<![CDATA[Gawker: Cigarettes]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Cigarettes]]> http://gawker.com/tag/cigarettes http://gawker.com/tag/cigarettes <![CDATA[ The Best Of Cigarette Pseudoscience ]]> Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a class action case accusing the tobacco industry of fraud for its marketing campaign aimed at convincing the public that "light" cigarettes are safer. This just shows you how far we've come: 50 years ago, we would have had to call the Supreme Court to determine which brand has the smoothest flavor for your T-Zone™! Coincidentally, the New York Public Library is now holding a huge exhibition of hi-larious old cigarette ads. With doctors! Babies! Blackface! And other outrages! In honor of our nation's justice system, the 15 best are below:






]]>
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:08:02 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5060035&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Crash Has Wall Streeters Lighting Up ]]> While some shell-shocked banking douches are selling blow-jobs as a way to cope with the economic meltdown, others are turning to more pedestrian methods to ease their stress. Namely, they're smoking their lungs out. Now that their hopes and dreams are dead, there's not much point to looking after their health, and they can be found puffing away all over the financial district like metalheads behind the high school bleachers. "Before the turmoil, says [Erick] Giliberti, a manager at Deloitte who works with mortgage-backed securities, I was maybe a pack a week.' Now? 'Probably double that...I can't stare at my computer screen anymore and watch the market collapse in front of me—I just want to get away from it.'"

A Lehman Brothers employee who, for now, has kept his job with new owner Barclays, is smoking "20, 30% more," in part because "we don’t really have much work to do these days, so we just sit around and talk to people."

Nearby, a woman named Liz, who has been let go from Lehman along with her boss, says that stress at the company in the past six months led her to start smoking for the first time in her life—at the age of 61.

"Everybody could tell that Lehman was falling apart the end of last year," she says. "I was under a tremendous amount of pressure, so I picked up a cigarette." It didn’t help matters that she lived with her daughter and her daughter’s fiancé, both of whom smoke.

[Health.com]

]]>
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:55:56 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059222&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is It Racist To Ban Menthols? ]]> Should menthol cigarettes be banned? From a public health standpoint, shit yea. It would be best for all of us if the only cigarettes available were unattractively packaged, harsh-tasting, and unwieldy. As a Kool smoker, though, I have mixed feelings. You know who else does? Members of the Congressional Black Caucus who receive bundles of cash from the tobacco industry! The fact that "75 percent of black smokers choose mentholated brands" means that the current battle over whether or not to ban them goes to issues even deeper than their sweet, sweet mentholated taste. Things at stake: billions of dollars in revenue, hundreds of millions in marketing campaigns, racial tension, and how happy cigarette companies are to kill you in exchange for money!

The current bill in Congress would ban "flavored" cigarettes, but exempt menthols. The Black Caucus is an important player because they stand for the black community—the most enthusiastic consumers of menthols—and they've been wooed big time by tobacco companies.

Philip Morris over the years has been one of the biggest contributors to the caucus’s nonprofit Congressional Black Caucus Foundation. That financial support, in some years exceeding $250,000, and lesser amounts at times from other cigarette makers, has been the reason some critics perceived an alliance between big tobacco and African-American members of Congress, some of whom were willing to help fend off antitobacco efforts.

Among them, some critics have said, was Charles B. Rangel of New York. Although he supported some antitobacco initiatives, until the last few years Mr. Rangel staunchly opposed federal tobacco tax increases. He has said his stand was based on the disproportionate effect of excise taxes on the poor, not the thousands of dollars he received in tobacco industry political action committee donations.

Way to use logic in order to help your constituents into an early grave, Charlie Rangel! But a lot of CBC members are in fact in favor of banning menthol, many because of the fact that it disproportionately kills black people. Tobacco companies that currently support the bill, though, would probably oppose it if menthols got added.

It looks like menthols will stay legal, for now. Awesome for the black community as well as race car drivers!

