<![CDATA[Gawker: circulation]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: circulation]]> http://gawker.com/tag/circulation http://gawker.com/tag/circulation <![CDATA[We Must Save The New York Post]]> After an all-too-brief period as King of the Tabloids, the New York Post's circulation is cratering. Could the "Scurrilous Money-Losing Yellow Tabloid Propped Up By a Rich Foreign Patron" formula be on the wane? Everyone must pitch in to help!

According to a story in the New York Times today (in which the NYT tries very hard to suppress its glee), the Post's circulation has fallen by 30% in less than three years, to just a hair over half a million; and its financial losses were around $70 million last year, making the paper an expensive habit even by Rupert Murdoch's standards. And the fact that Rupert's adding local reporting to the WSJ makes Post reporters (reasonably) nervous they're falling out of favor.

We must not let this perpetually money-losing right-wing tabloid fall from grace! New York would be such a boring newspaper city without a loud, drunk voice of opposition. A few helpful suggestions:

  • Andrea Peyser's sexxxy, but is she sexxxy enough? Millions of people in New York have sex every day without being mentioned in Andrea Peyser's column. Work on that.
  • Col Allan is drunk, but is he drunk enough? Secretly rig the water fountains to emit gin, if you haven't done so already.
  • Sean Delonas is racist, but is he racist enough? Racist cartoons are all well and good, but try upping Sean's visibility by getting him out there on the street, among the people, beating up minorities, then quick-sketching it on a blog. After he's all done promoting his children's book.
These are just a start, of course. You can all do your part by buying a hard copy of the Post every day, and ranting about it while you get drunk and then start race-related fights. Word of mouth is priceless.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400325&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BusinessWeek Just Not Eight-Figure Material]]> In your manly Monday media column: BusinessWeek's actual sale price revealed, America's most fucked newspapers revealed, Gene Weingarten revealed to still be (reasonably) funny, and a job revealed at Conde Nast! Oh, too late.

Peter Kafka pulls out the actual sale price of BusinessWeek: $9.3 million, before taxes. That's more than earlier reports of $2-5 million, but less than what McGraw-Hill would have liked to get for the magazine ($999 million).


The entire newspaper industry did terribly in the latest circulation report, but who did the worst? Well, the SF Chronicle's circulation dropped 26%; the Miami Herald dropped 23%; and the Newark Star-Ledger dropped 22%. Coincidentally, those are the same three papers that lead the "Papers that are toast" list. [Oh and look at this!]


Gene Weingarten cracks jokes about his newspaper's stupid pundit contest. Most of you probably think you're "too cool" to admit that old Gene Weingarten, plain old newspaper "humor columnist," is a funny writer, don't you? Well you're not. Just admit it.


Conde Nast has hired Julie Raimondi as the new editor in chief of Brides.com, one of the few jobs that still exists over there, at Conde Nast.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390145&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eight Years to Zero]]> US newspaper circulation in the past six months: Down 10.6% compared to last year. Eek.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390064&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Senator Dares to Insult 'A Hardworking Nevadan Who Toils Every Day on Behalf of Advertisers']]> In your proper Monday media column: One newspaper attacked by Harry Reid, another newspaper attacked by Blondie, women's magazines that sit at the checkout line unread, and a reporter hurt in Afghanistan.

Easily caricatured Nevada Sen. Harry Reid is in a "flap" because he got mad at the hometown Las Vegas Review Journal and then he went to some luncheon and saw the paper's advertising director—"a hard-working Nevadan who toils every day on behalf of advertisers"—and Harry Reid told the guy he hopes his paper goes out of business because it totally sucks, and also does not like Harry Reid. This prompted an indignant editorial, which is about the extent of the "flap" at this point, due to the rapidly waning influence of newspapers. "Flaps" aren't what they used to be.


Some joker sent a fake bomb to the Naples Daily News, but when bomb techs finally opened it all it did was play "Call Me" by Blondie. That's kind of a good one, let's get real.


Cami McCormick, a CBS News correspondent, was injured by an IED while on assignment with a US Army unit in Afghanistan. She's now being treated, but no specifics are available on her condition. Get well soon Cami.


Magazine circulation news! Of the bad sort. Overall newsstand sales were down about 12% in the first half. And women's magazines did the worst—Ladies Home Journal, for example, fell 46%. No extra pennies in the supermarket checkout line, MYSTERY SOLVED.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5349546&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Save Your Newspaper: Don't Let Anyone Cancel]]> The chairman of the Associated Press says he's "mad as hell" at people who don't pay for news. Is that why his newspaper is reportedly impossible to cancel?

