years from now, which is about the time that I hope to be able to afford a hardcover book again. Right now, I want questions that ask him if he's doing his job, and I want answers that replace the nauseated feeling in my stomach with a warm and fuzzy one.
@GeraldineHyperion: Yes! I was watching him earlier during the news conference and thinking that in my world, at least, his race is no longer part of the discussion. And then along comes ABC . . .
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
Communist!
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
Ahh, simply being able to have retained an open mind, pursued an education, and moved away from my Southern Baptist upbringing is a blessed thing indeed...
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
if that didn't get him a Nobel what would?
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
03/25/09
03/25/09
03/25/09
03/25/09
03/25/09
Is it possible to ask a multiple-part question without coming off as an irritating d-bag? I'm skeptical.
03/25/09
03/25/09
03/25/09
What would you guys have asked?
03/25/09
03/25/09