[NYT]

]]>
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:36:22 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5029061&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iTunes Steals <em>Mad Men</em>'s Smokes ]]> The image you see on top is a standard ad for Mad Men, AMC's series about hard-paryting admen in the good old days that conveniently advertises itself everywhere. The image on the bottom is what you see when you visit iTunes to purchase the full season of Mad Men. The difference? On iTunes, the man has had his cigarette taken away. Steve Jobs does not understand the point of this show at all. Click to enlarge the Apple-approved scrubbing of our culture.

]]>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:25:03 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026440&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dutch Potheads Threatened by Anti-Tobacco Goons ]]> 8006-2It's still cool to buy some weed and smoke a joint in one of Amsterdam's fine coffee houses, but the freedom-hating health nuts at the European Union have shoved their anti-tobacco agenda down that fair city's throat! This is a real problem for Amsterdam's stoners, since they enjoy the European tradition of mixing tobacco with their hash and Mary Jane.

"This city's famed marijuana bars have weathered many challenges over the years and are still smoking. But now they face an unwelcome blast of fresh air: On July 1, the Netherlands will be one of the last European countries to ban smoking in bars and restaurants in compliance with EU law.

"The Health Ministry says the ban will apply to cafes that sell marijuana, known as coffee shops. But this being Holland, which for centuries has experimented with social liberalism, there's a loophole: The ban covers tobacco but not marijuana, which is technically illegal anyway.

"But that still leaves coffee shops and their customers in a bind. Dutch and other European marijuana users traditionally smoke pot in fat, cone-shaped joints mixed with tobacco. 'It's the world upside down: In other countries they look for the marijuana in the cigarette. Here they look for the cigarette in the marijuana,' said Jason den Enting, manager of coffee shop Dampkring.

"Shops are scrambling to adapt. One alternative is 'vaporizer' machines, which incinerate weed smokelessly. Another is to replace tobacco with herbs like coltsfoot, a common plant that looks like a dandelion and that smokers describe as tasting a bit like oregano.

"But most shops are just planning to increase their sales of hash brownies and pure weed - and are hoping the law isn't enforced." [AP]

]]>
Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:42:36 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020489&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Five Ways Camel Cigarettes Are Good For You ]]> Are you aware that Camels are made from finer, more expensive tobaccos than any other brand? And that they stimulate digestion, taste great, and will make you a better swimmer? Failing to teach your kids to smoke Camels is virtually child abuse! All true, according to the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. We've compiled five of the most outrageous claims from classic Camel ads of the 1930s-50s, from the peerless archive at the Gallery of Graphic Design. Read them and be educated. Do it for your "T-Zone!"





]]>
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:20:47 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018013&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Keep Your Laws Off Our Kools! ]]> kool.jpegSeven former US health secretaries have signed a letter calling on the government to ban menthol cigarettes, which have been exempted from an upcoming bill banning "flavored" cigarettes. Congress, thankfully, isn't backing them on this one. Do you know what we smoked before Kools? Beedies. They're even worse! Soon, shady Astroturf groups quietly financed by Big Tobacco will come together with unscrupulous hustlers posing as representatives of the black community to say: Hands off our bodies, government! [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:49:48 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=395119&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ $10 Cigarettes Are Here ]]> cigad.jpegThe state of New York raised its cigarette tax by $1.25 per pack today, which has caused some of the more pricey Manhattan stores to start selling packs for $10.25. Outside of prisons, this appears to be the first time in US history that the cost of a pack has hit the four-digit mark. That sound you hear is the stampede of kids buying dime bags of weed. Or as they call it now, "saving a quarter." [AP]

]]>
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:32:20 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394790&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Menthol Cigarettes Are Not 'Flavored,' Says Dr. Kool Newport ]]> newportad.jpegHow popular are menthol cigarettes? Popular enough to reverse logic. The government is set to pass a bill that will ban "flavored" cigarettes, but menthols will be excluded. Because menthol, of course, is not a flavor. What menthol is is close to $20 billion in sales for the tobacco industry. As well as an important part of African-American culture! Tobacco companies advertise menthol brands disproportionately to minority communities, and it obviously works, although nobody really knows why. What we do know is that this bill is perfect—it protects my precious Kools, while saving America from the strawberry menace:

"My recollection is that we were able to eliminate the use of flavored cigarettes, strawberry, mocha, and all this stuff that is clearly targeted at young kids and to start them smoking tobacco," Mike DeWine, the former Ohio senator [said].