As newspapers bleed print readers, the Los Angeles Daily News seems to have hit upon a circulation strategy that WORKS: make it super hard to stop delivery, then sic a collection agency on delinquent "subscribers."

Think this will only work on gullible old ladies? Think again. We heard from a would-be-former News subscriber who is gainfully employed at a public relations agency.

That's right: even flacks, who take pride in bending newspapermen to their will, have trouble wriggling out of their News subscriptions.

Our tipster has tried calling, twice, but was put on hold for more than half an hour each time. She tried letters, of a sort, and even emailing the publisher and top editors. No dice. See her account below.

Perhaps the source of her headaches is obvious: the News is owned by Dean Singleton's MediaNews Group. Singleton, presently chairman of the Associated Press, just gave a speech saying he's "mad as hell" at those who would "walk off with our work" online. With that much anger at the top of the organization, maybe it was inevitable some non-customers in the offline world would get burned, as well.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5219128&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[This Is How Print Dies: Newspapers Shed More Jobs and Readers]]> Hey, how about some more terrible news? The LA Times is laying off 75 people from editorial. "This is about 10% of our total staff and these cuts are comparable in scale to those made on the business side of The Times last week." Sigh. So soon after their redesign launch! Yes well innovation director Lee Abrams will probably have something innovative to say about all this, soon. This is not even the extent of the bad news.

See, over the weekend the FAS-FAX circulation numbers came out and basically everyone lost. Circ was down more than 5% for the LAT. Meanwhile, on our coast, the Newark Star-Ledger is slashing 40% of its newsroom staff. They are trying to sell the paper but no one wants it.

It is basically a bad time to enjoy getting a paycheck. Sadly, the Newspaper Industry is not too big to fail.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5069396&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[WSJ Avoids Circ Decline]]> 200Px-Wall Street Journal 28April2008"Top American newspapers posted further declines in weekday circulation in the six-month period ended in March, with the exception of USA Today and The Wall Street Journal... The New York Times was No. 3 at 1,077,256, but that was down 3.9 percent from the period a year earlier... Newspaper circulation has been on a declining trend since the 1980s, but the pace of decline has picked up in recent years as more people go to the Internet for news, information and entertainment." [Times]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007221&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['New York Times' Circ Plunges; 'News' Bests 'Post' By Hair]]> postthanks.jpgWell lookee here! Turns out we weren't too far off with our predictions that the recent price increase at the New York Times might have kicked off a circulation drop. According to the Audit Board of Circulation's six-month report for the period ending in September, daily circ at the Times fell 4.51% to 1,037,828—with Sunday circulation nosediving by 7.59% to 1,500,394, "at least partly due to a price increase," according to Editor & Publisher. Not that we're saying we told you so.

The Times wasn't the only paper reporting circulation hits&mdash daily numbers for the News and the Post were down 1.5% and 5.2%, respectively, which pushes Zuckerman ahead of Murdoch by a mere 15,000 papers. Brace yourselves for tomorrow's modest and classy cover, folks!

The Wall Street Journal also saw a slide of 1.53% and poor Newsday fell under the 400,000 mark, down by 5.62%.

For the record, major metro papers and magazines have spent a large part of this year and last cutting out what's known as "bad circ," that is, copies sent to school, hotels, and employees. Sponsored third-party bulk sales fall under this category as well, and all of it goes toward a newspaper's final circulation number, regardless of whether that copy of Time magazine sitting in your dentist's office is ever read by a single soul. You didn't think the Post teamed up with Commerce Bank to hand you a free paper in the morning out of the goodness of their hearts, did you?

So in all fairness&mdash stick with us, here!&mdash for many of these papers, lower circulation is actually a step in the right direction&mdash no, seriously! Smart advertisers tend to be more inclined to book their business with a newspaper that offers "quality" circulation, rather than one with a ginormous but bloated number.

Still! We're pretty sure the Times isn't exactly thrilled about losing nearly 8% of their Sunday headcount.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318881&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did 'Times' Price Surge Trigger Circ Drop?]]> mathisIn the just-ended third quarter, the New York Times Company claimed a 22% decrease in newsprint costs. At the same time, they claimed that operating costs are down only 1.5%. We think that's fishy! Here's why. Newsprint and payroll are typically two of the biggest expenditures at a newspaper. The company is claiming an 8% savings based on "reduction in consumption." Cutting its page size might play a part in that, but isn't entirely responsible. We suspect circulation took a hit somewhere.