It's about time we got rid of those mocha cigarettes that all the kids are smoking these days. Of course, we'll still have this problem:


Scientists who study smoking have identified various disparities in the health of black and white smokers. National Cancer Institute data shows that African-American men get lung cancer at a rate 50 percent higher than white men — a gap that most scientists say cannot be fully explained by historically higher rates of smoking by black men.

One theory suggests that menthol in cigarettes, by providing an additional pleasurable sensory cue, reinforces addiction.

[NYT]

But let's be fair, those crying racial discrimination in advertising: how do you explain THIS?


newportad2.jpeg

]]>
Tue, 13 May 2008 10:06:30 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389890&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Butt Smuggling Is A Great Business ]]> cigsmuggling.jpegAny smoker who moved to New York from another state has probably reflected on the fact that they could make a lot of easy cash just by filling up a U-Haul truck with cheap cigarettes from back home and driving them into the city. And boy would they be right! Congressman Peter King has helpfully crunched the numbers for an editorial in the Post today, and now we are seriously considering getting into the Newport-smuggling business full time. Upside: you can make $50K in a single trip. Downside: according to Peter King, you will probably use that money to finance "another 9/11-style attack." Also: Peter King loves to use the phrase "butt-smuggler":

The profit margins for cigarette smugglers are staggering. In New York City, where cartons must sell for a minimum of $70, a smuggler can make more than $50,000 on a 1,500-carton load. A well-organized ring can generate $200,000 to $300,000 a week.

Sweet! But wait:

Many cigarette-smuggling rings are now sending their profits to overseas terrorist organizations, including Hamas and Hezbollah. The report identifies three recent cases where cigarette smugglers had ties to such groups. In one case, convicted butt-smuggler Mohamad Hammoud made more than $8 million from 2000 to 2002 - and funneled at least $100,000 to Hezbollah. Officials estimate that these smugglers are sending millions a year to overseas terror networks...

The $50,000-plus from just one contraband load would be enough to fund as many as 10 USS Cole bombings. In just several weeks of butt-smuggling, a motivated terrorist cell could generate enough to fund another 9/11-style attack (estimated operational cost: $500,000).

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:06:37 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385806&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Smoke And Have Your Fingers Hacked Off ]]> amputee.jpegThe City of New York has always run anti-smoking ads that are pretty great, in the sense that they're disgusting and make smokers jump up and change channels as quickly as possible. The city's newest campaign features "Marie," a 58 year-old who has smoked for 40 years, even as bits of her body were constantly being amputated because of her poor circulation [NY Sun]. This could backfire, though, because it just makes it easy to say "I'll stop after my first amputation." The ad is below—I particularly admire how they slipped in a picture of a bone saw. Something to think about on my smoke break.

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:48:16 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380983&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Odious Attorney Couple Settles Asinine Smoking Lawsuit ]]> marleysmoke.jpegJonathan and Jenny Selbin—two people who deserve one another—are both attorneys and the worst neighbors you could possibly imagine. In February, they filed a lawsuit against their neighbor for smoking in her own apartment, taking her to court even after she bought air purifiers because her smoking was "endangering" their sensitive child. The note they slipped under her door at the time read "As you may not be aware, we are both lawyers and both litigators, for whom the usual barriers to litigation are minimal." That bit made them the runaway winners of our February ""Which snippet from the Times Real Estate section makes you most want to assault the person in the story?" contest. Now, the suit has been settled [NYT]—and the Selbins are concerned about their own reputation.