The company touts its 3.9% quarterly increase in circulation revenue, about $8.4 million, but this is probably a pretty soft number. This quarter past, the paper raised the newsstand price of the Sunday paper in the greater metro area, and increased home delivery prices, and raised prices for the daily paper nationwide at the newsstand.

If they were able to hold their readers, we think that circulation revenue would have been much, much higher. As we've seen at the tabloids in New York, newsstand price can cause a serious drop in sales.

Now, the paper knows a lot more about its own finances than we do—if we're misconstruing things, we're happy to hear from folks who are in-the-know.

But it seems to us that the Times seems to be seriously missing the mark in their "ongoing program of focusing costs and efficiency," in the words of spokesperson Catherine Mathis. If operating costs are down only 1.5%, they're either spending a boatload of money on something they're not telling anyone about (office greenery? Kidding!) or they're just plain undisciplined, fiscally speaking.

Some analysts are making much of the company's earnings going from 6 to 10 cents a share, but their total earnings so far this year are still 40% less than last year. Either way, that cash isn't going back into the shareholders' pockets.

The company claimed total quarterly revenues of $754.4 million and total operating costs of $726.3 million. That leaves a profit of $28.1 million for the quarter. That's pocket change. (One major investor already bolted for the aisles.)

Now sure, we'd take it! It's not pocket change to us, but to a $3.3 billion-dollar publicly-traded company? That's just the cost of one apartment at 770 Park Avenue. And not even a particularly good one.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315645&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A correction in today's New York Times addressed...]]> ROCKYA correction in today's New York Times addressed their juxtaposition, either accidentally or idiotically, of a photo of a Philadelphia Inquirer and Philly Daily News delivery truck with a business piece on why declining circulation isn't always a bad thing. "Neither The Inquirer nor The Daily News was mentioned in the article, and the photograph was an inappropriate illustration for it." Daily News circ was down 2.3% this year.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306285&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can Free Subscriptions In Brooklyn Save The 'New York Sun'?]]> http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2007/09/ny%20sun%20subscription-thumb.jpgThis morning, I received a letter at my apartment in Brooklyn. It was from the New York Sun, and they were offering me a free one-year subscription to the "most critically acclaimed newspaper to debut in the city in a generation." (Had they not heard what I think of their editorial product?) It made sense, though, given that the paper recently raised its newsstand price. Because, seriously, is anyone paying for this paper? Click to enlarge!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296656&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Men's Health acquiesces to the demand from...]]> Men's Health acquiesces to the demand from MediaVest—the ad buying firm whose clients include Wal-Mart, Kraft, Coca-Cola, and Procter & Gamble—that "publishers guarantee each issue's circulation instead of averaging multiple issues like usual." Will other titles follow suit? There's a lot of bluster, but, yeah, probably. [AdAge]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291206&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Have you forgotten that it's Audit Bureau...]]> Have you forgotten that it's Audit Bureau of Circulation time? Whee! People's sales declined, probably because a steady diet of Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, and Britney Spears grows tiring after a while; we need some hot new celebrities to hit the rehab circuit and, sorry, Amy Winehouse just won't cut it. Over on the serious side of things, Time takes a massive hit, dropping 17.1% in paid and weekly circulation against the same period last year. A Time spokesperson claims that the drop is a result of the magazine's heroic struggle for transparency—shedding copies distributed to doctor's offices and the like—and that the industry will eventually be forced to follow suit, which sort of jibes with our theory that it's all part of new managing editor Rick Stengel's plan to make sure there are only seven people who read Time, but that those seven people absolutely savor every single word. [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eight million people are still buying Reader's...]]> Eight million people are still buying Reader's Digest every month. [AdAge]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=273277&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Oprah Cancels Presidential Election]]>

  • Oprah Winfrey endorses Barack Obama. Hell, if she can move copies of The Road she can probably sell anything. [NYT]
  • Both the News and the Post have padded their circulation numbers. [AdAge]
  • Jeff Bewkes, likely successor to Time Warner's Dick Parsons, sees a bright future for HBO, noting popularity of OnDemand. [B&C]
  • HBO CEO Chris Albrecht on demand with Las Vegas PD after domestic violence incident following DeLaHoya/Mayweather bout. [LAT]
  • At the Conrad Black trial, the government's star witness—Black's former right-hand man—prepares to testify. [NYP
  • CNet reporters who were spied on by Hewlett-Packard have filed suit against the company. [NYT]
  • Thomson's bid for Reuters raises regulatory concerns. [FT]
  • Media buyers to mags: Give us issue-by-issue circulation guarantees or we take a hike. [AdAge]
  • Vibe: Everybody's leaving. [WWD]
  • Boston free daily starts printing material from bloggers. You get what you pay for, etc. [NYT]
  • Conde Nast CEO Chuck Townsend: leisurewear model. [WWD]
  • This newspaper industry: Giving it away for free is a bad idea. Except that people are starting to realize the value of top-tier brands. (And Tribune.) "There's a gold rush on." [Boston Globe]
  • Simon Dumenco gets letters, a few of which don't even refer to him as a muppet! [AdAge]
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258180&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Circulation Game]]>
  • Newspaper circulation falls pretty much everywhere. Here on the home front, though, both the Post and the News saw increases. Other (slight) success stories: USA Today and the Wall Street Journal. [WSJ]
  • Those numbers would be better if the Audit Bureau of Circulation included website visits. [E&P]
  • Conrad Black trial gets even more contentious. [NYT]
  • Christopher Hitchens charms ASME panelists; calls women "humorless bitches" and refers to Anna Nicole Smith as "that fat slut who died." [WWD]

    ]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=256678&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Yes: Anderson Cooper, Naked]]>
  • The rumor that Anderson Cooper showers in his underwear at the gym? Decidedly untrue. Anyway, who does that? That's crazy! The gym men would have been staring at him and pointing! [Towleroad]
  • Predator and Umbrager says that spring newspaper circ numbers are in the toilet. [E&P]
  • The Chumley's chimney comes down very, very slowly. [Curbed]
  • David Halberstam's final speech, given at Berkeley's J-school a couple days before he died, was about journalism and history. And recorded by a Business Week reporter, handily. [Business Week]

    ]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255299&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Zinczenko and Tiki To Share Couch?]]>

    • Magazine circulation for the second half of 2006? Not so good. The big winners were the celebrity weeklies and Men's Health, which may have found a winning strategy in sticking Dave Zinczenko on the "Today Show" every goddamn day. The big losers? Everyone else, particularly Marie Claire, some copies of which reportedly returned themselves. [WWD]
    • Speaking of "Today," former Giant Tiki Barber has joined the team. [NYT]
    • Arthur Sulzberger hopes that if he makes some nice noises about print journalism to the staff on Wednesday it'll shut up all his employees who worry about the Times going web-only. Good luck, Pinch, those folks never shut up about nothin'. [NYO]
    • The head of Metro International to step down. Your ability to get to your train without having a free paper shoved at you will not be affected. [Guardian]
    • YouTube wants to capture the grandma demographic. [MediaWeek]
    • At the end of the day, you will either be working for The Politico or Portfolio. Just accept it. [MediaPost]

      [Image: Reuters]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=236147&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Tabloid Wars: 'News' Tops 'Post' On Alternate Thursdays Between Hours Of Five and Seven]]> Great news! The Daily News, reports the Daily News, is still on top, circulation-wise, provided you squint and use a different system of metrics than the Audit Bureau of Circulations:

    The News has more than twice the number of readers in the metropolitan area as the Post on Sundays, according to the latest Scarborough Report, an independent organization that measures newspaper readership. The News averaged 2,724,300 readers every Sunday during the period Sept. 1, 2005 to Aug. 31, as compared to the Post's 1,187,100. The latest Scarborough data, which canvases the Designated Market Area (DMA) - the five boroughs and 24 surrounding counties - also shows that The News continues to dominate readership during the week, recording 2,482,900 readers Monday-to-Friday in the DMA compared to the Post's 1,914,300.
    We've yet to hear which paper surrounding-county homeless prefer to bed down on, but we have no doubt that Bay Shore bag ladies choose the News!

    Daily News is must-read for more New Yorkers [NYDN]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213550&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Over the Moon]]>

    • You can't pay people to read newspapers these days. [PEJ]
    • Old Man Redstone loves him some Les Moonves. [NYP]
    • NBC's Bob Wright: Crucified by the FCC. [WSJ]
    • Time for Bruce Wasserstein to buy Field and Stream, etc.? [NYP]
    • English-language Al-Jazeera will interview some has-been British politician. [Independent]
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=212198&view=rss&microfeed=true