Their neighbor agreed to install air filters and use a smokeless ashtray. The Selbin's suit did not even allege that the smoke was coming into their apartment, just the common hallway in the building. Once publicity about the suit got out, a company called Aerus donated the air filters for free.

Attorney, plaintiff, and terrible rat bastard Jonathan Selbin hopes that this messy affair doesn't make him look bad:

Mr. Selbin indicated on Monday that the publicity surrounding the lawsuit had not been pleasant. "I am confident you will find a way to make us look like terrible people all over again for insisting on such an onerous thing," he said in the e-mail message.
]]>
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:28:59 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377216&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ $5 Bootleg Newport Packs Bought On The Street Looking More Attractive ]]> smokers.jpegBad/ good news: New York is attempting to double its cigarette tax to $3 per pack, which would bring the overall cost of a pack to almost $9, the most in the nation. But the New York Association of Convenience Stores is lobbying hard against the increase, saying it will only drive smokers to bootleggers and Indian reservations to stock up. Gosh, how evil of these cursed Convenience Store lobbyists to oppose this vital public health measure! Also, does anybody know where I can send contributions to the Convenience Store lobby? This is tearing our society's fragile smoker-nonsmoker peace agreement apart! Luckily, the crack New York media found one smokin' teenager to put this difficult issue in perspective:

Megan Lane, 17, called it "ridiculous" and vowed to find ways to avoid paying the tax rather than quit.

"If you're a true smoker, you'll pay anything. I'll never quit. Never," said the East Quogue, L.I., teen, who was chain-smoking Parliaments outside Madison Square Garden as she waited with her dad for an autograph from Rangers forward Sean Avery.

"Nine dollars is stupid," she said. "I'm going to go to the Indian reservation and get them for $3. They don't check ID."

[pic via Gotham Gazette; quote via NYDN]

]]>
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:58:10 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374852&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Smoking Ban Making New York Dangerously Fat, Uncool ]]> fatsmoker%282%29.jpgExcept for dry cleaners, almost everyone likes the New York City cigarette ban. People smell better, smokers have an excuse to leave a bad conversation and non-smokers feel left out, as they should. But oh no: we're getting fat without our cigs! From 2002, when the law was enacted, through 2004, New Yorkers gained 10 million pounds collectively. Imagine how fat we are now! The island will surely sink if we can't smoke indoors. Manhattan will become a post-apocalyptic wasteland inhabited only by Will Smith and roving hordes of zombie fatties, unless you give us back our cigarettes. What's a little cancer compared with looking good in skinny jeans? [NY Sun]

]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:20:28 EDT rebecca http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372913&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ They Want Us to Die ]]> flintstone.jpgSo some scientist did some study that showed that many fewer people would die of the lung cancer if we all got CT scans, or something, and they printed the study in the New England Journal of Medicine. But now the New York Times has revealed that the study was funded in part by a foundation that received four grants from Liggett Tobacco, so none of it counts. "In the seven years that I've been here, we have never knowingly published anything supported by" a cigarette maker, the editor-in-chief of the journal said. Because he wants us to die. They'll take all the studies in the world funded by groups whose raison d'etre is proving that cigarettes are bad! But one little giant tobacco company tries to come up with a way we can safely journey into the country of the shadow of flavor and suddenly its a big ethics crisis. Now they'll ban the cigarettes, again. [NYT]

]]>
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:30:32 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How's this for a brilliant idea: a cigarette ... ]]> How's this for a brilliant idea: a cigarette that will still give you all the cancer, but without any of that sweet, sweet nicotine! You get no pleasure from smoking it beyond the satisfaction of committing yourself to 10 minutes less of life. Former FDA policy director David Adams sees a world where kids finally get their own cigarettes, so they can continue to "fit in" and "look cool" while not worrying about becoming addicted or enjoying the entire chemical point of smoking. And eventually nicotine will be banned anyway and only wealthy assholes will be able to afford antique cigarettes smuggled in from Cuba or something. [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:23:59 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313414&view=rss&microfeed=true